Biyolojik mücadelede önemli entomofag kuşlar

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 51 - 65, 13.07.2016

Ali Kayahan İsmail Karaca

Öz

Zararlı böcekler üzerinde omurgalıların baskısı oldukça yüksektir. Bu omurgalılar arasında kuşlar ilk sırayı almaktadır. Böcekçil kuşlar, ormanlarda ve tarımda zararlı olan böceklerin mücadelesinde potansiyel etkin etmen olarak kabul görmektedirler. Böceklerin erginlerini, pupalarını, larvalarını ve yumurtalarını yiyerek doğal dengeyi korunmaktadırlar. Bu derlemede özellikle ormanların zararlılara karşı korunmasında etkili olan kuşların biyolojik mücadeledeki önemi hakkında bilgiler verilmeye çalışılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biyolojik etmen, entomofag kuşlar, orman zararlıları

Important entomophagus birds in biological control

Öz

The pressure of vertebrates on pests is very high. Among these vertebrates, birds rank first. Insectivorous birds are accepted as active agents in the control of forest and agricultural pests. They protect the natural balance by eating the adults, larvae, pupae and eggs of insects. In this review, we aimed to especially give information about the importance of birds that are effective in protecting against pests of forests within biological control.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biological control, entomophagous, birds, forest pests

