Project-based learning and academic motivation in gastronomy and culinary arts education

Yıl 2024, , 170 - 181, 30.06.2024

Beybala Timur

https://doi.org/10.53601/tourismandrecreation.1462192

Öz

This study investigates the relationships between project-based learning (PBL) and the dimensions of academic motivation within the framework of self-determination theory. To this end, the study employed a mixed method and, data were collected from gastronomy and culinary arts students through a survey and interview via open-ended questions. PLS-SEM structural equation modeling was used to analyze the quantitative data, while the qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. The quantitative findings indicated that PBL positively affects students' extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, while it negatively affects their motivation. The qualitative findings showed that PBL was found to boost students' desire and motivation to learn, while also cultivating their sense of responsibility and problem-solving skills. Consequently, it can be concluded that PBL is an active learning method that positively affects the academic motivation of gastronomy and culinary arts students, and its use in higher education should be encouraged.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gastronomy education, Project-based learning, Academic motivation, Self-determination theory

Gastronomi ve mutfak sanatları eğitiminde proje temelli öğrenme ve akademik motivasyon

Öz

Bu çalışma, özerklik teorisi çerçevesinde proje temelli öğrenme (PTÖ) ile akademik motivasyon boyutları arasındaki ilişkileri araştırmaktadır. Bu amaçla çalışmada karma bir yöntem tercih edilmiş, gastronomi ve mutfak sanatları öğrencilerinden anket ve açık uçlu sorulara yazılı olarak cevap verdikleri bir mülakatla veri toplanmıştır. Nicel veriler PLS-SEM yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile, nitel veriler ise içerik analizi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Nicel bulgular, PTÖ'nün öğrencilerin dışsal ve içsel motivasyonunu pozitif yönde etkilediğini, motivasyonsuzluklarını ise negatif yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Nitel bulgular ise PTÖ'nün öğrencilerin öğrenme isteği ve motivasyonunu arttırdığını, sorumluluk bilincini ve problem çözme becerilerini geliştirdiğini işaret etmektedir. Sonuç olarak, PTÖ'nün gastronomi ve mutfak sanatları öğrencilerinin akademik motivasyonunu olumlu yönde etkileyen bir aktif öğrenme yöntemi olduğu ve yükseköğretimde kullanımının teşvik edilmesi gerektiği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gastronomi eğitimi, Proje temelli öğrenme, Akademik motivasyon, Özerklik teorisi

