Knowledge and implication about oral antineoplastics drugs use of cancer patients
Öz
Material and Methods: There research sample consists of 100 people who use oral antineoplastic drugs in Ankara Numune and Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Education and Research Hospital Oncology wards. Patient conversation form and evaluation of dring information form, which was developed by the investigator according to literature, was used as a data obtaining an instrument. In the evaluation of data percentage and chi-square tests was used.
Results: Average age of the person that participates in surveying is 51.5±7,1. We observed that 48% of participants use capecitabine as oral antineoplastic, and 51% of participants have cure number between 0-3. 93% of participant sex pres that they informed about medicine by the doctor when prescribed, and 50% by the nurse at the outpatient clinic. It is observed71% of participant stake medicine not in time. As the reason for this case, forget fullness is on the top with a 51% rate. It is observed male more successful than female for taking medicine in time (p<0.05) and the rate of taking medicine in time is increasing with education level (p<0.05). Besides, we observed that the rate of taking medicine in time is lower for participants that informed verbally than informed verbal and written.
Conclusion: This study suggests that individuals have a low educational level successful in drug-taking at the same hour and the long period of drug-taking decrease this success. Female take assistance drug use more than male and taking assistance increases while the educational level decrease in both genders.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer 2015; 136: 359-86.
- 2. Betcher J, Dow E, Khera N. Oral Chemotherapy in Patients with Hematological Malignancies—Care Process, Pharmacoeconomic, and Policy Implications. Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports 2016; 11: 288-94.
- 3. Durna Z, Akın S, Özdilli K. İç hastalıkları hemşireliği uygulama rehberi: Nobel Tıp Kitapevi. 2011. 95-98. ISBN: 978-975-420-865-8.
- 4. Kavookjian J, Wittayanukorn S. Interventions for adherence with oral chemotherapy in hematological malignancies: A systematic review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 2015; 11: 303-14.
- 5. Schneider SM, Adams DB, Gosselin T. A tailored nurse coaching intervention for oral chemotherapy adherence. Journal of The Advanced Practitioner in Oncology. 2014; 5: 163.
- 6. Servick K. ‘Nonadherence’: A bitter pill for drug trials. Science 2014; 346: 288-9.
- 7. Spoelstra SL, Given BA, Given CW, Grant M, Sikorskii A, You M, et al. Issues related to overadherence to oral chemotherapy or targeted agents. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2013; 17: 604-9.
- 8. Spoelstra SL, Schueller M, Hilton M, Ridenour K. Interventions combining motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour to promote medication adherence: a literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2015; 24: 1163-73.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Aralık 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi
13 Ocak 2020
Kabul Tarihi
9 Mart 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 5
Cited By
The Effect of Educational Follow-Up with the Motivational Interview Technique on Self-Efficacy and Drug Adherence in Cancer Patients Using Oral Chemotherapy Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151140Türkiye’de Son 10 Yılda Hemşirelik Alanında Yapılan Oral Kemoterapi Konulu Makalelerin İncelenmesi
Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1263211