Türk Toplumunda Covid-19 Pandemi Süreci: Deneyimler, Fobi ve Koronavirüs ile Başa Çıkma Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 143 - 160, 30.05.2022

Oya Sevcan Orak , Ercan Tunç

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye toplumunda COVID-19 salgını sırasında koronavirüs ile ilgili deneyimleri, fobileri ve başa çıkma yöntemlerini incelemektir. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı tipteki bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin farklı illerinde yaşayan bireylerle yapılmıştır. Çalışma 413 kişiyle online platformda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler “Tanıtıcı Bilgi Formu” ve “COVID-19 Fobi Ölçeği” kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Katılımcıların %45,9'u gelir düzeylerinin etkilenmediğini, %73'ü evlerinin dışında çalışmadığını ve %40,4'ü pandemi sırasında en çok kullandıkları bilgi kaynağının sosyal web siteleri olduğunu belirtmiştir. Başa çıkma yöntemlerine ilişkin açıklamaları; spiritüel yollar, ev içi iş-uğraş aktiviteleri, sosyal etkileşim, ekrana bağlanma, sanatsal-sportif-kültürel aktiviteler, kendine psikososyal yardım uygulamaları, kaçınma-yok sayma olmak üzere yedi başlık altında toplanmıştır. Katılımcıların “Covid 19 Fobisi Ölçeği” toplam puan ortalaması 47.09 ± 15.52 olarak belirlenmniştir. Pandemide ev dışında çalışma durumu ile cinsiyet ve medeni durum değişkenleri arasındaki ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır (p<0,05). Medeni duruma göre Covid 19 Fobisi Ölçeği’nin somatik ve sosyal alt boyut puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Sonuç: Katılımcıların evde kaldıkları süreçle baş etmek için çoğunlukla ekrana bağlandıkları ve sanatsal-sportif-kültürel aktivitelere yöneldikleri belirlenmiştir. Katılımcıların Covid 19 fobisi düzeyi orta düzeyde bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türk Toplumu, Koronavirüs, Pandemi, Korku, Baş etme

Covid-19 Pandemic Period in Turkish Society: A Study on Experiences, Phobia and Cophing with Coronavirus

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the experiences, phobia and coping methods about the coronavirus during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society. Method: This descriptive study was conducted with individuals who were living in different cities in Turkey. The study was conducted by 413 individuals on online platform. The data were collected using an “Introductory Information Form” and the “COVID-19 Phobia Scale”. Results: 45.9% of the participants stated that their income levels were not affected, 73% did not work outside their homes, and 40.4% stated that the most used information source during the pandemic was social websites. Explanations on coping methods; spiritual paths are grouped under seven headings, namely, domestic work-occupation activities, social interaction, screen attachment, artistic-sportive-cultural activities, self-psychosocial help practices, avoidance-ignoring. The total score average of the participants in the "Covid 19 Phobia Scale" was determined as 47.09 ± 15.52. It was determined that there is a relationship between working outside the home and gender and marital status variables in the pandemic (p <0.05). A significant difference was found between the somatic and social sub-dimension mean scores of the Covid 19 Phobia Scale according to marital status (p <0.05). Conclusion: It has been determined that the participants mostly tied to the screen to cope with the process of staying at home and focused on artistic-sporting-cultural activities. Covid 19 phobia level of the participants was found to be moderate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkish Society, Coronavirus, Pandemic, Fear, Coping

