ECONOMIC AND FISCAL DETERMINANTS OF PUBLIC DEBT IN TÜRKİYE: EVIDENCE FROM STRUCTURAL BREAK COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS (1990-2024)

Öz

Determining the dynamics affecting the public debt portfolio, which is the largest fiscal portfolio of a country, plays a critical role in ensuring both macroeconomic stability and a sustainable fiscal structure. In this sense, this study aims to examine the main economic and fiscal dynamics driving public debt Türkiye for the period 1990-2024. As indicated by the results of the Maki (2012) multiple structural break cointegration test conducted to examine the cointegration relationship, it is found that there is a long-run relationship between the variables. According to the FMOLS and DOLS long-run coefficient estimation results, inflation and unemployment have a positive effect on the public debt burden, while economic growth and improvements in the primary budget balance reduce the public debt burden. In particular, it is concluded that the most powerful policy instrument for a sustainable fiscal structure is the primary budget balance, which shows the fiscal position of the state. The findings of the study suggest that institutional arrangements that support the economic growth process, the fight against inflation, policies to reduce unemployment, a consistent understanding of fiscal consolidation, and budget policies that observe fiscal discipline are necessary policy instruments for a sustainable public debt structure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Debt Dynamics
• Fiscal Sustainability
• Türkiye
• Cointegration Analysis

TÜRKİYE’DE KAMU BORCUNUN EKONOMİK VE MALİ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: YAPISAL KIRILMALI EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİNDEN KANITLAR (1990-2024)

Öz

Bir ülkenin en büyük finansal portföyü olan kamu borç portföyünü etkileyen dinamiklerin belirlenmesi hem makroekonomik istikrarın sağlanmasında hem de sürdürülebilir mali yapının oluşturulmasında kritik bir rol almaktadır. Bu anlamda çalışma, 1990-2024 dönemi için Türkiye'de kamu borçlanmasına yön veren temel ekonomik ve mali dinamikleri belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin incelenmesi amacıyla yapılan Maki (2012) çoklu yapısal kırılmalı eşbütünleşme testi sonuçlarına göre, değişkenler arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. FMOLS ve DOLS uzun dönem katsayı tahmin sonuçlarına göre, enflasyon ve işsizlik kamu borç yükü üzerinde pozitif yönlü etkiler yaratırken, ekonomik büyüme ve birincil bütçe dengesindeki iyileşmeler ise kamu borç yükünü azaltmaktadır. Özellikle sürdürülebilir mali yapı için en güçlü politika aracının, devletin mali pozisyonunu gösteren birincil bütçe dengesi olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular, ekonomik büyüme sürecini destekleyen kurumsal düzenlemelerin, enflasyonla mücadelenin, işsizliği azaltmaya dönük politikaların ve mali konsolidasyona ilişkin tutarlı bir anlayış ile mali disiplini gözeten bütçe politikalarının sürdürülebilir kamu borç yapısı için gerekli birer politika aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kamu Borç Dinamikleri
• Mali Sürdürülebilirlik
• Türkiye
• Eşbütünleşme Analizi

Kaynakça

1. Afflatet, N. (2018). The impact of population ageing on public debt: A panel data analysis for 18 European countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(4), 68-77.
2. Afonso, A. ve Ibraimo, Y. (2020). The macroeconomic effects of public debt: An empirical analysis of Mozambique. Applied Economics, 52(2), 212-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1644445
3. Afonso, A., Alves, J. ve Monteiro, S. (2024). The pressure is on: How geopolitical tensions impact institutional fiscal and external stability responses (CESifo Working Paper No. 11067). CESifo.
4. Alesina, A., Favero, C. ve Giavazzi, F. (2019). Effects of austerity: Expenditure-and tax-based approaches. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.141
5. Ando, S., Mishra, P., Patel, N., Peralta-Alva, A. ve Presbitero, A. F. (2025). Fiscal consolidation and public debt. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 170, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2024.104998
6. Balibek, M. E., Haque, M. T., Rivetti, D. ve Tamene, M. M. (2019). Medium-term debt management strategy: Analytical tool manual. International Monetary Fund.
7. Ben Ali, T. ve Al Yahya, B. A. A. (2019). The effect of governance on public debt: An empirical investigation for the Arabian Gulf countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(4), 812-841. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-07-2017-0168
8. Bozatlı, O., Serin, S. C. ve Demir, M. (2024). The causal relationship between public debt and economic growth in G7 countries: New evidence from time and frequency domain approaches. Economic Change and Restructuring, 57(136), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09716-8

