التداولية عند العرب والغرب: من الجذور الفلسفية إلى التطبيقات اللسانية"

Öz

يهدف هذا البحث إلى دراسة أهم المفاهيم التّداولية كما تجلّت في التّراث العربي من خلال علوم البلاغة، وأصول الفقه، والنّحو وغيرها من العلوم، ومن ثم مقارنتها بما توصّل إليه اللسانيون الغربيون المعاصرون في إطار نظريات الأفعال الكلامية، والملاءمة، والتفاعل الحواري. وقد بيّن البحث أنّ التراث العربي أسّس مبكّراً لمفاهيم تداولية راسخة، مثل مراعاة مقتضى الحال، والمقاصد الخطابية، وسياق التخاطب، في حين ركّز الدرس الغربي على بناء نظريات تحليلية منهجية تنطلق من الفلسفة التحليلية واللسانيات الحديثة. وانتهى البحث إلى أنّ الجمع بين هذين المسارين، عبر مقاربة نقدية، يسمح بإثراء الدّرس التداولي المعاصر وتطوير أدواته في تحليل الخطاب، خصوصاً في مجالات الخطاب الدّيني والإعلامي والأدبي.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• التداولية
• التراث
• العربي
• اللسانيات
• أفعال الكلام
• المقاربة النقدية

Destekleyen Kurum

أُنجز هذا البحث دون الحصول على أي تمويل من جهات حكومية أو تجارية أو غير ربحية.

Proje Numarası

4

Etik Beyan

أصرح بشرفي بأن هذا البحث أُنجز وفق المعايير الأخلاقية للبحث العلمي، وأن العمل أصيل ولم يسبق نشره أو تقديمه للنشر في أي مجلة أخرى. كما تم توثيق جميع المصادر المعتمدة في هذه الدراسة توثيقًا علميًا صحيحًا، وتؤكد الباحثة عدم وجود أي تضارب في المصالح يتعلق بهذا البحث.

Teşekkür

أتقدم بخالص الشكر والتقدير إلى إدارة تحرير مجلة [اسم المجلة] على جهودهم الكبيرة في مراجعة هذا البحث وإتاحة الفرصة لنشره. كما أعرب عن امتناني لكل أعضاء هيئة التحرير والمراجعين لملاحظاتهم القيمة التي ساهمت في تحسين جودة هذا العمل.

Pragmatics in Arab and Western Thought: From Philosophical Roots to Linguistic Applications

Öz

This study aims to examine the most significant pragmatic concepts as manifested in the Arab intellectual heritage, particularly within the disciplines of rhetoric, usūl al-fiqh (principles of Islamic jurisprudence), grammar, and other related fields. It then seeks to compare these concepts with the findings of contemporary Western linguists within the frameworks of Speech Act Theory, Relevance Theory, and dialogic interaction. The research demonstrates that the Arab heritage established, at an early stage, well-founded pragmatic notions such as consideration of the requirements of context (muqtadā al-ḥāl), communicative intentions, and the situational context of discourse. In contrast, Western scholarship has focused on constructing systematic analytical theories grounded in analytic philosophy and modern linguistics. The study concludes that integrating these two approaches through a critical perspective would enrich contemporary pragmatic studies and further develop discourse analysis tools, particularly in the fields of religious, media, and literary discourse.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• pragmatics
• Arab heritage
• Western linguistics
• speech acts
• situational appropriateness
• discourse analysis
• critical approach.

Destekleyen Kurum

This research was conducted without any specific financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit organizations.

Proje Numarası

4

Etik Beyan

The author declares that this study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of academic research. The work is original, has not been published previously, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All sources and references have been properly cited. The author confirms that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this research.

Teşekkür

I would like to express my sincere thanks to the editorial team of [Journal Name] for their great efforts in reviewing this research and for providing the opportunity to publish it. I also extend my gratitude to all members of the editorial board and the reviewers for their valuable comments, which contributed to improving the quality of this work.

