Türkiye’s and the EU’s Coordinated and Divergent Approaches to the 2011 Syrian Crisis
Öz
This study examines Türkiye’s and the EU’s reactions to the Syrian civil war by using the concept of normative power. This conceptual framework is preferred to explain and evaluate whether Türkiye’s and the EU’s reactions to the Syrian crisis matched the value-based approach. The study argues that Türkiye and the EU have differences and similarities in their policies toward the Syrian crisis. It further posits that rather than taking an ally or value-based approach, Türkiye and the EU have decided to put their national interests in their reactions regarding the Syrian conflict in certain areas of war and some regions. Türkiye and the EU have suffered especially on security issues resulting from the Syrian crisis. Furthermore, the Syrian crisis led to economic difficulties, humanitarian traumas, and challenges for Türkiye and the EU in the social and political spheres. As a result, in certain areas of conflict and some issues, both Türkiye and the EU have attempted to prioritize their interest first. Therefore, these actors have not taken a value-based stance on some matters. Nonetheless, Türkiye and the EU offered massive humanitarian aid several times and desired the Syrian crisis to end.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Syrian Civil War, Türkiye, The EU, The Responses of Türkiye and the EU to the Syrian Civil War.
Kaynakça
- Akkaya, A. Y. (2019). Avrupa’nın Mülteci Politikalarına Oryantalist Yaklaşımı: Suriye Krizi Sonrası Avrupa ve Türkiye İlişkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 74(2), 357–380.
- Al-Hilu, K. (2021). The Türkiye Intervention in Northern Syria: One Strategy, Discrepant Policies, Technical Middle East Directions, European University Institute, Research Project Report.
- Altundeğer, N., & Yılmaz, M. E. (2016). İç Savaştan Bölgesel İstikrarsızlığa: Suriye Krizinin Türkiye’ye Faturası. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 289–301.
- Altunışık, M. B. (2016). The inflexibility of Türkiye’s policy in Syria. IEMed. Mediterranean Yearbook, https://www.iemed.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/01/The-Inflexibility-of-Türkiyes-Policy-in-Syria.pdf
- Aşkar-Karakır, İ. (2017). Suriye İç Savaşının AB’ye Yansımaları: Mülteci Sorunu ve Uluslararası Terörizm. Yaprak Gülcan, Sedef Akgüngör & Yeşim Kuştepeli (eds.), Türkiye-AB İlişkilerinde Yeni Bir Konu: Mülteci Sorunu ve Türkiye-AB İşbirliği, 134- 164. İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı.
- Asseburg, M. (2020). Reconstruction in Syria: Challenges and policy options for the EU and its member states. [SWP Research Paper 11]. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
- Ataç, C. A. (2008). EU’s Capacity of Creating Desirable Outcomes: Cyprus, Georgia, Central Asia, and Some Other Matters of Normative Leadership. Journal of Cyprus Studies, 14(35), 59-88.
- Ataç, C. A. (2012). AB’nin Normatif Kapasite Sorunu, Akdeniz İçin Birlik ve Türkiye. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 1–24.
- Ataman, M., & Özdemir, Ç. (2018). Türkiye’s Syria policy: Constant objectives shifting priorities. Türkiye Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 13-36.
- Björkdahl, A., Chaban, N., Leslie, J., & Masselot, A. (2015). Introduction: To take or not to take EU norms? Adoption, adaptation, resistance, and rejection. Björkdahl, A., Chaban, N., Leslie, J., Masselot, A. (eds) Importing EU Norms. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 8, 1–9. Springer, Cham.
