Trafik Yönetim Stratejileri: FSM Köprüsü Bakım Çalışmaları Örneği

Öz

Artan trafik sıkışıklığı dünya çapında büyük şehirlerde kaçınılmaz bir durumdur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Fatih Sultan Mehmet (FSM) Köprüsü´nün 2012 yılındaki bakım çalışmaları sırasında uygulanan trafik yönetim stratejilerini değerlendirmektir. Bu amaçla, çalışma bölgesindeki trafik değişkenleri ve zirve saatleri, ücret politikasının ve gişe sayısının trafiğe etkisi, araç sınıfları, alternatif yollardaki trafik ve kaza sayılarındaki değişimler çözümlenmiştir. Bulunan sonuçlara göre; bakım çalışmalarıyla araçların ortalama hızı %40 azalırken, önlemlerin alınmasıyla birlikte %58 artış göstermiştir. Bakım çalışmalarının ilk zamanlarında hızlar günde 14 saat 20 km/sa’nın altında devam ederken, alınan önlemlerden sonra sadece 2 saat 20 km/sa’nın altında ilerlemiştir. Gişe ve FSM köprüsünde oluşan kaza sayısı da alınan önlemlerle bakım çalışmalarından sonra %80’e varan oranda azalmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çalışma alanları, trafik yönetim stratejileri, trafik detektörleri, trafik akış çözümlemesi

-

Öz

Evaluation of Traffic Management Strategies Implemented During the FSM Bridge Maintenance management strategies. After the construction with the implemented measures, the number of accidents at toll booths and on the FSM Bridge is decreased by nearly 80%

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Work zones, traffic management strategies, traffic detectors, traffic flow analysis

Kaynakça

1. TÜİK, Taşıt Türleri ve Motorlu Kara Taşıtları Sayısı, Ulaşım İstatistikleri, Ankara, İstanbul, 2012.
2. Ergün G., Şahin, N., Development of Traffic Congestion Management Strategies: Strategic Plan Studies, İstanbul, 2006.
3. ACEA, Basic Survey on Congestion in Europe, European Automobile Manufacturers Association, Brussels, 2004.
4. Aydın, Ö.F., Evaluation of Work Zone Management Strategies: FSM Bridge Case Study, Master Thesis, Boğaziçi University, 2013.
5. Leung H., El Faouzi N.E., Kurian A., “Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)”, Information Fusion, 01/2011; 12:2-3, 2011.
6. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Work Zone Mobility and Safety Program”, Washington, D.C., USA, 2011.
7. Martinelli, D.R., Xu, D., “Delay Estimation and Optimal Length for Four-Lane Divided Freeway Work Zones”, Journal of Transportation Engineering 122(2), 114- 122, 2006.
8. Jiang, Y., “Traffic Capacity, Speed and Queue Discharge Rate of Indiana’s Four-Lane Freeway Work Zones”, Transportation Research Record, Journal of Transportation Research Board 1657, 10-17, 1999.

9. Sconfeld, P.,Chien, S., “Optimal Work Zone Lengths for Two-Lane Highways”, Journal of Transportation Engineering 125(1), 21-29, 1999.
10. Chitturi, M., Benekohal, R., Kaja-Mohideen, A.Z., “Methodology for Computing Delay and User Costs in Work Zones”, Transportation Research Record, Journal of Transportation Research Board 2055, 31-38, 2008.
11. Adeli, H., Jiang, X., “Neuro-Fuzzy Logic Model for Freeway Work Zone Capacity Estimation”, Journal of Transportation Engineers, ASCE, 2003.
12. Jiang, X., Adeli, H., “Object-Oriented Model for Freeway Work Zone Capacity and Queue Delay Estimation”, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 19, 144-156, 2004.
13. Karim, A., Adeli, H., “CBR Model for Freeway Work Zone Traffic Management”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 134-145, 2003.
14. Vidya R., Santhakumar S.M., Mathew S., “Impact of Work Zones on Speed Variation During Widening of the Highway – A Case Study”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), India, 2012.
15. Carr, R.I., “Construction Congestion Cost – CO3 User Manual.”,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, 1998.
16. Edara P.K., Cottrell B. H. Jr., “Estimation of Traffic Mobility Impacts at Work Zones: State of the Practice.”, TRB 2007 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Virginia, 2006.
17. Jackson, J., “Dynamic Work Zone Management”, Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE Journal, May 2010, 80, 5, pg. 26-33, 2010.
18. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Benefits of Using Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones – A Summary Report”, Report No. FHWA- HOP-08-021, Washington, D.C., USA, 2008.
19. Research and InnovativeTechnology Administration (RITA), “Deployment Statistics – Freeway Management”, Washington, D.C. , USA, 2012.
20. Klein, L.A., “Data Requirements and Sensor Technologies for ITS”, Norwood, MA, Artech House, 2001.
21. Hollborn, S., “Intelligent Transport System in Japan”, Technische Universtat Darmstadt, July 2002, Germany, 2002.
22. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management”, Report No FHWA-PL-07-012, Washington, D.C., USA, 2007.
23. Egnetia, “Driving on the Egnetia Motorway, Traffic Data”, Egnatia Odos A.E., Greece, 2012.
24. Sparmann, J., “Freeway Operation in Germany: Experiences in Hessen”, Presentation to First International Symposium on Freeway and Tollway Operations, Athens, Greece, 2006.
25. Helleman, B., “Hard Shoulder Running (HSR) in the Netherlands” Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, AVV Transport Research Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Presentation to PCM Scan Team, 2006.
26. England Highway Agency, “Active Traffic Management (ATM) Project M42 Junctions 3A-7”, Highway Agency, England, 2012.
27. Sen, R., Raman, B., “Intelligent Transportation Systems for Indian Cities”, Indian Institute for Technology, Bombay, India, 2012.
28. Trafik Kontrol Merkezi, İstanbul, 2012.
29. Trafik Yönetim Merkezi, Karayolları 1. Bölge Müdürlüğü Fatih Sultan Mehmet Köprüsü Bakım İşletme Başmühendisliği, İstanbul, 2012.
30. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Traffic Detector Handbook” Third edition Volume 1, Publication No.FHWA-HRT-06-108, Washington, D.C., USA, 2006.
31. Downs A., “Traffic: Why It’s Getting Worse, What Government Can Do”, Brookings Institution Policy Brief, January 2004, pp.1-8, 2004.
32. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Comparative Analysis Report: The Benefits of Using Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones”, Report Number FHWA-HOP-09-002, Washington, D.C., USA, 2008.