Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 67 - 76, 25.08.2019
https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.501233

Öz

The objective of this study is to define a
conceptual framework for measuring the Global Economic Performance (GEP) of
farms. After a literature review of GEP measurement methods and indicators, we
have specified a composite indicator for this purpose. It is called Global
Economic Performance Indicator (GEPI). It consists of one group of positive
indicators and another of negative indicators. Each group is the reduced
centered average of the indicators that make it up. GEPI was applied to 262
randomly selected maize growers of Burkina Faso grouped into 'production
systems', 'farm sizes' and 'provinces'. The results show that the large farms,
the motorized producers and those of Tuy are generally the most powerful of
their respective group. In addition, large farms are overall the best
performers of all categories of producers with a score of 0.59.

Kaynakça

  • Bouljlida A. 2002. La performance financière des PME manufacturières : Conceptualisation et mesure. Mémoire présenté à Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
  • Bouquin H., 1986. Le contrôle de gestion, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
  • Bourguignon A., 1997. Sous les pavés la plage...ou les multiples fonctions du vocabulaire comptable : l'exemple de la performance, Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 1(3): 89-101.
  • Bremmers, H., Omta, O., Kemp, R., and Haverkamp, D-J. 2007. Do Stakeholder Groups Influence Environmental Management System Development in the Dutch Agri-Food Sector? Business Strategy and the Environment Bus. Strat. Env. 16: 214–231,
  • Crapon M., and Quairel-Lanoizelée F. 2005. Mythes et réalités de l'entreprise responsable, Paris, Ed. La Découverte.
  • De Rochambeau, H., Veronese, T., and Roché, P. 2008. Un exemple d'écoconception dans les filières agricoles, agroalimentaires et agro-industrielles : le pôle de compétitivité « AgriMip Innovation » en région Midi-Pyrénées. Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles, pp. 72-77.
  • Delen, D., Kuzey,C., and Uyar, A. 2013. Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach. Expert Systems with Applications 40(10) 3970–3983.
  • Dohou, A., and Berland, N. 2008. Mesure de la performance globale des entreprises, Communication au congrès annuel de l'Association Francophone de Comptabilité, Poitiers, 22 p.
  • Kalogeras ,N., Baourakis, G., Zopounidis,C., and Dijk van, G. 2005. Journal of Food Engineering 70: 365–371
  • Kasterine, A., and Vanzetti, D. 2010. The Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity of Market Based and Voluntary Measures to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Agri-Food Sector. UNCTAD Trade and Environment Review, 37 p
  • Kroma, S., and Lamien N. 2017. Evaluation de la rentabilité et de la compétitivité de la chaine de valeur gomme arabique dans l’amélioration des conditions de vie des populations au sahel du Burkina Faso. Agronomie Africaine Sp. 29(1): 29 - 40.
  • Latruffe, L. 2010. Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en (Available December 20, 2018).
  • Maxime, D., Marcotte, M., and Arcand, Y. 2005. Development of eco-efficiency indicators for the Canadian food and beverage industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 : 636-648Morin, E. M. 2001. Dimensions, critères et indicateurs de performance.
  • Naro, 2005. Responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise et pilotage des performances, Chapitre 4 in : La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise, Dir. F. Le Roy et M. Marchesnay, Ed. EMS Management et Société, pp. 59-71.
  • Rastoin, J.-L. 2006. Vers de nouveaux modèles d’organisation du système agroalimentaire ? Approches stratégiques. MSH-M Séminaire de recherche Produits de terroir, filière qualité et développement Montpellier, (22 juin 2006)
  • Zahm, F., Alonso A., and Ugaglia, B. De l’Homme. L’évaluation de la performance globale d’une exploitation agricole. Synthèse des cadres conceptuels, des outils de mesure et application avec la méthode IDEA. 8`eme Congrès du RIODD, Jun 2013, Lille, France. 32 p., 2013. (Available December 20, 2018).

Tarım İşletmelerinin Toplam Ekonomik Performansının Ölçülmesi: Burkina Faso’dan Örnek Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 67 - 76, 25.08.2019
https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.501233

Öz



Bu çalışmanın
amacı, tarım işletmelerinin Toplam Ekonomik Performansını (TEP) ölçmek için
kavramsal bir çerçeve tanımlamak ve uygulamaktır. TEP ölçüm yöntemleri ve
göstergelerinin literatür taramasından sonra, bu amaç için bütünleşik bir
gösterge belirlenmiştir. Bu gösterge Toplam Ekonomik Performans Göstergesi (TEPG)
olarak adlandırılmışır. Bu gösterge bir grup pozitif ölçüt ile bir grup olumsuz
ölçütün toplulaştırılmasından oluşmaktadır. Her grup, onu oluşturan
göstergelerin ortalamaları ve standart sapmaları dikkate alınarak hesaplamaya
dahil edilmiş ve uygulanmıştır. Her bir üretici için TEPG, Burkina Faso'da
rastgele seçilmiş 262 mısır üreticisinden anket yoluyla elde edilen veriler
kullnılarak tahmin edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, “üretim sistemleri”, “büyüklük” ve
“il” gruplarına göre karşılaştırmalı olarak sunulmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda
büyük çiftliklerin, makinalı üretim yapan üreticilerin ve Tuy ilindeki
çiftçilerin genel olarak daha yüksek performans gösterdikleri belirlenmiştir.
Buna ek olarak, büyük üreticilerin genel olarak 0,59 puanla tüm mısır
üreticileri gruplarında en iyi performansı gösterdikleri bulunmuştur.




