Acceleration Displacement Response Spectra for Design of Seismic Isolation Systems in Turkey

Öz

In this study, base shear and inelastic displacement limits of seismic isolation systems are presented through acceleration-displacement response spectra considering the ground motion and design provisions of the Turkish Building Seismic Design Code. A series of nonlinear response history analyses are performed using a combination of eight site-specific design spectra, six isolation systems having six different periods and five yield levels. As a result, eight spectra presented herein can be used for the preliminary design stage of seismic isolation systems in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Seismic isolation
• Non-linear response history analysis
• Acceleration-displacement response spectrum

Kaynakça

1. TASI, Turkish Association for Seismic Isolation. https://did.org.tr/, 2018.
2. TBSDC-2018, Turkish Building Seismic Design Code, Disaster and Emergency Management Authority, Ankara, 2018.
3. IBC 2015, International Building Code, International Code Council (ISBN: 978-1-60983-468-5), 2015.
4. Anderson, E., and Mahin S. A., Displacement-based design of seismically isolated bridges, Proc. of the Sixth U.S. National Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California, 1998.
5. Dicleli, M., Buddaram S., Comprehensive evaluation of equivalent linear analysis method for seismic-isolated structures represented by SDOF systems, Engineering Structures, Vol.29, 1653-1663, 2007.
6. Park, J., and Otsuka, H., Optimal Yield Level of Bilinear Seismic Isolation Devices, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28:941-955, 1999.
7. Tena-Colugna A., A new method for the seismic design of structures with bilinear isolators using inelastic spectra, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.
8. Ryan, K. L., and Chopra A. K., Estimation of Seismic Demands on Isolators Based on Nonlinear Analysis, Journal of Structural Engineering,130 (3):392-402, ASCE, 2004.

9. Whittaker, D., Jones, L., Design spectra for seismic isolation systems in Christchurch, New Zealand, NZSEE Conference, New Zealand, 2013.
10. Whittaker, D., Jones, L., Displacement and acceleration design spectra for seismic isolation systems in Christchurch, New Zealand, NZSEE Conference, New Zealand, 2014.
11. Jones, L., Aiken, I., Black, C., Whittaker, D., Design displacement and acceleration spectra for seismic isolation systems: New Zealand, San Francisco and Vancouver, 14th World Conference on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation and Active Vibration Control of Structures, San Diego, CA USA, 2015.
12. Jones, L., Aiken, I., Black, C., Whittaker, D., Ratemales, R., Boroschek, R., An improved design methodology for seismic isolation systems using nonlinear response spectra, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, 2017.
13. ASCE 7-10. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, 2010.
14. Jones, L., Aiken, I., Black, C., Whittaker, D., Şadan, B., Nonlinear response spectra for isolation system design: case studies in Turkey, California and New Zealand, 3 TDMSK, Izmir, Turkey, 2015.
15. NGA-West 2 Database (NGA-West2, 2015). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley, USA(http://peer.berkeley.edu/ngawest2/).
16. Naeim, F., and Kelly J. M., Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1999.
17. Erdik. M., Ülker, Ö., Şadan, B., Tüzün, C., Seismic isolation code developments and significant applications in Turkey, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 115, 413-437, 2018.
18. Eurocode 8, Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, ENV-2003, CEN, Brussels, 2003.
19. Akkar, S., Azak T., Çan T., Çeken U., Demircioğlu Tümsa M. B., Duman, T. Y., Erdik, M., Ergintay, S., Kadirioğlu, F. T., Kalafat, D., Kale, Ö., Kartal R. F., Kekovalı K., Kılıç T. S., Zülfikar Ö., Evolution of seismic hazard maps in Turkey, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol.16, Issue 8, pp 3567-3570, 2018.
20. New Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map of Turkey (TDTH, 2016) (https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/ ).
21. Luco, N., and Bazzurro P. Does amplitude scaling of ground motion records result in biased nonlinear structural drift responses?, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; 36 Issue13: 1813–35., 2007.
22. Prism for Earthquake Engineering Software 2.0.1 (PRISM) 2018, Earthquake Engineering Research Group, Departement of Architectural Engineering, INHA University, Incheon, South Korea, 2018.
23. Erdik M., Binalarda deprem yalıtımı ve ülkemizdeki uygulamalar, 6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, 16-20 October 2007.
24. Zekioglu, A., Darama, H., Erkuş, B. Performance-based seismic design of a large seismically isolated structure:Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen International Airport Terminal Building., Proc. of the SEAOC 2009 Convention, San Diego, California, September 23-26, 2009.
25. Sucuoğlu, H., Kubin, J., Kubin, D., Özmen, A., Şadan, B., Eroğlu, E., Seismic retrofit of an existing multi-block hospital by seismic isolators, 15WCEE Lisboa, Portugal, 2012.
26. Sartori, M., Maraston, S., Zivanovic, I., Seismic retrofitting of the Marmara Başibüyük University Hospital in Istanbul, 16WCEE, Santiago Chile, 9-13 January 2017.