Uygulamalı Derslerde Ters Yüz Sınıf Modeline Bütüncül Bakış: Akademik Başarı, Öz-Düzenleme ve Öz-Yeterlik Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırma, ters yüz sınıf uygulamasının üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik başarıları, akademik öz-yeterlik algıları ve çevrim içi öz-düzenleme becerilerindeki değişim üzerindeki rolünü incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, bir üniversitenin Bilgisayar Programcılığı bölümünde öğrenim gören 43 öğrenci ile yürütülmüş ve deneysel araştırma yöntemlerinden tek grup ön test-son test deseni kullanılmıştır. Dört haftalık uygulama sürecinde öğrenciler ders içeriklerini ders öncesinde çevrim içi ortamda incelemiş, ders saatlerinde ise bilgisayar laboratuvarında uygulamalı etkinliklere katılmışlardır. Bulgular, ters yüz sınıf uygulaması sonrasında öğrencilerin akademik başarılarında ve çevrim içi öz-düzenleme becerilerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı artışlar olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna karşılık akademik öz-yeterlik algısında gözlenen artış istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, dört haftalık ters yüz sınıf uygulamasının öğrencilerin öğrenme süreçlerini planlama, izleme ve düzenleme gibi öz-düzenleme becerilerini desteklediğini ve bu gelişimin akademik başarıya olumlu yansıyabildiğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte akademik öz-yeterlik gibi görece daha kalıcı duyuşsal yapıların anlamlı biçimde değişebilmesi için daha uzun süreli ve sistematik uygulamalara ihtiyaç duyulabileceği düşünülmektedir. Sonuç olarak çalışma ters yüz sınıf modelinin özellikle uygulamalı ve teknoloji temelli derslerde öğrencilerin bilişsel ve öz-düzenleyici öğrenme çıktılarının desteklenmesinde işlevsel bir öğretim yaklaşımı olarak değerlendirilebileceğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ters yüz sınıf
• Çevrim içi öz-düzenleme
• Akademik öz-yeterlik
• Akademik başarı

A Holistic View of the Flipped Classroom Model in Applied Courses: Examining the Effects on Academic Achievement, Self-Regulation and Self-Efficacy

Öz

This study aims to examine the role of the flipped classroom approach in changes in university students’ academic achievement, academic self-efficacy perceptions, and online self-regulation skills. The study was conducted with 43 students enrolled in the Computer Programming Department of a university and employed a single-group pretest–posttest design, one of the experimental research methods. During the four-week implementation period, students examined course content online prior to class and participated in applied activities in the computer laboratory during class sessions. The findings indicated that, following the flipped classroom implementation, there were statistically significant increases in students’ academic achievement and online self-regulation skills. In contrast, the increase observed in academic self-efficacy perceptions was not statistically significant. The results suggest that a four-week flipped classroom implementation supports students’ self-regulation skills, such as planning, monitoring, and regulating their learning processes, and that this development may positively reflect on academic achievement. However, it is considered that more stable affective constructs, such as academic self-efficacy, may require longer-term and more systematic implementations to demonstrate meaningful change. In conclusion, the study indicates that the flipped classroom model can be considered a functional instructional approach in supporting students’ cognitive and self-regulatory learning outcomes, particularly in applied and technology-based courses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Flipped classroom
• Online self-regulation
• Academic self-efficacy
• Academic achievement

Kaynakça

1. Abeysekera, L. & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
2. Akçayır, G. & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
3. Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2020). Investigating self-regulated learning and academic achievement in an eLearning environment: The case of K-12 flipped classroom. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1835145. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1835145
4. Algarni, B. (2025). Impact of flipped learning on student self-efficacy across age groups and subject domains: A systematic review of 44 studies (2015–2024). Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 24, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.28945/5442
5. Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7. b.). Prentice.
6. Arpaci, I. & Basol, G. (2020). The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3503–3514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10104-8
7. Bishop, J. L. & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition içinde (s. 23–1200). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (25. b.). Pegem Akademi.

