Sitoredüktif Cerrahi ve HIPEC ile İlgili YouTube Videolarının İçerik ve Kalite Analizi

Öz

Amaç: Sitoredüktif cerrahi (CRS) ve hipertermik intraperitoneal kemoterapi (HIPEC), ileri gastrointestinal malignitelerde kullanılan önemli tedavi yöntemleridir. YouTube, hem toplum hem de sağlık profesyonelleri tarafından bu prosedürler hakkında en sık danışılan bilgi kaynaklarından biridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, YouTube’daki CRS ve HIPEC videolarının içerik, kalite, anlaşılabilirlik ve doğruluk açısından değerlendirilmesidir. Yöntemler: YouTube’da “cytoreductive surgery HIPEC” anahtar kelimesi kullanılarak arama yapılmış ve ilk 180 video analiz edilmiştir. Videolar kaynaklarına göre (hekim, kurumsal, medya, hasta) sınıflandırılmıştır. Sesli anlatım, altyazı, dil, yorumlar, beğeni sayısı, izlenme sayısı ve video süresi ile ilgili veriler kaydedilmiştir. Ayrıca her video, 5 puanlık Likert ölçeği kullanılarak kalite, anlaşılabilirlik ve doğruluk açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Analiz edilen videoların %52,2’si medya kaynaklı, %28,3’ü kurumsal, %17,4’ü hekim, %2,2’si hasta kaynaklıydı. Videoların %91,8’inde sesli anlatım mevcutken yalnızca %5,4’ünde altyazı bulunmaktaydı. Ortalama video süresi 13,3±21,8 dakika, ortalama izlenme sayısı ise 4667±16.932 idi. Ortalama kalite skoru 2,47±1,08; anlaşılabilirlik skoru 2,69±1,02; doğruluk skoru ise 2,80±1,04 bulundu. Hekim ve kurumsal videolar, medya kaynaklı videolara kıyasla anlamlı derecede daha yüksek kalite (p<0,001) ve anlaşılabilirlik (p<0,001) skorlarına sahipti. Sonuç: YouTube’daki CRS ve HIPEC videolarının çoğunluğu medya kaynaklı olup, genel olarak düşük kalite ve anlaşılabilirlik düzeyine sahiptir. Hekim ve kurum temelli videolar bilimsel açıdan daha yüksek kalite sunsa da daha az erişilebilir ve popülerdir. Cerrahi onkolojide doğru ve anlaşılır bilgi sağlamak için profesyonel, yüksek kaliteli içeriklerin artırılması gereklidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sitoredüktif cerrahi
• Hipertermik intraperitoneal kemoterapi
• HIPEC
• YouTube
• Sosyal medya
• Video analizi
• Kalite değerlendirmesi

Content and Quality Analysis of YouTube Videos on Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC

Öz

Objective: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are important treatment modalities used in advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. YouTube is among the most frequently consulted sources of information about these procedures by both the public and healthcare professionals. This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality, comprehensibility, and accuracy of CRS and HIPEC videos on YouTube. Methods: A YouTube search was performed using the keyword “cytoreductive surgery HIPEC,” and the first 180 videos were analyzed. Videos were categorized by source (physician, institutional, media, patient). Data on voice narration, subtitles, language, comments, likes, views, and video length were recorded. In addition, each video was assessed for quality, comprehensibility, and accuracy using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: In total, 52.2% of the analyzed videos were media-based, 28.3% institutional, 17.4% physician, and 2.2% patient-based. While 91.8% had voice narration, only 5.4% included subtitles. The mean video length was 13.3±21.8 minutes, and the mean number of views was 4667±16,932. The mean quality score was 2.47±1.08, comprehensibility score 2.69±1.02, and accuracy score 2.80±1.04. Physician and institutional videos had significantly higher quality (p<0.001) and comprehensibility (p<0.001) scores compared with media-based videos. Conclusion: The majority of CRS and HIPEC videos on YouTube are produced by media sources, with overall low quality and comprehensibility. Although physician- and institution-based videos demonstrate higher scientific quality, they remain less accessible and popular. Increasing the availability of professional, high-quality content is essential to provide accurate and comprehensible information in surgical oncology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cytoreductive surgery
• Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
• HIPEC
• YouTube
• Social media
• Video analysis
• Quality assessment

