Social Reform Versus Individual Treatment: Opening a Window to the Reasons of One Hundred Year Debate

Öz

After 100 years, there are stili debates about the basic goal of social work profession. Is it individual treatment or social reform, adjustment or social change, micro social work practlce or macro social work practlce, self- determination or social justice? This article tries to exp!ore the factors causing these false questions which are conceptualized by the author as parameters of the conditions in which social work emerge, societal contex in which social work practised and its relation with the society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social reform,individual treatment,social justice

SOSYAL REFORMA KARŞI BİREYSEL TEDAVİ: YÜZYILLIK TARTIŞMANIN NEDENLERİNE İLİŞKİN BİR DENEME

Öz

Yüzyıl sonra dahi, sosyal hizmet mesleğinin temel amacı konusunda tartışmalar devam etmektedir. Bireysel tedavi mi yoksa sosyal reform mu, uyum mu yoksa sosyal değişme mi, mikro sosyal hizmet uygulaması mı makro sosyal hizmet uygulaması mı, self- determinasyon mu yoksa sosyal adalet mi? Bu makale, bu yanlış sorulara neden olan ve yazar tarafından, mesleğin gelişim parametreleri, uygulandığı toplumsal koşullar ve toplumla olan ilişkisi olarak kavramsallaştırılan faktörleri açıklamaya çalışmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal reform,bireysel tedavi,sosyal adalet

Kaynakça

1. ABRAMOWITZ, Mimi. “Should Ali Social Work Students Be Educated For Social Change", Journal Of Social Work Education, V. 29, N. 1, 1993, p. 6-11.
2. ABRAMOVVITZ, Mimi. “Social Work and Social Reform”, Social Work, V. 43, N. 6, 1998, p. 512-526.
3. COMPTON, Beulah, Robert, Burt GALAVVAY. Social Work Processes, Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1979.
4. COWGER, Charles D. "Assessing Client Strengths: Clinical Assessment for Client Empowerment", Social Work , V. 39, N. 3, 1994, p. 262-268.
5. DEAN, Harvey “Social Work and the Concept of Individualism”, Families in Society, V. 75, N. 7, 1994, p. 423-428.
6. DOLGOFF, Ratph L. “Clinicians as Policymakers." Social Casework, V. 62, N. 5, 1981, p. 284- 292.
7. DOMANSKI, Margaret Dietz. “Prototypes of Social Work Polİtical Participation: An Empirical Model” Social Work, V. 43, N. 2, 1998, p. 156-167.
8. FIGUEIRA-McDONOUGH, Josefina. “Policy Practice: The Neglected Side Of Social Work Interventions”, Social Work, V. 38, N. 2, 1993, p. 179-188.

9. GREENE, R. Roberta, Ruth I. KNEE. “Shaping The Policy Practice Agenda of Social Work in the Field of Aging” Social Work, V. 41, N. 5, 1996, p. 553-560.
10. HARTMAN, Ann. ‘The Professional is Political", Social Work, V. 38, N. 4, 1993, p. 365-366.
11. HAYNES, Karen S. “The One Hundred-Year Debate: Social Reform Versus Individual Treatment", Socîal Work, V. 43, N. 6, 1998, p. 501-509.
12. JONES, Catherina. “Types of Welfare Capitalism", Goverment and Opposition, V. 20, N. 30, 1985, p. 328-342.
13. JANSSON, Bruce S. Social Welfare Poicy From Theory to Practice., California, Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1990.
14. KAGLE, Jill Döner, Charles D. COVVGER. “Blaming the Clientimplicit Agenda In Practice Research" Social Work, V. 29, N. 4, 1984, p. 347-352
15. KOŞAR, Nesrin. Sosyal Hizmetlerde Aile ve Çocuk Refahı Alanı, Ankara: 1992.
16. KUT, Sema. Sosyal Hizmet Mesleği: Nitelikleri, Temel Unsurları, Müdahale Yöntemleri. Ankara: 1988.
17. MEENAGHAN, Thomas M. “ Macro Practice: Current Trend and issues", Encyclopedia Of Social Work, 18 th Edition, Silver Spring, Md, National Association of Social VVorkers, 1987, p. 82-89.
18. PINCUS, Ailen, Anne MINAHAN. Social Work Practice: Model and Method. Illinois: Peacock Press, 1973.
19. RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1971.
20. REİN, Martin. Social Policy, New York: Random House, 1970.
21. SCHORR, Alvin. “Professional Practice as Policy”, Social Service Revîew, V. 59, N. 2, 1985, p. 178-196.
22. SPECHT, Harry. “Social Work and Popular Psychotherapies", Social Service Review, V. 64, N. 3, 1990, p. 345-357.
23. ŞAHİN, Fatih. "Sosyal Hizmetin Doğası ve Paradigmaları” Prof. Dr. Sema Kut’a Armağan: Yaşam Boyu Sosyal Hizmet, Editör: Prof. Dr. Nesrin G, Koşar, Ankara: 1999, s. 60-74.
24. ŞAHİN, Fatih. Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanlarının Sosyal Refah Politikası Süreçlerine Katılımı, Ankara: 2000
25. WEICK, Ann, Charles RAPP, W. Patrick SULLIVAN, VValter KISTHARDT. "A Strenghts Perspective for Social Work Practice", Social Work, V. 34, N. 4, 1989, p. 350-354.
26. WAKEFlELD.Jerome Cari. “Psychotherapy, Distributive Justice and Social Work. Part 1: , Distributive Justice as a Conceptual Framevvork for Social Work", Social Service Review, V. 62, N. 2, 1988, p. 187-210.
27. WITKIN, Stanley L. “Is Social Work an Adjective”, Social Work{Special Centennial Issue) V. 43, N. 6, 1998, p. 483-486.
28. WYERS, Norman L. “Policy-Practice in Social Work : Models and Issues", Journal of Social Work Education, V. 27, N. 3, 1991, p. 241-250.