AKADEMİK BAŞARI İLE PSİKOSOSYAL FAKTÖRLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ: PISA 2018 ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Akademik başarıyı etkileyen faktörler uzun yıllardır incelenmektedir. Araştırmalar, akademik başarının bilişsel özelliklerin yanı sıra psikolojik ve sosyal faktörlere de bağlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Akademik başarı aynı zamanda çeşitli uluslararası ölçümlere de konu olmaktadır ve dünyanın çok sayıda ülkesinde yaşayan, 15 yaş grubu öğrencilerin değerlendirildiği Uluslararası Öğrenci Değerlendirme Programı (PISA) akademik başarıyı etkileyen psikososyal faktörlere ilişkin zengin bulgular sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, PISA 2018’e Türkiye’den katılan öğrencilerin 13 psikososyal faktördeki durumları incelenmiş ve bu faktörlerin akademik başarıya etkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Öncelikle bağımsız değişkenler ve başarı gruplarına dair betimleyici istatistikler sunulmuş, ardından farklılıkların anlamlılığı ve açıklayıcı ilişkiler analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan regresyon analizine göre, seçilen psikososyal faktörlerden hayatın anlamı, başarısızlık korkusu ve iş birlikçi okul ortamının akademik başarı üzerinde anlamlı etkisi bulunmadığından modellere dâhil edilmemiştir. Kalan 10 faktörün akademik başarının %10,7’sini açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. Bulgular alan yazını ışığında tartışılmış ve öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• PISA 2018
• akademik başarı
• psikososyal faktörler
• PISA Türkiye sonuçları

EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS: PISA 2018 CASE

Öz

Factors affecting academic achievement have been studied for years, showing that success depends on not only cognitive, but also psychological and social factors. Academic achievement is also assessed through international evaluations, and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which evaluates 15-year-old students from numerous countries, provides valuable findings on the psychosocial factors affecting academic performance. This study examined 13 psychosocial factors among Turkish students in PISA 2018 and their impact on achievement. Descriptive statistics for independent variables and achievement groups were presented, followed by analyses of differences and explanatory relationships. Regression analysis revealed that sense of meaning in life, fear of failure, and collaborative school environment had no significant effect and were excluded from the models. The remaining 10 factors explained 10.7% of the variance in academic achievement. Findings were discussed in light of the literature, and recommendations were provided.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• PISA 2018
• academic achievement
• psychosocial factors
• Türkiye’s results of PISA

Kaynakça

1. Ahtola, A., Haataja, A., Kärnä, A., Poskiparta, E. ve Salmivalli, C. (2012). For children only? Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 851-859. Doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.006
2. Akbaşlı, S., Kösece, P. ve Balta Uçan, M. (2018). Okul değişkenlerinin akademik başarıya olan etkisine yönelik öğrenci görüşlerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Bilimsel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 93110. Doi: 10.31798/ses.439740
3. Aktaş, E. (2022). 2018-2021 LGS Türkçe sorularının PISA okuma yeterlik düzeylerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 11(1), 258-276. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/teke/issue/68990/1091168
4. Altınkurt, Y. (2008). Öğrenci devamsızlıklarının nedenleri ve devamsızlığın akademik başarıya olan etkisi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 129-142. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/dpusbe/issue/4762/65425
5. American Psychology Association. (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: APA.
6. American School Counselor Association. (2019). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (4. ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
7. Ashcraft, M. ve Kirk, E. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130(2), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224
8. Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York: McMillan.

