Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilere Fen Bilimleri Öğretiminde Kullanılan Müdahaleler: Tek-Denekli Araştırmaların Sistematik Derlemesi

Öz

Fen bilimleri eğitiminin gerekliliklerini karşılamak öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrenciler için ciddi bir zorluktur. Dolayısıyla bu gruptaki öğrencilere fen bilimleri öğretimini destekleyecek deneysel kalitesi güçlü müdahalelerin belirlenmesi önemli görülmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı; öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilere fen bilimleri öğretiminde kullanılan müdahalelerden tek denekli deneysel desenlerle desenlenmiş 2010-2024 yılları arasında yürütülen çalışmaları, deneysel kaliteleri ve betimsel özellikleri açısından incelemektir. Sistematik derleme olarak gerçekleştirilen bu araştırmada dâhil etme kriterlerini karşılayan 20 çalışmaya ulaşılmıştır. Bulgulara göre; çoğunlukla ortaokul düzeyindeki katılımcılara yer verildiği, teknoloji destekli uygulamaların sıklıkla kullanıldığı, öğretimde ağırlıklı olarak canlılar ve yaşam konusunun ele alındığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırmaların güvenirlik katsayılarının yüksek olduğu ve genelleme verisinin sınırlı sayıdaki çalışmada toplandığı görülmektedir. Çalışmaların etkililik bulguları müdahalelerin tamamının hedef davranışların öğretiminde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Araştırmaların çoğunluğu What Works Clearinghouse (2020) standartlarını istenen düzeyde karşılayamamıştır. Bulgular alan yazını doğrultusunda tartışılmış gelecekte planlanacak araştırmalara ilişkin önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğrenme güçlüğü
• Fen öğretimi
• Tek-denekli deneysel desen
• Desen standartları

Interventions Used in Science Education for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review of Single-Case Research

Öz

Meeting the requirements of science education poses a substantial challenge for students with learning disabilities. Accordingly, identifying evidence-based interventions with strong experimental quality to support their science learning is important. This study aims to examine, in terms of experimental quality and descriptive characteristics, studies on science education interventions for students with learning disabilities that employed single-case experimental designs and were conducted between 2010 and 2024. Implemented as a systematic review, the study identified 20 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that participants were predominantly at the middle-school level, technology-supported applications were frequently utilized; and instruction most often focused on the “life and living organisms” domain. Reliability coefficients were generally high, whereas generalization measures were collected in a limited number of studies. Effectiveness results showed that all interventions were effective in teaching target behaviors. The majority of the studies did not meet the What Works Clearinghouse (2020) standards without reservations. The results are discussed in light of the literature, and recommendations are offered for future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Learning disabilities
• Science teaching
• Single-case ecperimental design
• Design standarts

Kaynakça

1. Apanasionok, M. M., Hastings, R. P., Grindle, C. F., Watkins, R. C., & Paris, A. (2019). Teaching science skills and knowledge to students with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 847-880. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21531
2. Araci, N., Melekoglu, M. A., & Çetin, M. E. (2023). Impact of a mnemonic strategy on learning science concepts for middle school students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 21(1), 69-85. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1386167.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
3. Aydeniz, M., Cihak, D. F., Graham, S. C., & Retinger, L. (2012). Using inquiry-based instruction for teaching science to students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 189-206. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982873.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
4. Benedek-Wood, E., Mason, L. H., Wood, P. H., Hoffman, K. E., & McGuire, A. (2014). An experimental examination of quick writing in the middle school science classroom. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(1), 69-92. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1039825.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
5. Boyle, J. R. (2011). Strategic note-taking for inclusive middle school science classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 34(2), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410862
6. Boyle, J. R. (2025). Argumentative writing for students with disabilities in inclusive science classes: A pilot study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 41(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2024.2389776
7. Brigham, B. J., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2011). Science education and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00343.x
8. Bulgren, J. A., Ellis, J. D., & Marquis, J. G. (2014). The use and effectiveness of an argumentation and evaluation intervention in science classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9452-x