Kaynakça

• 1. Chan JFW, Yuan S, Kok KH, To KKW, Chu H, Yang J, Xing F, Liu J, Yip CCY, Poon RWS, Tsoi HW, Lo SKF, Chan KH, Poon VKM, Chan WM, Ip JD, Cai JP, Cheng VCC, Chen H, Hui CKM, Yuen KY. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. The Lancet, 2020; 514-523.
• 2. Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(4): e21.
• 3. World Health Organization [WHO]. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. 2021. https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed date: February, 08, 2021).
• 4. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. COVID-19 information page. 2021. https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/?_Dil=2 (accessed date: February, 08, 2021).
• 5. Gatto M, Bertuzzo E, Mari L, Miccoli S, Carraro L, Casagrandi R, Rinaldo A. Spread and dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy: Effects of emergency containment measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020; 117(19): 10484-10491.
• 6. Górnicka M, Drywień ME, Zielinska MA, Hamułka J. Dietary and lifestyle changes during COVID-19 and the subsequent lockdowns among Polish adults: A Cross-sectional online survey PLife COVID-19 study. Nutrients. 2020; 12(8): 2324.
• 7. Baker SR, Bloom N, Davis SJ, Kost K, Sammon M, Viratyosin T. The unprecedented stock market reaction to COVID-19. Review of Asset Pricing Studies. 2020; 10(4): 742-758.
• 8. Douglas M, Katikireddi SV, Taulbut M, McKee M, McCartney G. Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response. BMJ. 2020; 369(1557): 1-6.
• 9. Bakioglu F, Korkmaz O, Ercan H. Fear of COVID-19 and positivity: Mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty, depression, anxiety, and stress. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2020; 1-14.
• 10. Karatas Z. COVID-19 Pandemisinin toplumsal etkileri, değişim ve güçlenme. [Social impacts of COVID-19 pandemic, change and empowerment]. Turkish Journal of Social Work Research. 2020; 4(1): 3-17.
• 11. Satici B, Saricali M, Satici SA, Griffiths MD. Intolerance of uncertainty and mental wellbeing: Serial mediation by rumination and fear of Covid-19. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020; 1-12.
• 12. Cinelli M, Quattrociocchi W, Galeazzi A, Valensise CM, Brugnoli E, Schmidt AL, Zola P, Zollo F, Scala A. The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 1-10.
• 13. Xiang YT, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, Ng CH. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(3): 228-229.
• 14. American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Pub. 2013.
• 15. Arpaci I, Karataş K, Baloğlu M. The development and initial tests for the psychometric properties of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S). Personality and Individual Differences. 2020; 164: 110108.
• 16. Asmundson GJG, Paluszek MM, Landry CA, Rachor GS, McKay D, Taylor S. Do pre-existing anxiety-related and mood disorders differentially impact COVID-19 stress responses and coping? Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2020; 74: 102271.
• 17. Elbay RY, Kurtulmus A, Arpacıoglu S, Karadere E. Depression, anxiety, stress levels of physicians and associated factors in Covid-19 pandemics. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 290: 113130.
• 18. Ozdin S, Bayrak Ozdin S. Levels and predictors of anxiety, depression and health anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society: The importance of gender. IJSP. 2020; 66(5): 504-511.
• 19. Polizzi C, Lynn SJ, Perry A. Stress and coping in the time of Covid-19: Pathways to resilience and recovery. Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 2020; 17(2): 59-62.
• 20. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020; 17: 1729.
• 21. Roy C. Extending the Roy adaptation model to meet changing global needs. NSQ. 2011; 24(4): 345-351.
• 22. Duygun A. COVID-19 pandemisi sırasında tüketicilerin yaşam tarzlarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of consumers' lifestyles during the covıd-19 pandemic]. Econder. 2020; 4(1): 232-247.
• 23. Aylaz R, Yildiz E. COVID-19 pandemisinin yaşam tarzı ve psikososyal alandaki etkileri. Yeni koronavirüs hastalığının toplum üzerine etkileri ve hemşirelik yaklaşımları. 2020. https://avesis.inonu.edu.tr/yayin/42da77d6-6e83-4381-b23c-76451e29ba3d/yeni-koronavirus-hastaliginin-toplum-uzerine-etkileri-ve-hemsirelik-yaklasimlari (accessed date: October, 14, 2020).
• 24. Ferguson N, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G, Imai N, Ainslie K, Baguelin M, Bhatia S, Boonyasiri A, Cucunubá Z, Cuomo-Dannenburg G, Dighe A, Dorigatti I, Fu H, Gaythorpe K, Green W, Hamlet A, Hinsley W, Okell LC, Elsland SV, Thompson H, Verity R, Volz E, Wang H, Wang Y, Walker PGT, Walters C, Winskill P, Whittaker C, Donnelly CA, Riley S, Ghani AC. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College London. 2020; 10(77482): 1-20.
• 25. Malta M, Rimoin AW, Strathdee SA. The coronavirus 2019-nCoV epidemic: Is hindsight 20/20?. EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 20: 100289.
