Dijital Medyada Savaş Haberciliğinin Etik Sınavı: Batı Medyasında İki Savaş, İki Anlatı

Öz

Bu çalışma, Batı ana akım medyasının (BBC, The Guardian, CNN, Associated Press) Rusya Ukrayna Savaşı ile İsrail-Filistin çatışmasının ilk dönemlerini haberleştirirken kurduğu çerçeveleme stratejilerini karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektedir. Entman’ın çerçeveleme yaklaşımı temel alınarak, her kurumdan her iki savaşa ilişkin altışar metin olmak üzere toplam 48 düz haber, bütüncül (holistik) çerçeve analiziyle çözümlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular Batı medyasının iki savaşa farklı etik ve normatif statüler atfettiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Rusya-Ukrayna haberlerinde Rusya, “saldırganlık”, “işgal” ve “savaş suçları”nın tartışmasız faili olarak konumlandırılırken Ukrayna ve Ukraynalı siviller hem mağdur hem de direnen “kahraman” özneler olarak temsil edilmektedir. İsrail-Filistin haberlerinde ise Gazze’deki insani kriz güvenlik ikilemi ve diplomatik süreçlerle girift biçimde çerçevelenmekte, İsrail çoğunlukla Hamas saldırılarına tepki veren meşru savunmacı, Hamas ise şiddetin ve sivil kayıpların başlıca sorumlusu olarak kodlanmaktadır. Böylece Gazze’deki insani kriz faille bağı silikleştirilmiş, yönetilmesi gereken bir trajediye indirgenmektedir. Bu ikircikli bakış, savaş haberciliğini bilgilendirmenin ötesinde, etik çifte standartları yeniden üreten bir manipülasyon pratiğine dönüştürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Medya
• Savaş Haberciliği
• Çerçeveleme Kuramı
• Rusya-Ukrayna
• İsrail-Filistin

The Ethical Test of War Reporting in Digital Media: Two Wars, Two Narratives in Western Media

Öz

This study comparatively examines the framing strategies employed by Western mainstream media outlets (BBC, The Guardian, CNN, Associated Press) in reporting the early stages of the Russia–Ukraine war and the Israel–Palestine conflict. Based on Entman’s framing approach, a total of 48 straight news texts—six from each outlet for each conflict—were analyzed using a holistic frame analysis. The findings reveal that Western media assign different ethical and normative statuses to the two wars. In the Russia–Ukraine coverage, Russia is positioned as the unequivocal perpetrator of “aggression,” “invasion,” and “war crimes,” while Ukraine and Ukrainian civilians are represented as both victims and resilient “heroic” actors. In contrast, reporting on the Israel–Palestine conflict frames the humanitarian crisis in Gaza within a complex web of security dilemmas and diplomatic processes; Israel is predominantly portrayed as a legitimate defender responding to Hamas attacks, whereas Hamas is coded as the primary agent responsible for violence and civilian casualties. As a result, the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza becomes detached from its perpetrator and is reduced to a crisis to be managed. This ambivalent perspective transforms war reporting from a practice of informing the public into a form of manipulation that reproduces ethical double standards.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital Media
• War Reporting
• Framing Theory
• Russia-Ukraine
• Israel-Palestine

