A Bibliometric Study on Creativity in the Gifted

Öz

In this study, it was investigated articles that contain concepts of gifted and creativity with social network analaysis. It was searched that these articles were made in which time periods and which articles had a significant effect in these time intervals. CiteSpace program was used to make a document/article co-citation analysis. As a result of the research, clusters were determined based on the relationship in the citations, articles that were the most cited and important contained concepts of gifted and creativity were presented. Among the important articles in database, it is possible to see the articles from Turkey. With the help of the programs reflecting the social network profile such as CiteSpace, the subject of study can be determined, obtained up-to-date information on deficiencies or gaps in the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Creativity, Giftedness, Social Network, CiteSpace
• Creativity;
• Giftedness;

ÜSTÜN YETENEKLİLERDE YARATICILIK ÜZERİNE BİR BİBLİOMETRİK ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Bu çalışmada yaratıcılık ve üstün yetenek kavramlarını içeren makaleler sosyal ağ analizi ile incelenmiştir. Bu makalalerin daha çok hangi zaman aralığında yapıldığı ve hangi makalelerin bu zaman aralıklarında önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğu araştırılmıştır. Ortak atıf analizini ve doküman analizini gerçekleştirmek için CiteSpace programı kullnılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, atıflar arasındaki ilişkiye göre, üstün yetenek ve yaratıcılık kavramlarıı içeren en çok atıf alan ve önemli makaleler sunulmuştur. Veri tabanında yer alan önemli makaleler arasıda Türkiye de yapılmış olan makaleleri de görmek mümkündür. CiteSpace gibi sosyal ağ profilini yansıtan programların yardımıyla, çalışma konusu belirlenebilir, literatürdeki eksiklikler veya boşluklar hakkında güncel bilgiler elde edilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yaratıcılık,
• Üstün Yeteneklilik;
• Sosyal Ağ Analizi;
• CiteSpace

Kaynakça

1. Alberta Learning (2004). The Journey: A Handbook for Parents of Children Who are Gifted and Talented. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Learning.
2. Ausubel, P.D. (1964) Creativity, general creative abilities, and the creative individual. Psychology in the Schools, 1(4): 344-347.
3. Besançon, M. (2013). Creativity, giftedness and education. Gifted and talented International Journal. 28 (1-2), 149-161. doi: 10.1080/15332276.2013.11678410
4. Baykoç Dönmez, N. (2011). Üstün ve Özel Yetenekli Çocuklar ve Eğitimleri (Ed.: N. Baykoç Dönmez), Özel Gereksinimli Çocuklar ve Özel Eğitim, Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
5. Besimoğlu, C. (2015). Türkiye’deki ziraat fakültelerinin tarımsal araştırma eğilimleri: 1996-2011 yıllarının bibliyometrik analizi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
6. Chen C,(2006). CiteSpaceII. Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns inscientific literature. Journal of The Amerıcan Socıety For Informatıon Scıence And Technology, 57(3):359–377
7. Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Chen, C. (2014). The CiteSpace manual. Retrieved from http://cluster.ischool.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace.

9. Davis, G .A. & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the Gifted. McGraw-Hill Book Company, England.
10. Feng, F., Zhang, L., Du,Y. & Wang, W. (2015). Visualization and quantitative study in bibliographicdatabases: A case in the field of university–industry cooperation. Journal of Informetrics 9, 118–134. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.009
11. Flint, L. J. (2001). Challenges of identifying and serving gifted children with ADHD. Teaching Expectional Children, 33(4), 62-69. doi: 10.1177/004005990103300409
12. Heller, K. H.,Perleth, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students, In Sternberg, R., J., Davidson, J., E., (Ed) Conceptions of giftedness (2nd 327-342), Cambridge UniversityPress.
13. Galagher, J.J. (2015). Education of gifted students: a civil rights ıssue? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(1) 64–69. doi: 10.1177/0162353214565547
14. Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57. doi: 10.1023/A:1023619503005
15. Jackson, N. & Klein, E. (1997). Gifted Performance on Young Children. In Colangeloand G. Davis (eds). Handbook of GiftedEducation, Boston MA: Ally&Bacon.
16. Kaufman,J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Russell, C.M. (2012). Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1) 60 –73. doi:10.1177/0734282911428196
17. Kaufman, J. C., Gentile, C. A., & Baer, J. (2005). Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 260-265. doi: 10.1177/001698620504900307
18. Khan, B. S. & e Niazi, M. A. (2017). Network community detection: A review and visual survey. CoRR, abs/1708.00977.
19. Kurup, A., Chandra, A. & Binoy, V. V. (2015). ‘Little minds dreaming big science’: are we really promoting ‘children gifted in STEM’ in India? Current Science, 108, 5: 779-781. 6 Mayıs 2015 Retrieved from http://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp? T=P&P=AN&K=101659152&S=R&D=a9h&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeprQ4yOvsOLCmr02ep7ZSsqu4Sa%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGutkywrLJRuePfgeyx43zx
20. Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W. & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103:135–158. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y
21. Luria, S. R., O’Brien, R. L & Kaufman, J. C (2016). Creativity in gifted identification: increasing accuracy and diversity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 44-52
22. Mongeon, P. & Paul-Hus, A. (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106: 213 –228. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
23. Mann, E. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. Vol. 30(2). 236–260. doi:10.4219/jeg-2006-264
24. Manning S. (2006) Recognizing gifted students: A practical guide for teachers Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42, 64–68. doi: 10.1080/00228958.2006.10516435
25. Olszewski-Kubilus, P.,Subotnik, R. F. & Worrell, F. C. (2015). Conceptualizations of giftedness and the development of talent: Implications for counselors. Journal of Counseling& Development, 93: 143-152. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00190.x
26. Po, B., & Merryman, A. (2010). The creativity crisis. Newsweek. Retrieved from Expended Academic ASAP.
27. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., & Reis, S. M. (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. Elementary School Journal, 82, 185-194. Retrieved from https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/461256
29. Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Davidson (Ed.), Conceptions of giftedness (p. 246-279). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
30. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687
31. Tsay, M.-Y., Xu, H. & Wu, C.-W. (2003). Author co-citation analysis of semiconductor literatüre. Scientometrics, 58(3), 529-545. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006878.83104.61
32. Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33. Torrence, E. P. (1965). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. Creativity and Learning, 94(3), 663-681
34. Santos, A.-B. (2015). Open Innovation research: trends and influences – abibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation Management, 3 (2), 131-165. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/67648/1/59-760-2-PB.pdf
35. Seyedghorban, Z., Jekanyika_matanda, M. & LaPlaca, P. (2016). Advancing theory and knowledge in the business-to-business branding literature, Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2664-2677. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.002
36. Song, J.,Zhang, H. & Dong, W. (2016). A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: analysis and visualization. Scientometrics, 107, 1111-1147. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1918-1,
37. Van Raan, A.F.J.,(2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 3 (1), 50–62. doi: 10.1207/s15366359mea0301_7
38. Yu, Y.-C., Chang, S.-H. & Yu, L.-C. (2016). An academic trend in STEM education from bibliometric and co-citation method. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2).113-116. doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.668
39. Zhao, R. & Wang, J. (2011). Visualizing the research on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. Scientometrics, 86, 593–612. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0283-8