Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Doğal Faiz Oranının Tahmin Edilmesi: Para Politikası İçin Çıkarımlar

Yıl 2024, , 184 - 192, 15.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.16951/trendbusecon.1422010

Öz

Doğal faiz oranı, para politikasının şekillendirilmesinde ve iktisadi kararların yönlendirilmesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu çalışma Türkiye için doğal faiz oranını yapısal VAR (SVAR), indirgenmiş form ve Hodrick-Prescott (HP) filtresi olmak üzere üç farklı ekonometrik yaklaşım kullanarak tahmin etmektedir. Çalışma, 2006-2023 yılları arasındaki verileri kullanarak, Türkiye'deki faiz oranı farkının dinamiklerinin kapsamlı bir analizini sunmaktadır. İndirgenmiş form yaklaşımı ve HP filtresi belirli dönemlerde önemli reel faiz oranı açığı varlığına işaret ederken, SVAR yaklaşımı tahmin sürecindeki döngüselliğe bağlı olarak nispeten daha küçük bir reel faiz oranı açığı ortaya koymaktadır. Ortalama olarak, her üç yöntemden elde edilen doğal faiz oranı tahminleri karşılaştırılabilir olmakla birlikte, SVAR ve HP yaklaşımları indirgenmiş form yaklaşımından daha yüksek tahminler vermektedir. Ayrıca, reel faiz oranı farkının oynaklığı SVAR yaklaşımında en düşük seviyededir. Bu sonuçlar, doğal faiz oranının oynaklığı göz önüne alındığında, fiyat istikrarını korumak için aktif bir para politikasının benimsenmesinin önemini ve alınan politika kararlarında DFO’nı dikkate alması gerektiğini vurgulamaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Blanchard, O. J. and Quah, D. (1989). ‘The dynamic effects of aggregate supply and demand disturbances’, American Economic Review, 79, pp. 655–673. [CrossRef]
  • Brzoza-Brzezina, M. (2003). Estimating the natural rate of interest: a SVAR approach. National Bank of Poland. [CrossRef]
  • Brzoza‐Brzezina, M. (2006). The Information Content of the Neutral Rate of Interest: The Case of Poland. Economics of Transition, 14(2), 391-412. [CrossRef]
  • Crespo-Cuaresma, J., Gnan, E. and Ritzberger-Gruenwald, D. (2003). ‘Searching for the natural rate of interest: A Euro-area perspective’, Working Paper No. 84, Vienna: Austrian National Bank. [CrossRef]
  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1057-1072. [CrossRef]
  • Enders, W. (2015). Applied econometric time series fourth edition. New York (US): University of Alabama.
  • Hamilton, J. D. (2020). Time series analysis. Princeton university press.
  • Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. Journal of Money, credit, and Banking, 1-16. [CrossRef]
  • Holston, K., Laubach, T., & Williams, J. C. (2017). Measuring the natural rate of interest: International trends and determinants. Journal of International Economics, 108, S59-S75. [CrossRef]
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1), 159-178. [CrossRef]
  • Laubach, T., & Williams, J. C. (2001). Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest. [CrossRef]
  • Laubach, T., & Williams, J. C. (2003). Measuring the natural rate of interest. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1063-1070. [CrossRef]
  • Lee, A., & Williams, C. A. (2019). Assessing the Usefulness of the Neutral Rate of Interest to Monetary Policy in Jamaica1. [CrossRef]
  • Mendes, R. R. (2014). The neutral rate of interest in Canada (No. 2014-5). Bank of Canada Discussion Paper. [CrossRef]
  • Muñoz-Salas, E., & Rodríguez-Vargas, A., (2021). Monetary policy in Costa Rica: an assessment based on the neutral real interest rate. [CrossRef]
  • Neiss, K. S., & Nelson, E. (2003). The real-interest-rate gap as an inflation indicator. Macroeconomic dynamics, 7(2), 239-262. [CrossRef]
  • Öğünç, F., & Batmaz, İ. (2011). Estimating the neutral real interest rate in an emerging market economy. Applied Economics, 43(6), 683-693. [CrossRef]
  • Phillips, P.C., Perron, P., (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  • Rachel, L., & Smith, T. D. (2015). Secular drivers of the global real interest rate. Bank of England Staff Working Paper No. 571. [CrossRef]
  • Summers, L. H. (2014). U.S. economic prospects: Secular stagnation, hysteresis, and the zero lower bound. Business Economics, 49(2), 65-73. [CrossRef]
  • Us, V. (2018). Measuring the natural interest rate for the Turkish economy. 52nd issue (January 2018) of the International Journal of Central Banking.
  • Wicksell, K. (1938). Interest and Prices (tr. de la edición de 1898 de R.F. Kahn). Londres: Macmillan.
  • Woodford, M. (2003). Optimal interest-rate smoothing. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(4), 861-886. [CrossRef]
  • Zhang, R., Martínez-García, E., Wynne, M. A., & Grossman, V. (2021). Ties that bind: Estimating the natural rate of interest for small open economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 113, 102315. [CrossRef]

