Revisiting Türkiye’s Diaspora Engagement in the USA

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 1 - 20, 27.03.2025

Şevval Çoklar Aksu , Damla Bayraktar Aksel

https://doi.org/10.52241/tjds.1616937

Öz

Over the past decades, diaspora governance has transitioned from a niche academic interest to a central subject in migration studies and international relations. As transnational communities increasingly shape economic, cultural, and political arenas, states have expanded their diaspora policies to include both symbolic and strategic objectives. This article examines the evolution of Türkiye’s diaspora engagement policies in the United States, by tracing their historical development, institutional reforms, and recent initiatives targeting highly skilled emigrants. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in 2014 and 2022 and interviews with state and civil society representatives in Ankara, Washington D.C., and New York, it analyzes how Turkish policymakers have moved from cultural diplomacy to leveraging diaspora networks for economic and political influence. The findings highlight the fragmented and selective nature of these efforts, shaped by ideological divides and institutional disconnects. Situating Türkiye’s evolving diaspora policies within the broader context of Turkish migration to the U.S., this article highlights the divergences between state-driven strategies and the aspirations of emigrant communities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Transnationalism, diaspora governance, Turkish-American, highly skilled

Kaynakça

• Adamson, F. B. (2020). Non‐state authoritarianism and diaspora politics. Global Networks, 20 (1), 150–169.
• Ahmed, F. (1986). Turks in America: The Ottoman Turk’s Immigrant Experience. Columbia International.
• Akçapar, Ş. K. (2009). Turkish highly skilled migration to the United States: New findings and policy recommendations. In A. İçduygu & K. Kirişçi (eds.), Land of Diverse Migrations: Challenges of Emigration and Immigration in Turkey (pp. 110–248). Istanbul Bilgi University Press.
• Akçapar, Ş. K., & Aksel, D. B. (2017). Public diplomacy through diaspora engagement: The case of Turkey. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 22 (3), 135–160.
• Aksel, D. (2022). Diaspora engagement policies as transnational social engineering: Rise and failure of Turkey’s diaspora policies. Middle East Critique, 31 (4), 311–325.
• Aksel, D. B. (2016). Home States and Homeland Politics: Interactions Between the Turkish State and Its Emigrants in France and the United States [Doctoral dissertation, Koç University].
• Aksel, D. B. (2019). Home states and homeland politics: Interactions between the Turkish state and its emigrants in France and the United States. Routledge.
• Amerika Diyanet Merkezi New York’ta tanıtıldı”. (2019, October 25), Anatolian News Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/amerika-diyanet-merkezi-new-yorkta-tanitildi/1625691 (Accessed on 15 February 2025)
• Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
• Anderson, B. (1998). Long-distance nationalism. In The spectre of comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia and the world (pp. 58–74). Verso.
• Arkılıç, A. (2022). ‘Selective engagement’: Mobilising a fragmented diaspora and the limits of diaspora diplomacy. In Diaspora Diplomacy (pp. 120-42). Manchester University Press.
• Arkılıç, A. (2021). Explaining the evolution of Turkey’s diaspora engagement policy: A holistic approach. Diaspora Studies, 14(1), 1–21.
• Ataselim, M. Ş. (2014). Diaspora as development actors: A source of human and social capital for local development in Turkey [Doctoral dissertation, The City University of New York].
• Başer, B., & Öztürk, A. E. (2021). Positive and negative diaspora governance in context: From public diplomacy to transnational authoritarianism. In Erdoğan’s Turkey (pp. 80–95). Routledge.
• Bauböck, R. (2010). Cold constellations and hot identities: Political theory questions about transnationalism and diaspora. In R. Bauböck & T. Faist (eds.), Diaspora and transnationalism: Concepts, theories and methods (pp. 295–322). Amsterdam University Press.
• Bettie, M. (2015). The scholar as diplomat: The Fulbright Program and America’s cultural engagement with the world. Caliban. French Journal of English Studies, 54, 233–252.
• Böcü, G., & Başer, B. (2024). Transnational mobilization of future generations by non-democratic home states: Turkey’s diaspora youth between empowerment and co-optation. Ethnopolitics, 23 (1), 34–58.
• Boyle, M., & Kavanagh, A. (2018). The Irish government’s diaspora strategy: Towards a care agenda. Rethinking the Irish diaspora: After the gathering, 59-79.
• Brand, L. A. (2010). Authoritarian states and voting from abroad: North African experiences. Comparative Politics, 43 (1), 81–99.
• Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2019). Diasporas and public diplomacy: Distinctions and future prospects. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14 (1–2), 51–64. Turkish Journal of Diaspora Studies 19
• Brubaker, R. (2005). The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28 (1), 1–19.
• Cohen, N. (2016). A web of repatriation: The changing politics of Israel’s diaspora strategy. Population, Space and Place, 22 (3), 288–300.
• Cohen, R. (1997). Global Diasporas: An Introduction. University of Washington Press.
• Çoklar, Ş. (2024). Historical transformation of Türkiye’s state policies towards Turkish migrants in the United States [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Bahçeşehir University Graduate School, Department of Migration Studies.
• Collyer, M. (2014). A geography of extra-territorial citizenship: Explanations of external voting. Migration Studies, 2 (1), 55–72.
• Collyer, M., & Vathi, Z. (2007). Patterns of extra-territorial voting. Development Research Centre on Migration, Globalisation and Poverty Working Paper, 22, 1–36.
• Délano Alonso, A., & Mylonas, H. (2019). The microfoundations of diaspora politics: Unpacking the state and disaggregating the diaspora. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45 (4), 473–491.
• Délano, A. (2014). The diffusion of diaspora engagement policies: A Latin American agenda. Political Geography, 41, 90–100.
• DiCarlo, L. (2008). Migrating to America: Transnational social networks and regional identity among Turkish migrants. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Erman, T. (2013). The mosque community of ‘lower-class’ Turks in the United States: Quo Vadis? International Journal of Turkish Studies, 19 (1–2), 95–113.
• Faist, T. (1998). Transnational social spaces out of international migration: Evolution, significance, and future prospects. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 39 (2), 213–247.
• Fitzgerald, D. (2008). A nation of emigrants: How Mexico manages its migration. University of California Press.
• Gamlen, A. (2008). The emigration state and the modern geopolitical imagination. Political Geography, 27 (8), 840–856.
• Gamlen, A. (2014). Diaspora institutions and diaspora governance. International Migration Review, 48, S180–S217.
• Grabowski, J. J. (2005). Prospects and challenges: The study of early Turkish immigration to the United States. Journal of American Ethnic History, 25 (1), 85–100.
• Güler, M. (2008). Turkish immigrants in the United States: Men, women, children. In D. Balgamış & K. H. Karpat (Eds.), Turkish migration to the United States (pp. 151–172). University of Wisconsin Press.
• Hanafi, L., & Hites, D. (2017). Morocco and diaspora engagement: A contemporary portrait. Africa and its Global Diaspora: The Policy and Politics of Emigration, 61–82.
• Ho, E. L. E. (2011). ‘Claiming’ the diaspora: Elite mobility, sending state strategies, and the spatialities of citizenship. Progress in Human Geography, 35 (6), 757–772.
• Ho, E. L., & McConnell, F. (2019). Conceptualizing ‘diaspora diplomacy’: Territory and populations betwixt the domestic and foreign. Progress in Human Geography, 43 (2), 235–255.
• Karpat, K. H. (1985). The Ottoman emigration to America, 1860–1914. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 17 (2), 175–209.
• Karpat, K. H. (2008). The Turks finally establish a community in the United States. In D. Balgamış & K. H. Karpat (Eds.), Turkish migration to the United States (pp. 173–192). University of Wisconsin Press.
• Kaya, A. (2019). Home-state politics towards Turkish emigrants. In Turkish origin migrants and their descendants: Identities and modernities in Europe (pp. 94–109). Palgrave Pivot, Cham.
• Kaya, I. (2003). Shifting Turkish-American identity formations in the United States [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University].
• Kaya, İ. (2004). Turkish-American immigration history and identity formations. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 24 (2), 295–308.
• Koinova, M., & Tsourapas, G. (2018). How do countries of origin engage migrants and diasporas? Multiple actors and comparative perspectives. International Political Science Review, 39 (3), 311–321.
• Kolbaşı-Muyan, G. (2023). Türkiye’s diaspora engagement policy: Change in perspective since 2010. Bilig, (105), 99-128.
• Köse, M. (2023). The development of diaspora policies through political participation of Turkish diaspora [Doctoral dissertation, Istanbul University]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
• Köser-Akçapar, S. (2006). Do brains really go down the drain? Highly skilled Turkish migrants in the USA and the “brain drain” debate in Turkey. Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 22 (3), 79–107.