9. Ciullo, S., Falcomata, T. S., Pfannenstiel, K., & Billingsley, G. (2014). Improving learning with science and social studies text using computer-based concept maps for students with disabilities. Behavior Modification, 39(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514552890
10. Clemons, L. L., Mason, B. A., Garrison-Kane, L., & Wills, H. P. (2015). Self-monitoring for high school students with disabilities: A cross-categorical ınvestigation of I-Connect. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715596134
11. Comarú, M. W., Lopes, R. M., Braga, L. A. M., Batista-Mota, F., & Galvão, C. (2021). A bibliometric and descriptive analysis of inclusive education in science education. Studies in Science Education, 57(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897930
12. Cook, B. G., Collins, L. W., Cook, S. C., & Cook, L. (2020). Evidence–based reviews: How evidence–based practices are systematically identified. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12213
13. Çoruhlu, T. S. & Pehlevan, M. (2021). The effectiveness of the science experimental guidebook on the conceptual understanding of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 230-243. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i3
14. De La Paz, S. (1999). Self-regulated strategy ınstruction in regular education settings: ımproving outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(2), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1402_3
15. Denizli-Gülboy, H. & Melekoğlu, M. (2022). Özel gereksinimli öğrencilere fen bilimleri öğretiminde yanlışsız öğretim yöntemlerinin kullanımı: Sistematik derleme. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 23(2), 481-506. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.833253
16. Denyer, D. & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Ed.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods içinde (s. 671–689). Sage.
17. Dexter, D. D. & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871103400104
18. Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400030301
19. Gülboy, E. & Rakap, S. (2023). Özel gereksinimleri olan öğrencilere okuma becerilerinin öğretimi konulu lisansüstü tezlerin sistematik derlemesi. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 37(1), 88-117. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2023371475
20. Helman, A. L., Calhoon, M. B., & Kern, L. (2015). Improving science vocabulary of high school English language learners with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714539769
21. Helman, A., Dennis, M. S., & Kern, L. (2022). Clues: Using generative strategies to improve the science vocabulary of secondary english learners with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720929005
22. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
23. House, A. W., House, B. G., & Campbell, M. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formula and distribution effect. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321350
24. Kaldenberg, E. R., Watt, S. J., & Therrien, W. J. (2015). Reading instruction in science for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(3), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714550204
25. Karabulut, H. A., Uçar, A. S., & Uçar, K. (2021). Türkiye’de özel gereksinimli öğrencilerle fen bilimleri öğretimine ilişkin yapılan araştırmaların gözden geçirilmesi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 62-85. http://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.895279
26. Karaer, G. & Melekoğlu, M. A. (2020). Özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilere fen bilimleri öğretimi üzerine yapılan çalışmaların incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 21(4), 789-818. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.532903
27. Karaer, G., Melekoglu, M. A., & Hand, B. (2024). Examining the use of embedded generative strategies with graphic organizers to improve science achievement of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 27(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.16.0002
28. Kester, J. L. & Bross, L. A. (2024). Adding to the evidence base: Effects of i-connect in a secondary special education rural classroom. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 390-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241236714
29. Kim, W. & Linan-Thompson, S. (2013). The effects of self-regulation on science vocabulary acquisition of English language learners with learning difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 34(4), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513476956
30. Knight, V. F., Wood, L., McKissick, B. R., & Kuntz, E. M. (2019). Teaching science content and practices to students with intellectual disability and autism. Remedial and Special Education, 41(6), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519843998
31. Lee-Swanson, H. & Sachse-Lee, C. (2000). A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(2), 114-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300201
32. Lee, Y. & De La Paz, S. (2021). Science writing intervention research for students with and at risk for learning disabilities, and english learners: A systematic review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487211018213
33. Maggin, D. M., Cook, B. G., & Cook, L. (2018). Using single–case research designs to examine the effects of interventions in special education. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(4), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12184
34. Marino, M. T., Gotch, C. M., Israel, M., Vasquez, E., Basham, J. D., & Becht, K. (2014). UDL in the middle school science classroom: Can video games and alternative text heighten engagement and learning for students with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713503963
35. Mason, L. H. & Hedin, L. R. (2011). Reading science text: Challenges for students with learning disabilities and considerations for teachers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00342.x Mastropieri, M. A. & Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Science for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62(4), 377-411. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062004377
36. McGrath, A. L. & Hughes, M. T. (2018). Students with learning disabilities in inquiry-based science classrooms: A cross-case analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(3), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717736007