Arap ve Batı Düşüncesinde Edimbilim: Felsefi Kökenlerden Dilbilimsel Uygulamalara

Öz

Bu araştırma, en önemli edimbilimsel kavramları Arap mirasında, özellikle belâgat, fıkıh usulü (İslam hukuk metodolojisi), nahiv ve diğer ilimler çerçevesinde incelemeyi, ardından bunları çağdaş Batılı dilbilimcilerin söz edimleri kuramı, bağdaşıklık (uygunluk/ilişkililik) kuramı ve söyleşimsel etkileşim teorileri kapsamında ulaştıkları sonuçlarla karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, Arap mirasının erken dönemlerden itibaren duruma uygunluk (muktezâ-yı hâl), söylem amaçları ve iletişim bağlamı gibi köklü edimbilimsel kavramlara sağlam temeller attığını ortaya koymuştur. Buna karşılık Batı’daki çalışmaların, analitik felsefe ve modern dilbilimden hareketle sistemli ve analitik kuramlar geliştirmeye odaklandığı görülmektedir. Çalışma, bu iki yaklaşımın eleştirel bir perspektifle birleştirilmesinin çağdaş edimbilim araştırmalarını zenginleştireceği ve özellikle dinî, medyatik ve edebî söylem alanlarında söylem çözümleme araçlarını geliştireceği sonucuna varmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• edimbilim
• Arap mirası
• batı dilbilimi
• söz edimleri
• duruma uygunluk
• söylem çözümlemesi
• eleştirel yaklaşım.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu araştırma, kamu, ticari veya kar amacı gütmeyen kuruluşlardan herhangi bir finansal destek alınmadan gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Proje Numarası

4

Etik Beyan

Yazar, bu çalışmanın akademik araştırma etik standartlarına uygun olarak yürütüldüğünü beyan eder. Çalışma orijinaldir, daha önce yayımlanmamıştır ve başka bir yerde yayımlanmak üzere değerlendirilmemektedir. Tüm kaynaklar ve referanslar uygun şekilde belirtilmiştir. Yazar, bu araştırmayla ilgili herhangi bir çıkar çatışması olmadığını doğrular.

Teşekkür

TARR dergi editörlüğüne, bu araştırmayı gözden geçirme konusundaki büyük çabaları ve yayımlama fırsatı verdikleri için en içten teşekkürlerimi sunarım. Ayrıca, tüm editör kurulu üyelerine ve hakemlere, bu çalışmanın kalitesinin artırılmasına katkıda bulunan değerli yorumları için minnettarlığımı ifade ederim.

Kaynakça

1. Ibn Rushd al-Qurtubi, Muhammad ibn Ahmad. (1983). The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer and the Beginning of the Striver’s Endeavor (6th ed., Vol. 2). Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
2. Ibn Ashur, Muhammad al-Tahir. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunis: Tunisian Publishing House.
3. Ibn Manzur, Muhammad ibn Mukarram. (1994). Lisan al-‘Arab (3rd ed., Vol. 11). Beirut: Dar Sadir.
4. Al-Amidi, Sayf al-Din. (1983). Al-Ihkam fi Usul al-Ahkam (Vol. 2). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
5. Armenko, Françoise. (1986). The Pragmatic Approach, translated by Sa‘id ‘Allush. Rabat: National Development Center.
6. Adrawi, Abd al-Fadil. (2012). The reality of rhetoric: A study of the specificity of the rhetorical approach to literature. Alam al-Fikr, 41(2), 39–66.
7. Al-Bustani, Antoine Mas‘ud. (1986). Rhetoric and Imagination (3rd ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq.
8. Baghoura, al-Zawi. (2007). Sign and symbol in contemporary philosophy: Foundation and renewal. Alam al-Fikr, 35(3), 97–131.

