Öğretmen Adaylarının Medya Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri

Öz

Medya araçlarının yaygınlaşması ve yoğun şekilde kullanılması neticesinde “dijital toplum” olarak adlandırılabilecek geleneksel anlayıştan farklı olan bir toplum ve toplumsal katılım türü ortaya çıkmıştır. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram vb. sosyal ağlar bu tanımlamaya örnek olarak gösterilecek medya araçlarıdır. Araştırmanın temel amacı, öğretmen adaylarının genel olarak “değişik yapıdaki medya mesajlarına ulaşma, analiz etme, değerlendirme ve kullanabilme becerisi” olarak tanımlanabilecek olan medya okuryazarlık becerilerine ne derecede sahip olduklarının belirlenmesi ve bazı değişkenler açısından irdelenmesidir. Tarama modellerinden karşılaştırma türü ilişkisel tarama kullanılarak yapılan araştırmanın örneklemini 2011-2012 eğitim-öğretim yılında Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesinde 1. ve 4. sınıflarda öğrenim gören 1101 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada kullanılan veri toplama aracı iki kısımdan; demografik özellikler ve Literat (2011) tarafından geliştirilen ve çalışma kapsamında araştırmacı tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan medya okuryazarlığı ölçeğinden oluşmaktadır. Sonuçlar öğretmen adaylarının, dijital medyayı kullanım sıklıkları, sosyal paylaşım ağlarında harcadıkları zaman ve medya okuryazarlık düzeyleri bakımında bazı farklılıklara sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• medya,okuryazarlık,öğretmen adayı

Media Literacy Levels of Teacher Candidates

Öz

As a result of the widespread use of media tools, a society and social participation type different from the traditional approach which can be called “digital society” has emerged. Social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and etc. are examples of this media tools defined. The main purpose of the research is to determine the media literacy level of students. Survey method is used in this casual comparative study. The sample of the research was consisted of 1101 students who were studying in Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Education in the academic year of 2011-2012. The data collection tool used in the research is composed of two parts; demographics and the media literacy scale which originally developed by Literat (2011) and adapted to Turkish by the researcher. Results show that pre-service teachers have some differences in the frequency of using digital media, the time they spend on social networks and media literacy levels. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• media,literacy,teacher candidates

Kaynakça

1. Almenara, J. C., ve Liano, S. G. (2011). Media Literacy in the Initial Teacher Education. Education XX1, s. 59-87.
2. Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media Literacy: A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Queenstown, Maryland: The Aspen Institute Wye Center.
3. Aufderheide, P. (2001). Media literacy: From a report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. R. Kubey içinde, Media literacy in the information age: current perspectives (s. 76-86). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
4. Balcı, A. (2004). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
5. Baykul, Y. (1999). İstatistik Metodlar ve Uygulamalar. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
6. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Buckingham, D. (2005). The Media Literacy of Children and Young People: A Review of the Research Literature. London: OFCOM.
8. Buckingham, D. (2009). Media Educaton. Cambridge: Polity Press.