Kaynakça

1. Allan, S. (2013). Citizen Witnessing: Revisioning Journalism in Times of Crisis. Polity Press.
2. Allan, S., & Zelizer, B. (2004). Reporting War: Journalism in Wartime. Routledge.
3. Argın, E. (2021). Dijital Habercilikte Etik Sorunlar Pandemi Özelinde Bir Bakış. Içinde Ş. Güler (Ed.), Dijital İletişim Araştırmaları. Nobel Yayınları. https://books.google.com.tr/bookshl=tr&lr=&id=w_lLEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA49&dq=habercilikte+etik&ots=Z3zADMjDVE&sig=Xnsu7LVCrXsOjXQUXb_lKPvjI2c&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=habercilikte etik&f=false.
4. Associated Press. (2022a). Pregnant woman, baby die after Russian bombing in Mariupol. https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-maternity-hospital-pregnant-woman-dead-c0f2f859296f9f02be24fc9edfca1085.
5. Associated Press. (2022b). Rocket attacks hit Ukraine’s Lviv as Biden visits Poland. https:// apnews.com/article/explosions-in-lviv-ukraine-russia-war-d19574a99afeb4bf964be7c3276c084c
6. Associated Press. (2022c). Waiting, fearing, singing: A night sheltering in Ukraine. https:// apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-kyiv-entertainment-europe musicf420368ddd90824c9ca6e694aeb972cd
7. Associated Press. (2022d). War Crimes Watch: A devastating walk through Bucha’s horror.
8. Associated Press. (2023). Israel strikes and seals off Gaza after incursion by Hamas, which vows to execute hostages.