Kaynakça

• Al - Melhim W.N., Z.S. Amr, A.M. Disi & A.K. Bader 1997. On the Diet of the Little Owl, Athene noctua, in the Safawi Area, Eastern Jordan. Zoology in the Middle East, Heidelberg, 15: 19-28.
• Alexander I. & B. Cresswell 1990. Foraging by nightjars Caprimulgus europaeus away from their nesting areas. Ibis, 132: 568–574.
• Barba E., D.M. Garcia, J.A. Gil-Delgado & G.M. Lopez 1994. Moth abundance and breeding success in a Great Tit population where moths are the main nestling food. Ardea, 82: 329–33
• Barbaro L., J. Nezan, M. Bakker, F. Revers, L. Couzi, F. Vetillard & O.Le Gall 2003. Distribution par habitats des oiseaux nicheurs a enjeu de conservation en foret des Landes de Gascogne. Le Courbageot 21–22, 12–23.
• Barbaro L., J.P. Rossi, F. Vetillard, J. Nezan & H. Nezan 2007. The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure. Journal of Biogeography, 34: 652–664.
• Barbaro L. & A. Battisti 2011. Birds as predators of the pine processinary moth (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae). Biological Control, 56: 107 – 114.
• Barbaro L., L. Couzi, V. Bretagnolle, J. Nezan, & F. Vetillard 2008. Multi-scale habitat selection and foraging ecology of the eurasian hoopoe (Upupa epops) in pine plantations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17: 1073–1087.
• Barber N.A., R.J. Marquis & W.P. Tori 2008. Invasive prey impacts regional distribution of native predators. Ecology, 89: 2678–2683.
• Battisti A., M. Bernardi & C. Ghiraldo 2000. Predation by the hoopoe on pupae of Thaumetopoea pityocampa and the likely influence on other natural enemies. Biocontrol, 45: 311–323.
• Bellocq M.I. 2000. A review of the trophic ecology of the Barn Owl in Argentina. Journal of Raptor Research, 34 (2): 108- 119. Biliotti E. 1958. Les parasites et predateurs de Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. (Lepidoptera). Entomophaga, 3: 23–24.
• Blondel J. 1985. Breeding strategies of the blue tit and coal tit (Parus) in mainland and island Mediterranean habitats: a comparison. Journal of Animal Ecology,54: 531–556.
• Bock A., B. Naef-Daenzer, H. Keil, F. Korner-Nievergelt, M. Perrig & M.U. Perrig 2013. Roost site selection by Little Owls Athene noctua in relation to environmental conditions and life-history stages. Ibis, 155: 847 – 856p.
• Bon M., E. Ratti & A. Sartor 2001. Variazione stagionale della dietta della Civetta Athene noctua (Scopoli, 1769) in una localita agricola della gronda lagunare Venezia. Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Venezia, 52: 193 – 212.
• Charter M., Y. Leshem, I. Izhaki, M. Guershon & Y. Kiat 2006. The Diet of the Little Owl, Athene noctua, in Israel. Zoology in the Middle East, 39: 31 – 40.
• Cleere N. 1999. Family caprimulgidae (Nightjars). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J. (Eds.), Handbook of the Birds of the World, Barn-owls to Hummingbirds, vol. 5. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp. 302–386.
• Clench M.H. & J.R. Mathias 1995. The avian cecum: A review, Wilson Bulletin, 107: 93– 121.
• Crawford H.S. & D.T. Jennings 1989. Predation by birds on spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana: functional, numerical, and total responses. Ecology, 70: 152– 163.
• Cooper R.J. & H.R. Smith 1995. Predation on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) egg masses by birds. Environmental Entomology, 24: 571–575.
• Cuadrado M. & F. Dominguez 1996. Phenology and breeding success of Red-necked Nightjar Caprimulgus ruficollis in Southern Spain. Journal fur Ornithologie, 137: 249– 253.
• Del Hoyo J., A. Elliot & J. Sartagal 1999. Handbook Of The Birds Of The World- vol-8. Lynx Edition. Demirsoy A. 2003. YaĢamın Temel Kuralları, Omurgalılar / Amniyota (Sürüngenler, KuĢlar ve Memeliler), Cilt-III, Kısım-II. Meteksan A.ġ., Ankara, 941 s.
• Diaz M., J.C. Illera & J.C. Atienza 1998. Food resource matching by foraging tits Parus spp. during spring–summer in a Mediterranean mixed forest: evidence for an ideal free distribution. Ibis, 140: 654–660.
• Eroğlu M. 1990. Euproctis chrysorrhoea (L.) (Lep., Lymantriidae)‟nın Biyolojisi, Doğal DüĢmanları ve Kısır Böcek Salıverme Metodu (SIRM) ile Kontrol Olanaklarının AraĢtırılması. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Orman Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, 203 s., Trabzon.
