Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Pakistan’ın Muzaffargarh ilindeki Pamuk Üreticilerin Bilgi Kaynakları ve Yayımdan Memnuniyet Durumları

Yıl 2017, , 61 - 68, 06.04.2017
https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.325620

Öz

Pakistan’da kuruluşundan bu yana pek çok tarımsal yayım sistemi ve yaklaşımı denenmiştir. 1988 yılında hükümet tarafından kurulan Ulusal Tarım Komisyonunun önerisi ile tarımsal yayımın özellestirilmesi süreci başlatılmıştır. Halen 500'den fazla özel şirket (çok uluslu, ulusal ve yerel) kamu yayımı ile birlikte çiftçilere yayım hizmetleri sağlamaktadır. Günümüzde hesap verme sorumluğu çok önemlidir ve bunun dışında bir sektörün performansını değerlendirmek mümkün değildir. Yayım hizmeti sunucuları çiftçilerin sürekli memnuniyetini sağlamalıdırlar. Çiftçilerin güvenini ve sadakatini artırmak için geri bildirim yayım için günden güne daha önemli hale gelmektedir. Genellikle yayımın değerlendirilmesi örneğin davranış değişikliği, verim ve gelirdeki değişim ve ayrıca artan  girdi kullanımı ile ilgili olarak  çiftçi odaklıdır. Yayım programlarının başarısını veya başarısızlığını etkileyen bir diğer önemli faktör yayım elemanlarının sundukları hizmetlerin verimliliği ve etkinliği olabilir. Bu çalışma, pamuk yetiştiricilerinin bilgi kaynaklarını belirlemeyi, kamu ve özel yayım hizmetlerinden memnuniyetlerini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla önceden alanda denemesi yapılmış olan anket formları ile Pakistan’ın Pencab eyaletinin Muzaffargarh ilindeki 95 çiftçiden veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler ki-kare testi, frekans ve yüzdeler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma alanındaki çiftçilerin çoğu özel sektörden (pestisit şirketleri) enformasyon (bir bakıma yayım hizmeti) almaktadır. Araştırma bulguları, çiftçilerin çoğunluğunun kamu ya da özel sektör yayım hizmetlerinden tam olarak memnun olmadığını göstermektedir. Ancak çiftçilerin özel pestisit şirketlerinden kısmi olarak memnun oldukları saptanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, hem özel hem de kamu sektörü tarafından yayım hizmetlerinin kalitesini artırmak gerektiğini göstermektedir. Bunun içinse kararlı çabalara ihtiyaç bulunmaktadır. Bu kapsamda üreticilerin teknoloji kullanımını geliştirmek için katılımcı yaklaşımların önemi yadsınamaz. Talep odaklı hizmet sunumu ve çiftçi dostu uygulamaların yapılması yararlı ve özel yayım kapsamında sektör tarafından sadece ilaç kullanımı ve hastalık tanımlama hizmetleri yerine alanla ilgili tüm konuları içeren genel bir hizmet sunumu uygun olacaktır.

