Cinsiyet eşitsizliğinin ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: OECD örneği

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2, 221 - 235, 19.12.2025

Damla Geboloğlu , Berna Türkekul

https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.1679612

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma OECD ülkelerinde toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliği ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktadır. Kadınların eğitime erişimi, işgücü piyasasına katılımı ve siyasi temsiline odaklanmaktadır. Çalışma ayrıca kırsal kesimdeki kadınların eğitim ve istihdamının tarımsal büyüme ile ilişkisini de incelemektedir.
Tasarım/Metodoloji/Yaklaşım: Analiz, 1990-2021 yılları arasında 38 OECD ülkesini kapsayan dengeli bir panel veri seti kullanmaktadır. Dinamik panel veri modelleri, endojenlik ve otokorelasyon gibi konuları ele alan iki aşamalı Genelleştirilmiş Momentler Yöntemi (GMM) kullanılarak tahmin edilmiştir. Kişi başına GSYH, ayrıştırılmış cinsiyet göstergeleri ve tarımsal çıktıyı incelemek için üç model geliştirilmiştir. Modelin geçerliliği, alternatif spesifikasyonlar ve sabit etkiler yoluyla test edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Sonuçlar, eğitim ve siyasi temsilde toplumsal cinsiyet farklılıklarının azaltılmasının kişi başına GSYH ile pozitif ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Özellikle kadınlar arasında ortaöğretimin hem doğrudan hem de istatistiksel olarak anlamlı etkileri vardır. Tarım odaklı modelde, kırsal kesimdeki kadınların istihdamı ve eğitimi, tarımsal katma değerdeki artışlarla güçlü bir şekilde bağlantılıdır. Bu bulgular, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğinin genel ve sektörel ekonomik performansa katkıda bulunduğu fikrini desteklemektedir.
Özgünlük/Değer: Bu araştırma, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliğine sadece sosyal bir mesele olarak değil, aynı zamanda üretkenlikle bağlantılı ekonomik bir faktör olarak da yaklaşmaktadır. OECD ülkelerinin karşılaştırmalı bir analizini sunarak, mevcut literatüre ampirik olarak katkıda bulunmaktadır. Kadınların eğitime, istihdama ve siyasi hayata eşit erişiminin makroekonomik sonuçlarını vurgulamaktadır. Başta tarım olmak üzere sektöre özgü görüşlerin de dahil edilmesi analize farklı bir bakış açısı katmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dinamik panel veri , ekonomik büyüme , eğitim , cinsiyet eşitsizliği , işgücü

Destekleyen Kurum

Ege Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Fonu

Proje Numarası

23706

Teşekkür

Bu makale Gamze Geboloğlu'nun Yüksek lisans tezinden üretilmiştir.

Gender inequality and economic growth: An analysis of OECD countries

Öz

Purpose: This study explores the relationship between gender inequality and economic growth in OECD countries. It focuses on female access to education, labor market participation, and political representation. The study also examines how rural women’s education and employment relate to agricultural growth.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The analysis uses a panel dataset covering 38 OECD countries from 1990 to 2021. Dynamic panel data models are estimated using the two-step Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), addressing issues such as endogeneity and autocorrelation. Three models are developed to examine aggregate GDP, disaggregated gender indicators, and agricultural value added. Robustness is tested through alternative specifications and fixed effects.
Finding: The results show that reducing gender gaps in education and political representation is positively associated with GDP per capita. Secondary education among women, in particular, has both direct and statistically significant effects. In agriculture-focused models, the employment and education of rural women are strongly linked to increases in agricultural value added. These findings support the idea that gender equality contributes to overall and sectoral economic performance.
Originality/Value: This research approaches gender inequality not only as a social issue but also as an economic factor linked to economic growth. By offering a comparative analysis of OECD countries, it contributes empirically to the existing literature. It emphasizes the macroeconomic outcomes of women's equal access to education, employment, and political life. The inclusion of sector-specific insights, particularly in agriculture, adds a distinct perspective to the analysis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dynamic panel data , economic growth , education , gender inequality , labor

