Domates güvesi, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) mücadelesinde Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki ve bazı çevre dostu pestisitlerin etkileri

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 13 - 24, 13.07.2016

Mikdat Doğanlar Ahmet Emin Yıldırım Abdurrahman Yiğit

Öz

Domates güvesi, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) 2010-2011 yıllarında domates yetiştirilen iki serada (Kırıkhan-Hatay’da bir üretici serasında ve Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi (MKÜ) uygulama serasında) araştırılmış; ayrıca sera çalışmalarında elde edilen sonuçlar, 2011 yılında Reyhanlı (Hatay)‟da bir üretici tarlasında gözlenmiştir. Çalışmalar Kırıkhan‟daki serada Bt (100 g/hl) ve thiodicarb (60 g/hl) ile yapılmıştır. Deneme üç tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuş; her parselde 10‟ar bitkide bulaşık yaprakçıklar uzaklaştırılarak ilaçlar uygulanmıştır. Uygulamadan 15 gün sonra bulaşık yaprakçık ve meyve oranları belirlenmiştir. Bu denemedeki yaprakçık ve meyvelerde bulaşma oranları Bt parsellerinde % 1.67 ± 0.22 ve % 2.23 ± 0.20, thiodicarb‟da % 3.03 ± 0.45 ve % 2.15 ± 0.25 ve şahitte % 21.20 ± 2.03 ve % 16.50 ± 0.51 olarak belirlenmiştir. MKÜ serasında ise Bt (100 g/hl), cyromazine (20 g/hl), diflubenzuron (50 g/hl), lufenuron (30 ml/hl), CTPR+abamectin (80 ml/hl) üç tekerrürlü olarak denenmiştir. MKÜ serasındaki denemeler, biri Bakanlık standart yöntemine (sayım 15 gün sonra yapılacak şekilde değiştirilerek), diğeri yukarıda belirtilen yönteme göre değerlendirilmiştir.Bu denemde yaprakçık bulaşma oranları Bt parselinde ortalama % 15.0 ± 1.15; cyromazine‟de % 24.42 ± 1.74; diflubenzuron‟da % 25.97 ± 2.55; lufenuron‟da % 32.33 ± 4.16; CTPR+abamectin‟de % 4.94 ± 0.67 ve şahitte‟de % 23.45±3.85 olmuştur. Bu serada yapılan diğer denemede bitki başına canlı larva sayısı Bt parselinde 0.12; cyromazine‟de 0.28; diflubenzuron‟da 0.34; lufenuron‟da 0.07; CTPR+abamectin‟de 0.17 ve şahitte 0.38 olmuştur. Reyhanlı‟da yapılan tarla denemesinde de Bt’nin T. absoluta zararını önlemede, uygulama yapılmayan şahit parsellere göre etkili olduğu gözlenmiştir. T. absoluta mücadelesinde CTPR+abamectin en etkili ilaç olarak gözlenmiş, bunu Bt izlemiştir. Domates yetiştiriciliğinde T. absoluta zararının önlenmesinde insan ve çevre sağlığı yönünden güvenli bir biyo-pestisit olarak Bt’nin kullanılabileceği vurgulanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tuta absoluta, çevre dostu pestisitler, Bacillus thuringiensis var, kurstaki

Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki and some environmentally friendly pesticides on the Tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Öz

The efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Bt) and some environmentally friendly pesticides, along with clorantraniliprole (CTPR)+abamectin, against the Tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae), which is injurious to tomato, were studied in 2010-2011 in two greenhouses and under field conditions in Reyhanlı (Hatay), Turkey. For this purpose, Bt (100 g/hl) and thiodicarb (60g/hl) were tested in a commercial greenhouse. The experiment was conducted with 3 replications, 10 plants of each plot were cleared from infested parts before the application. Fifteen days after the application, infested leaflets and fruits were counted. Infestation rates were 1.67% ± 0.22 and 2.23% ± 0.20 for Bt, 3.03% ± 0.45 and 2.15% ± 0.25 for thiodicarb and 21.20% ±2.03 and 16.50%±0.51 for untreated plots, respectively. In the MKU campus greenhouse, Bt (100 g/hl), cyromazine (20 g/hl), diflubenzuron (50 g/hl), lufenuron (30 ml/hl) and CTPR+abamectin (80 ml/hl) were tested with 3 replications. One of the trials was conducted according to the method described above, and the other one was conducted according to the Ministry‟s standard method (except the day of counting to be the 15th day). Leaflet infestation levels for the trial in the campus greenhouse for the above mentioned pesticides were 15% ± 1.15, 24.42% ± 1.74, 25.97% ± 2.55, 32.33% ± 4.16, and 4.94% ± 0.67, respectively, while the untreated control was 23.45% ± 3.85. The mean numbers of live larvae per plant for Bt, cyromazine, diflubenzuron, lufenuron and CTPR+abamectin plots were 0.12, 0.28, 0.34, 0.07 and 0.17, respectively, and 0.38 for the untreated control. In conclusion, CTPR+abamectin appears to be the most effective pesticide, followed by Bt. Bt applications were also effective in controlling T. absoluta damage under field conditions in Reyhanlı. The results of the present study suggest that the use of Bt, an environmentally friendly bio-pesticide considered safe for human health, to reduce T. absoluta damage in tomatoes should be further investigated in larger trials.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tuta absoluta, friendly pesticides, Bacillus thuringiensis var, kurstaki