Kaynakça

  • Abbas, S. 2005. Role of pesticides companies in dissemination of plant protection Technologies among cotton grower in thesil rajanpur. M.Sc. (hons.) thesis., department of agricultural extension., university of agriculture faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Ahmad, N., Israr, M., Nawab, K., khan, B. U., and Ali, S. 2014. Economic incentives and satisfaction of the agricultural extension agents. Int. J. Agr. Ext. 02(01):13-19
  • Ali, S., Ahmad, M., Ali, T., Shahbaz, B., Khan, G.A., İftikhar, M., and Nosheen, F. 2013. Role of private sector in promoting IPM practices among farming community in Punjab, Pakistan. The J. of Animal & Plant Sci. 23(5): 1473-1476.
  • Anderson, J. R., G. Feder, and S. Ganguly. 2006. The rise and fall of training and visit extension: An Asian mini-drama with an African epilogue. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  • APCAS. 2010. Asia and Pacific Commission on Agricultural Statistics. 23rd session, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 26-30 April 2010.
  • Baloch, A.M., Thapa, B. G. 2014. Agricultural extension in Balochistan, Pakistan: Date palm farmers' access and satisfaction. Journal of Mountain Science. 11(4):1035-1048
  • Birner, R., and J. R. Anderson. 2007. How to make agricultural extension demand-driven? The case of India's agricultural policy. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00729. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Birner, R., K.Davis, J.Pender, E.Nkonya, P.Anandayasekeram, J.Ekboir, A.Mbabu, D.Spielman, D.Horna, S.Benin, M.Cohn. 2006. From “best practice” to “best fit”: A framework for analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide. DSGD Discussion Paper 37. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Boyaci, M. and O. Yildiz. 2016. An overview of agricultural extension services in Turkey. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 22: 151–157.
  • Boz,İ. and Özçatalbaş,O.,2010. Determining information sources used by crop producers: A case study of Gaziantep province in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 5(10), pp. 980-987, 18 May, 2010. ISSN 1991-637X , 2010 Academic Journals.
  • Davis, K. 2008. Extension in sub-Saharan Africa: Overview and assessment of past and current models, and future prospects. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 15(3): 15–28.
  • Ghafoor, A., Hussain, M.,Naseer, K., Ishaque, M., Baloch, M. H. 2010. Factors affecting income and saving of small farming households in sargodha district of the Punjab, Pakistan.Pak. J. Agri., Eng., Vet. Sci., 2010, 26 (2): 27-35
  • GOP. 2014. Economic Survey of Pakistan. Statistics Division, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Hall, A., et al. 2000. Coping with new policy agendas for agricultural research: The role of institutional innovations. ICAR Policy Brief 13. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
  • Kizilaslan, N. 2006. Agricultural information systems: a national case study, Library Review, 55(8):497-507.
  • Kizilaslan, N. 2010. Agricultural Extension Policies in Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 5: 843-850.
  • Kokate, K. D., et al. 2009. Farmers-led extension: Experiences and road ahead. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 9(2):18–21.
  • Mengal, A.A, Mallah, M. U. Mirani, Z.A. and Siddiqui, B. N. 2012. An analysis of public and private agricultural extension services in Balochistan, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 25 (4):307-317
  • Moore, M. 1984. Institutional development, the World Bank, and India's new agricultural extension programme. Journal of Development Studies 20(4): 303–317.
  • Nelson, G.C. 2009. Agriculture and Climate Change: An Agenda for Negotiation in Copenhagen for Food, Agriculture, and the E n v i r o n m e n t t h e I m p o r t a n t R o l e o f E x t e n s i o n S y s t e m s . A v a i l a b l e a t : http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/rome2007/docs/Agriculture_CC_IFPRI_focus16_01.pdf
  • Özçatalbaş, O. 2001. “TarımaGirdiSağlayanÖzelKuruluşlarınYayımAçısındanDeğerlendirilmesi: Adana İli Örneği”, TZOB Çiftçive Köy Dergisi, 201,28-30
  • Ö z ç a t a l b a ş , O . v e İ . K u t l a r, 2 0 0 3 . “ A n t a l y a İ l i E l m a l ı Ve K o r k u t e l i İ l ç e l e r i n d e Ta r ı m a G i rd i SağlayanKuruluşlarınFaaliyetleriveYayımAçısındanDeğerlendirilmesi”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15/2, 89-100 (2003)
  • Qamar, M. K. 2011.Introducing Demand-Driven Extension Approach in a Traditional Region: a Case Study from Pakistan. Research and Extension Branch Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Riaz, M. 2010. The role of the private sector in agricultural extension in Pakistan. Rural Development News.
  • Sulaiman, R., and A. Hall. 2002. beyond technology dissemination: Can Indian agricultural extension re-invent itself? ICAR Policy Brief 16. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
  • Swanson, B. 2009. Changing extension paradigms within a rapidly changing global economy. Paper presented at the European Seminar on Extension Education, Assisi, Italy.
  • Swanson, B. E. and R. Rajalahti. 2010. Strengthening Agricultural Extension and Advisory Systems: Procedures for Assessing, Transforming and Evaluating Extension Systems, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, pp. 98 - 127.

Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan

Yıl 2017, , 61 - 68, 06.04.2017
https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.325620

Öz

Pakistan has tried many agricultural extension systems and approaches since its birth. In 1988, on the recommendation of National Commission on Agriculture formed by government to look into the poor performance of agriculture, privatization of agricultural extension was started. Currently, more than 500 private companies with public extension departments (multinational, national and generic) with public extension departments are actively engaged in providing extension services to farmers in addition to selling their products. In recent day's world, accountability is very important, without that you cannot evaluate the performance of any sector. Extension service providers should ensure the continuous satisfaction of farmers with the services being provided. In order to increase farmers' confidence and loyalty, extension feedback is becoming important day by day. Generally, evaluation of extension has been focused on farmers, such as behavioral change and also increase in output use, yield and income. Another important factor impacting the success or failure of extension programs may be efficiency and effectiveness with which extension personal deliver extension services. Present study, is aimed at analyzing the satisfaction of cotton growers with public and private extension services. In this regard, data was collected from 95 farmers using pre-tested questionnaire and using the mutli-stage random sampling technique from Muzaffargarrh district of Punjab province of Pakistan. Collected data were analyzed by using chi square test and frequency and percentages. Most of the farmers in the study area are getting extension services from private sector (pesticide companies). Study concluded that majority of the farmers were not fully satisfied with either the public or private extension services, however, farmers expressed partial satisfaction with private pesticide companies. Following these findings, resolute efforts are needed to improve quality of extension services both by private and public sector. Holistic participatory approaches are required to improve farmers understanding of technology, demand driven and farmers friendly strategies are recommended. Total service package should be applied by private companies rather than just pesticide use and disease identification services.

Kaynakça

  • Abbas, S. 2005. Role of pesticides companies in dissemination of plant protection Technologies among cotton grower in thesil rajanpur. M.Sc. (hons.) thesis., department of agricultural extension., university of agriculture faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Ahmad, N., Israr, M., Nawab, K., khan, B. U., and Ali, S. 2014. Economic incentives and satisfaction of the agricultural extension agents. Int. J. Agr. Ext. 02(01):13-19
  • Ali, S., Ahmad, M., Ali, T., Shahbaz, B., Khan, G.A., İftikhar, M., and Nosheen, F. 2013. Role of private sector in promoting IPM practices among farming community in Punjab, Pakistan. The J. of Animal & Plant Sci. 23(5): 1473-1476.
  • Anderson, J. R., G. Feder, and S. Ganguly. 2006. The rise and fall of training and visit extension: An Asian mini-drama with an African epilogue. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  • APCAS. 2010. Asia and Pacific Commission on Agricultural Statistics. 23rd session, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 26-30 April 2010.
  • Baloch, A.M., Thapa, B. G. 2014. Agricultural extension in Balochistan, Pakistan: Date palm farmers' access and satisfaction. Journal of Mountain Science. 11(4):1035-1048
  • Birner, R., and J. R. Anderson. 2007. How to make agricultural extension demand-driven? The case of India's agricultural policy. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00729. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Birner, R., K.Davis, J.Pender, E.Nkonya, P.Anandayasekeram, J.Ekboir, A.Mbabu, D.Spielman, D.Horna, S.Benin, M.Cohn. 2006. From “best practice” to “best fit”: A framework for analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide. DSGD Discussion Paper 37. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Boyaci, M. and O. Yildiz. 2016. An overview of agricultural extension services in Turkey. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 22: 151–157.
  • Boz,İ. and Özçatalbaş,O.,2010. Determining information sources used by crop producers: A case study of Gaziantep province in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 5(10), pp. 980-987, 18 May, 2010. ISSN 1991-637X , 2010 Academic Journals.
  • Davis, K. 2008. Extension in sub-Saharan Africa: Overview and assessment of past and current models, and future prospects. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 15(3): 15–28.
  • Ghafoor, A., Hussain, M.,Naseer, K., Ishaque, M., Baloch, M. H. 2010. Factors affecting income and saving of small farming households in sargodha district of the Punjab, Pakistan.Pak. J. Agri., Eng., Vet. Sci., 2010, 26 (2): 27-35
  • GOP. 2014. Economic Survey of Pakistan. Statistics Division, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Hall, A., et al. 2000. Coping with new policy agendas for agricultural research: The role of institutional innovations. ICAR Policy Brief 13. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
  • Kizilaslan, N. 2006. Agricultural information systems: a national case study, Library Review, 55(8):497-507.
  • Kizilaslan, N. 2010. Agricultural Extension Policies in Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 5: 843-850.
  • Kokate, K. D., et al. 2009. Farmers-led extension: Experiences and road ahead. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 9(2):18–21.
  • Mengal, A.A, Mallah, M. U. Mirani, Z.A. and Siddiqui, B. N. 2012. An analysis of public and private agricultural extension services in Balochistan, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 25 (4):307-317
  • Moore, M. 1984. Institutional development, the World Bank, and India's new agricultural extension programme. Journal of Development Studies 20(4): 303–317.
  • Nelson, G.C. 2009. Agriculture and Climate Change: An Agenda for Negotiation in Copenhagen for Food, Agriculture, and the E n v i r o n m e n t t h e I m p o r t a n t R o l e o f E x t e n s i o n S y s t e m s . A v a i l a b l e a t : http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/rome2007/docs/Agriculture_CC_IFPRI_focus16_01.pdf
  • Özçatalbaş, O. 2001. “TarımaGirdiSağlayanÖzelKuruluşlarınYayımAçısındanDeğerlendirilmesi: Adana İli Örneği”, TZOB Çiftçive Köy Dergisi, 201,28-30
  • Ö z ç a t a l b a ş , O . v e İ . K u t l a r, 2 0 0 3 . “ A n t a l y a İ l i E l m a l ı Ve K o r k u t e l i İ l ç e l e r i n d e Ta r ı m a G i rd i SağlayanKuruluşlarınFaaliyetleriveYayımAçısındanDeğerlendirilmesi”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15/2, 89-100 (2003)
  • Qamar, M. K. 2011.Introducing Demand-Driven Extension Approach in a Traditional Region: a Case Study from Pakistan. Research and Extension Branch Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Riaz, M. 2010. The role of the private sector in agricultural extension in Pakistan. Rural Development News.
  • Sulaiman, R., and A. Hall. 2002. beyond technology dissemination: Can Indian agricultural extension re-invent itself? ICAR Policy Brief 16. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
  • Swanson, B. 2009. Changing extension paradigms within a rapidly changing global economy. Paper presented at the European Seminar on Extension Education, Assisi, Italy.
  • Swanson, B. E. and R. Rajalahti. 2010. Strengthening Agricultural Extension and Advisory Systems: Procedures for Assessing, Transforming and Evaluating Extension Systems, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, pp. 98 - 127.
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat Mühendisliği, İşletme
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Muhammad Imran