Etik Beyan

Not applicable

Destekleyen Kurum

Ege University Scientific Research Fund

Proje Numarası

23706

Teşekkür

This article was derived from the Damla GEBOLOĞLU’s Master of Science Thesis

Kaynakça

• Agénor, P.-R. and Canuto, O. (2015), “Gender equality and economic growth in Brazil: A long-run analysis”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 43, pp. 155–172, doi: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.10.004.
• Aguilar, A., Carranza, E., Goldstein, M., Kilic, T. and Oseni, G. (2015), “Decomposition of Gender Differentials in Agricultural Productivity in Ethiopia”.
• Akbulaev, N. and Aliyeva, B. (2020), “Gender and economic growth: Is there a correlation? The example of Kyrgyzstan”, edited by Sapena, J.Cogent Economics & Finance, Vol. 8 No. 1, p. 1758007, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1758007.
• Albanesi, S. and Olivetti, C. (2009), Gender Roles and Medical Progress, No. w14873, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, p. w14873, doi: 10.3386/w14873.
• Alene, A.D., Manyong, V.M., Omanya, G.O., Mignouna, H.D., Bokanga, M. and Odhiambo, G.D. (2008), “Economic Efficiency and Supply Response of Women as Farm Managers: Comparative Evidence from Western Kenya”, World Development, Vol. 36 No. 7, pp. 1247–1260, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.015.
• Altuzarra, A., Gálvez-Gálvez, C. and González-Flores, A. (2021), “Is Gender Inequality a Barrier to Economic Growth? A Panel Data Analysis of Developing Countries”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 1, p. 367, doi: 10.3390/su13010367.
• Asantewa, J. (2024), “Income-Generating Activities and Economic Empowerment of Rural Women in the Mion District, Ghana: A Phenomenological Study”, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, Vol. VIII, pp. 2238–2250, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8080168.
• Attanasio, O., Low, H. and Sanchez-Marcos, V. (2004), Explaining Changes in Female Labour Supply in a Life-Cycle Model, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
• Baerlocher, D., Parente, S.L. and Rios-Neto, E. (2021), “Female Labor Force Participation and economic growth: Accounting for the gender bonus”, Economics Letters, Vol. 200, p. 109740, doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109740.
• Bardasi, E., Sabarwal, S. and Terrell, K. (2011), “How do female entrepreneurs perform? Evidence from three developing regions”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 417–441, doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-9374-z.
• Becker, G. and Lewis, H.G. (1973), “On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81 No. 2, pp. S279-88.
• Berniell, M.I., Sanchez, P.C. (2011), “Overview of Time Use Data Used for Analysis of Gender Differences in Time Use Patterns. Background Paper for the World Development Report”, World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Blackden, C.M. and Bhanu, C. (1999), Gender, Growth, and Poverty Reduction: Special Program of Assistance for Africa, 1998 Status Report on Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa, World Bank - Technical Papers.
• Blau, F. and Kahn, L. (2013), Female Labor Supply: Why Is the US Falling Behind?, Working Paper No. w18702, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, p. 19, doi: 10.3386/w18702.
• Bruhn, M. (2009), “Female-owned firms in Latin America : characteristics, performance, and obstacles to growth”, Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank.
• Busse, M. and Spielmann, Christian. (2006), “Gender Inequality and Trade”, Review of International Economics, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 362–379, doi: DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2006.00589.x.
• Çağatay, N. and Ozler, S. (1995), “Feminization of the labor force: The effects of long-term development and structural adjustment”, World Development, Vol. 23 No. 11, pp. 1883–1894.
• Cavalcanti, T.V. de V. and Tavares, J. (2008), The Output Cost of Gender Discrimination: A Model-Based Macroeconomic Estimate, Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Zurich 2008 No. 43, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
• Croppenstedt, A., Goldstein, M. and Rosas, N. (2013), “Gender and Agriculture: Inefficiencies, Segregation, and Low Productivity Traps”, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 79–109, doi: 10.1093/wbro/lks024.
• Cuberes, D. and Teignier, M. (2012), “Gender Inequality and Economic Growth”, World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Doepke, M. and Tertilt, M. (2009), “Women’s Liberation: What’s in It for Men?*”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 124 No. 4, pp. 1541–1591, doi: 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1541.
• Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2003), “Institutions, trade, and growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 133–162, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00206-4.
• Esteve-Volart, B. (2008), Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence from India.
• FAO (Ed.). (2011), Women in Agriculture: Closing the Gender Gap for Development, FAO, Rome.
• Fernández, R. (2009), Women’s Rights and Development, No. 15355, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
• Galor, O. and Weil, D.N. (1996), “The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth”, American Economic Review, Vol. 86 No. 3, pp. 374–387.
• Goldin, C. and Katz, L.F. (2002), “The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions”, Journal of Political Economy, The University of Chicago Press, Vol. 110 No. 4, pp. 730–770, doi: 10.1086/340778.
• Greenwood, J., Seshadri, A. and Yorukoglu, M. (2005), “Engines of Liberation”, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 72 No. 1, pp. 109–133.
• Hill, M.A. and King, E. (1995), “Women’s education and economic well-being”, Feminist Economics, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 21–46, doi: 10.1080/714042230.
• Hsieh, C.-T., Hurst, E., Jones, C.I. and Klenow, P.J. (2019), “The Allocation of Talent and U.S. Economic Growth”, Econometrica, Vol. 87 No. 5, pp. 1439–1474, doi: 10.3982/ECTA11427.
• Huyer, S. (2016), “Closing the Gender Gap in Agriculture”, Gender, Technology and Development, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 105–116, doi: 10.1177/0971852416643872.
• İnce, M. (2011), “Kadın Eğitiminin Ekonomik Büyümedeki Rolü: Türkiye Örneği”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, No. 26, pp. 227–238.
• Jiang, Y. and Khan, H. (2023), “The relationship between renewable energy consumption, technological innovations, and carbon dioxide emission: evidence from two-step system GMM”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 4187–4202, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22391-4.
• Jones, L., Manuelli, R. and McGrattan, E. (2003), Why Are Married Women Working so Much?, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
• Karoui, K. and Feki, R. (2018), “The impacts of gender inequality in education on economic growth in Tunisia: an empirical analysis”, Quality & Quantity, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 1265–1273, doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0518-3.
• Kennedy, T., Rae, M., Sheridan, A. and Valadkhani, A. (2017), “Reducing gender wage inequality increases economic prosperity for all: Insights from Australia”, Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 55, pp. 14–24, doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2017.04.003.
• Khan, H., Weili, L., Khan, I. and Khamphengxay, S. (2021), “Renewable Energy Consumption, Trade Openness, and Environmental Degradation: A Panel Data Analysis of Developing and Developed Countries”, edited by Kazak, J.Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2021, pp. 1–13, doi: 10.1155/2021/6691046.
• Klasen, S. (2000), “Does Gender Inequality Reduce Growth and Development? Evidence from Cross-Country Regressions”, Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, doi: 10.5282/UBM/EPUB.1602.
• Klasen, S. and Lamanna, F. (2009), “The Impact of Gender Inequality in Education and Employment on Economic Growth: New Evidence for a Panel of Countries”, Feminist Economics, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 91–132, doi: 10.1080/13545700902893106.
• Kovalenko, T. and Töpfer, M. (2021), “Cyclical dynamics and the gender pay gap: A structural VAR approach”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 99, p. 105488, doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.03.007.
• Lagerlof, N.-P. (2003), “Gender Equality and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 403–426.
• Litmeyer, M.-L., Bender, L., Happel, S., Peusch, A., Spory, N. and Hennemann, S. (2022), “The effects of gender equality on economic development in Europe”, Erdkunde, Vol. 76 No. 1, pp. 21–40, doi: 10.3112/erdkunde.2022.01.02.
• Lucal, B. (1999), “WHAT IT MEANS TO BE GENDERED ME: Life on the Boundaries of a Dichotomous Gender System”, Gender & Society, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 781–797, doi: 10.1177/089124399013006006.
• Matthew, O., Osabohien, R., Lakhani, K.H., Aderounmu, B., Osadolor, N.E., Adediran, O., Mabinuori, O., et al. (2022), “Women engagement in agriculture and human capital development in developing countries: An African sub-regional analysis”, edited by Rodriguez Andres, A.PLOS ONE, Vol. 17 No. 12, p. e0277519, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277519.