9. Bahçetepe, Ü. ve Meşeci Giorgetti, F. (2015). Akademik başarı ile okul iklimi arasındaki ilişki. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education, 1(3), 83-101. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ieyd/issue/35806/402431
10. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
11. Barnes, G. M., Reifman, A. S., Farrell, M. P. ve Dintcheff, B. A. (2000). The effects of parenting on the development of adolescent alcohol misuse: A six-wave latent growth model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 175-186. Doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00175.x
12. Berger, C., Alcalay, L., Torretti, A. ve Milicic, N. (2011). Socio-emotional well-being and academic achievement: evidence from a multilevel approach. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(2), 344-351. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722011000200016
13. Blank, C., VE Shavit, Y. (2016). The association between student reports of classmates’ disruptive behavior and student achievement. AREA Open, 2(3), 1-17. Doi: 10.1177/2332858416653921
14. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
15. Bronk, K. C., Hill, P. L., Lapsley, D. K., Talib, T. L. ve Finch, H. (2009). Purpose, hope, and life satisfaction in three age groups. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 500–510. Doi: 10.1080/17439760903271439
16. Butler, J. (2013). Self-efficacy. M. Gellman ve J. R. Turner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine içinde (s. 1737-1738). New York: Springer.
17. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2021). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (30. ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
18. Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., Hou, H. ve Oades, L. G. (2021). Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1051-1095. Doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3
19. Chang, L., Mcbride-Chang, C., Stewart, S. M. ve Au, E. (2003). Life satisfaction, self-concept, and family relations in Chinese adolescents and children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(2), 182-189. Doi: 10.1080/01650250244000182
20. Cheema, J. ve Kitsantas, A. (2014). Influences of disciplinary classroom climate on high school student self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: A look at gender and racial-ethnic differences, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1261-1279. Doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9454-4
21. Crede, J., Wirthwein, L., McElvany N. ve Steinmayr R. (2015). Adolescents’ academic achievement and life satisfaction: The role of parents’ education. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-8. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00052
22. Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K. ve Elder, G. H. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 77(1), 60-81Doi: 10.1177/003804070407700103
23. Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J. ve Schennach, S. M. (2010). Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica, 78(3), 883-931. Doi: 10.3982/ECTA6551
24. Çoban, M. (2018). PISA 2012 bağlamında 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematiksel okuryazarlığının incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Balıkesir: Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
25. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (6. ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
26. Dennis-Madrid, Canas, L., M. ve Ortega-Medina, M. (2007). Effects of team competition versus team cooperation in classwide peer tutoring. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), 155-160. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27548174
27. Diener, E., Oishi, S. ve Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403-425. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
28. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D. ve Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
29. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Routledge.
30. Elliot, A. J. ve McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
31. Ercan, L. ve Şahin, S. (2015). Çağdaş eğitimde öğrenci kişilik hizmetleri. C. Şahin (ed.), Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik içinde (s. 3-35). Ankara: Pegem.
32. Erdem, C. ve Kaya, M. (2021). Socioeconomic status and well-being as predictors of students’ academic achievement: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 3, 1-19. Doi: 10.1017/jgc.2021.10
33. Ertem, H. Y. (2020). Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 248-264. Doi: 10.17275/per.21.14.8.1
34. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. Doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202
35. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
36. Gilman, R., Huebner, S. ve Buckman, M. (2009). Life Satisfaction. S. J. Lopez (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology içinde (s. 582-585). Birleşik Krallık: Blackwell.
37. Gough, H. G. (1949). Factors relating to the academic achievement of high-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 40(2), 65-78. Doi: 10.1037/h0063117
38. Guskey, T. R. (2007). Multiple sources of evidence: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions of various indicators of student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(1), 19-27. Doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00085.x
39. Gutiérrez-Tapia, M. P., Domínguez-Espinosa, A. D. C., Ruiz-Muñoz, M. M., Fuentes-Balderrama, J. ve Gutiérrez-Fierros, E. (2019). The psychosocial factors of academic achievement: Three different theoretical models. Acta de investigación psicológica, 9(3), 100-113. Doi: 10.22201/fpsi.20074719e.2019.3.326
40. Hall, A. (2014). Life satisfaction, Concept of. A. C. Michalos (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research içinde (s. 3599-3601) Dordrecht: Springer.