• Fattorini S., A. Mangarano, L. Ranazzi, M. Cento & L. Salvati 2000. Insect predation by Little Owl, Athene noctua, in different habitats of Central Italy. Rivista Italiana di Ornithologia, 70: 139 – 142.
• Fayt P., M.M. Machmer & C. Steeger 2005. Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers: a literature review. Forest Ecology and Management , 206: 1–14.
• Forsman J.T., M.B. Hjernquist & L. Gustafsson 2009. Experimental evidence for the use of density based interspecific social information in forest birds. Ecography, 32: 539–545.
• Fournier J. & R. Arlettaz 2001. Food provision to nestlings in the Hoopoe Upupa epops: implications for the conservation of a small endangered population in the Swiss Alps. Ibis, 143: 2–10.
• Gale G.A., J.A. DeCecco, M.R. Marshall, W.R. McClain, R.J. Cooper 2001. Effects of gypsy moth defoliation on forest birds: an assessment using breeding bird census data. Journal of Field Ornithology, 72: 291–304.
• Gil-Lletget A. 1945. Bases para un estudio cientifico de alimentacion en las aves y resultado del analisis de 400 estomagos. Boletin de la Real Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural, 43: 9–23.
• Gill B.J. 1980. Foods of the shining cuckoo (Chrysococcyx lucidus, Aves: Cuculidae) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 3: 138–140.
• Gilman S.E., M.C. Urban, J. Tewksbury, G.W. Gilchrist, & R.D. Holt 2010. A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25: 325–331.
• Glen D.M. 2004. Birds as predators of lepidopterous larvae. In: van Hemden, H., Rothschild, M. (Eds.), Insect and Bird Interactions. Intercept, Andover, pp. 89– 106.
• Gonzalez Cano J.M. 1981. Predacion de procesionaria del pino por vertebrados en la zona de Mora de Rubielos (Teruel). Boletin de la Estacion Central de Ecologia, 10: 53–77.
• Gorzel, M. & G. Grzywaczewski 2003. Feed of Little Owl (Athene noctua Scop., 1769) in Agricultural Landscape of the Lublin Area. Acta Agrophysica, 1(3): 433-440.
• Grajal A. 1995. Structure and function in digestive tract of the Hoatzin (Ophisthocomos hoazin): A folivorous bird with foregut fermentation. Auk, 112: 20–28. Grzywaczewski G., I. Kitowski & R. Scibior 2006. Diet of Little Owl Athene noctua during breeding in the central part of Lublin region (SE Poland). Acta Zoologica Sinica, 52: 1155 – 1161p.
• Halperin J. 1990. Natural enemies of Thaumetopoea spp. (Lep., Thaumetopoeidae) in Israel. Journal of Applied Entomology, 109: 425–435.
• Higashiura Y. 1989. Survival of eggs in the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar. I. Predation by birds. Journal of Animal Ecology, 58: 403–412.
• Hino T., A. Unno & S. Nakano 2002. Prey distribution and foraging preference for tits. Ornithological Science, 1: 81–87.
• Hogstad O. 2005. Numerical and functional responses of breeding passerine species to mass occurrence of geometrid caterpillars in a subalpine birch forest: a 30-year study. Ibis, 147: 77–91.
• Holmes R.T. 1990. Ecological and evolutionary impacts of bird predation on forest insects: an overview. Studies in Avian Biology, 13: 6–13.
• Hooks C.R.R., R.R. Pandey & M.W. Johnson 2003. Impact of avian and arthropod predation on lepidopteran caterpillar densities and plant productivity in an ephemeral agroecosystem. Ecological Entomology, 28: 522–532.
• Hounsome T., D. O‟mahony & R. Delahay 2004. The diet of Little Owls Athene noctua in Gloucestershire, England. Birds Study, 51: 282 – 284.
• Hoyas J. & F. Lopez 1998. Distribucion del crialo segun la abundancia de procesionaria del pino. Quercus, 149: 20–22.
• Ishizawa J., & S. Chiba 1966. Food analysis of four species of cuckoos in Japan. Miscellaneous Reports of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, 4: 302–326.
• Jaksic F.M., R.I. Seib & C.M. Herrera 1982. Predation by the Barn owl (Tyto alba) in Mediterranean habitats of Chile, Spain and California. The American Midland Naturalist, 107: 151-162.
• Jackson H.D. 2000. The food of the Afrotropical nightjars. Ostrich 71, 408–415. Jarry G. 1994. Coucou gris Cuculus canorus. In: Yeatman-Berthelot, D., Jarry, G.(Eds.), Nouvel atlas des oiseaux nicheurs de France. Societe Ornithologique de France, Paris, pp. 386–387.
• Ji R., S.J. Simpson, F. Yua, Q.X. He & C.J. Yun 2008. Diets of migratory rosy starlings (Passeriformes: Sturnidae) and their effects on grasshoppers: implications for a biological agent for insect pests. Biological Control, 46: 547–551. Jones J., P.J. Doran & R.T. Holmes 2003. Climate and food synchronize regional forest bird abundances. Ecology, 84: 3024–3032.
