İNSAN HAKİMLERİN VE YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SİBER SİMBİYOZU: BRICS ÜLKELERİNİN YARGI SİSTEMLERİNİN ENTEGRASYONU VE BAŞARILI MODERNİZASYONU İÇİN SORUNLAR VE OLASI ÇÖZÜMLER

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 249 - 261, 31.12.2024

Said Gulyamov

Öz

Günümüzde birçok ekonomik ve uluslararası birlik ve dernek bulunmaktadır. Küreselleşme, ademi merkeziyetçilik ve stratejik ortaklık açısından en ilginç olanlardan biri BRICS birliğidir. Bununla paralel olarak, gündem yapay zekâ ve daha pek çok gelişmiş teknolojinin gelişimi bağlamında hukuk alanında stratejik reform ihtiyacı konusunu içermektedir. Yukarıdaki noktalar, özellikle bu makalenin BRICS ülkelerinde uygulanabilecek insan ve yapay zekâ arasındaki sibersimbiyoz durumunu incelemesi bakımından, bu araştırmanın yürütülmesine olan ilginin nedenidir. Makale, modern teknolojilerin entegre kullanımıyla adaleti iyileştirmek için uzman sistemlerin ve insan yeteneklerinin kullanılmasına olanak tanıyacak bir yapı önermektedir. Makalede tartışılan araştırma tasarımı kullanılarak, yapay zekanın çeşitli olguların analizi ve sistematikleştirilmesi görevleriyle başa çıkmada yardımcı olması beklendiği ve akıllı modellerin, kural koyma konusunda kişiselleştirilmiş bir yaklaşım benimseyebilecek bir sorumluluklar ve öneriler sistemi oluşturulmasına olanak sağladığı not edilebilir.
Bu makalenin ana amacı, insan ve yapay zekâ arasındaki sibersimbiyoz çerçevesinde düşünceli bir iş birliğidir. Bu iş birliği, BRICS ülkelerinin yasa yapma faaliyetlerinin gelişim vektörünü hedeflemesine yardımcı olacaktır. Bu değişim vektörü, mahkeme davaları, vakalar, yönetmelik yazımı ve daha pek çok konuyu içermektedir. Bununla birlikte, yapay zekâ geliştiricileri tarafından etik ve diğer yanlış anlamaları, çeşitli otomatik sistemlerin işleyişini ve diğer sorunları ortadan kaldırmak için çözülmesi gereken bir dizi tehdit hala mevcuttur. Ayrıca makale, yukarıda belirtilen sorunlardan potansiyel olarak kurtulmaya yardımcı olacak bir dizi öneri ve çözüm sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapay Zekâ, Sibersimbiyoz, Sinir ağları, Mahkeme, BRICS ülkeleri, Hukuk Uygulaması.

CYBERSYMBIOSIS OF HUMAN JUDGES AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: PROBLEMS AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS FOR INTEGRATION AND FOR THE SUCCESSFUL MODERNIZATION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS OF THE BRICS COUNTRIES

Öz

Abstract. This article examines the situation of cybersymbiosis between humans and artificial intelligence in order to consider how this phenomenon can be applied in the BRICS countries. The article proposes a structure that will allow the use of expert systems and the capabilities of people in order to improve justice with the integrated use of modern technologies. Using the research design discussed in the article, it can be noted that artificial intelligence is expected to help cope with tasks in the analysis and systematization of various phenomena, and intelligent models make it possible to create a system of responsibilities and proposals that can take a personalized approach to the issue of rulemaking.
The main goal of this article is thoughtful cooperation within the framework of cybersymbiosis between humans and artificial intelligence, which will help the BRICS countries to target the vector of development of law-making activities, including such provisions of the vector of change as court cases, cases, writing regulations and much more. However, there remain a number of threats that need to be resolved in order to get rid of ethical and other misunderstandings on the part of artificial intelligence developers, the operation of various automated systems and other problems. In addition, the article offers a number of suggestions and solutions that will help potentially get rid of the above problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cybersymbiosis between humans and artificial intelligence, neural networks, court, BRICS countries, law enforcement.

Kaynakça

• BRICS, Joint statement of the BRICS ministers of foreign affairs/international relations on strengthening and reforming the multilateral system, 2020, <http://infobrics.org/> l.a.d. 15 May 2024.
• CEPEJ, European ethical charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment 2018, <https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepej-european-ethical-charter-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-judicial-systems-and-their-environment> l.a.d. 3 April 2024.
• Choudhary A, Role of artificial intelligence in judiciary. International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 2018, 17-19.
• Daksh, Access to justice survey, 2018, <http://dakshindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Daksh-access-to-justice-survey.pdf> l.a.d. 7 June 2024.
• EU, Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence, 2022, <https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206> l.a.d. 22 March 2024.
• Feng E, How China is using AI in its courtroom - the first AI judge in the world is in China. TechNode, 2021, <https://www.dw.com/en/how-chinas-ai-is-automating-the-legal-system/a-64465988> l.a.d. 29 May 2024. Gulyamov SS, AI authorship and ownership of intellectual property in industrial power and control systems. In Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency, SUMMA 2023 (pp. 217-221).
• Gulyamov, SS, Legal frameworks for the integration of artificial intelligence. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 92, 2024, pp. 144-149).
• Gulyamov S, Rustambekov I, Narziev O, Xudayberganov A, Draft Concept of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the Field of Development Artificial Intelligence for 20212030. Yurisprudensiya, 1, 2021, 107-21, <https://www. researchgate.net/publication/351658151_DRAFT_ CONCEPT_OF_THE_REPUBLIC_OF_UZBEKIS- TAN_IN_THE_FIELD_OF_DEVELOPMENT_AR- TIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_FOR_2021-2030> l.a.d. 18 April 2024). <doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.51788/tsul. jurisprudence.1.1./QUGT2226>.
• Konaev M, Bendett S, Russian AI Strategy: Ambitions and Implications. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 22(3), 2021, 125-134.
• McQuoid-Mason D, Access to justice in South Africa: Are there enough lawyers?. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 3(3), 2013, 561-579. <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2272640> l.a.d. 12 June 2024.
• Mehta PB, Emerging role of artificial intelligence in the legal field and justice system: Note from India. Journal of Legal Technology Risk Management, 12, 2017, 124.
• Monteleone S, Puccetti R, A Global Look at Data Protection & AI: Legislating Responsible AI Development & Deployment. Recognizing the promise & managing the peril. Global Partners Digital, 2021, <https://www. gp-digital.org/> l.a.d. 8 March 2024.
• NPC, <http://bg.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zgzt/ lh/200502/t20050215_2368881.htm> l.a.d. 2 May 2024. Odendaal N, Case study on the use of artificial intelligence in the public sector - South Africa. UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence, 2020.
• Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, Wickens CD, A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 2000, 286297. <doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354> l.a.d. 8 March 2024.
• Sikdar S, How India is using AI to enhance tax collection and prevent fraud and corruption. Analytics Insight, 2021, <https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/ blog/2023/04/how-india-uses-data-analytics-ai-ml-to-improve-tax-process/> l.a.d. 30 April 2024.
• South African Government. (2016). National Integrated ICT Policy Green Paper. Supreme People’s Court of China, Supreme People’s Court work report, 2021, https://english.court.gov.cn/ (Accessed: June 5, 2024).
• The Brazil Business, Brazil’s justice is very slow. The Brazil Business, 2019.
• Wang Y, Judicial reform of Chinese characteristics: A mixture of progress and inertia. Vol. 2021, United States Association of Comparative Law.