37. Mikropoulos, T. A. & Iatraki, G. (2023) Digital technology supports science education for students with disabilities: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 3911–3935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11317-9
38. Özbek, A. B. & Ergül, C. (2021). Effectiveness of comprehension strategies mobile app (COSMA) on reading comprehension performances of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(2), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211013540
39. Polat, E., Cagiltay, K., Aykut, C., & Karasu, N. (2019). Evaluation of a tangible mobile application for students with specific learning disabilities. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1613437
40. Rakap, S., Denizli-Gülboy, H. & Gülboy, E. (2023). Özel gereksinimli öğrencilere fen bilimleri öğretimi: Gri literatürün sistematik derlemesi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 6(1), 242-264. https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.1241580
41. Scruggs T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Boon, R. (1998). Science education for students with disabilities: A review of recent research. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560126
42. Scruggs, T. E. & Mastropieri, M. A. (1993). Current approaches to science education: Implications for mainstream instruction of students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259301400104
43. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Berkeley, S., & Graetz, J. E. (2009). Do special education interventions improve learning of secondary content? A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327465
44. Slemrod, T., Howorth, S., Wood, L., Lemmi, C., Hart, S., Cheney, D., & West, E. (2022). A comparison of science vocabulary acquisition using keyword mnemonics via technology and flash cards. Journal of Special Education Technology, 38(3), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434221100729
45. Snodgrass, M. R., Chung, M. Y., Meadan, H., & Halle, J. W. (2018). Social validity in single-case research: A systematic literature review of prevalence and application. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 74, 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.01.007
46. Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D., Jimenez, B., & DiBiase, W. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practice in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(2), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.62
47. Starling, A., Lo, Y. Y. & Rivera, C. J. (2015). Improving science scores of middle school students with learning disabilities through engineering problem solving activities. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 10(2), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.266
48. Steele, M. M. (2008). Helping students with learning disabilities succeed. The Science Teacher 75(3), 38-42. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ787509
49. Swanson, H. L. & Siegel, L. (2011). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Experimental Psychology, 49(1), 5-28. https://research.ebsco.com/c/orz54z/viewer/html/hzijgizhnr sayfasından erişilmiştir.
50. Taylor, J. C., Tseng, C. M., Murillo, A., Therrien, W., & Hand, B. (2018). Using argument-based science inquiry to improve science achievement for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 21(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.10.0001
51. Tekin-İftar, E. (2012). Tek denekli araştırmalar ve temel kavramlar. E. Tekin-İftar (Ed.), Eğitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek denekli araştırmalar içinde (s. 15-39). Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
52. Therrien, W. J., Benson, S. K., Hughes, C. A., & Morris, J. R. (2017). Explicit instruction and next generation science standards aligned classrooms: A fit or a split? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12137
53. Therrien, W. J., Taylor, J. C., Hosp, J. L., Kaldenberg, E. R., & Gorsh, J. (2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta–analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 188-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00340.x
54. Thornton, A., McKissick, B. R., Spooner, F., Lo, Y., & Anderson, A. L. (2015). Effects of collaborative preteaching on science performance of high school students with specific learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(3), 277-304. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0027
55. Tosun, C. (2021). Bibliometric and content analyses of articles related to science education for special education students. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(1), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2021.2016659
56. Turan, Z. & Atila, G. (2021). Augmented reality technology in science education for students with specific learning difficulties: Its effect on students’ learning and views. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(4), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1901682
57. Türker-Yıldırım, Ç. (2022). Zihin yetersizliği olan öğrencilere fen öğretimine ilişkin Türkiye’de yapılan çalışmaların incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 23(3), 721-750. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.843449
58. VanUitert, V. J., Millirons, E., Coleman, O. F., & Kennedy, M. J. (2024). Learning by talking: Using multimedia to enhance science explanation development of neurodivergent students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241257228
59. Wills, H. T. & Mason, B. A. (2014). Implementation of a self-monitoring application to improve on-task behavior: A high-school pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(4), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9204-x
60. WWC. (2020). Standards handbook (version 4.1). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/WWC-Standards-Handbook-v4-1-508.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
61. Yaman, H. (2023). A thematic review of studies on specific learning disabilities in science education. Participatory Educational Research, 10(2), 124-141. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.32.10.2
62. Yenioglu, B. Y., Yenioglu, S., Sayar, K., & Ergulec, F. (2023). Using augmented reality based intervention to teach science to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231184829
63. Yenioğlu, S. & Güner-Yıldız, N. (2022). Özel gereksinimli öğrencilere fen öğretimi: Tablet bilgisayarla sunulan fen deneylerinin etkililiği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 23(4), 811-829. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.905523