9. Boudjadi, Khalifa. (2012). Pragmatic linguistic thought among the Arabs: Its sources and fields. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 9(2), 31–38.
10. Jalouli, al-‘Aid. (2011). Speech Act Theory from Austin to Searle. University of Kasdi Merbah, Ouargla, 12, 54–63.
11. Hassan, Tammam. (1987). The ancient rhetorical terminology in the light of modern rhetoric. Fusul, 7(3–4), 21–36.
12. Hamou al-Hajj, Dahbia. (2015). Pragmatics and Communication Strategy (1st ed.). Dar Ru’ya for Publishing and Distribution.
13. Al-Hadari, Jamal. (2010). Stylistic Measures in Qur’anic Studies (1st ed.). Beirut: Majd University Institution for Studies, Publishing and Distribution.
14. Al-Khalifa, Hisham Abdullah. (2007). Speech Act Theory between Modern Linguistics and Linguistic Studies in the Arab-Islamic Heritage (1st ed.). Beirut: Librairie du Liban Publishers; Egyptian International Publishing Company, Longman.
15. Al-Raysuni, Ahmad. (2014). The Objectives of Objectives (2nd ed.). Beirut: Arab Network for Research and Publishing.
16. Al-Zamakhshari, Mahmud ibn ‘Umar. (1998). Asas al-Balaghah, edited by Muhammad Basil ‘Uyun al-Sud (1st ed., Vol. 1). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
17. Al-Shatibi, Ibrahim ibn Musa. (1994). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shari‘ah, edited by Abdullah Darraz (Vol. 2). Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
18. Al-Shirazi, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim ibn Ali ibn Yusuf. (1988). Sharh al-Luma‘, edited by Abd al-Majid Turki (1st ed., Vols. 1–2). Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.
19. Sahraoui, Mas‘ud. (2008). Pragmatics among Arab Scholars: A Pragmatic Study of Speech Acts in the Arab Linguistic Heritage (1st ed.). Dar al-Tanwir.
20. Tabanah, Badawi. (n.d.). The Arabic Bayan: A Study of the Development of the Rhetorical Idea among the Arabs, Its Methods and Major Means (3rd ed.). Anglo-Egyptian Bookshop.
21. Taha Abderrahmane. (1993). Renewing the Methodology for Evaluating the Heritage. Casablanca: Arab Cultural Center.
22. Taha Abderrahmane. (2000). On the Foundations of Dialogue and the Renewal of Kalam (2nd ed.). Casablanca: Arab Cultural Center.
23. Taha Abderrahmane. (1988). Integration of knowledge: Linguistics, logic, and philosophy. Journal of Semiotic, Literary and Linguistic Studies, 2, 117–137.
24. Abdelmajid, Jamil. (2000). Rhetoric and Communication. Cairo: Dar Gharib for Printing, Publishing and Distribution.
25. Abd al-Hadi bin Dhafer al-Shahri. (2004). Discourse Strategies: A Linguistic Pragmatic Approach (1st ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Jadid al-Muttahidah.
26. Al-Qarafi, Ahmad ibn Muhammad Shihab al-Din. (2001). Anwar al-Buruq fi Anwa’ al-Furuq, edited by Muhammad Ahmad Siraj and Ali Jum‘ah Muhammad (Vol. 1). Cairo: Dar al-Salam for Printing, Publishing and Distribution.
27. Kroum, Ahmad. (2015). The Objectives of Language and Their Impact on Understanding Religious Discourse (1st ed.). Jordan: Kunuz al-Ma‘rifah.
28. Milad, Khalid. (2001). Insha’ in Arabic between Syntax and Semantics: A Syntactic Pragmatic Study. University of Manouba, Tunisia; Arab Institution for Distribution.
29. Jamal al-Din, Mustafa. (1980). Grammatical Research among the Legal Theorists. Baghdad: National Library.
30. Reboul, Anne, & Moeschler, Jacques. (2003). Pragmatics Today: A New Science of Communication, translated by Sayf al-Din Ghafur (1st ed.). Beirut: Arab Organization for Translation.