A DISCUSSION ON THE METHODOLOGY OF PEACE JOURNALISM
Öz
Peace journalism is a normative mode of journalism that aims to contribute to nonviolent transformation of conflicts. The theory, which supports that news about conflict should be given in a way to enhance empathy and understanding among adversaries, is referred to as a revolutionary or insurgent form of journalism by various sources. Peace journalism had an ambiguous start regarding its methodology, which seems to be related to the movement’s pragmatic take-off in the late 1990’s, and did not discuss its methodology until the mid-2000’s. Later Jake Lynch (2006, 2007, 2014) proposed critical realism as the methodological foundation of the movement. This paper discusses the methodology problem of peace journalism and suggests instead a constructionist methodology, which is based on the premise that there is no truth independent of the observer; rather everything we know about the world is socially constructed. Critical realism prioritizes ontology over epistemology and argues that there is a certain shape of reality that one has to believe in. This paper argues that this transcendental ontology is a form of story-telling and there are thousands of ways of telling a story. Therefore, the priority for journalism should be on epistemology, that is to say, on the question of “how to know” as news is a representation of reality, and not a reflection of it.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Peace journalism,methodology,critical realism,constructionism,epistemology
Kaynakça
- Atay, A. D. (2016). Communicating with the Other: Peace Journalism as a Form of Self-Other Relationship. Journal of Media Ethics, 31(3), 188-195.
- Bilton, T. (2002). Introductory Sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Burr, V. (1995). An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London and New York: Routledge.
- Burr, V. (2003). Social Constructionism (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
- Christians, C. G. (2011). Journalism Ethics in Theory and Practice. In G. Cheney, S. May, & D. Munshi (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Ethics (pp. 190-203). New York and Oxon: Routlegde.
- Derrida, J. (1982). Différance. In Margins of Philosophy (A. Bass, Trans., pp. 3-27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Derrida, J. (1997). ...That Dangerous Supplement... In J. Derrida (Ed.), Of Grammatology (pp. 141-164). Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press, Corrected Edition.
- Fairclough, N., Jessop, B., & Sayer, A. (2004). Critical Realism and Semiosis. In J. Joseph, & J. M. Roberts (Eds.), Realism Discourse and Deconstruction (pp. 23-42). London and New York: Routledge.
- Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Foucault, M. (1984). What is an Author? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 101-120). New York: Pantheon Books.