Kaynakça

  • Bouljlida A. 2002. La performance financière des PME manufacturières : Conceptualisation et mesure. Mémoire présenté à Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
  • Bouquin H., 1986. Le contrôle de gestion, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
  • Bourguignon A., 1997. Sous les pavés la plage...ou les multiples fonctions du vocabulaire comptable : l'exemple de la performance, Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 1(3): 89-101.
  • Bremmers, H., Omta, O., Kemp, R., and Haverkamp, D-J. 2007. Do Stakeholder Groups Influence Environmental Management System Development in the Dutch Agri-Food Sector? Business Strategy and the Environment Bus. Strat. Env. 16: 214–231,
  • Crapon M., and Quairel-Lanoizelée F. 2005. Mythes et réalités de l'entreprise responsable, Paris, Ed. La Découverte.
  • De Rochambeau, H., Veronese, T., and Roché, P. 2008. Un exemple d'écoconception dans les filières agricoles, agroalimentaires et agro-industrielles : le pôle de compétitivité « AgriMip Innovation » en région Midi-Pyrénées. Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles, pp. 72-77.
  • Delen, D., Kuzey,C., and Uyar, A. 2013. Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach. Expert Systems with Applications 40(10) 3970–3983.
  • Dohou, A., and Berland, N. 2008. Mesure de la performance globale des entreprises, Communication au congrès annuel de l'Association Francophone de Comptabilité, Poitiers, 22 p.
  • Kalogeras ,N., Baourakis, G., Zopounidis,C., and Dijk van, G. 2005. Journal of Food Engineering 70: 365–371
  • Kasterine, A., and Vanzetti, D. 2010. The Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity of Market Based and Voluntary Measures to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Agri-Food Sector. UNCTAD Trade and Environment Review, 37 p
  • Kroma, S., and Lamien N. 2017. Evaluation de la rentabilité et de la compétitivité de la chaine de valeur gomme arabique dans l’amélioration des conditions de vie des populations au sahel du Burkina Faso. Agronomie Africaine Sp. 29(1): 29 - 40.
  • Latruffe, L. 2010. Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en (Available December 20, 2018).
  • Maxime, D., Marcotte, M., and Arcand, Y. 2005. Development of eco-efficiency indicators for the Canadian food and beverage industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 : 636-648Morin, E. M. 2001. Dimensions, critères et indicateurs de performance.
  • Naro, 2005. Responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise et pilotage des performances, Chapitre 4 in : La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise, Dir. F. Le Roy et M. Marchesnay, Ed. EMS Management et Société, pp. 59-71.
  • Rastoin, J.-L. 2006. Vers de nouveaux modèles d’organisation du système agroalimentaire ? Approches stratégiques. MSH-M Séminaire de recherche Produits de terroir, filière qualité et développement Montpellier, (22 juin 2006)
  • Zahm, F., Alonso A., and Ugaglia, B. De l’Homme. L’évaluation de la performance globale d’une exploitation agricole. Synthèse des cadres conceptuels, des outils de mesure et application avec la méthode IDEA. 8`eme Congrès du RIODD, Jun 2013, Lille, France. 32 p., 2013. (Available December 20, 2018).
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat Mühendisliği
Bölüm Araştıma
Yazarlar

İbrahim Yılmaz

Babou Sogué Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Ağustos 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Aralık 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yılmaz, İ., & Sogué, B. (2019). Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 25(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.501233
AMA Yılmaz İ, Sogué B. Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso. TED - TJAE. Ağustos 2019;25(1):67-76. doi:10.24181/tarekoder.501233
Chicago Yılmaz, İbrahim, ve Babou Sogué. “Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso”. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 25, sy. 1 (Ağustos 2019): 67-76. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.501233.
EndNote Yılmaz İ, Sogué B (01 Ağustos 2019) Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 25 1 67–76.
IEEE İ. Yılmaz ve B. Sogué, “Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso”, TED - TJAE, c. 25, sy. 1, ss. 67–76, 2019, doi: 10.24181/tarekoder.501233.
ISNAD Yılmaz, İbrahim - Sogué, Babou. “Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso”. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 25/1 (Ağustos 2019), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.501233.
JAMA Yılmaz İ, Sogué B. Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso. TED - TJAE. 2019;25:67–76.
MLA Yılmaz, İbrahim ve Babou Sogué. “Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso”. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, c. 25, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 67-76, doi:10.24181/tarekoder.501233.
Vancouver Yılmaz İ, Sogué B. Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Overall Economic Performance of Farms: A Case Study from Burkina Faso. TED - TJAE. 2019;25(1):67-76.

            

Dergimiz 2024  Nisan ayında Scopus veri tabanına kabul edilmiştir. Kabul edilen dergiler listesinde yer almıştır. Veri tabanı çalışmaları devam etmektedir. 

https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/content#4-titles-on-scopus linkten indirilebilir.

Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, DergiPark'ın sunduğu LOCKSS sistemini kullanır. Arşivleme sistemi hakkında daha fazla bilgi için LOCKSS web sitesini ziyaret edebilirsiniz.
Depo Politikası : Arşiv Dünyasında, hakemli makalelere CrossRef tarafından sağlanan bir DOI numarası atanır.

 This website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.