41. Hill, N. E. ve Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740-763. Doi: 10.1037/a0015362
42. Hughes, J. ve Kwok O. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 39-51. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.39
43. Jennings, P. ve Greenberg, M. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525. Doi: 10.3102/0034654308325693
44. Jou, Y. T., Mariñas, K. A. ve Saflor, C. S. (2022). Assessing cognitive factors of modular distance learning of K-12 students amidst the COVID-19 pandemic towards academic achievements and satisfaction. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), 1-19. Doi: 10.3390/bs12070200
45. Karagöz, Y. (2017). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı nitel ve karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği. Ankara: Nobel.
46. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Poskiparta, E., Alanen, E. ve Salmivalli, C. (2011b). Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1-9. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(6), 796-805. Doi: 10.1037/a0025740
47. Khajehpour, M. (2011). Relationship between emotional intelligence, parental involvement and academic performance of high school students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1081-1086. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.242
48. Kepenekçi, Y. ve Çınkır, Ş. (2006). Bullying among Turkish high school students. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(2), 193-204. Doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.10.005
49. Kuzgun, Y. (2000). Rehberlik ve psikolojik danışma. Ankara: ÖSYM. Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Sierra-Sanchez, V., Rivera-Torres, P. ve Liesa-
50. Orus, M. (2022). Emotional well-being and social reinforcement as predictors of motivation and academic expectations. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 1-12. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102043
51. Lee, J. ve Stankov, L. (2018). Non-cognitive predictors of academic achievement: Evidence from TIMSS and PISA. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 50-64. Doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.009
52. Lorcu, F. (2015). Örneklerle veri analizi: SPSS uygulamalı. Ankara: Detay.
53. Mata, L., Pedrob, I. ve Peixotoa, F. J. (2018). Parental support, student motivational orientation and achievement: The impact of emotions. International Journal of Emotional Education, 10(2), 77-92. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1197565
54. Midgett, A., Doumas, D. M. ve Johnston, A. D. (2017). Establishing School Counselors as Leaders in Bullying Curriculum Delivery: Evaluation of a Brief, School-Wide Bystander Intervention. Professional School Counseling, 21(1). Doi: 10.1177/2156759X18778
55. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2019). PISA 2018: Türkiye ön raporu. Ankara: MEB. https://pisa.meb.gov.tr/www/pisa-2018-turkiye-on-raporu-yayimlandi/icerik/3
56. Melkonian, L. (2021). What is emotional well-being? 8 ways to improve your mental health. https://www.betterup.com/blog/what-is-emotional-well-being
57. Moussa, N. M. ve Ali, W. F. (2022). Exploring the relationship between students’ academic success and happiness levels in the higher education settings during the lockdown period of COVID-19. Psychology Reports, 125(2), 986-1010. Doi: 10.1177/0033294121994568
58. OECD. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/19963777
59. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results Volume II: Policies and practices for successful schools. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/9789264267510-en
60. OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 results Volume II: Where all students can succeed. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en
61. OECD. (2019b). PISA in Focus: Do students learn in co-operative or competitive environments? Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/e7a5f3e4-en
62. OECD. (2019c). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/b25efab8-en
63. OECD. (2019d). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm
64. OECD. (2019e). PISA 2018 results Volume I: What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/5f07c754-en
65. OECD. (2019f). PISA 2018 results Volume III: What school life means for students’ lives. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/acd78851-en
66. OECD. (2019g). Annex A1. Construction of indices. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/acd78851-en
67. Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H. ve Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(3), 566-571. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514483113
68. Pang, H. (2018). WeChat use is significantly correlated with college students’ quality of friendships but not with perceived well-being. Heliyon, 4(11), 1-22. Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00967
69. Parker, J. D., Creque Sr, R. E., Barnhart, D. L., Harris, J. I., Majeski, S. A., Wood, L. M., Bond, B. J. ve Hogan, M. J. (2004). Academic achievement in high school: Does emotional intelligence matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1321-1330. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.002