Kaynakça

• Ahmad, S. Z., Abu Bakar, A. R., & Ahmad, N. (2018). An evaluation of teaching methods of entrepreneurship in hospitality and tourism programs. International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.11.002
• Baillie, C. A., & Fitzgerald, G. (2000). Motivation and attrition in engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 145-155. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:109199503
• Başbay, A. (2005). Basamaklı Öğretim Programıyla Desteklenmiş Proje Tabanlı Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Öğrenme Sürecine Etkileri. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 6(1), 95-116.
• Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel Araştırmalarda Geçerlik, Güvenirlik ve Örneklem Büyüklüğünün Belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23-28.
• Bayrakçeken, S., Oktay, Ö., Samancı, O., & Canpolat, N. (2021). Motivasyon Kuramları Çerçevesinde Öğrencilerin Öğrenme Motivasyonlarının Arttırılması: Bir Derleme Çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(2), 677-698. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/62432/900664
• Becker, P. H. (1993). Common Pitfalls in Published Grounded Theory Research. Qualitative Health Research, 3(2), 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300207
• Brophy, J. (1988). Research linking teacher behavior to student achievement: Potential implications for instruction of Chapter 1 students. Educational Psychologist, 23(3), 235-286. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2303_3
• Brundiers, K., & Wiek, A. (2013). Do We Teach What We Preach? An International Comparison of Problem- and Project-Based Learning Courses in Sustainability. Sustainability, 5(4), 1725-1746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041725
• Burgess, O. (2015). Cyborg Teaching: The Transferable Benefits of Teaching Online for the Face-to- Face Classroom. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:110097428
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Erkan Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (25. bs). Ankara:Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789944919289
• Carcary, M. (2009). The Research Audit Trial - Enhancing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Inquiry. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:27367673
• Carroll, L., & Leander, S. (2001). Improving Student Motivation Through the Use of Active Learning Strategies [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Saint Xavier University & Skylight.
• Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x
• Cicuto, C. A. T., & Torres, B. B. (2016). Implementing an Active Learning Environment To Influence Students’ Motivation in Biochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(6), 1020-1026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00965
• Cocco, S. (2006). Student Leadership Development: The Contribution of Project-Based Learning [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Royal Roads University.
• Collins, J. W., & O’brien, N. P. (2011). The Greenwood Dictionary of Education. ABC-CLIO.
• Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
• Crosling, G., Nair, M., & Vaithilingam, S. (2015). A creative learning ecosystem, quality of education and innovative capacity: a perspective from higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1147-1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881342
• Çavuşoğlu, F. (2021). Lisans Düzeyi̇nde Gastronomi̇ ve Mutfak Sanatları Eği̇ti̇mi̇ Alan Öğrenci̇leri̇n Akademi̇k Moti̇vasyonlarını Beli̇rlemeye Yöneli̇k Bi̇r Araştırma. International Journal of Contemporary Tourism Research, 5(2), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.30625/ijctr.1031956
• Dağlı, G., Ateş, M., Şamiloğlu, G., Dağlı, T., Durmaz, B., & Evran Edemen, F. (2022). Çevrimiçi Robotik Kodlama Eğitiminin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarısı ve Motivasyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların İncelenmesi. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 9(90), 2634-2657. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.3381
• Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Vallerand, R. J., & Pelletier, L. G. (1991). Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
• Deckers, L. (2022). Motivation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003202646
• Ersoy, A. (2006). İlköğretim Beşinci Sınıfta Teknoloji Destekli Proje Tabanlı Öğrenme Uygulamaları [Doktora Tezi]. Anadolu Üniversitesi.
• Filiz, N. Y., & Dikmen, Y. (2017). Hemşirelik Eğitiminde Aktif Öğrenme Yöntemlerinin Kullanımı: Jigsaw Tekniği. Journal of Human Rhythm, 3(3), 145-150. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/johr/issue/31267/340432
• Finfgeld‐Connett, D. (2010). Generalizability and transferability of meta‐synthesis research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(2), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05250.x
• Fraser, B. J. (1998). The birth of a new journal: Editor’s introduction. Learning Environments Research. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009994030661
• Grossoehme, D. H. (2014). Overview of Qualitative Research. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 20(3), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2014.925660
• Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
• Gültekin, M. (2005). İlköğretim Beşinci Sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinde Proje Tabanlı Öğrenmenin Öğrenme Ürünlerine Etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 5(2), 517-556.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis (8. bs). Pearson Education Limited.
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-011-0261-6/TABLES/5
• Huguet, C., Pearse, J., Noè, L. F., Valencia, D. M., Ruiz, C., Jimenez Heredia, A., Andrea, M., Avedaño, P., No E A, L. F., Castillo Ruiz, N., Heredia, A. J., Onica, M., Pati~, A., & No, A. (2020). Improving the motivation of students in a large introductory geoscience course through active learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1588489
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
• Jones, L. (2007). The Student-Centered Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
• Kazoğlu, İ. H., & Şahin, B. (2021). Turizm Eğitiminde Akti̇f Öğrenme ve Web Tabanlı Uzaktan Eği̇ti̇m: Müfredatlar Üzeri̇ne Bi̇r İnceleme. International Journal of Contemporary Tourism Research, 5(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.30625/ijctr.785306
• Kim, J. (2004). Educational psychology. Seohyun-sa.
• Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-Based Learning. Içinde R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2. bs, ss. 275-297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018
• Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306
• Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K. J., Tan, O. S., Koh, C., & Ee, J. (2009). A self-determination approach to understanding students’ motivation in project work. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 139-145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.002
• Martín, P., Potočnik, K., & Fras, A. B. (2017). Determinants of students’ innovation in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1229-1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1087993
• Memişoğlu, H. (2001). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretiminde proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımı [Doktora Tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
• Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102
• Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2020). Student Motivation from and Resistance to Active Learning Rooted in Essential Science Practices. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-017-9688-1/FIGURES/1
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
• Palmer, S., & Hall, W. (2011). An evaluation of a project-based learning initiative in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.593095
• Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
• Powell, K. (2003). Spare me the lecture. Nature, 425(6955), 234-236. https://doi.org/10.1038/425234a
• Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
• Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. Içinde C. Ames & R. E. Ames (Ed.), Research on motivation in education: The classroom in milieu (ss. 13-51). Academic.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2012). Multiple identities within a single self: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization within contexts and cultures. Içinde M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Ed.), Handbook of self and identity (2. bs, ss. 225-246). Guilford.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Toward a social psychology of assimilation: Self-determination theory in cognitive development and education. Içinde B. Sokol, F. M. E. Grouzet, & U. Muller (Ed.), Self-regulation and autonomy: Social, developmental, educational, and neurological dimensions of human contact (ss. 191-207). Cambridge University Press.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2015). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. Içinde K. R. Wentzel & D. Miele (Ed.), Handbook on motivation at school (2. bs). Routledge.
• Sarioglan, M., & Sezen, T. S. (2017). Project based learning approach in fusion cuisine education: A modal proposal. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 574-578. https://doi.org/10.18844/PROSOC.V4I1.2303
• Sarstedt Marko and Ringle, C. M. and H. J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Içinde M. and V. A. Homburg Christian and Klarmann (Ed.), Handbook of Market Research (ss. 1-40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
• Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2012). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Pearson Higher Ed.
• Shin, M.-H. (2018). Effects of Project-based Learning on Students’ Motivation and Self-efficacy. English Teaching, 73(1), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.95
• Sivan, A., Leung, R. W., Woon, C., & Kember, D. (2000). An Implementation of Active Learning and its Effect on the Quality of Student Learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 381-389. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:144361469
• Tanaka, M. (2023). Motivation, self-construal, and gender in project-based learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2043870
• Tasgin, A., & Tunc, Y. (2018). Effective Participation and Motivation: An Investigation on Secondary School Students. World Journal of Education, 8(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n1p58
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4).
• Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. International Universities Press.
• Wlodkowski, R. J. (2008). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. Içinde Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults, 3rd ed. (3. bs). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
• Wold, H. O. A. (1982). Soft modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions (K. G. Joreskog & H. O. A. Wold, Ed.). North-Holland. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:59790709
• Wolfe, K. (2008). Active Learning. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 6(1), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1300/J172V06N01_05
• Wood, E. J. (2001). Biochemistry and molecular biology teaching over the past 50 years. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2(3), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.1038/35056600
• Yuliansyah, A., & Ayu, M. (2021). The Implementation of Project-Based Assignment in Online Learning during Covid-19. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JELTL), 2(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.33365/JELTL.V2I1.851 Yurt, E., & Bozer, E. N. (2015). Akademik Motivasyon Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması-The Adaptation of the Academic Motivation Scale for Turkish Context. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(3), 669-685. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/223140.