Orhan Özçatalbaş

Yayımlanma Tarihi 6 Nisan 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Mart 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017

Kaynak Göster

APA Imran, M., & Özçatalbaş, O. (2017). Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 23(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.325620
AMA Imran M, Özçatalbaş O. Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan. TED - TJAE. Nisan 2017;23(1):61-68. doi:10.24181/tarekoder.325620
Chicago Imran, Muhammad, ve Orhan Özçatalbaş. “Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan”. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 23, sy. 1 (Nisan 2017): 61-68. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.325620.
EndNote Imran M, Özçatalbaş O (01 Nisan 2017) Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 23 1 61–68.
IEEE M. Imran ve O. Özçatalbaş, “Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan”, TED - TJAE, c. 23, sy. 1, ss. 61–68, 2017, doi: 10.24181/tarekoder.325620.
ISNAD Imran, Muhammad - Özçatalbaş, Orhan. “Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan”. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 23/1 (Nisan 2017), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.325620.
JAMA Imran M, Özçatalbaş O. Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan. TED - TJAE. 2017;23:61–68.
MLA Imran, Muhammad ve Orhan Özçatalbaş. “Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan”. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, c. 23, sy. 1, 2017, ss. 61-68, doi:10.24181/tarekoder.325620.
Vancouver Imran M, Özçatalbaş O. Information Sources and Satisfaction of Cotton Growers of Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan. TED - TJAE. 2017;23(1):61-8.

              

Dergimiz 2020 yılından itibaren Scopus veri tabanında taranmaya başlanmıştır.

Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, DergiPark'ın sunduğu LOCKSS sistemini kullanır. Arşivleme sistemi hakkında daha fazla bilgi için LOCKSS web sitesini ziyaret edebilirsiniz.
Depo Politikası : Arşiv Dünyasında, hakemli makalelere CrossRef tarafından sağlanan bir DOI numarası atanır.

 This website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.