70. Pascarella, E. T. ve Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research, Volume 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71. Pekel-Uludağlı N. ve Uçanok, Z. (2005). Akran zorbalığı gruplarında yalnızlık ve akademik başarı ile sosyometrik statüye göre zorba / kurban davranış türleri. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 20(56), 77-92. https://psikiyatridizini.net/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=21310&tammetinvar=yes
72. Pollard, E. ve Lee, P. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61(1), 59-78. Doi: 10.1023/A:1021284215801
73. Rahmani, P. (2011). The relationship between self-esteem, achievement goals and academic achievement among the primary school students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 803-808. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.308
74. Reyes, O. ve Jason, L. A. (1993). Pilot study examining factors asscociated with academic success for hispanic high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22(1), 57-71. Doi: 10.1007/BF01537904
75. Roseth, C., Johnson, D. ve Johnson, R. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
76. Rumberger, R. W. ve Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999-2045. Doi: 10.1177/016146810510700905
77. Sağlam, Z., Pekyürek, M. F. ve Yılmaz, R. (2020). PISA 2018 araştırmasına etki eden duygusal faktörlerin veri madenciliği yöntemleri ile incelenmesi. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 2(2), 113-148. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bited/issue/58421/749242
78. Samara, M., Da Silva Nascimento, B., El-Asam, A., Hammuda, S. ve Khattab, N. (2021). How can bullying victimisation lead to lower academic achievement?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the mediating role of cognitive-motivational factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 1-21. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052209
79. Sarıer, Y. (2016). Türkiye’de öğrencilerin akademik başarısını etkileyen faktörler: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(3), 609-627. Doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2016015868
80. Sarıer, Y. (2020). TIMSS uygulamalarında Türkiye’nin performansı ve akademik başarıyı yordayan değişkenler. Temel Eğitim, 2(2), 6-27. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/temelegitim/issue/57288/745624
81. Shavelson, R. J. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik (N. Güler, çev. ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
82. Siebecker, A. B. ve Swearer, S. M. (2010). Bullying. C. S. Clauss-Ehlers (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural School Psychology içinde (s. 172-174). New York: Springer.
83. Steger, M. F. (2009). Meaning in life. J. Lopez ve C. R. Snyder (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology içinde (s. 679-687). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84. Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H. ve Özer, M. (2020). Türkiye’de öğrencilerin okuryazarlık becerilerinin yıllara ve okul türlerine göre değişimi: Öğrencilerin PISA uygulamalarındaki performansı. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 11(1), 76-97. Doi: 10.21031/epod.702191
85. Thomas, K., Nilsson, E., Festin, K., Henriksson, P., Lowén, M. ve Kristenson, M. (2020). Associations of psychosocial factors with multiple health behaviors: A population-based study of middle-aged men and women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1239. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041239
86. Tindle, R., Abo Hamza, E. G., Helal, A. A., Ayoub, A. E. A. ve Moustafa, A. A. (2022). A scoping review of the psychosocial correlates of academic performance. Review of Education, 10(3), 1-28. Doi: 10.1002/rev3.3371
87. Türk Dil Kurumu. (t.y.). Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
88. Upton, J. (2013). Psychosocial Factors. M. Gellman ve J. R. Turner (ed.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine içinde (s. 1580-1581). New York: Springer.
89. Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S. ve Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770-775. Doi: 10.1177/0956797612458937
90. Yuen, M. ve Datu, J. A. D. (2021). Meaning in life, connectedness, academic self-efficacy, and personal self-efficacy: A winning combination. School Psychology International, 42(1), 79-99. Doi: 10.1177/0143034320973370
91. Yukhymenko-Lescroarta, M. ve Sharma, G. (2022). Sense of life purpose is related to grades of high school students via academic identity. Heliyon, 8, 1-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11494
92. Zeybekoğlu, Ş., Bilicioğlu-Güneş, A. ve Yalçın, E. (2024). PISA 2018 okuma becerileri testinde yer alan maddelerde değişen madde fonksiyonunun incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 49(217), 201-223. Doi: 10.15390/EB.2023.12123
93. Zwane, N. P. ve Mukuna, K. R. (2023). Psychosocial factors influencing the academic performance of students at a rural college in the Covid-19 era. International Journal of Studies in Psychology, 3(1), 6-12. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-ijspsy_v3_n1_a3