9. Briceño, H. R. ve Perote, J. (2020). Determinants of the public debt in the Eurozone and its sustainability amid the Covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 12(16), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166456
10. Burriel, P., Checherita-Westphal, C., Jacquinot, P., Schon, M. ve Stahler, N. (2020). Economic consequences of high public debt: Evidence from three large scale DSGE models (European. Central Bank Working Paper Series No. 2450). European Central Bank.
11. Cherif, R. ve Hasanov, F. (2018). Public debt dynamics: The effects of austerity, inflation and growth shocks. Empirical Economics, 54, 1087-1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1260-3
12. Cooray, A. ve Özmen, I. (2024). The role of institutions on public debt: A quantile regression approach. International Review of Economics and Finance, 93, 912-928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.065
13. Çelikay, F. (2020). Dimensions of tax burden: A review on OECD countries. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 25(49), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-12-2018-0138
14. Di Serio, M. (2024). Public debt determinants: A time-varying analysis of core and peripheral Euro area countries. Finance Research Letters, 69(A), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106101
15. Edo, S. E. (2002). The external debt problem in Africa: A comparative study of Nigeria and Morocco. African Development Bank; Blackwell Publishers.
16. Eğilmez, M. (2019). Hazine. Remzi Kitabevi.
17. Filip, B. F. (2019). Determinants of public debt: The case of the European Union countries. Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania, Special Issue, 61-70.
18. Garcia-Macia, D. (2023). The effects of inflation on public finances (IMF Working Paper No. 2023/93). International Monetary Fund.
19. Gill, I. ve Raiser, M. (2012). Golden growth: Restoring the lustre of European economic model. The World Bank.
20. Golemejic, Z. R. (2012). Coordination between the monetary and public debt management policies in Croatia. Financial Theory and Practice, 36(2), 109-138.
21. Göv, A. ve Salihoğlu, E. (2020). Türkiye’de ekonomik göstergeler ve para arzının bireysel kredi kartı kullanımına etkileri. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, 5(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.670283
22. Göv, A. ve Yılancı, V. (2022). Türkiye’de kamu iç borçları ve temel makroekonomik göstergeler arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 9(2), 788-812. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.834949
23. Hansen, B. E. ve Phillips, P. C. (1988). Estimation and inference in models of cointegration: A simulation study. Advances in Econometrics, 8, 225-248.
24. Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı. (2025). İstatistikler. https://www.hmb.gov.tr/kamu-finansmani-istatistikleri adresinden 6 Mart 2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
25. Herranz, M. M. ve Turino, F. (2023). Tax evasion, fiscal policy and public debt: Evidence from Spain. Economic Systems, 47(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101121
26. Ibrahim, C. (2021). Primary fiscal performance, economic growth, and public debt in Lebanon. Contemporary Economics, 15(2), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.443
27. Institute of International Finance. (2024). Winds of change - Prospects for debt markets in 2025. https://www.iif.com/portals/0/Files/content/Global%20Debt%20Monitor_December2024_vf.pdf adresinden 26 Aralık 2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
28. International Monetary Fund. (2001). Guidelines for public debt management. IMF Publication.
29. International Monetary Fund. (2021). Fiscal monitor: A fair shot. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2021/10/13/fiscal-monitor-october-2021 adresinden 20 Aralık 2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
30. International Monetary Fund. (2023). World economic outlook report. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO adresinden 26 Aralık 2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
31. International Monetary Fund. (2025). World economic outlook database: April 2025 edition. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2025/april adresinden 12 Ocak 2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
32. Jacobs, J., Ogawa, K., Sterken, E. ve Tokutsu, I. (2020). Public debt, economic growth and the real interest rate: A panel VAR approach to EU and OECD countries. Applied Economics, 52(12), 1377-1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1673301
33. Jönsson, P. O. (2005). Risk management of government debt in Sweden. H. Blommestein (Ed.), Advances in risk management of government debt (s. 217-229) içinde. OECD Publishing.
34. Kadiroğlu, A. (2023). Türkiye’de dış borcu etkileyen ekonomik faktörler: ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı (1994-2020). Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 786-799.
35. Kasal, S. (2024). Unveiling the impact of geopolitical risks on Turkish economy and fiscal dynamics. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 46(1), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.1411164
36. Köstekçi, A. ve Yıldız, F. (2019). Kamu borç yönetimi Türkiye ve OECD ülke uygulamaları. Ekin Yayınevi.
37. Köstekçi, A. ve Yıldız, F. (2021). Kamu borç yönetiminde etkinliğin ülkelerin makroekonomik performansına etkisi: OECD ülkeleri örneği. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(1), 445-462.
38. Lee, J. ve Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815961
39. Lee, J. ve Strazicich, M. (2004). Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break (Working Papare No. 04-17). Appalachian State University.
40. Lopez-Garcia, M. A. (1987). Public debt and demographic growth in an overlapping generations model. Economics Letters, 24(2), 197-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(87)90251-5
41. Maki, D. (2012). Tests for cointegration allowing for an unknown number of breaks. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2011-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.04.022
42. Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of economics. Cengage Learning.
43. Mara, E. R. ve Maran, R. (2024). Are fiscal rules efficient on public debt restraint in the presence of shadow economy?. Finance Research Letters, 64, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105495
44. Musah, I. (2023). An empirical investigation of macroeconomic determinants of public debt in Ghana. Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2285625
45. Nagou, M., Bayale, N. ve Kouassi, B. K. (2021). On the robust drivers of public debt in Africa: Fresh evidence from Bayesian model averaging approach. Cogent Economics and Finance, 9(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1860282
46. Nastansky, A. ve Strohe, H. G. (2015). Public debt, money and consumer prices: a vector error correction model for Germany. Ekonometria, (47), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.15611/ekt.2015.1.01
47. Nguyen, V. B. (2015). The relationship between public debt and inflation in developing countries: Empirical evidence based on difference panel GMM. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 5(9), 128-142.
48. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2020). COVID-19 crisis response in MENA. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/covid-19-crisis-response-in-mena-countries_4b366396-en.html adresinden 10 Aralık 2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
49. Omrane Belguith, S. ve Omrane, H. (2017). Macroeconomic determinants of public debt growth: A case study for Tunisia. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 24(4), 161-168.
50. Otiento, B. A. (2024). Public debt, investment and economic growth dynamics: Do geographical proximity and spatial spillover effects matter?. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 16, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100059
51. Oyeleke, O. J. (2021). On the non-linear relationship between fiscal deficit and inflation: The Nigeria experience. International Advances in Economic Research, 27(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-021-09822-7
52. Pehlivan, N. (2003). Risk analizine dayalı kamu borç yönetimi. Ö. F. Batırel (Ed.), XVIII Türkiye maliye sempozyumu (ss. 385–417) içinde. Marmara Üniversitesi Maliye Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Yayınları.
53. Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361-1401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712
54. Perron, P. ve Vogelsang, T. J. (1992). Nonstationarity and level shifts with an application to purchasing power parity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509907
55. Reinhart, C. M. ve Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.573
56. Salihoğlu, E. ve Göv, A. (2021). Dijital emtia olarak Bitcoin’e yatırım portföyünde yer verilmeli mi?: Bitcoin’in altın, gümüş ve petrol fiyatları ile ilişkisi üzerine bir inceleme. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(16), 538-554. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.970269
57. Sargent, T. J. ve Wallace, N. (1984). Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. B. Griffiths ve G. E. Wood (Ed.), Monetarism in the United Kingdom (s. 15-41) içinde. Palgrave Macmillan.
58. Semik, S. ve Zimmermann, L. (2022). Determinants of substantial public debt reductions in Central and Eastern European countries. Empirica, 49, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-021-09529-2
59. SenGupta, S., Talukder, J. ve Atal, A. (2025). Between Keynesianism and neoclassicism: A comparative analysis of public debt-unemployment nexus across continents. Development and Sustainability in Economics and Finance, 5, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsef.2024.100036
60. Stock, J. H. ve Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783-820. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951763
61. Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. (2025). Gösterge ve istatistikler. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/ekonomik-ve-sosyal-gostergeler/ adresinden 25 Şubat 2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
62. Sumba, J. O., Ochenge, R., Mugambi, P. ve Musafiri, C. M. (2024). Public debt and macroeconomic stability among sub-Saharan African countries: A system GMM test approach. Cogent Economics and Finance, 12(1), 2326451. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2326451
63. Swamy, V. (2015). Government Debt and its macroeconomic determinants-An empirical investigation (MPRA Paper No. 64106). Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
64. Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası. (2025). Elektronik veri dağıtım sistemi. https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/ adresinden 25 Şubat 2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
65. Yalçın, E. ve Ünlükaplan, I. (2024). The impact of fiscal rules on public debt and public deficits based on the budget institutions approach. International Journal of Public Finance, 9(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1285953
66. Yıldız, F. (2024). Kamu borçlarının belirleyicileri: Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri analizi. Özgür Publications. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub433
67. Zivot, E. ve Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20, 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509904
68. Waheed, A. (2017). Determinants of external debt: A panel data analysis for oil and gas exporting and importing countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(1), 234-240.
69. Woldu, G. T. ve Kanó, I. S. (2023). Macroeconomic effects of fiscal consolidation on economic activity in SSA countries. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 28, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00312
70. World Economic Forum. (2024). What is ‘global debt’-and how high is it now? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/12/what-is-global-debt-why-high/ adresinden 3 Ocak 2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.