9. Cabi, E. (2018). The impact of the flipped classroom model on students’ academic achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3482
10. Cera, R., Mancini, M., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Relationships between metacognition, self-efficacy and self-regulation in learning. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 4(7), 115-141. https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2013-007-CERA.
11. Chen, K. S., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y. H., Jenq, C. C., Chang, Y. J., Chang, Y. C., & Chai, P. Y. C. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: A meta‐analysis. Medical Education, 52(9), 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13616
12. Chu, T. L., Wang, J., Monrouxe, L., Sung, Y. C., Kuo, C. L., Ho, L. H., & Lin, Y. E. (2019). The effects of the flipped classroom in teaching evidence based nursing: A quasi-experimental study. PloS one, 14(1), e0210606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210606
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. b.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Cole, J. E. & Kritzer, J. B. (2009). Strategies for success: Teaching an online course. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050902800406
15. Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
16. Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17. Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Adolesanlarda benlik saygısı. (Uzmanlık Tezi). https://katalog.hacettepe.edu.tr/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:%24002f%24002fSD_ILS%24002f0%24002fSD_ILS:65031/one?qu=Benlik&qf=AUTHOR%09Author%09%C3%87uhadaro%C4%9Flu%2C+F%C3%BCsun.%09%C3%87uhadaro%C4%9Flu%2C+F%C3%BCsun.&ic=true sayfasından erişilmiştir.
18. Ebel, R. L. & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5. b.). Prentice Hall.
19. Gravetter, J. F. & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (4. b.). Linda Schreiber-Ganster.
20. Gueroni, L. P. B., Pompeo, D. A., Eid, L. P., Ferreira Júnior, M. A., Sequeira, C. A. D. C., & Lourenção, L. G. (2024). Interventions for strengthening general self-efficacy beliefs in college students: An integrative review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 77, e20230192. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0192
21. Han, L., Hu, G., Chen, Z., & Liu, M. (2025). Integrating self-regulated cognitive strategies in preclass learning of mathematics flipped classroom: Effects on students’ self-efficacy and anxiety. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01073-1.
22. Hew, K. F. & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38-38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
23. Holcomb, Z. (2016). Fundamentals of descriptive statistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266510
24. Honicke, T. & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84.
25. Jerusalem, M. & Schwarzer, R. (1981). Fragebogen zur Erfassung von "Selbstwirksamkeit. Skalen zur Befindlichkeit und Persoenlichkeit In R. Schwarzer (Hrsg.). (Forschungsbericht No. 5). Freie Universitaet, Institut fuer Psychologie
26. Joo, Y.-J., Bong, M., & Choi, H.-J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313398
27. Karagöl, İ. & Esen, E. (2019). Ters-yüz edilmiş öğrenme yaklaşımının akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(3), 708-727.
28. Karimi, A. & Manteufel, R. D. (2024). Engage to retain: Active learning at the conclusion of traditional lectures. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference. American Society for Engineering Education.
29. Kilis, S. & Yıldırım, Z. (2018). Online self-regulation questionnaire: Validity and reliability study of Turkish translation. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(1), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.298791
30. Lai, C.-L. & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
31. Lan, W. Y., Bremer, R., Stevens, T., & Mullen, G. (2004). Self-regulated learning in the online environment. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association içinde (s. 7–8). San Diego.
32. Lejia, L. I. U., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024). Design principles for supporting self-regulated learning in flipped classrooms: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102319
33. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(3), 356-362.
34. Lo, C. K. & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
35. McLean, S., Attardi, S. M., Faden, L., & Goldszmidt, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms and student learning: Not just surface gains. Advances in Physiology Education, 40, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00098.2015
36. Nacaroğlu, O. & Bektaş, O. (2023). The effect of the flipped classroom model on gifted students’ self-regulation skills and academic achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101244
37. Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3. b.). McGraw-Hill.
38. O’Flaherty, J. & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
39. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image (c. 11). Princeton University.
40. Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Self-regulation and learning. W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (2. b.) içinde (s. 59–78). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207003
41. Silverajah, V. G., Wong, S. L., Govindaraj, A., Khambari, M. N. M., Rahmat, R. W. B. O., & Deni, A. R. M. (2022). A systematic review of self-regulated learning in flipped classrooms: Key findings, measurement methods, and potential directions. IEEE Access, 10, 20270-20294. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3143857
42. Sparks, R. J. (2013). Flipping the classroom: An empirical study examining student learning. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 65-70.
43. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
44. Sun, Y. L., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., & Li, J. (2023). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2287886
45. Talan, T. & Gülseçen, S. (2018). Ters-yüz sınıf ve harmanlanmış öğrenmede öğrencilerin öz-düzenleme becerilerinin ve öz-yeterlik algılarının incelenmesi. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(3), 563-580.
46. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel.
47. Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
48. Tsai, M.-J. & Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800032000038822
49. Van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 158, 104000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000
50. Yavuz, M. & Karaman, S. (2021). Ters yüz sınıf modelinin ortaöğretim düzeyindeki öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve deneyimlerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(4), 1127–1144. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2021.-918498.
51. Yılmaz, M., Gürçay, D., & Ekici, G. (2007). Akademik özyeterlik ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(33), 253-259.
52. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.