9. Caverlee, J., ve Webbs, S. (2008). "A large-scale study of MySpace: Observations and implications for online social networks. 2nd International Conference on
10. Weblogs and Social Media. Seattle: ICWSM.
11. Dezuanni, M., Kapitzke, C., ve Iyer, R. (2010). Copyright, digital media literacies and preservice teacher education. Digital Culture & Education (DCE), s. 230-245.
12. Duncan, B. (1989). Media literacy at the crossroads: Some issues, probes and questions. The History and Social Science Teacher, 205-209.
13. Andersen, N., Duncan, B., & Pungente, J. (1999). Media Education in Canada – the Second Spring. C. Feilitzen, & U. Carlsson içinde, Children and Media: Image. Participation.
14. European Commission. (2011). Testing and Refining Criteria to Assess Media Literacy Levels in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
15. Federov, A. (2008). A Media Education around the World: Brief History. Acta Didactica Napocensia, s. 56-68.
16. Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE.
17. Grafe, S., Boss, M., Bergey, B., ve Hobbs, R. (2011). Media Education in Germany and the United States: Teachers’ Motivations, Perceptions and Attitudes. ECER 2011, Urban Education. ECER 2011.
18. Harris, I. M., ve Morrison, M. L. (2003). Peace Education. North Carolina: McFarland Company Inc. Publishers.
19. Hart, A., ve Süss, D. (2002). Media education in 12 European countries: a comparative study of teaching media in mother tongue education in secondary schools. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
20. Hartmann, T., ve Klimmt, C. (2006). Gender and computer games: Exploring females' dislikes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4).
21. Hobbs, R. (1998). Building citizenship skills through media literacy education. M. Salvador ve P. Sias içinde, The Public Voice in a Democracy at Risk (s. 57-76). Westport: Praeger Press.
22. Hobbs, R. (2007). Approaches to Instruction and Teacher Education in Media Literacy. Doha: UNESCO.
23. Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Washington: The Aspen Institute.
24. Hobbs, R., ve Jensen, A. (2009). The Past, present and The Future of Media Literacy Education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, s. 1-11.
25. Hunneshagen, H. (2005). Innovationen in Schulen. Lowther: Waxman Inan.
26. Jenkins, H., Purushhotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., ve Robison, A. J. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education in 21st Century. London: The MIT Press.
27. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushatma, R., Robison, R., ve Weigel, M. (2007). “Confronting the Challenges of a Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Nordic Journal of Media Literacy, Nr01(02), s. 98-113.
28. Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at', 'Looking up' or 'Keeping up with' people? Motives and uses of Facebook. CHI 2008 Proceedings (pp. 1027-1036). Florence: CHI.Jochum, V., Pratten, B., ve Wilding, K. (2005). Civil Renewal Andactice Citizenship: A Guide to The Debate.
29. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın-Dağıtım.
30. Kim, H., ve Kim, J. (2009). A Study on Gender Difference in the Use of Digital Games: Focused on Self-Realization of Game Players. IASDR2009 (pp. 4047-1050). Seul: IASSDR.
31. Köklü, N., ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2000). Sosyal Bilimler İçin İstatistiğe Giriş. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
32. Kubey, R. (2001). Media Literacy in the Information Age, Current Perspectives. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
33. Lauri, M. A., Borg, J., Günnel, T., ve Gillum, R. (2010). Attitudes of A Sample of English, Maltese and German Teachers Towards Media Education. European Journal of Teacher Education, s. 79-98.
34. Lehmen, R. (2006). Media Education in European Schools - Let’s Move Together. Media Skills and Competence Conference, (s. 48-50). Tampere.
35. Literat, I. (2011). Measuring New Media Literacies; Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Assessment Tool. Teachers College Educational Technology Conference (TCETC) Proceedings. New York: TCETC.
36. Lenhart, A. (2009). Adults and Social Network Websites. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
37. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., ve Christakis, N. (2008). The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 79-100.
38. Livingstone, S., Wang, Y., ve Li, C. (2011, Mayıs 5). London School of Economics and Political Arts-LSE Media Policy Project. Şubat 5, 2012 tarihinde Dossier: Media literacy and the UK’s Communication Act 2003: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2011/05/05/dossier-media-literacy-and-the-uks-communication-act-2003/ adresinden alındı.
39. Martin, C. (2009). Social Networking Usage and Grades Among College Students: A Study to Determine the Correlation Of Social Media Usage and Grades. Hampshire: University of New Hampshire-Whittemore School of Business & Economics.