Kaynakça

• Abbott W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18: 265-267.
• Allen W. R. & A. B. Broadbent 1986. Transmission of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Ontario Greenhouses by Frankliniella occidentalis. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 8(1): 33-38.
• Anonymous 2014. Tarım Bakanlığı, Bitki Zararlıları Standart Ġlaç Deneme Metotları: Bitki Sağlığı AraĢtırmaları Daire BaĢkanlığı. 128 s.
• Bajonero J. 2008. Biology and Life Cycle of Apanteles gelechiidivoris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Parasitoid of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Agronomica do Colombiana, 26(3): 417-426.
• Barrientos Z., H. Apablaza, S. Norero & P. Estay 1998. Temperatura base y constante te‟rmica de desarrollo de la polilla del tomate, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera:Gelechiidae).Ciencia e Investigacio’n Agraria, 25: 133-137.
• Braham M. & L. Hajji (2012). Management of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) with Insecticides on Tomatoes, Insecticides Pest Engineering, Dr. Farzana Perveen (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-895-3, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/27812.
• Braham M., H. Glida-Gnidez & L. Hajji 2012. Management of the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta in Tunisia with novel insecticides and plant extracts. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO, 42(2): 291–296.
• Brambila J. 2011. Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a species of concern to agriculture in Florida. Florida Entomologıcal Society 94th Annual Meeting Presentation Abstracts (DSP2) (July 24-27, 2011) URL:http://www.flaentsoc.org/2011brambila.pdf, http://flaentsoc.org/2011annmeetabstracts.pdf (EriĢim: 20 Mayıs 2014).
• Cabello T., J.R. Gallego, E. Vila, A. Soler, M. Del Pino, A. Carnero, E. Hernández, & A. Polaszek 2009. Biological control of the South American Tomato Pinkworn, Tuta absoluta with releases of Trichogramma achaeae in tomato greenhouses of Spain. IOBC/ WPRS Bulletin, 49: 225-230.
• Chiot G., L. Lanza & E. Casagrande 2011. First results from South Europe for Tuta absoluta control using diflubenzuron with adjuvant and with/without Bt kurstaki. EPPO/IOBC/FAO/NEPPO Joint International Symposium on management of Tuta absoluta (tomato borer). 16-18 November, Agadir, Morocco, URL: http://neppo.nindo.ma/ site/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/GiancarloChiot_Dimilin-newuses_2010_2011-trials_Tuta2.pdf (EriĢim: 20 Mayıs 2014)
• Campbell C.D., J.F. Walgenbach & G.C. Kennedy 1991. Effect of parasitoids on Lepidopterous pests in insecticide-treated and untreated tomatoes in western North Carolina. Journal of Economic Entomology, 84: 1662-166
• Doğanlar M.& S. Aydın 2009. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi (Türkiye)‟nde yeni bir zararlı, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Turkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 33(2): 153-160.
• Doğanlar M. & A. Yiğit 2011. Parasitoid Complex of the Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917), (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Hatay, Turkey. KSU Journal of Natural Science, 14(4): 28-37.
• Erler F., M. Can, M. Erdogan, A.O. Ates & T. Pradier 2010. New record of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on greenhouse-grown tomato in southwestern Turkey (Antalya). Journal of Entomological Science, 45: 392-393.
• Estay P. 2000. Polilla del tomate Tuta absoluta (Meyrick). Instituto de Investigationes Agropecuarias, Centro Regional de Investigacion La Platina, Ministerio de Agricultura Santiago Chile. URL: http://www.inia.cl/medios/biblioteca/informativos/NR25648.pdf (EriĢim:20 Mayıs 2014).
• FERA 2009. The food and environment Research Agency. Plant Pest notice. South American tomato moth Tuta absoluta, 56: 1-4.
• Galdino T.V. da S., M.C. Picanço, E.G.F. de Morais, N.R. Silva, G.A.R. da Silva & M.C. Lopes 2011. Bioassay method for toxicity studies of insecticide formulations to Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917). A Ciência e Agrotecnologia. Lavras, 35(5): 869-877.