Kaynakça

1. Drittone D, Schipilliti FM, Arrivi G, Mazzuca F. Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy applications in upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer, a review. Oncol Rev. 2024; 18: 1496141.
2. Quénet F, Elias D, Roca L, Goéré D, Ghouti L, Pocard M, et al. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus cytoreductive surgery alone for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PRODIGE 7): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22: 256–66.
3. Goéré D, Malka D, Tzanis D, Gava V, Boige V, Eveno C et al. Is there a possibility of a cure in patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis amenable to complete cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy? Ann Surg. 2013; 257: 1065-71.
4. Glehen O, Gilly FN, Boutitie F, Bereder JM, Quenet F, Sideris L, et al. Toward curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from nonovarian origin by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A multi institutional study of 1290 patients. Cancer 2010; 116: 5608-18.
5. Voron T, Eveno C, Jouvin I, Beaugerie A, Lo Dico R, Dagois S, Soyer P, Pocard M. Cytoreductive surgery with a hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy program: Safe after 40 cases, but only controlled after 140 cases. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015; 41: 1671-7.
6. Mathew R, Ramakrishnan N, Boland F, Pawlikowska T, Holland JC. Learning cardiac embryology on YouTube-What videos are there to view? Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 17: 1495-508.
7. Zhu YC, Du RC, Gao J, Lu NH, Zhu Y, Hu Y. YouTube and TikTok as sources of information on acute pancreatitis: a content and quality analysis. BMC Public Health. 2025; 25: 1446.
8. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015; 21: 173-94.

9. Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018; 4: e3.
10. Limon M, Tezcan D. YouTube as a source of information on reactive arthritis: a quality analysis. Z Rheumatol. 2024; 83(Suppl 3): 359-66.
11. Li Z, Yan C, Lyu X, Li F, Zeng R. Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study. BMC Public Health. 2024; 24: 2620.
12. Zeng B, Jeon M, Wen H. How does item wording affect participants' responses in Likert scale? Evidence from IRT analysis. Front Psychol. 2024; 15: 1304870.
13. Yuan X, Liang H, Fu X, Yang S, Xiang C, Chen Z. Cytoreductive surgery with multimodal therapies in advanced or metastatic ovarian, colorectal, and gastric cancers: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomized trials. World J Surg Oncol. 2025; 23: 286.
14. Dagenborg VJ, Brudvik KW, Lund-Andersen C, Torgunrud A, Lund-Iversen M, Flatmark Ket al. Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Liver Resection is a Treatment Option for Patients With Peritoneal and Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2024; 280: 745-52.
15. Kusamura S, Baratti D, Virzì S, Bonomi S, Iusco DR, Grassi A, et al. Learning curve for cytoreductive surgery and hyper- thermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancies: analysis of two centres. J Surg Oncol 2013; 107: 312e319.
16. Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, Keith JN, Rosenbaum ME, Kapadia MR. YouTube is the Most Frequently Used Educational Video Source for Surgical Preparation. J Surg Educ. 2016; 73: 1072-6.
17. Pavuloori M, Lin A, Mi M. Tools/instruments for assessing YouTube videos on surgical procedures for patient/consumer health education: a systematic review. Front Public Health. 2025; 13: 1575801.
18. Mahendran R, Abiharini S, Subbaraj A. Unveiling the YouTube addiction: Understanding the spectrum of digital dependency. J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13: 5265-9.
19. Zhang Q, Li Z, Zhang H, Han L, Zhao S, Jia S. YouTube and Bilibili as sources of information on oral cancer: cross-sectional content analysis study. Sci Rep. 2025; 15: 21671.
20. Joshi M, R N, Jagtap K, Gupta R, Agarwal V, Aggarwal R, Goel A, Gupta L. Assessment of quality and reliability of YouTube videos for patient and physician education on inflammatory myositis. Clin Rheumatol. 2023; 42: 1339-49.
21. Kim JH, Kim HK. Content and quality of YouTube regarding women's health: a scoping review. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2023; 29: 179-89.
22. Morkavuk ŞB Sr, Badem A. Contribution of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Videos on YouTube to the Learning Curve in COVID-19 Pandemic Process. Cureus. 2021; 13: e16820.
23. Kepenekian V, Sgarbura O, Marchal F, Villeneuve L, Kusamura S, Deraco M. 2022 PSOGI Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 30: 7803-13.
24. Polanco PM, Ding Y, Knox JM, Ramalingam L, Jones H, Hogg ME, Zureikat AH, Holtzman MP, Zeh HJ 3rd, Bartlett DL, Pingpank JF. Institutional learning curve of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19: 1410-6.
25. El-Mahrouk M, Jaradat D, Eichler T, Sucher R, Margreiter C, Lederer A, Karitnig R, Geisler A, Jahn N, Hau HM. "YouTube" for Surgical Training and Education in Donor Nephrectomy: Friend or Foe? J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025; 12: 23821205241301552