Investigation of Turkish Teacher Candidates' Perceptions Towards the Use of Technology in the Framework of Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory

Öz

Developments in the field of technology have brought about innovations in education, both in the literature and in practice, as in every field. In this context, mobile learning has begun to spread rapidly with both its advantages and disadvantages. This study was designed to learn Turkish teacher candidates' perceptions, perspectives, and reactions towards innovations in the field of mobile learning. The study was conducted with 215 Turkish teacher candidates within the framework of the diffusion of innovation theory developed by Rogers (1995). In the study, the data were collected by using the Mobile Learning Adoption Scale developed by Çelik et al. (2014) and the data were analyzed in the SPSS 25.0 software. According to the results of the study, it was determined that 75.4% of Turkish teacher candidates were in the group (innovators, early adopters, and the first majority) that developed positive answers and reactions towards mobile learning in the context of the theory of diffusion of innovations. However, it was observed that mobile learning features had a defining effect on Turkish teacher candidates' ability to embrace and adopt innovations and their positive decisions to use innovations. In this context, in this study, suggestions have been developed to facilitate and develop mobile learning methods, enrich their content and make them more interesting.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teacher candidates
• Education
• Diffusion of innovation
• Mobile learning
• Technology use

Rogers’ın Yeniliğin Yayılması Teorisi Çerçevesinde Türkçe Öğretmen Adaylarının Teknoloji Kullanımına Yönelik Algılarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Teknoloji alanındaki gelişmeler, her alanda olduğu gibi eğitimde hem alanyazında hem de uygulamada yenilikleri beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu bağlamda mobil öğrenme de eğitim alanında hem avantajları hem de dezavantajları ile birlikte hızla yayılmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışma Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının mobil öğrenme alanındaki yeniliklere olan algı, bakış açısı ve tepkilerini öğrenmek amaçlı tasarlanmıştır. Çalışma, Rogers (1995) tarafından geliştirilen yeniliğin yayılması kuramı çerçevesinde, 215 Türkçe öğretmen adayı katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada veriler, Çelik vd. (2014) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan Mobil Öğrenme Benimseme Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmış ve veriler SPSS 25.0 programında analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının %75,4’ünün, yeniliklerin yayılması teorisi bağlamında mobil öğrenmeye yönelik olumlu yönde cevap ve tepkiler geliştiren grubun içinde (yenilikçiler, ilk benimseyenler ve ilk çoğunluk) oldukları saptanmıştır. Bununla birlikte, mobil öğrenme özelliklerinin Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının yenilikleri kucaklayabilme ve benimsemeleri ile yenilikleri kullanmaları adına olumlu yönde karar vermelerinin üzerinde tanımlayıcı bir etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada mobil öğrenme yöntemlerinin kolaylaştırılıp geliştirilmesi, içeriklerinin zenginleştirilmesi ve daha ilgi çekici hâle getirilmesi yönünde öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğretmen adayları
• Eğitim
• Yeniliğin yayılması
• Mobil öğrenme
• Teknoloji kullanımı

Kaynakça

1. Abd-Ali, R. S., Radhi, S. A., & Rasool, Z. I. (2020). A survey: the role of the internet of things in the development of education. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 19(1), 215-221.
2. Al-Absy, M. S. M. (2023). Effects of Covid-19 pandemic on accounting students’ capability to use technology. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(1), 247-267.
3. Asad, M. M., Naz, A., Churi, P., & Tahanzadeh, M. M. (2021). Virtual reality as pedagogical tool to enhance experiential learning: A systematic literature review. Education Research International, 2021, 1-17.
4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Veri analizi el kitabı (16. b.). Pegem.
5. Bruce, B. C. (1997). Critical issues, literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29(2), 289-309.
6. Buchori, A., Prasetyowati, D., & Wijayanto. (2022). Design of virtual lab geometry using virtual to supplement learning in mathematics classes. KnE Social Sciences, 444-453.
7. Carroll, J., Hopper, L., Farrelly, A. M., Lombard-Vance, R., Bamidis, P. D., & Konstantinidis, E. I. (2021). A scoping review of augmented/virtual reality health and wellbeing interventions for older adults: redefining immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality(2), 1-26
8. Chang, H. Y., Binali, T., Liang, J. C., Chiou, G. L., Cheng, K. H., Lee, S. W. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2022). Ten years of augmented reality in education: A meta-analysis of (quasi-) experimental studies to investigate the impact. Computers & Education(191), 104641.

