Kırsal kalkınma ve sosyal girişimcilik alanının bilimsel yapısı: Web of science verilerine dayalı bibliyometrik bir inceleme

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, kırsal kalkınma ve sosyal girişimcilik literatüründeki bilimsel eğilimleri, tematik yapıları ve entelektüel yönelimleri ortaya koymak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma, bu iki alan arasındaki kesişim noktalarını belirleyerek mevcut araştırma yönelimlerinin kapsamlı bir görünümünü sunmayı hedeflemektedir.

Tasarım / Metodoloji / Yaklaşım: Araştırmada bibliyometrik analiz tekniği kullanılmıştır. Veriler, Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanından elde edilmiş ve 2006–2025 yılları arasındaki döneme odaklanılmıştır. Analize yalnızca Business, Management ve Economics alanlarında yayımlanan araştırma makaleleri dâhil edilmiştir. Toplamda 407 makale incelenmiş, yıllık büyüme oranı %20.58 olarak hesaplanmıştır.

Bulgular: Bulgular, sosyal girişimciliğin kırsal kalkınma süreçlerinde giderek daha fazla stratejik bir rol üstlendiğini ve literatürdeki yayınların sosyal sermaye, yenilikçilik, kadın girişimciliği ve sürdürülebilirlik temaları etrafında yoğunlaştığını göstermektedir. En üretken kurumlar arasında Aleksandras Stulginskis University, South China Agricultural University ve University of Nigeria öne çıkmıştır. Bradford Yasası bulguları, yayınların az sayıdaki çekirdek dergi etrafında yoğunlaştığını ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak, sosyal girişimciliğin kırsal kalkınmadaki rolü, ekonomik büyüme kadar toplumsal refah ve sürdürülebilirlik boyutlarıyla da ilişkilidir.

Özgünlük / Değer: Bu çalışma, sosyal girişimcilik ve kırsal kalkınmayı birlikte ele alan nadir bibliyometrik analizlerden biridir. Web of Science verilerine dayalı olarak alanın araştırma ağlarını, tematik eğilimlerini ve gelecekteki çalışma fırsatlarını ortaya koyarak literatüre önemli katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Girişimcilik
• kırsal yenilik
• sosyal yenilik
• bilimsel haritalama

The scientific structure of the field of rural development and social entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis based on web of science data

Öz

Purpose: This study was conducted to reveal the scientific trends, thematic structures, and intellectual orientations in the literature on rural development and social entrepreneurship. The study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current research trends by identifying the points of intersection between these two fields.

Design/Methodology/Approach: A bibliometric analysis technique was used in the research. Data was obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) database and focused on the period between 2006 and 2025. Only research articles published in the fields of Business, Management, and Economics were included in the analysis. A total of 407 articles were examined, and the annual growth rate was calculated as 20.58%.

Results: The results show that social entrepreneurship is playing an increasingly strategic role in rural development processes and that publications in the literature are concentrated around the themes of social capital, innovation, women's entrepreneurship, and sustainability. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, South China Agricultural University, and the University of Nigeria stand out among the most productive institutions. Bradford Law findings reveal that publications are concentrated around a small number of core journals. Consequently, the role of social entrepreneurship in rural development is related not only to economic growth but also to social welfare and sustainability dimensions.

Originalit/Value: This study is one of the few bibliometric analyses that jointly examine social entrepreneurship and rural development. Based on Web of Science data, it reveals the research networks, thematic trends, and future research opportunities in the field, making a significant contribution to the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entrepreneurship
• rural innovation
• social innovation
• scientific mapping

Kaynakça

1. Akar, H., and Üstüner, M. (2017), “Mediation role of self-efficacy perceptions in the relationship between emotional intelligence levels and social entrepreneurship traits of pre-service teachers.” Journal of Education and Future, 12, pp.95-115.
2. Aktaş, Ü.N. and Akdeve, E., (2024), “Social entrepreneurship and the development process in Turkey.” Öneri Dergisi, 19(61), pp.164–185. doi:10.14783/maruoneri.1414236
3. Alvord, S.H., Brown, L.D. and Letts, C.W., 2004. “Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), pp.260–282. doi:10.1177/0021886304266847
4. Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C., (2017), “Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis.” Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp.959–975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
5. Bradford, S.C., 1934. “Sources on information on specific subjects.” Journal of Information Science, 10, pp.176–180. doi:10.1177/016555158501000407
6. Çukur, F. and Çukur, T. (2017), “Evaluation of geographically indicated products in terms of rural development: the case of Muğla Province.” Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 23(2), pp.187-194. doi: 10.24181/tarekoder.364914
7. Çukur, F. and Çukur, T. (2024), “Assessment of the potential impact of geographically indicated products on the economy of Milas district, Muğla province.” Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 34(2), pp. 203–214. doi: 10.18615/anadolu.1552711
8. Çukur, T., Kızılaslan, N. and Çukur, F. (2019), “Contribution of the cooperation between agriculture and tourism for rural development.” In Proceedings of the Conference Rural Development, pp. 371–375. doi: 10.15544/RD.2019.070