• Minasyan, A., Zenker, J., Klasen, S. and Vollmer, S. (2019), “Educational gender gaps and economic growth: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis”, World Development, Vol. 122, pp. 199–217, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.006.
• Olivetti, C. (2006), “Changes in women’s hours of market work: The role of returns to experience”, Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 557–587, doi: 10.1016/j.red.2006.06.001.
• Önder, E. and Önder, K. (2012), “The Role of The Female Education in Economic Growth: A Case For Turkey”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Vol. 3 No. 5, p. 0.
• Osabohien, R., Olurinola, I., Matthew, O., Azuh, D. and Aderounmu, B. (2021), “Female participation in agriculture and economic development in 33 African Countries”, African Journal of Reproductive Health / La Revue Africaine de La Santé Reproductive, Women’s Health and Action Research Centre (WHARC), Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 107–115, doi: 10.29063/ajrh2021/v25i5s.10.
• Palaz, S. (2005), “Women’s Labour Force Participation in Turkey”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Vol. 0 No. 50, pp. 591–606.
• Panda, S. (2015), “Farmer education and household agricultural income in rural India”, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 42 No. 6, pp. 514–529, doi: 10.1108/IJSE-12-2013-0278.
• Perrons, D. (1995), “Gender Inequalities in Regional Development”, Regional Studies, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 465–476, doi: 10.1080/00343409512331349113.
• Rendall, M. (2010), “Brain Versus Brawn: The Realization of Women’s Comparative Advantage”, SSRN Electronic Journal, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1635251.
• Ridgeway, C.L. (2009), “Framed Before We Know It: How Gender Shapes Social Relations”, Gender & Society, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 145–160, doi: 10.1177/0891243208330313.
• Risman, B.J. (2004), “Gender As a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism”, Gender & Society, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 429–450, doi: 10.1177/0891243204265349.
• Savaş, G. (2018), “Türkiye’de Yaşayan Bireylerin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşit(siz)liği Algısı - Gender (In) Equality Perception of Individuals Living in Turkey”, Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi, Nurşen ADAK, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 101–121.
• Seguino, S. (2000a), “Accounting for Gender in Asian Economic Growth”, Feminist Economics, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 27–58, doi: 10.1080/135457000750020128.
• Seguino, S. (2000b), “Gender Inequality and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis”, World Development, Vol. 28 No. 7, pp. 1211–1230, doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00018-8.
• Seguino, S. and Were, M. (2014), “Gender, Development and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Journal of African Economies, Vol. 23 No. suppl 1, pp. i18–i61, doi: 10.1093/jae/ejt024.
• Sumithira, A. (2024), “Political Representation of Women in Post-Independence India”, Contemporary Studies in Social Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 151–168, doi: 10.31559/CSSS2024.2.2.4.
• Tatoglu, F.Y. (2020), Panel Data Econometrics with Stata, 5th ed., Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş., İstanbul.
• Thévenon, O., Ali, Nabil, Adema, Willem, and Salvi Del Pero, Angelica. (2012), Effects of Reducing Gender Gaps in Education and Labour Force Participation on Economic Growth in the OECD, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 138, Vol. 138, doi: 10.1787/5k8xb722w928-en.
• UNDP. (2023), “UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2024. Human Development Report 2023-24: Breaking the gridlock: Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world”, UNDP.
• WEF. (2023), Global Gender Gap Report 2023, Global Gender Gap Report No. Insight Report June 2023, WEF, Switzerland, p. 382.
• Yu, N., Yu, B., De Jong, M. and Storm, S. (2015), “Does inequality in educational attainment matter for China’s economic growth?”, International Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 41, pp. 164–173, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.02.008.
• Yu, Z. and Osabohien, R. (2023), “Investigating the Impact of Education and Women in Agriculture on Human Capital Outcomes in Africa: An Interaction Analysis”, Problemy Ekorozwoju, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 242–248, doi: 10.35784/preko.4037.
• Yumusak, I.G., Bilen, M. and Ates, H. (2013), “The Impacts of Gender Inequality in Education on Economic Growth in Turkey”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 103, pp. 1093–1103, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.437.