• González-Cabrera J., O. Mollá, H. Montón & A. Urbaneja 2011. Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) in controlling the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Bio Control, 56(1): 71-80.
• Henderson C.F. & E.W. Tilton 1955. Tests with acaricides against the brow wheat mite Journal of Economic Entomology, 48: 157-161.
• Kabiri F., E. Vila & T. Cabello 2010. Trichogramma achaeae: An excellent biocontrol agent against Tuta absoluta. Sting Newsletter on Biological Control, 33: 5-6.
• Kılıç T. 2010. First record of Tuta absoluta in Turkey. Phytoparasitica, 38: 243-244. Lietti M.M.M., E. Botto & R.A Alzogaray 2005. Insecticide resistance in Argentine populations of Tuta absoluta (Lep.: Gelechiidae). Neotropical Entomology, 34: 113- 119.
• Luna M.A.G., N. Sánchez & P. C. Pereyra 2007. Parasitism of Tuta Absoluta (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) by Pseudapanteles dignus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) under laboratory conditions. Environtal Entomology, 36(4): 887-893.
• Marchiori C.H., C.G Silva & A.P. Lobo 2007. Parasitóides de Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Coletados em Plantas de Tomate em Lavras, Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 50(6): 434- 437.
• María G.L., N.E. Sánchez & C.P. Patricia 2004. Parasitism of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) by Pseudapanteles dignus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) under laboratory conditions. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 64(3): 487-492.
• Méndez C. R 2010. La polilla del Tomate Tuta absoluta (Meyrick), una plaga muy agresiva. OIRSA México, Coordinador del Programa Fitosanitario de Apoyo a la Cadena Agroalimentaria de Hortalizas-Tomate Consultado el 14/12/2011 y disponible en Word web: URL: http://www.oirsa.org/portal/documents/tuta/La-Polilla-del-tomateuna-plaga-muy-agresiva.pdf (EriĢim: 20 Mayıs 2014)
• Miranda M.M.M., M. Picanço, J.C. Zanuncio & R.N.C. Guedes 1998. Ecological Life Table of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8: 597–606
• Ripa S., P. Rojas, & G. Velasco 1995. Releases of biological control agents of insect pests on Easter Island (Pacific Ocean). Entomophaga, 40: 427-440.
• Shehata S. E .M., M.M. Soliman Mahmmod & E.M. Abd. Ei-Mageed Ahmed 2012. Evaluation of some insecticides against tomato leaf miner (Tuta absoluta) and determination of their residues in tomato fruits. Applied Biological Research, 14 (2):113-119. URL:http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:abr&volume= 14&issue= 2&article=001 (EriĢim: 20 Mayıs 2014).
• Silva G.A., M.C. Picanço, L. Bacci, A.L. Crespo, J.F. Rosado & R. N. Guedes 2011. Control failure likelihood and spatial dependence of insecticide resistance in the tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta. Pest Management Science, 67(8): 913-20.
• Siqueira H.A.A., R.N.C. Guedes & M.C. Picanco 2000a. Insecticide resistance in populations of Tuta absoluta (Lep.: Gelechiidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2: 147–153.
• Siqueira H.A.A, R.N. Guedes & M.C. Picanco 2000b. Cartap resistance and synergism in populations of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal Applied Entomology, 124: 233-238.
• Siqueira H.A.A., R.N.C. Guedes, D.B. Fragoso & L.C. Magalhaäes 2001. Abamectin resistance and synergism in Brazilian populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). International Journal of Pest Management, 47(4): 247-251.
• Van Deventer P. 2009. Leafminer threatens tomato growing in Europe. 10-12 in Agri- & HortiWorld, Fruit & Veg. Tech. URL: http://documents.plant.wur.nl/ pri/leafminer.pdf (EriĢim: 20 Mayıs 2014).
• Walgenbach J.F., R.B Leidy & T.J Sheets 1991. Persistence of insecticides on tomato foliage and implications for control of tomato fruitworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 84: 978-986.