A Study on the Adaptation of The Anatomy Curriculum in Medical Faculties to the National Core Curriculum-2014: Anatomy-CEP Version I
Öz
Methods: The planning of the study was based on the "systematic anatomy education approach", which is commonly used in anatomy education. The prepared report was named as Anatomi-ÇEP 1st version, and a work plan was made to keep the new versions up-to-date through this report. Workshops were held with the participation of the faculty members of the anatomy department in the creation of the adaptation lists. Consensus questionnaires participated by faculty members who teach anatomy were used in the acceptance of the adaptation lists.
Results: Two workshops were held in the process. In these workshops, the relationships between anatomy subjects and "Core Diseases and Clinical Problems" in "Undergraduate Medical Education National Core Education Program- 2014" were determined. Since the "Core Diseases and Clinical Problems" list was in alphabetical order, the lists were re-created in a systematic order according to the anatomy course contents. The lists were presented to the opinions of faculty members working in the Anatomy Departments twice and a consensus decision was made. In "Anatomy-ÇEP 1st Edition", basic diseases in "UÇEP2014" have been adapted to the basic topics in anatomy education, but they have not been associated with symptoms and conditions and basic medical practices.
Conclusions: With this article, it was aimed to share what was done in "Anatomy-ÇEP 1st Edition" with academicians, and to provide data for studies to be carried out to adapt the changes brought by "UÇEP-2020" to "Anatomy-ÇEP" with the feedback to be received.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Sindel M, Şenol Y, Gürpınar E. Akdeniz üniversitesi tip fakültesinde anatomi eğitiminin öğrenciler tarafindan değerlendirilmesi. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2008; 28:31-36.
- Özcan E , Vatansever A . Balıkesir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dönem-II Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Eğitimini Değerlendirmeleri . Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018; 5(4):164-168. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cbusbed/issue/41981/455239
- Adıgüzel Şahin Z, Benli G, Demirci MS, Kahraman Yıldırım FG. Bir Anket Çalışması: İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi’nde Topografik Anatomi Uygulama Derslerinin ve Sınavının Değerlendirilmesi. Anatomy. 2018;8(1): 106-110. doi:10.2399/ana.18.054
- Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):104-107. doi:10.1308/003588407X168244
- Sbayeh A, Qaedi Choo MA, Quane KA, et al. Relevance of anatomy to medical education and clinical practice: perspectives of medical students, clinicians, and educators. Perspect Med Educ. 2016; 5:338–346 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0310-4
- Trautman J, McAndrew D, Craig SJ. Anatomy teaching stuck in time? A 10-year follow-up of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. Australian Journal of Education. 2019;63(3):340-350. doi:10.1177/0004944119878263
- Smith C, Finn GM, Stewart J, McHanwell S. Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine: the Delphi process. Journal of Anatomy. 2016;228:2-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12402
- Sager KL, Gastil J. The Origins and Consequences of Consensus Decision Making: A Test of the Social Consensus Model. Southern Communication Journal. 2006;71:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940500503464.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Esat Adıgüzel
*
0000-0002-1110-5786
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Aralık 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi
6 Nisan 2021
Kabul Tarihi
29 Haziran 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2021 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 62