Estimating the Natural Interest Rate for the Turkish Economy: Insights for Monetary Policy

Yıl 2024, , 184 - 192, 15.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.16951/trendbusecon.1422010

Öz

The natural interest rate plays an important role in shaping monetary policy and guiding economic decisions. This paper estimates the natural interest rate for Turkey using three different econometric approaches: structural VAR (SVAR), reduced form, and Hodrick-Prescott (HP) filter. The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the dynamics of the interest rate differential in Turkey using data for the period 2006-2023. While the reduced-form approach and the HP filter indicate the existence of a significant real interest rate gap in certain periods, the SVAR approach reveals a relatively smaller real interest rate gap due to the procyclicality in the estimation process. On average, the natural interest rate forecasts from all three methods are comparable, but the SVAR and HP approach yields higher forecasts than the reduced-form approach. Moreover, the volatility of the real interest rate spread is the lowest in the SVAR approach. Given the volatility of the natural interest rate, these results emphasize the importance of adopting an active monetary policy to maintain price stability and to take into account the natural interest rate in policy decisions.

Kaynakça

  • Blanchard, O. J. and Quah, D. (1989). ‘The dynamic effects of aggregate supply and demand disturbances’, American Economic Review, 79, pp. 655–673. [CrossRef]
  • Brzoza-Brzezina, M. (2003). Estimating the natural rate of interest: a SVAR approach. National Bank of Poland. [CrossRef]
  • Brzoza‐Brzezina, M. (2006). The Information Content of the Neutral Rate of Interest: The Case of Poland. Economics of Transition, 14(2), 391-412. [CrossRef]
  • Crespo-Cuaresma, J., Gnan, E. and Ritzberger-Gruenwald, D. (2003). ‘Searching for the natural rate of interest: A Euro-area perspective’, Working Paper No. 84, Vienna: Austrian National Bank. [CrossRef]
  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1057-1072. [CrossRef]
  • Enders, W. (2015). Applied econometric time series fourth edition. New York (US): University of Alabama.
  • Hamilton, J. D. (2020). Time series analysis. Princeton university press.
  • Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. Journal of Money, credit, and Banking, 1-16. [CrossRef]
  • Holston, K., Laubach, T., & Williams, J. C. (2017). Measuring the natural rate of interest: International trends and determinants. Journal of International Economics, 108, S59-S75. [CrossRef]
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1), 159-178. [CrossRef]
  • Laubach, T., & Williams, J. C. (2001). Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest. [CrossRef]
  • Laubach, T., & Williams, J. C. (2003). Measuring the natural rate of interest. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1063-1070. [CrossRef]
  • Lee, A., & Williams, C. A. (2019). Assessing the Usefulness of the Neutral Rate of Interest to Monetary Policy in Jamaica1. [CrossRef]
  • Mendes, R. R. (2014). The neutral rate of interest in Canada (No. 2014-5). Bank of Canada Discussion Paper. [CrossRef]
  • Muñoz-Salas, E., & Rodríguez-Vargas, A., (2021). Monetary policy in Costa Rica: an assessment based on the neutral real interest rate. [CrossRef]
  • Neiss, K. S., & Nelson, E. (2003). The real-interest-rate gap as an inflation indicator. Macroeconomic dynamics, 7(2), 239-262. [CrossRef]
  • Öğünç, F., & Batmaz, İ. (2011). Estimating the neutral real interest rate in an emerging market economy. Applied Economics, 43(6), 683-693. [CrossRef]
  • Phillips, P.C., Perron, P., (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  • Rachel, L., & Smith, T. D. (2015). Secular drivers of the global real interest rate. Bank of England Staff Working Paper No. 571. [CrossRef]
  • Summers, L. H. (2014). U.S. economic prospects: Secular stagnation, hysteresis, and the zero lower bound. Business Economics, 49(2), 65-73. [CrossRef]
  • Us, V. (2018). Measuring the natural interest rate for the Turkish economy. 52nd issue (January 2018) of the International Journal of Central Banking.
  • Wicksell, K. (1938). Interest and Prices (tr. de la edición de 1898 de R.F. Kahn). Londres: Macmillan.
  • Woodford, M. (2003). Optimal interest-rate smoothing. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(4), 861-886. [CrossRef]
  • Zhang, R., Martínez-García, E., Wynne, M. A., & Grossman, V. (2021). Ties that bind: Estimating the natural rate of interest for small open economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 113, 102315. [CrossRef]
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İktisat Teorisi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Metin Tetik 0000-0003-2741-7175

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 9 Ekim 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Ekim 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Ocak 2024
Kabul Tarihi 26 Temmuz 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024

Kaynak Göster

APA Tetik, M. (2024). Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Doğal Faiz Oranının Tahmin Edilmesi: Para Politikası İçin Çıkarımlar. Trends in Business and Economics, 38(4), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.16951/trendbusecon.1422010

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

29928