• 26. Kawohl W, Nordt C. COVID-19, unemployment, and suicide. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(5): 389-390.
• 27. Goodell JW. COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research. Finance Research Letters. 2020; 35: 101512.
• 28. Yagan Guder S, Guler Yildiz T. Okul öncesi dönemdeki çocukların toplumsal cinsiyet algılarında ailenin rolü [Role of the family in preschool children's perception of gender]. HUJE. 2016; 1-23.
• 29. Couch KA, Fairlie RW, Xu H. The impacts of COVID-19 on minority unemployment: First evidence from April 2020 CPS microdata. SSRN. 2020; 1-42.
• 30. TUBA [Turkish Academy of Sciences] COVID-19 pandemi değerlendirme raporu. 2020. http://www.tuba.gov.tr/files/images/2020/kovidraporu/Covid-19%20Raporu-Final+.pdf (accessed date: October, 14, 2020).
• 31. Househ M. Communicating Ebola through social media and electronic news media outlets: A cross-sectional study. Health Informatics Journal. 2016; 22(3): 470-478.
• 32. Li L, Zhang Q, Wang X, Zhang J, Wang T, Gao TL, Duan W, Tsoi KKF, Wang FY. Characterizing the propagation of situational information in social media during Covid-19 epidemic: A case study on weibo. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. 2020; 7(2): 556-562.
• 33. Arpaci I, Alshehabi S, Al-Emran M, Khasawneh M, Mahariq I, Abdeljawad T, Hassanien AE. Analysis of twitter data using evolutionary clustering during the COVID-19 pandemic. CMC. 2020; 65(1): 193-204.
• 34. Garcia R. Neurobiology of fear and specific phobias. Learn Mem. 2017; 24(9): 462-471.
• 35. Metwally AM, El-Sonbaty MM, Abdellatif GA, El-Etreby LA, Elsayed H, Elsheshtawy E, Elsaeid A, Ibrahim NA. Common Phobias among Egyptian Primary Schoolchildren: An Emergency Trigger for Panic Disorder due to Corona Pandemic. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020; 8(T1): 3-11.
• 36. Tian F, Li H, Tian S, Yang J, Shao J, Tian C. Psychological symptoms of ordinary Chinese citizens based on SCL-90 during the level I emergency response to COVID-19. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 288: 112992.
• 37. Singh R, Subedi M. COVID-19 and stigma: Social discrimination towards frontline healthcare providers and COVID-19 recovered patients in Nepal. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020; 53: 102222.
• 38. Tandon R. The COVID-19 pandemic, personal reflections on editorial responsibility. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020; 50: 102100.
• 39. Devereux S, Béné C, Hoddinott J. Conceptualising COVID-19’s impacts on household food security. Food Security. 2020; 12(4): 769-772.
• 40. Hobbs JE. Food supply chains during the COVID‐19 pandemic. CJAE. 2020; 68(2): 171-176.
• 41. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, Zheng J. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 287: 112934.
• 42. Singh G, Singh A, Zaidi SZH, Sharma S. A study on mental health and well-being of individuals amid COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Mukt Shabd Journal. 2020; 9(5): 952-963.
• 43. Arslan DA, Arslan G. Kırsal Türkiye’de, geçmişten geleceğe kadın, evlilik ve aile [Marriage, family and the women in rural Turkey: Yesterday today and tomorrow]. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2015; 1(37): 629-684.
• 44. Sumer N, Gundogdu Akturk E, Helvacı E. Anne-baba tutum ve davranışlarının psikolojik etkileri: Türkiye’de yapılan çalışmalara toplu bakış. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2010; 13(25): 42-59.
• 45. Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2020; 1-9.
• 46. Haktanir A, Seki T, Dilmaç B. Adaptation and evaluation of Turkish version of the fear of COVID-19 scale. Death Studies. 2020; 1-9.
• 47. Eakman AM, Schelly C, Henry KL. Protective and vulnerability factors contributing to resilience in post-9/11 veterans with service-related injuries in postsecondary education. AJOT. 2016; 70(1): 7001260010p1-7001260010p10.
• 48. Xu W, Fu G, An Y, Yuan G, Ding X, Zhou Y. Mindfulness, posttraumatic stress symptoms, depression, and social functioning impairment in Chinese adolescents following a tornado: Mediation of posttraumatic cognitive change. Psychiatry Research. 2018; 259: 345-349.
• 49. Liang L, Ren H, Cao R, Hu Y, Qin Z, Li C, Mei S. The effect of COVID-19 on youth mental health. Psychiatr Q. 2020; 91(3): 841-852.
• 50. Buyuksener E. Türkiye’de sosyal ağların yeri ve sosyal medyaya bakış. XIV. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı Bildirileri. 2009; 19-23.
• 51. Tutgun-Unal A, Deniz L. Sosyal medya kuşaklarının sosyal medya kullanım seviyeleri ve tercihleri. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches. 2020; 15(22): 1289-1319.
• 52. Durak H, Seferoglu SS. Türkiye'de sosyal medya okuryazarlığı ve sosyal ağ kullanım örüntülerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of social media literacy and social media usage patterns in turkey]. The Journal of International Social Research. 2016; 9(46): 526-535.
• 53. Taylan HH. Türkiye’de serbest zaman değerlendirme aracı olarak sinema izleme alışkanlıkları. Turkish Studies Social Sciences. 2019; 14(6): 3459-3478.