Diyalojik Öğretim Konusunda Yapılan Bilimsel Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Diyalojik öğretim öğrencileri düşünme, anlama ve öğrenmeye teşvik etmek için konuşmanın gücünden yararlanan pedagojik bir yaklaşımdır. Yaklaşımda konuşmaya değer atfedilmesinin nedeni konuşmanın anlam oluşturma sürecinin ve dolayısıyla öğrenmenin merkezinde yer almasıdır. Mevcut araştırmada diyalojik öğretim ile ilgili yapılmış bilimsel araştırmaların bibliyometrik özelliklerini ortaya koymak hedeflenmiştir. Bilginin hızla arttığı çağımızda bibliyometrik araştırmalar bir alanda araştırma yapacak bilim insanlarına alanın genel çerçevesini görmeleri ve ihtiyaçları belirlemeleri adına fırsatlar sunmaktadır. Araştırmanın yöntemi bibliyometrik analizdir. Web of Science veri tabanında diyalojik öğretim (dialogic teaching) anahtar kelimesi ile tüm alanlar seçilerek yapılan taramada makale türünde ve yayın dili İngilizce olan 237 adet yayına erişilmiştir. Bu makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi RStudio programının bibliometrix paketi kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda diyalojik öğretimle ilgili en çok yayın yapan dergilerin dağılımı, en çok yayın yapan yazarlar ve bu yazarların üretim grafiği, makalelerin küresel alıntı sıralaması, makalelerde ülkelerin verimliliği ve iş birliği ile yazarların iş birliği ağı ve bunlarda en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeler ile özet kelimeleri ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bibliyometrik analiz
• Diyalojik öğretim
• Sınıf etkileşimi

Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Dialogic Teaching

Öz

Dialogic teaching is a pedagogical approach that harnesses the power of talk to encourage students to think, understand and learn. The reason why speech is valued in the approach is that speech is at the center of the meaning-making process and therefore at the center of learning. The current research aims to reveal the bibliometric characteristics of scientific research on dialogic teaching. In our age where knowledge is rapidly increasing, bibliometric research offers opportunities for scientists who will conduct research in a field to see the general framework of the field and determine the needs. The method of the research is bibliometric analysis. In the Web of Science database, 237 publications were accessed by selecting all fields with the keyword "dialogic teaching". Bibliometric analysis of these articles was conducted using the bibliometrix package of RStudio software. As a result of the analysis, the distribution of the journals with the most publications on dialogic teaching, the authors with the most publications and their production graph, the global citation ranking of the articles, the productivity and collaboration of the countries in the articles and the collaboration network of the authors, and the most frequently used keywords and abstract words in them were revealed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bibliometric analysis
• Dialogic teaching
• Clasroom interaction

Kaynakça

1. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.
2. Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140
3. Alexander, R. J. (2005). Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. The Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology’de sunulmuş bildiri, Temmuz, University of Durham, UK.
4. Arévalo, Y. B. & García, M. B. (2023). Scientific production on dialogical pedagogy: a bibliometric analysis. Data & Metadata, 2, 7-7.
5. Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
6. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
7. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (c. 8). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
8. Berk, L. E. & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, D.C. : National Association for the Education of Young Children.

9. Bodrova, E. & Leong, D. J. (2013). Zihin araçları, erken çocukluk eğitiminde Vygotsky yaklaşımı (T. Güler, F. Şahin, A. Yılmaz & E. Kalkan, Çev.). Ankara: Anı.
10. Fisher, R. (2011). Dialogic teaching. A. Green (Ed.), Becoming a reflective English teacher içinde (s. 90-109). Berkshire: MG-Hill Open University.
11. Gülmez, D., Özteke, İ., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Uluslararası dergilerde yayımlanan Türkiye kaynaklı eğitim araştırmalarının genel görünümü: Bibliyometrik analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(206), 213-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9317
12. Gümüş, S., Gök, E. & Esen, M. (2020). A review of research on international student mobility: Science mapping the existing knowledge base. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(5), 495-517. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319893651
13. Hao, T., Chen, X., & Song, Y. (2020). A topic-based bibliometric analysis of two decades of research on the application of technology in classroom dialogue. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(7), 1311-1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120940956
14. Hennessy, S., Dragovic, T., & Warwick, P. (2018). A research-informed, school-based professional development workshop programme to promote dialogic teaching with interactive technologies. Professional Development in Education, 44(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/194 15257.2016.1258653
15. Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M. & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher-student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact upon student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4-5), 462-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
16. Kamarrudin, H., Talib, O., Kamarudin, N., Ismail, N., & Zamin, A. A. M. (2022). Examining the trend of research on active engagement in science education: bibliometric analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 937-957.
17. Kong, A. & Fitch, E. (2003). Using Book Club to engage culturally and linguistically diverse learners in reading, writing, and talking about books. The Reading Teacher, 56, 352–362. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205209 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
18. Kula, O. B. (2012). Dil felsefesi: Edebiyat kuramı II. İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
19. Kuzhabekova, A., Hendel, D. D., & Chapman, D. W. (2015). Mapping global research on international higher education. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 861–882. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24572045 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
20. Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and Education, 22(3), 222-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152499
21. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902954273
22. Meshcheryakov, B. G., Ponomareva, V. V., & Shvedovskaya, A. A. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on cultural-historical psychology from 2010 to 2020: Dynamics, geography, and key ideas. Psychology in Russia, 15(4), 188-214.
23. Murphy, P. K., Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
24. Oyman-Bozkurt, N. & Bozkurt, E. (2024). Eğitimde sistem düşüncesi: Bibliyometrik bir analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 49(218), 205-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2024.12634
25. Polat, H., Topuz, A. C., Yildiz, M., Taslibeyaz, E., & Kursun, E. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of research on ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.606
26. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
27. Reznitskaya, A. & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
28. Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S.-Y. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32(2–3), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651596
29. Reznitskaya, A., Glina, M., Carolan, B., Michaud, O., Rogers, J., & Sequeira, L. (2012). Examining transfer effects from dialogic discussions to new tasks and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.003
30. Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A. M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen‐Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701952
31. Sandora, C., Beck, I., & McKeown, M. (1999). A comparison of two discussion strategies on students’ comprehension and interpretation of complex literature. Journal of Reading Psychology, 20, 177-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/027027199278394
32. Sedova, K., Salamounova, Z., Svaricek, R. & Sedlacek, M. (2020). Getting dialogic teaching into classrooms: Making change possible. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9243-0
33. Song, Y., Chen, X., Hao, T., Liu, Z., & Lan, Z. (2019). Exploring two decades of research on classroom dialogue by using bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 137, 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.002
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher order processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
35. Yıldırım, L., Uçak, E. & Savran-Gencer, A. (2021). Fen derslerinde sınıf içi konuşmalar üzerine sistematik bir derleme. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 11(3), 1148-1172. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.778215
36. Yüceer, D. (2020). Diyalojik öğretim ve ana dili eğitimi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(3), 701-712. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tsadergisi/issue/58254/559836 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
37. Zupic, I. & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629