Theoretical Frameworks, Methods, and Procedures for Conducting Phenomenological Studies in Educational Settings

Yıl 2015, , 1 - 20, 01.01.2015

Pelin Yüksel Soner Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.59813

Cited By: 80

Öz

The main purposes of phenomenological research are to seek reality from individuals’ narratives of their experiences and feelings, and to produce in-depth descriptions of the phenomenon. Phenomenological research studies in educational settings generally embody lived experience, perception, and feelings of participants about a phenomenon. This study aims to provide a general framework for researchers who are interested in phenomenological studies especially in educational setting. Additionally, the study provides a guide for researchers on how to conduct a phenomenological research and how to collect and analyze phenomenal data. The first part of the paper explains the underpinnings of the research methodology consisting of methodological framework and key phenomenological concepts. The second part provides guidance for a phenomenological research in education settings, focusing particularly on phenomenological data collection procedure and phenomenological data analysis methods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Phenomenology, phenomenological inquiry, phenomenological data analysis

Eğitim Ortamlarında Fenomenal Çalışmaları Yürütmek İçin Teorik Çerçeveler, Yöntemler ve Prosedürler

Öz

Fenomenolojik araştırmaların temel amacı, bireyin deneyimlerinden ve duygularından yola çıkarak belli bir fenomenan üzerinde yaptığı anlatılarında gerçeği aramak ve bu fenomenana yönelik derinlemesine açıklamalar üretmektir. Eğitim ortamlarında fenomenolojik araştırmalar genellikle araştırmaya katılanların belli bir fenomenan hakkında yaşantıları, deneyimleri, algıları ve duyguları somutlaştırmak için kullanılır. Bu çalışma, özellikle eğitim ortamlarında fenomenolojik çalışmalarla ilgilenen araştırmacılar için genel bir çerçeve sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışmada fenomenolojik araştırmalar için veri toplamak ve bu fenomenal verileri analiz yapmak için araştırmacılara yön gösterici bir kılavuz olarak sunmak hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmanın ilk bölümü metodolojik çerçeve ve anahtar kavramlardan oluşan fenomenolojik araştırma metodolojisinin temellerini açıklamaktadır. İkinci bölümde ise özellikle eğitim ortamlarında bir fenomenolojik araştırma yapmak isteyen araştırmacılara yönelik fenomenolojik veri toplama prosedürü ve fenomenolojik veri analiz yöntemlerinin basamakları sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fenemoloji, fenomenolojik araştırma, fenomenolojik veri analizi

Kaynakça

• Ashworth, P. (1999). "Bracketing" in phenomenology: Renouncing assumptions in hearing about student cheating. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(6), 707-721.
• Beech, I. (1999). Bracketing in phenomenological research. Nurse Researcher, 6(3), 33-35
• Cilesiz, S. (2006). Phenomenological investigation of adolescents’ experiences of educational uses of computers at Internet cafés (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Florida
• Cilesiz, S. (2009). Educational computer use in leisure contexts: A phenomenological study of adolescents' experiences at Internet cafes. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1) 232-274.
• Cilesiz, S. (2010). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: current state, promise, and future directions for research. Educational Technology Research and Development DOI: 10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
• Creswell, J.W.(2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. B. (2000). Interpretive Practice and Social Action. In N. Denzin & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 483-505) -Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Husserl, E (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). London: George Allen & Unwin.
• Husserl, E. (1970). Logical Investigation (Vols. 1 - 2) (J. N. Findlay, Trans.). New York: Humanities Press.
• Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data, Human Studies, 8(3), 279-303.
• Ihde, D. (1986). Experimental phenomenology: An introduction. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(2), 282 –292.
• Kolkelmans. J. J. (Ed.), (1967) Phenomenology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
• Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Harlow: Pearson Education.
• Lauer, Q. (1967). On evidence. In J. J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Phenomenology (pp. 83-105). Garden City, NY: Doubleday
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Merriam, S. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1? Issues of validity and reliability of qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 51-60.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Poggenpoel, M., & Myburgh, C. (2003) The researcher as research instrument in educational research: A possible threat to trustworthiness? Education, 123(2), 418-421.
• Rockmore, T. (2011). Kant and phenomenology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Streubert, H., & Carpenter, D. (1995). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.
• van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York, NY: SUNY Press.