9. Dees, G., 1998. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. The Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership and Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Working Paper.
10. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. and Lim, W., (2021), “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines.” Journal of Business Research, 133, pp.285–296. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
11. Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R., (1990), Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
12. Ellis, F. and Biggs, S., 2001. “Evolving themes in rural development 1950s–2000s.” Development Policy Review, 19(4), pp.437–448. doi:10.1111/1467-7679.00143
13. Esmer, Y., and Çınar, D. (2020), “A Conceptual Analysis of Social Entrepreneurship in Agriculture.” Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 26(1), 71-80. doi:10.24181/tarekoder.655042
14. European Network for Rural Development. (2013), Encouraging diversification of the rural economy: Thematic information sheets 2007–2012, Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013. Brussels: European Commission. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu
15. Gökbunar, R., Aktaş, H., ve Kargın, M. (2018), “Social Entrepreneurship in Universities: Opportunities and Recommendations.” Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 25(1), pp.155-170. doi:10.18657/yonveek.356668
16. Gökovalı, U. (2007), “Geographical indications and their economic impacts: The case of Turkey.” Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2).
17. Keleş, Ş. and Dilmaç, M., (2017), “The impact of social capital on social entrepreneurship in rural areas: The case of rural Erzurum.” The International New Issues in Social Sciences, 4(4), pp.43–64.
18. Kılıç Kırılmaz, S. (2014), “A theoretical perspective on the dimensions of social entrepreneurship.” Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), pp.55–74.
19. Kumcu, E.H. and Çetinel, M., 2022. “The relationship between five-factor personality traits and social entrepreneurship tendency: The case of university students.” Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 18(2), pp.572–594. doi:10.17130/ijmeb.861974
20. Kuşat, N. (2014), “Rural tourism as an alternative for sustainable rural development and its applicability in Turkey” pp. 65-87.
21. Low, M. and Siegel, D., (2019), “A bibliometric analysis of employee-centred corporate social responsibility research in the 2000s.” Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), pp.691–717. doi:10.1108/srj-09-2018-0243
22. Mair, J. and Martí, I., (2006), “Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction and delight.” Journal of World Business, 41(1), pp.36–44. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
23. Martin, R. and Osberg, S., (2007), “Social entrepreneurship: The case for definitions.” Social Innovation Review, 5(2), pp.28–39.
24. Mendes, G., Oliveira, M., Gomide, E. and Nantes, J., 2017. “Uncovering the structures and maturity of the new service development research field through a bibliometric study (1984–2014),” Journal of Service Management, 28(1), pp.182–223. doi:10.1108/josm-07-2015-0230
25. Moral-Muñoz, J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A. and Cobo, M., (2020), “Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review.” El Profesional de La Información, 29(1). doi:10.3145/epi.2020.ene
26. Mort, G.S., Weerawardena, J. and Carnegie, K., (2003), “Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), pp.76–88. doi:10.1002/nvsm.202
27. Moseley, M.J., (2003), Rural development: Principles and practice. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
28. Özçatalbaş, O., Çukur, F., and Çukur, T. (2019), “Evaluating the potential of olive tourism in Milas for rural development purposes.” The Journal of Academic Social Science, 7(98), pp.21–37. doi:10.29228/asos.36641 Peredo, A.M. and McLean, M., (2006), “Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept.” Journal of World Business, 41(1), pp.56–65. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
29. Singhania, O., Swain, S.K. and George, B., (2022), “Interdependence and complementarity between rural development and rural tourism: A bibliometric analysis.” Rural Society, 31(1), pp.15–32. doi:10.1080/10371656.2022.2062198
30. Şengül, R., (2013), “A field study on the functionality of village service delivery units: The case of Bartın.” Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), pp.67–86.
31. Tolunay, A. and Akyol, A., (2009), “Development and rural development: Basic concepts and definitions.” Turkish Journal of Forestry, 7(2), pp.116–127. doi:10.18182/tjf.14685
32. Tomur, H.D., (2022), “The concept of social entrepreneurship in non-profit organizations.” İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Girişimcilik Dergisi, 6(12), pp.81–94. doi:10.55830/tje.1175620
33. Uzan, H.K., (2023), “Bibliometric analysis of studies related to the concept of rural development.” Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), pp.1442–1455.
34. Van der Ploeg, J.D. et al., (2000), “Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory.” Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), pp.391–408.
35. Yar, F. G. M., and Musadiq, M. (2024), “The role and importance of empowering rural communities for rural development in Afghanistan.” Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(11), pp.4961–4980. doi:10.46799/jsa.v5i11.1786 Yıldırak, N., 1991. Rural development. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
36. Zupic, I. and Čater, T., (2014), “Bibliometric methods in management and organization.” Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), pp.429–472. doi:10.1177/1094428114562629