Küresel İnovasyon Yarışında Teknoloji ve Ticaret İlişkisi: ABD, Birleşik Krallık ve Çin Örneği

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 18, 70 - 94, 30.09.2025

Şüheda Baran Satılmış

https://doi.org/10.55830/tje.1699620

Öz

Küresel ölçekte teknolojik gelişmeler, ülkelerin ekonomik büyüme stratejilerini ve uluslararası ticaret yapılarını derinlemesine dönüştürmektedir. Bu çalışmada, teknoloji-ticaret ilişkisinin küresel inovasyon yarışındaki belirleyici rolü Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD), Birleşik Krallık ve Çin örnekleri üzerinden incelenmektedir. Araştırmada, bu üç ülkenin bilim, teknoloji ve yenilik politikaları ile yüksek teknoloji ihracatı, uluslararası patent, marka ve tasarım başvuruları gibi göstergeler üzerinden karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme yapılmıştır. Ayrıca ABD ile Çin arasındaki teknoloji temelli ticaret savaşları da güncel veriler ışığında ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı, söz konusu ülkelerin inovasyon kapasiteleri ile dış ticaret performansları arasındaki etkileşimi ortaya koyarak, teknoloji odaklı küresel rekabette nasıl konumlandıklarını açıklamaktır. Elde edilen bulgular, teknoloji üretme ve yayma kapasitesinin yalnızca ekonomik değil, aynı zamanda stratejik üstünlük sağlamada da kilit bir faktör haline geldiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Ticaret , Teknoloji Politikaları , Küresel İnovasyon İndeksi

The Relationship Between Technology and Trade in the Global Innovation Race: The Case of the Usa, The United Kingdom, and China

Öz

Technological advancements on a global scale have profoundly transformed countries' economic growth strategies and the structure of international trade. This study examines the decisive role of the technology–trade relationship in the global innovation race through the cases of the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), and China. A comparative assessment is conducted based on key indicators such as science, technology, and innovation policies, high-tech exports, and international applications for patents, trademarks, and industrial designs. Furthermore, the technology-driven trade conflict between the US and China is analyzed in light of recent data. The aim of the study is to reveal the interaction between innovation capacity and trade performance in these countries and to explain how they are positioned in technology-oriented global competition. The findings indicate that the capacity to produce and disseminate technology has become a key factor not only for economic development but also for achieving strategic superiority.

Anahtar Kelimeler

International Trade , Technology Policies , Global Innovation Index

Kaynakça

• Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The Economics of Growth. MIT Press.
• Aghion, P., Antonin, C., Bunel, S., & Jaravel, X. (2021). The Power of Creative Destruction: Economic Upheaval and the Wealth of Nations. Harvard University Press.
• Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
• Bown, C. P. (2022). The US-China Trade War and Phase One Agreement. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
• Brown, K., & Singleton, L. (2021). Europe’s 5G dilemma: Balancing trade, security and innovation. Chatham House Report.
• Brown, T., Green, A., & White, S. (2023). Innovation and export dynamics in the UK high-technology sectors. Journal of International Trade, 58(3), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinttrade.2023.04.005
• Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.
• Crafts, N. F. R. (1985). British Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution. Oxford University Press.
• Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the Face of Uncertainty. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
• Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford University Press.
• Fagerberg, J. (2018). Innovation policy: Rationales, lessons and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(2), 540–565.
• Findlay, R., & O'Rourke, K. H. (2007). Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Princeton University Press.
• Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.
• Hall, B. H., & Harhoff, D. (2012). Recent research on the economics of patents. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 541–565.
• Hernandez, E., Prysner, J., & Ford, D. (2019, December 9). A Marxist approach to technology. Liberation School. Retrieved from https://liberationschool.org/a-marxist-approach-to-technology/
• IMF. (2023). International Trade and Technological Innovation Report. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications
• Kennedy, S. (2020). Made in China 2025: Beijing’s Industrial Policy under Challenge. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
• Lee, J., & Song, H. (2021). China’s Semiconductor Ambitions in the Shadow of US Sanctions. Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 13(2), 45–61.
• Lee, Y. (2023). China’s Rare Earth Strategy and the Geopolitics of Technology. Asia-Pacific Review, 30(1), 1–24.
• Li, X., & Sun, Y. (2022). China’s industrial upgrading and high-technology exports: A structural analysis. Economic Development Quarterly, 36(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424221092415 Lundvall, B. Å. (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press.
• Marx, K. (1867/1887). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1, Ch. 15). Progress Publishers.
• Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Institute for International Economics.
• Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press.
• Mowery, D. C., & Rosenberg, N. (1998). Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America. Cambridge University Press.
• Nelson, R. R., & Wright, G. (1992). The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(4), 1931–1964.
• OECD. (2018). Innovation policies in the digital age (SciTech Ind. Pap. No. 59). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eadd1094-en
• OECD. (2023). Main Science and Technology Indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/sti/msti.htm
• OECD. (2023). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2024). PISA 2018 results (volume I). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• OECD. (2024). Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2024. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2024-en
• OECD. (2025). Investment, innovation and productivity: Structural policy reforms for global competitiveness. OECD Economic Outlook.
• Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review.
• Rodrik, D. (2013). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.
• Segal, A. (2019). The Coming Tech Cold War with China. Foreign Affairs.
• Smith, J., & Johnson, M. (2023). Technological innovation and export performance in the United States. Research Policy, 52(7), 104588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104588
• Smith, T. (2010). Technological change in capitalism: Some Marxian themes. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep048
• UK Department for Business and Trade. (2024). UK High Technology Exports Annual Report 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-high-tech-exports-2023
• UNCTAD. (2023). Technology and Innovation Report 2023: Green and digital transitions in manufacturing global value chains. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
• UNCTAD. (2025). Technology and Innovation Report 2025: Inclusive artificial intelligence for development. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
• White House. (2022). CHIPS and Science Act of 2022. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov
• Wieczorek, A. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy, 39(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scr008
• WIPO. (2023). Global Innovation Index Country Rankings 2011–2024. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/
• WIPO. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: The Geography of Innovation. World Intellectual Property Organization.
• World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators – High Technology Exports. https://data.worldbank.org
• World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/
• Wu, M. (2020). The “National Security” Exception and the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Yale Journal of International Law, 45(1), 287–323.
• Zenglein, M. J., & Holzmann, A. (2019). Evolving Made in China 2025: China's Industrial Policy in the Quest for Global Tech Leadership. MERICS Papers on China, No. 8.
• Zhao, H., Wang, J., & Chen, L. (2023). Diversification and technological progress in China’s export sectors. Journal of Asian Economics, 85, 101442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2023.101442