• Kasarov W.H. 1996. Digestive plasticity in avian energetics and feding ecology. In Avian Energitics and Nutritional Ecology, 61–84 (C. Carey, Ed.). New York: Chapman & Hall.
• Keller M. & M. Parrag 1996. Die Zwergohreule Otus scops (L.) im Raum Mattersburg /Burgenland. Bericht über das Zwergohreulenschutzprojekt 1995. Dep. Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, 87 pp.
• Khoptynskii V.I. 1976. The cuckoo, an enemy of hairy caterpillars. Zashchita Rastenii, 8: 62. Kiziroğlu Ġ. 2009. Türkiye KuĢları Cep Kitabı. Ankamat Matbaası, 564s., Ankara.
• Koh L.P. 2008. Birds defend oil palms from herbivorous insects. Ecological Applications, 18: 821–825.
• Kristin A. & J. Patocka 1997. Birds as predators of Lepidoptera: selected examples. Biologia, 52: 319–326.
• Kristin A. 2001. Family upupidae (Hoopoe). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J. (Eds.), Handbook of the Birds of the World, Mousebirds to Hornbills, vol. 6. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp. 396–411.
• Latkova H., A.K. Sandor & Kristin, A. 2012. Diet composition of the Scops Owl (Otus scops) in Central Romania. Slovak Raptor Journal, 6: 1 7–26.
• Maicas R. & J. Fernandez Haeger 2004. Pine plantations as a breeding habitat for a holenesting bird species crested tit (Parus cristatus) in southern Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 195: 267–278
• Marchesi L. & F. Sergio 2005. Distribution, density, diet and productivity of the Scops Owl Otus scops in the Italian Alps. Ibis, 147: 176-187.
• Marples N.M. & T.J. Roper 2004. Warning colours and warning smells: how birds learn to avoid aposematic insects. In: van Hemden, H., Rothschild, M. (Eds.),Insect and Bird Interactions. Intercept, Andover, pp. 185–192.
• Meise W. & H. Schifter 1972. The cuckoos and their relatives. In: Grzimek, B. (Ed.), Grzimek‟s Animal Life Encyclopedia, vol. 8. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
• Mols C.M.M. & M.E. Visser 2002. Great tits can reduce caterpillar damage in apple orchards. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39: 888–899.
• Nakamura H. & Y. Miyazawa 1997. Movements, space use and social organisation of radio-tracked common cuckoos during the breeding season in Japan. Japanese Journal of Ornithology, 46: 23–54.
• Naef-Daenzer B. & L.F. Keller 1999. The foraging performance of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus) in relation to caterpillar development, and its consequences for nestling growth and fledging weight. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68: 708–718.
• Netherer S. & A. Schopf 2009. Potential effects of climate change on insect herbivores in European forests – general aspects and the pine processionary moth as specific example. Forest Ecology and Management, 259: 831–838.
• Norris A.R. & K. Martin 2008. Mountain pine beetle presence affects nest patch choice of red-breasted nuthatches. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72: 733– 737.
• Oğurlu Ġ. 2000. Biyolojik Mücadele. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yayın No:8, Orman Fakültesi Yayın No:1. 440s., Isparta.
• Parry D., J.R. Spence & W.J.A. Volney 1997. Responses of natural enemies to experimentally increased populations of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria. Ecological Entomology, 22: 97–108.
• Patten M.A. & J.C. Burger 1998. Spruce budworm outbreaks and the incidence of vagrancy in eastern North American wood-warblers. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76: 433–439.
• Payne R.B. 1997. Family Cuculidae (Cuckoos). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J. (Eds.), Handbook of the Birds of the World, Sandgrouses to Cuckoos, vol. 4. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp. 508–607.
• Pimentel C. & J.A. Nilsson 2007. Response of great tits Parus major to an irruption of a pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa population with a shifted phenology. Ardea, 95: 191–199.
• Pimentel C. & J.A. Nilsson 2009. Response of passerine birds to an irruption of a pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa population with a shifted phenology. Ardeola, 56: 189–203.
