B.Stiegler’de İnsan Ontolojisi ve Dijitalleşme Çağında Eğitim

Öz

Bernard Stiegler’in eğitim felsefesi, teknolojinin ve teknolojik gelişmelerin insan bilinci üzerindeki etkisini merkeze alan bir eleştiri sunmuştur. Stiegler’e göre son zamanlarda eğitim sistemi, teknolojinin hızlı gelişimiyle birlikte köklü bir dönüşüm yaşamaktadır. Özellikle dijitalleşme, bilgiye ulaşılabilirliği kolaylaştırırken bireyin bilişsel gelişimi için önemli olan dikkati hedef almakta ve zayıflatmıştır. Dijital dünya dikkati derinlikten koparıp geçici olan tüketime yöneltmekte, dijital araçlara bağlılık kişinin zihinsel proleterleşmesine sebep olmaktadır. Bu durum ise zihinsel çeşitliliği yok ederek entropiye neden olmaktadır. Eğitim bu yok edişe karşı negentropik bir alan olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Eğitim bireye kendi varoluşunu geliştirmek için direnme gücü sağlamalıdır. Eğitim dijital araçların yarattığı zehri, dikkat dağınıklığını ilaca; eleştirel düşünme, derin dikkat gibi becerilere dönüştürme sanatı olmalıdır. Bu noktada teknoloji ve dijitalleşme, doğru bir pedagoji ile ele alındığında bir pharmakon görevi görerek yıkımı iyileştirmeye dönüştürebilir. Çalışmada birinci bölüm Stiegler’in ontolojisi üzerinde durmaktadır. İkinci bölümde ise teknolojik gelişme ve insan ilişkisi, dijitalleşen dünyanın ayrıntıları analiz edilmekte ve üçüncü bölümde ise eğitimin pharmakon olma özelliği ayrıntılandırılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dikkat
• Entropi-Negentropi
• Dijitalleşme
• Eğitim
• Proleter
• Pharmakon

Human Ontology in B. Stiegler and Education in the Age of Digitalization

Öz

Bernard Stiegler's philosophy of education offers a critique centred on the impact of technology and technological developments on human consciousness. According to Stiegler, the education system has undergone a fundamental transformation in recent times, alongside the rapid development of technology. Digitalisation, in particular, while facilitating access to information, targets and weakens attention, which is crucial for an individual's cognitive development. The digital world diverts attention away from depth and towards transient consumption, and dependence on digital tools leads to the mental proletarianisation of the individual. This situation causes entropy by eliminating mental diversity. Education emerges as a negentropic field against this destruction. Education should provide the individual with the resilience to develop their own existence. Education should be the art of transforming the poison created by digital tools, the distraction of attention, into skills such as critical thinking and deep attention. At this point, technology and digitalisation, when approached with the right pedagogy, can act as a pharmakon, transforming destruction into healing. The first section of the study focuses on Steigler's ontology. The second section analyses technological development and human relations, as well as the details of the digitalising world, while the third section elaborates on education's pharmakon characteristic.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Attention
• Entropy-Negentropy
• Digitalization
• Education
• Proletarian
• Pharmakon

Kaynakça

1. Berkmen, Boğaç. “(Neg) Antroposen ve Yaşamın Noetik Vasfı: Bernard Stiegler’in Antroposen Eleştirisi,” REFLEKTİF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 3.3, (2022): 409-426.
2. Bradley, Joff PN ve David Kennedy. “Stiegler as philosopher of education,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 52.4, (2020a): 332-336.
3. Bradley, Joff PN ve David Kennedy. “On the Organology of Utopia: Stiegler's Contribution to the Philosophy of Education,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 52.4, (2020b): 420-432. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2019.1594779
4. Bradley, Joff PN. “Experiments in Negentropic Knowledge: Bernard Stiegler and the philosophy of education II,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 54.5, (2022): 459-464.
5. Bojesen, Emile. “Inventing the Educational Subject in the ‘Information Age’,” Studies in Philosophy and Education 35.3, (2016): 267-278.
6. Fitzpatrick, Noel. “Questions Concerning Attention and Stiegler’s therapeutics,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 52.4, (2020): 348-360. DOI:10.1080/00131857.2019.1625330
7. Keij, Daan. “Immature Adults and Playing Children: On Bernard Stiegler’s critique of infantilization,” Studies in Philosophy and Education 40.1, (2021): 67-80.
8. Knox, Jeremy. “Posthumanism and the MOOC: Opening the Subject of Digital Education,” Studies in Philosophy and Education 35.3, (2016): 305-320.