9. Associated Press. (2024a). Israel taps top legal minds, including a Holocaust survivor, to battle genocide claim at world court. https://apnews.com/article/israel-gaza-south-africa-genocide-court-87a6f22fd6d9cfc580eabb9d1bef3184
10. Associated Press. (2024b). These Israeli families want answers now. https://apnews. com/article/israel-hamas-hostages-investigation-friendly-fire-3b6fdd4592957340b32a8ee71505b8e9
11. Bateson, G. (1955). A Theory of Play and Fantasy. Içinde Steps to an Ecology of Mind (ss. 177–193). University of Chicago Press.
12. BBC. (2022). Ukraine war: Russia bombards cities as eastern offensive begins. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61145578
13. BBC. (2023a). Israel-Gaza: Four arrests after protest at drone factory. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-67276157
14. BBC. (2023b). Israel Gaza: “Where is mum? Where is grandma? Where did they go?”https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67688422
15. BBC. (2023c). Jabalia: Israel air strike reportedly kills dozens at Gaza refugee camp. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67276822
16. Berry, D. (2008). Journalism, Ethics and Society. UK: Ashgate Publishing.
17. Carruthers, L. S. (2011). The media at war: Communication and conflict in the twentieth century. Palgrave Macmillan.
18. CNN. (2022). Russia says it’s not hitting Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure. Evidence suggests otherwise.
19. CNN. (2023a). Civil order ‘starting to break down’ in Gaza as people raid UN warehouses. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/29/civil-order-starting-break-down-gaza-people-raid-un-warehouses
20. CNN. (2023b). Gaza becoming a ‘graveyard for children,’ UN chief warns as calls for ceasefire intensify. https://edition.cnn.com/world/gaza-graveyard-for-children-un-chief-warns-intl-hnk/index.html
21. CNN. (2024). Nothing is moving:’ Families’ anger grows in Israel as hostages mark 100 days in Hamas captivity.
22. Entham, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4).
23. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. University of Chicago Press.
24. Ergen, E. (2024). Çerçeveleme Kuramı Bağlamında Kamu Yayın Kuruluşlarının İsrail-Filistin Çatışmasına Yaklaşımlarının İncelenmesi: G7 Ülkeleri, Rusya ve Türkiye Örneği. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 67. https://doi.org//10.47998/ikad.1436435
25. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
26. Gamson, W. A., & Modiglini, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
27. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row Publishers.
28. Gökdemir, A. (2024). İngiliz Medyasında İsrail-Filistin Savaşının Haberin Tarafgirliği Ekseninde Değerlendirmesi. Mevzu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12, 224–261. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3907603
29. Guardian, T. (2023). Gaza faces ‘highest ever recorded’ levels of food insecurity, UN warns. Civil order ‘starting to break down’ in Gaza as people raid UN warehouses
30. Güran, M. S., & Özarslan, H. (2015). Çerçeveleme Teorisi ve Toplumsal Hareketler. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 4(1), 136–150.
31. Hohenberg, J. (1995). Foreign Correspondence: The Great Reporters and Their Times. Syracuse University Press.
32. Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2010). War and media: The emergence of diffused war. Polity Press.
33. İlik, E. B. (2025). Uluslararası Habercilikte Çerçeveleme Farklılıkları: BBC ve Al Jazeera’nin Ukrayna Savaşı Haberlerinin İçerik Analizi. SDÜ İFADE Dergisi, 7(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.70627/sduifade.1691697
34. Işık, M. (2020). Çatışma Alanlarında Gazetecilik Pratiklerinin Dönüşümü ve Dijital Çağda Savaş Gazeteciliği. Turkish Journal of War Stusdies, 1, 35–52.
35. Karakaş, A. V., & Yılmaz, M. (2023). Birleşik Krallık Dergisi The Week’te Yayınlanan Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı’na Dair Karikatür Temsiller. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.33688/aucbd.1254592
36. Kenneth, H. W. (2014). Herodotos the Historian: His Problems, Methods and Originality. Routledge.
37. Knightley, P. (1982). The first casualty: The war correspondent as hero, propagandist and myth-maker. Quartet Books.
38. Knightley, P. (2004). The First Casualty: The War Correspondent as Hero, Propagandist and Myth Maker. Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. Matthes, J., & Matthias, K. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279.
40. McLaughlin, G. (2016). The War Correspondent. Routledge.
41. McLaugjhlin, G. (2016). The War Correspondent. Pluto Press.
42. Motthes, J., & Matthias, K. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity, 58(2), 258–279.
43. Ramsey, N. (2015). The Grievable Life of the War-Correspondent: The Experience of War in Henry Crabb Robinson’s Letters to The Times, 1808–1809. Içinde A. L. Downes & K. O’Loughlin (Ed.), Emotions and War: Medieval to Romantic Literature (ss. 235–250). Palgrave Macmillan.
44. Raugh, H. E. J. (2004). The Victorians at War, 1815–1914: An Encyclopedia of British Military History. ABC-CLIO.
45. Reuters Institute. (2025). No Title. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/
46. Roth, M. P., & Olson, J. S. (1997). Historical dictionary of war journalism. Greenwood Press.
47. Roth, M. P., & Olson, R. S. (1995). War Reporting: Ethics, Practice, and the Shaping of Public Perception. Greenwood Press.
48. Sabahçı, B. (2024). İnternet Gazetelerinde Haber Yapısı ve Etik Sorunlar: Hakem Halil Umut Meler Saldırısı Sonrasında Spor Gazetelerinde Çıkan Haberler. Maltepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 218–239.
49. Sanders, M. B. (2000). British journalists and the Spanish war. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 1(1), 45–60.
50. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing As a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
51. Similar Web. (2025). Website traffic statistics and global rankings. https://www.similarweb.com/
52. Şimşek, V., & Şimsek, H. (2019). Mesleki Etik ve Etik Davranışlar. Pegem Akademi.
53. Speake, J. (2003). Literature of travel and exploration: R to Z. New York. Routledge.
54. Taithe, B. (2013). Early War Correspondents and the Construction of Modern War Reporting. Içinde J. Fox & D. Bates (Ed.), The History of War Reporting (ss. 15–38). Manchester University Press.
55. Tankard, J. W., Hendrickson, L., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S. (1991). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
56. TDK. (2025). https://sozluk.gov.tr/
57. The Guardian. (2022a). Crimes against history: mapping the destruction of Ukraine’s culture. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/24/crimes-against-history-mapping-the-destruction-of-ukraines-culture
58. The Guardian. (2022b). Huge armoured column nears Kyiv as ‘barbaric’ missile strikes continue.
59. Ulaş, M. (2025). Filistin-İsrail ve Ukrayna-Rusya Savaş Haberlerinin İdeoloji Perspektifinde Tematik Analizi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 69, 112–135. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1579950
60. Williams, K. (2020). A New History of War Reporting. Routledge.
61. Yerlikaya, T. (2020). Çerçeveleme Kuramı Bağlamında Türkiye’nin Suriyeli Göçmenlere Avrupa Sınırlarını Açmasının Gazetelere Yansıması: Sabah ve Cumhuriyet Gazetesi Örnekleri. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi, 12(4), 402–414.