• Reichlin T.S., M. Schaub, M.H.M. Menz, M. Mermod, P. Portner, R. Arlettaz & L. Jenni 2009. Migration patterns of Hoopoe Upupa epops and Wryneck Jynx torquilla: an analysis of European ring recoveries. Journal of Ornithology, 150: 393–400.
• Romanowski J. & M. Zmihorski 2008. Selection of foraging habitat by grassland birds: effect of prey abundance or availability? Polish Journal of Ecology, 56: 365–370.
• Salek M., J. Riegert & V. Krivan 2010. The impact of vegetation characteristics and prey availability on breeding habitat use and diet of Little Owls Athene noctua in Central European farmland. Bird Study, 57: 495 – 503p
• Serez M. 1982. Doğu Karadeniz Bölümünde YaĢayan Picidae (Ağaçkakanlar) Türleri, Tanımları, YayılıĢları, Biyolojileri ve Gıdaları. Ġstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, A, 32(1): 148 – 168.
• Shao M. & N. Liu 2008. The diet of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the desert habitats of Northwestern China. Journal Raptor Research, 42(1): 61 – 64.
• Sherry T.W. 1990. When are birds dietarily specialized? Distinguishing ecological from evolutionary approaches. Studies in Avian Biology, 13: 337–352.
• Sierro A., R. Arlettaz, B. Naef-Daenzer, S. Strebel & N. Zbinden 2001. Habitat use and foraging ecology of the nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus in the Swiss Alps: towards a conservation scheme. Biological Conservation, 98: 325–331.
• Soler M. 1990. Relationships between the great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius and its magpie hosts in a recently colonized area. Ornis Scandinavica, 21: 212– 223.
• Soler M., J.J. Palomino, J.G. Martinez & J.J. Soler 1994. Activity, survival, independence and migration of fledgling great spotted cuckoos. Condor, 96: 802–805.
• Streit B. & Z. Kalotas 1991. The reproductive performance of the Scops Owl (Otus scops L., 1758). Aquila, 98: 97-105.
• Tanhuanpää M., K. Ruohomaki & E. Uusipaikka 2001. High larval predation rate in nonoutbreaking populations of a geometrid moth. Ecology, 82: 281–289.
• Taylor I. 1994. Barn owls. Predator-prey relationships and conservation. Cambridge, University Press, 324p.
• Thomson L.J., S. Macfadyen & A.A. Hoffmann 2010. Predicting the effects of climate change on natural enemies of agricultural pests. Biological Control, 52: 296–306.
• Todd L.D., R.G. Poulin & R.M. Brigham 1998. Diet of common nighthawks (Chordeiles minor: Caprimulgidae) relative to prey abundance. American Midland Naturalist, 139: 20–28.
• Tome R., P. Catry, C. Bloise & E. Korpimaki 2008. Breeding density and success, and diet composition of Little Owls Athene noctua in steppe-like habitats in Portugal. Ornis Fennica, 85: 22 – 32p.
• Valverde J.A. 1953. Contribution a la biologie du coucou geai, Clamator glandarius L.I. Notes sur le coucou-geai en Castille. L'Oiseau et la revue française d'ornithologie, 23: 288–296.
• Van Bael S.A., S.M. Philpott, R. Greenberg, P. Bichier, N.A. Barber, K.A. Mooney & D.S. Gruner 2008. Birds as predators in tropical agroforestry systems. Ecology, 89: 928–934.
• Veldtman R., M.A. Mc Geoch & C.H. Scholtz 2007. Can life-history and defence traits predict the population dynamics and natural enemy responses of insect herbivores? Ecological Entomology, 32: 662–673.
• Wadatkar J., V. Zade, V. Patki & S. Talmale 2014. Diet composition of Brown-Fish Owl (Ketupa zeylonensis) from Melghat Tiger Reserve, Ġndia. World Journal of Zoology, 9 (2): 121-124.
• Wang Y.H. & Y.J. Liao 1990. Attracting beneficial birds for the biological control of Dendrolimus punctatus (Lep. Lasiocampidae). Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 6: 25–26.
• Whelan C.J., R.T. Holmes & H.R. Smith 1989. Bird predation on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larvae: an aviary study. Environmental Entomology, 18: 43–45.
• Whelan C.J., D.G. Wenny & R.J. Marquis 2008. Ecosystem services provided by birds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1134: 25–60.
• Wiacek J., M. Polak & M. Niedzwiedz 2009. The diet composition of the Tawny Owl Strix aluco in the Kozlowka Forest (eastern Poland). Annales. Vol. LXIV, 2, 75-81.
• Zhao W., M. Shao, S. Song & N. Liu 2008. Diets of little owls and long-eared owls in Northwestern China. Animal Biology, 58: 211–219.
• Zhao W., S. Song, M.Q. Shao & N.F. Liu 2011. Niche Separation of two sympatric owls in the desert of Northwestern China. Journal Raptor Research, 45(2): 174 – 179p.