9. Kouppanou, Anna. “Bernard Stiegler’s Philosophy of Technology: Invention, decision, and education in times of digitization,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 47.10, (2015): 1110-1123.
10. Irwin, Ruth. “Heidegger and Stiegler on Failure and Technology,” Educational Philosophy & Theory 52.4, (2020). Lechte, John. “Technics, Time and Stiegler's ‘Orthographic Moment’,” Parallax 13.4, (2007): 64-77.
11. Letiche, Hugo, Geoff Lightfoot ve Simon Lilley. “Bernard Stiegler and the Necessity of Education is the Hammer Broken and So What?,”Educational Philosophy and Theory 55.2, (2023): 245-257.
12. Lewin, David. “The Pharmakon of Educational Technology: The Disruptive Power of Attention in Aducation,” Studies in Philosophy and Education 35.3, (2016): 251-265.
13. Lindberg, Susanna. “Politics of Digital Learning—Thinking Education with Bernard Stiegler,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 52.4, (2020): 384-396. DOI:10.1080/00131857.2019.1586531
14. Heidegger, Martin. Tekniğe Yönelik Soru. Çeviren: Doğan Özlem, İstanbul: Afa Yayınları, 1997.
15. Mui, Constance L. ve Julien S. Murphy. “The University of the Future: Stiegler After Derrida” in Bernard Stiegler and the Philosophy of Education, 132-142. Londra: Routledge, 2021.
16. Niesche, Richard ve Christina Gowlett. “Bernard Stiegler: Technics and Educational Leadership as a Form of Psycho-Power” in Social, Critical and Political Theories for Educational Leadership, Editörler: Scott Eacott ve Richard Niesche, 85-109. (Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019.
17. Roberts, Ben. “Cinema as Mnemotechnics: Bernard Stiegler and the “İndustrialization of Memory”,” Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities 11.1, (2006): 55-63.
18. Smeyers, Paul. “Philosophy and Education: A Certain Kind of Wisdom” in International Handbook of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 2. Editör: Paul Smeyers, 1-17. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing., 2018.
19. Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Vol. 1. Çevirenler: Richard Beardsworth ve George Collins, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998.
20. Stiegler, Bernard. “Our Ailing Educational İnstitutions,” Culture Machine 5., Çeviren: Stefan Herbrechter, 2008. Erişim 02 Nisan 2024. https://culturemachine.net/the-e-issue/our-ailing-educational-institutions/ Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Ttime, 2: Disorientation. Vol. 2. Çeviren: Stephen Barker, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.
21. Stiegler, Bernard. Taking Care of Youth and the Generations. Çeviren: Stephen Barker, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.
22. Stiegler, Bernard. “Relational Ecology and the Digital Pharmakon,” Culture machine 13, (2012): 1-19.
23. Stiegler, Bernard. What Makes Life Worth Living: On Pharmacology. Çeviren: Daniel Ross, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.
24. Stiegler, Bernard. States of Shock: Stupidity and Knowledge in the Twenty-First Century. Çeviren: Daniel Ross, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
25. Stiegler, Bernard. Automatic Society, Volume 1: The Future of Work. Çeviren: Daniel Ross, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.
26. Stiegler, Bernard. “Artificial Stupidity and Artificial İntelligence in the Anthropocene,” (23 November 2018, Institute of Ereignis, Shanghai) Çeviren: Daniel Ross, (2018a), Erişim 26 Ekim 2025. https://www.academia.edu/37849763/ Stiegler, Bernard. The Neganthropocene. Çeviren: Daniel Ross, London: Open Humanities Press, 2018b.
27. Stiegler, Bernard. “The age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism.” Çeviren: Daniel Ross, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.
28. Stiegler, Bernard. Nanjing Lectures (2016-2019). Çeviren: Daniel Ross, London: Open Humanities Press, 2020.
29. Stiegler, Bernard, Malgorzata Grygielewicz ve Nathalie Périn. “The school of tomorrow,” Journal of the CIPH 97.1, (2020): 119-135.
30. Şan, Emre. “Bernard Stiegler’in Teknoloji Felsefesi Problemleri: Algoritmik Yönetimsellik ve Bilişsel Proleterleşme,” ViraVerita E-Dergi 15, (2022): 105-135.
31. Weaver, John A. “Bernard Stiegler Philosopher of Algorithms and Data Science in the Anthropocene: A Time to Care and Dream,” Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies (JAAACS) 16.1, (2024): 129-142.
32. Wu, Amiao. “Digitalized Grammatization and Critical Thinking: Synthesizing Chinese Chan Pedagogy and Bernard Stiegler’s Negentropic Knowledge,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10.1, (2023): 1-7.