• Kurtuluş, B. (1999). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’ne Türk beyin göçü. Alfa Basım. Levitt, P. (2001). Transnational migration: Taking stock and future directions. Global Networks, 1 (3), 195–216.
• Liu, H., & Van Dongen, E. (2016). China’s diaspora policies as a new mode of transnational governance. Journal of Contemporary China, 25 (102), 805–821.
• Mencutek, Z. S., & Baser, B. (2018). Mobilizing diasporas: Insights from Turkey’s attempts to reach Turkish citizens abroad. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 20 (1), 86–105.
• Moss, D. M. (2016). Transnational repression, diaspora mobilization, and the case of the Arab Spring. Social Problems, 63 (4), 480–498.
• Müller-Funk, L. (2018). Diaspora mobilizations in the Egyptian (post) revolutionary process: Comparing transnational political participation in Paris and Vienna. In Diasporic Social Mobilization and Political Participation during the Arab Uprisings (pp. 115-132). Routledge.
• Öniş, Z. (2004). Turgut Özal and his economic legacy: Turkish neo-liberalism in critical perspective. Middle Eastern Studies, 40 (4), 113-134.
• Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (2003). The politics of migrants’ transnational political practices. International Migration Review, 37 (3), 760–786.
• Ragazzi, F. (2009). Governing diasporas. International Political Sociology, 3 (4), 378–397.
• Safran, W. (1991). Diasporas in modern societies: Myths of homeland and return. Diaspora, 1 (1), 83–99.
• Republic of Türkiye Turkish Embassy in Washington. (2022). About us. Republic of Türkiye Turkish Embassy in Washington. Accessed on March 12, 2025,
• Şanlıer Yüksel, Ö. İ. (2008). Türkiye’den Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’ne göç eden birinci kuşak göçmenlerin yararlandığı kitle iletişim ortamlarının ulusaşırı kimlik dönüşümüne etkileri [Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
• Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C. S. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68 (1), 48–63.
• Senay, B., & Arkilic, A. (2024). Turkey’s Diaspora Youth Diplomacy. In Routledge Handbook of Turkey’s Diasporas (pp. 213-227). Routledge.
• Senouci, F. M. (2016). The Turkish diaspora in the United States: Immigration and identity formation. Turkish Journal of Diaspora Studies 21 International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 4 (2), 32–39.
• Sheffer, G. (2002). A nation and its diaspora: A re-examination of Israeli–Jewish diaspora relations. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 11 (3), 331–358.
• TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi). (1972). Millet Meclisi Tutanak Dergisi (January 17). https:// www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/TUTANAK/MM__/d04/c001/mm__04001031.pdf
• Tsourapas, G. (2022). Transnational state practices and authoritarian politics. In Handbook on Transnationalism (pp. 128-140). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2025). “Place of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population in the United States.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Detailed Tables, Table B05006, 2022, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDT1Y2022.B05006?t=Place of Birth:Populations and People& y=2022. Accessed on January 8, 2025.
• U.S. Customs and Border Protection, “Nationwide Encounters”, https://www.cbp.gov/document/stats/ nationwide-encounters, accessed on 17 December 2024.
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Homeland Security Statistics, “Lawful Permanent Residents”, https://ohss.dhs.gov/topics/immigration/lawful-permanent-residents, accessed on 17 December 2024.
• Ünver, C. (2013). Changing diaspora politics of Turkey and public diplomacy. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 12 (1), 181–189.
• Varadarajan, L. (2010). The Domestic Abroad: Diasporas in International Relations. Oxford University Press.
• Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 447–462.
• Waldinger, R., & Fitzgerald, D. (2004). Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology, 109 (5), 1177–1195.
• Yaldız, F. (2019). A Critical Approach to the Term Turkish Diaspora: Is there ‘the’Turkish Diaspora?. Bilig, (91), 53-80.
• Yanasmayan, Z., & Kaşlı, Z. (2019). Reading diasporic engagements through the lens of citizenship: Turkey as a test case. Political Geography, 70, 24–33.
• Yavuzer, H. (2009). Amerika’daki Türkler ve kurmuş oldukları Türk dernekleri. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken, 1 (1), 171–198.
• Zohry, A., & Debnath, P. (2010). A study on the dynamics of the Egyptian diaspora: Strengthening development linkages. International Organization for Migration (IOM).