THE USABILITY ANALYSIS OF AN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4, 50 - 66, 05.10.2015

Fulya Torun Hakan Tekedere

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.99146

Öz

In this research, an E-learning environment is developed for the teacher candidates taking the course on Scientific Research Methods. The course contents were adapted to one of the constructivist approach models referred to as 5E, and an expert opinion was received for the compliance of this model. An usability analysis was also performed to determine the usability of the e-learning environment. The participants of the research comprised 42 teacher candidates. The mixed method was used in the research. 3 different data collection tools were used in order to measure the three basic concepts of usability analyses, which are the dimensions of effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. Two of the data collection tools were the scales developed by different researchers and were applied with the approval received from the researchers involved. On the other hand, the usability test as another data tool was prepared by the researchers who conducted this study for the purpose of determining the participants’ success in handling the twelve tasks assigned to them with respect to the use of elearning environment, the seconds they spent on that environment and the number of clicks they performed. Considering the results of the analyses performed within the data obtained, the usability of the developed e-learning environment proved to be at a higher rate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

e-learning, scientific research methods, usability analysis

THE USABILITY ANALYSIS OF

Öz

Kaynakça

• Badre, A. N. (2002). Shaping Web Usability: Interaction Design in Context. Boston: Pearson Education, 28-39.
• Balci, A. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem Teknik ve İlkeler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 42-43.
• Bevan, N. (1995). Human-Computer Interaction Standards. Paper presented at
• Sixth International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Yokohama. Brinck, T., Gergle, D. & Wood, S. D. (2002). Usability For The Web: Designing Web Sites
• That Work. San Diego: Academic Press, 15. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A, Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A. & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. Colorado: BSCS, 1-4.
• Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2011). e-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven
• Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (Third Edition). San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 18-25. Cagiltay, K. (2011). İnsan Bilgisayar Etkileşimi ve Kullanılabilirlik Mühendisliği:
• Teoriden Pratiğe [Human Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering: from Theory to Practice].Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık, 94-115. Cakir, H., Uluyol, C. & Karadeniz, S. (2008). Öğretim Stratejileri. İnternet Temelli Eğitim
• [Internet Based Education]. Yalın, H. İ. (Editor). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 77-78. Dillon, A. & Zhu, E. (1997). Designing Web-Based Instruction: A Human-Computer
• Interaction Perspective. Web Based Instruction. Kahn, B., H. (Editor). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 223. Erdogan, Y. Bayram, S. & Deniz, L. (2007). Web Tabanlı Öğretim Tutum Ölçeği: Açıklayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi Çalışması [Web Based Education Attitude Scale: Study of
• Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2). Ferre, X., Juristo, N., Windl, H. & Constantine, L. (2001). Usability Basics for Software
• Developers. IEEE Software, (January, February 2001), 22-29.
• Garrison, D. R. (2011).e-Learning In The 21st Century: A Framework For Research and Practice (Second Edition). New York: Routledge, 1-2.
• Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J. & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to Solve Problems with Technology (Second edition). New Jersey: Merrill / Prentice Hall, 11.
• Kilic-Cakmak, E., Gunes, E., Ciftci, S. & Ustundag, M. T. (2011). Web Sitesi Kullanılabilirlik
• Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik, Güvenirlik Analizi Uygulama Sonuçları [Developing Web Site Usability Scale: Validity, Reliability Analysis of Implementation Results]. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(2). Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Diego: Academic Press, 26-228.
• Nielsen, J. & Loranger, H. (2006). Prioritizing Web Usability. Berkeley: New Riders.
• Senemoglu, N. (2010). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim (Onsekizinci Baskı) [Development,
• Learning and Teaching (18th Edition)]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 629-630. Shackel, B. & Richardson, S. (1991). Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge:
• Cambridge University Press, 40-360. Spool J. M., Scanlom, T., Schroeder, W., Snyder, C. & D’Angelo, T. (1999). Web Site
• Usability: A Designer’s Guide. San Diego: Academic Press, 15. Stair, R. & Reynolds, G. (2012). Principles of Information Systems. Boston: Course Technology, 36-37.
• Senturk, C. (2010). Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşım ve 5E Öğrenme Döngüsü Modeli
• [Constructivist Approach and 5E Learning Cycle Model]. Eğitim-Bir-Sen, 6(17), 62. Tufekci-Aslim, S. (2011). Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşım. Öğrenme Öğretme Kuram ve Yaklaşımları [Theory and Approaches of Teaching and Learning]. Büyükalan-Filiz, S.
• (Editor). Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 346-347. Usun, S. (2006). Uzaktan Eğitim [Distance Education].Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 113.