40. Masterman, L. (2001). Teaching the media. Madison. Routledge.
41. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Moddy, K. (2012). Marshall McLuhan: The Revolution is -- Media! Ocak 24, 2012 tarihinde Center for Media Literacy: http://www.medialit.org/reading-room/marshall-mcluhan-revolution-media adresinden alındı.
43. Namita, Y. (2010). Teachers' perceptions of media education in BC secondary schools: Challenges and posibilities. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia.
44. OFSTED. (2012). Initial Teacher Education (ITE) inspection handbook. Manchester: Crown.
45. Ogan, C., Karakus, T., Inal, Y., ve Cagiltay, K. (2009). Gender and Teenage Computer Use and Gaming Activity in Turkey and the United States. EU Kids Online Conference. London.
46. Peterson, A., ve Knowles, C. (2009). Active citizenship: a preliminary study into student teacher understandings. Educational Research, s. 35-59.
47. Potter, W. J. (2005). Media Literacy. London: Sage Publications.Quaiser-Pohl, C., Geiser, C., ve Lehmann, W. (2006). The Relationship between Computer-Game Preference, Gender and Mental-Rotation Ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 609-619.
48. Radyo Televizyon Üst Kurulu. (2008). Medya Okuryazarlığı Nedir? Ocak 25, 2012 tarihinde Medya Okuryazarlığı: http://www.medyaokuryazarligi.org.tr/nedir.html adresinden alındı.
49. Richardson, E. (2009). A Theoretical Investigation into the Two major Ağğroaches to Media Literacy: A Proposal for a Hybrid. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Northeastern University.
50. Robertson, L., ve Hughes, J. M. (2011). Investigating Pre-Service Teachers’ Understandings of Critical Media Literacy. Language and Literacy, s. 37-53.
51. Scharrer, E. (2003). Making a case for media literacy in the curriculum: Outcomes and assessment. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 354-358.
52. Schwarz, G. (2005). Overview: What Is Media Literacy, Who Cares and Why? G. Schwarz, ve P. Brown içinde, Media Literacy: Transformng Curriculum and Teaching (s. 5-17). Madlen: Blackwell Publishing.
53. Silva, K., ve Wyatt, W. (2007). Reviving a Culture – Debating Public Through Media Education. S. Abel, A. Nowak, ve K. Ross içinde, Rethinking Media Education: Critical Pedagogy and Identity Politics (s. 1-16). Cresskill: Hampton Press.
54. Silverblatt, A. (1995). Media Literacy: Keys to Interpreting Media Messages. Westport: Praeger.
55. Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. 2007: Pearson Educatın Inc.
56. Thoman, E. (1999). Skills & Strategies for Media Education. Educational Leadership, s. 50-54.
57. Thoman, E., ve Jolls, T. (2003). Literacy for the 21st Century: An Overview & Orientation Guide to Media Literacy Education. Santa Monica: Center for Media Literacy.
58. Thoman, E., ve Jolls, T. (2004, September). Media Literacy-A National Priority for a Changing World. The American Behavioral Scientist, s. 18-29.
59. Tornero, P., & Manuel, J. (2007). Study of the Current Trends and Approaches on Media Literacy in Europe. European Commision: http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/media_literacy/studies/index_en.htm adresinden alındı
60. Torres, M. (2006). The Need for Critical Media Literacy In Teacher Education Core Curricula. Educational Studies, 260-282.
61. Tsai, M. J. (2004). Gender Differences in Online Behaviors, Motivation and Attitudes. In L. Cantoni, ve C. McLoughlin, Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 4409-4415). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
62. Tutkun, T., Demir, M. K., Genç, S. Z., ve Şahin, Ç. (2012). Öğretmen Adaylarının Medya Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri. 21. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Bildiri Özetleri. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi.
63. UNESCO. (1982, Ocak). Grunwald Declaratin on Media Education. Grunwald: UNESCO.
64. UNESCO. (2008). International Expert Group Meeting: Teacher Training Curricula Enrichment for Media and Information Literacy. Paris: UNESCO.
65. UNESCO. (2011). Community media: a good practice handbook. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
66. Williams, D., Consalvo, M., Caplan, S., ve Yee, N. (2009). Looking for Gender: Gender Roles and Behaviors Among Online Gamers. Journal of Communication, 725.
67. Williams, D., Yee, N., ve Caplan, S. E. (2008). Who Plays, How Much, and Why? Debunking the Stereotypical Gamer Profile. Journal of Computer-Mediated, 993-1018.
68. Wilson, C. (2012). Media and Information Literacy Pedagogy and Possibilities. Communicar, s. 15-22.
69. Wilson, C., Grizzle, A., Tuazon, R., Akyempong, K., ve Cheung, C.-K. (2011). Media and Information Literacy Curriculum for Teachers. France: UNESCO.
70. Zylka, J., Müller, W., ve Martins, S. W. (2011). Media Literacy Worldwide: Similarities and Differences of Theoretical and Practical Approaches. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (s.726-733). Amman: IEEE.