9. Çelik, I., Sahin, I., & Aydin, M. (2014). Reliability and validity study of the mobile learning adoption scale developed based on the diffusion of ınnovations theory. Online Submission, 2(4), 300-316.
10. Challenor, J. & Ma, M. (2019). A review of augmented reality applications for history education and heritage visualisation. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(2), 1-20.
11. Chen, F. Q., Leng, Y. F., Ge, J. F., Wang, D. W., Li, C., Chen, B., & Sun, Z. L. (2020). Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: Meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res, 22(9), e18290.
12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
13. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4. b.). Sage.
14. Donno, M. D., Tange, K., & Dragoni, N. (2019). Foundations and evolution of modern computing paradigms: Cloud, iot, edge, and fog. IEEE Access, 7, 150936-150948. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2947652
15. Dubé, A. K. & Wen, R. (2021). Identification and evaluation of technology trends in K-12 education from 2011 to 2021. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1929-1958.
16. Ecampus. (2023). Bloom’s taxonomy revisited. https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/faculty/artificial-intelligence-tools/blooms-taxonomyrevisited.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
17. Evens, M., Empsen, M., & Hustinx, W. (2023). A literature review on 360-degree video as an educational tool: Towards design guidelines. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(2), 325-375.
18. Ghory, S. & Ghafory, H. (2021). The impact of modern technology in the teaching and learning process. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 4(3), 168-173.
19. Grubert, J., Langlotz, T., Zollmann, S., & Regenbrecht, H. (2017). Towards pervasive augmented reality: context-awareness in augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(6), 1706-1724. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2016.2543720
20. Herault, R. C., Lincke, A., Milrad, M., Forsgärde, E. S., & Elmqvist, C. (2018). Using 360-degrees interactive videos in patient trauma treatment education: Design, development and evaluation aspects. Smart Learning Environments, 5(26).
21. Hill, J. R. & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of source-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52.
22. Hinojo-Lucena, F., Díaz, I. A., Reche, M. D. P. C., & Rodríguez, J. M. R. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact in the scientific literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 1-9.
23. Karakaya, İ. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. A. Tanrıöğen (Ed.), Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri içinde (s. 57-84). Anı.
24. Kassab, M., DeFranco, J., & Laplante, P. (2020). A systematic literature review on internet of things in education: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 115-127.
25. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
26. Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022). Augmented reality and virtual reality in education: Public perspectives, sentiments, attitudes, and discourses. Education Sciences, 12(11), 798.
27. Law, N. (2007). Comparing pedagogical innovations. M. Bray, B. Adamson, & M. Mason (Ed.), Comparative education research: Approaches and methods içinde (s. 315-337). Springer.
28. Lie, S. S., Helle, N., Sletteland, N. V., Vikman, M. D., & Bonsaksen, T. (2022). Implementation of virtual reality in health professional higher education: protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(7), e37222.
29. Light, P. C. (1998). Sustaining innovation. Jossey-Bass.
30. Lu, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2018). Internet of things: A systematic review of the business literature from the user and organisational perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 285-297.
31. Medlin, B. D. (2001). The factors that may influence a faculty member’s decision to adopt electronic technologies in instruction (Doktora Tezi). ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (UMI No. AAT 3095210).
32. Moshinski, V., Позняковська, Н. М., Mikluha, O., & Voitko, M. (2021). Modern education technologies: 21st century trends and challenges. SHS Web of Conferences, 104, 03009.
33. Parisot, A. H. (1995). Technology and teaching: The adoption and diffusion of technological innovations by a community college faculty (Doktora Tezi). ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (UMI No. AAT 9542260).
34. Patton. M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3. b.). Sage.
35. Pelletier, K., Robert, J., Muscanell, N., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ..., & Zimmern, J. (2023). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report. Teaching and Learning Edition.
36. Perez-Marcos, D. (2018). Virtual reality experiences, embodiment, videogames and their dimensions in neurorehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 15(1), 1-8.
37. Porter, B. E. (2005). Time and implementing change. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 1063-1065.
38. Robert, J. & Muscanell, N. (2023). 2023 EDUCAUSE Horizon Action Plan: Generative AI.
39. Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 155-192.
40. Richey, S. B. (2018). Utilizing presence in augmented-reality applications to improve learning outcomes. Performance Improvement, 57(4), 10-18.
41. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4. b.). Free.
42. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5. b.). Free.
43. Salem, A. B. M., Mikhalkina, E. V., & Nikitaeva, A. Y. (2020). Exploration of knowledge engineering paradigms for smart education: Techniques, tools, benefits and challenges. Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 1(9), 1-9.
44. Saran, M., Seferoğlu, G., & Cagiltay, K. (2009). Mobile assisted language learning: English pronunciation at learners’ fingertips. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 34, 97-114.
45. Sherry, L. & Gibson, D. (2002). The path to teacher leadership in educational technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(2), 178-203.
46. Siemens, G., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Gabriel, F., Medeiros, K., Marrone, R., Joksimovic, S., & de Laat, M. (2022). Human and artificial cognition. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100107.
47. Solak, E. & Erdem, G. (2015). A content analysis of virtual reality studies in foreign language education. Participatory Educational Research, 15(2), 21-26.
48. Şahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 14-23.
49. Timuçin, M. (2009). Diffusion of technological innovation in a foreign languages unit in Turkey: A focus on risk‐ aversive teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(1), 75-86.
50. Tonbuloğlu, İ. (2023). Eğitim teknolojilerinde güncel uygulamaların incelenmesi. Alanyazın, 4(2), 173-186.
51. Tuma, F. (2021). The use of educational technology for interactive teaching in lectures. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 62, 231-235.
52. Verma, A., Singh, A., Anand, D., Aljahdali, H. M., Alsubhi, K., & Khan, B. (2021). Iot inspired intelligent monitoring and reporting framework for education 4.0. IEEE Access, 9, 131286- 131305. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3114286
53. Woodel, J. & Garafoli, E. (2002). Diffusion of innovation theory meets faculty development. Syllabus, 16(6), 15-17.
54. Yin, Z. & Tsai, S. B. (2021). Research on virtual reality interactive teaching under the environment of big data. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 1-11.
55. Zhang, X., Cao, Z., & Wei, D. (2020). Overview of edge computing in the agricultural internet of things: key technologies, applications, challenges. IEEE Access, 8, 141748-141761. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3013005