The Relationship Between Diabetes Awareness and Acceptance Levels and Health Literacy in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Descriptive- Cross-Sectional Study

Öz

Aim: This study examines the relationship between diabetes awareness and acceptance levels and health literacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Material and Methods: The study was conducted as a cross-sectional study among outpatients presenting to hospitals and clinics in northeastern Türkiye between July 15, 2025, and November 15, 2025. Participants were 18 years of age or older and had type 2 diabetes; those with type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes, or who could not complete the questionnaire were excluded from the study. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews using the Patient Information Form, Diabetes Awareness and Acceptance Scale (DAAS), and E-Health Literacy Scale (EHLS). Descriptive statistics, t-tests for independent samples, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analyses were used Results: Participants’ mean age was 56.2±14.9 years; 62.7% were female. The mean DAAS and EHLS scores were 81.6±18.7 and 22.1±8.3, respectively. Men and single individuals had higher EHLS scores; higher education was associated with higher EHLS scores. DAAS scores increased with disease duration, whereas EHLS scores decreased with age and longer disease duration. Positive correlations were observed between all DAAS subscales and EHLS. Many participants expressed uncertainty or negative attitudes toward obtaining health information online. A positive and significant correlation was found between the DAAS awareness subscale, DAAS acceptance subscale, and DAAS total score and the EHLS total score (p<0.001). Conclusion: The study found a positive and significant correlation between diabetes awareness, acceptance, and e-health literacy in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It has been found that age, education, marital status, disease duration, general health perception, family history and nutritional habits may have an impact on these variables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diabetes mellitus
• Diabetes awareness
• Acceptance levels
• Health literacy

Destekleyen Kurum

No

Etik Beyan

Written permission was obtained from the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Gümüşhane University (dated 06/25/2025 and numbered 2025/6). Written permission was obtained from Gümüşhane Province Kelkit State Hospital (numbered E.31127779- 774.01.06) for the data collection process of the study. Before data collection, participants were given detailed information about the study and their verbal consent was obtained. The confidentiality of the participants was ensured, no personal identification information was collected, and all data were anonymized and used only for research purposes. The information and records collected were used only for this study and for no other purpose.

Teşekkür

I would like to thank the participants in the study and the hospital administration team, the internal medicine doctor, and the officials who granted the study permit.

Tip 2 Diyabet Mellituslu Bireylerde Diyabet Farkındalığı ve Kabul Düzeyleri ile Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Arasındaki İlişki: Tanımlayıcı-Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Tip 2 diyabetli hastalarda diyabet farkındalığı ve kabul düzeyleri ile sağlık okuryazarlığı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma, 15 Temmuz 2025 ile 15 Kasım 2025 tarihleri arasında Türkiye'nin kuzeydoğusundaki hastane ve kliniklere başvuran ayakta tedavi gören hastalar arasında kesitsel bir çalışma olarak yürütülmüştür. Katılımcılar 18 yaş ve üzeri olup tip 2 diyabet hastasıydı; gebelik diyabeti olanlar veya anketi tamamlayamayanlar çalışmadan dışlanmıştır. Veriler, Hasta Bilgi Formu, Diyabet Farkındalığı ve Kabul Ölçeği (DAAS) ve E-Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği (EHLS) kullanılarak yüz yüze görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler, bağımsız örneklem t-testleri, ANOVA ve Pearson korelasyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Katılımcıların ortalama yaşı 56,2±14,9 yıl; %62,7'si kadındı. Ortalama DAAS ve EHLS puanları sırasıyla 81,6±18,7 ve 22,1±8,3 idi. Erkekler ve bekar bireylerin EHLS puanları daha yüksekti; daha yüksek eğitim düzeyi daha yüksek EHLS puanlarıyla ilişkiliydi. DAAS puanları hastalık süresiyle artarken, EHLS puanları yaş ve daha uzun hastalık süresiyle azaldı. Tüm DAAS alt ölçekleri ile EHLS arasında pozitif korelasyonlar gözlendi. Birçok katılımcı, çevrimiçi sağlık bilgisi edinmeye yönelik belirsizlik veya olumsuz tutumlar ifade etti. DAAS farkındalık alt ölçeği, DAAS kabul alt ölçeği ve DAAS toplam puanı ile EHLS toplam puanı arasında pozitif ve anlamlı bir korelasyon bulunmuştur (p<0.001). Sonuç: Çalışma, Tip 2 diabetes mellituslu bireylerde diyabet farkındalığı, kabulü ve e-sağlık okuryazarlığı arasında pozitif ve anlamlı bir korelasyon bulmuştur. Yaş, eğitim, medeni durum, hastalık süresi, genel sağlık algısı, aile öyküsü ve beslenme alışkanlıklarının bu değişkenler üzerinde etkili olabileceği bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diyabet mellitus
• Diyabet farkındalığı
• Kabul düzeyleri
• Sağlık okuryazarlığı

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok.

Etik Beyan

Written permission was obtained from the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Gümüşhane University (dated 06/25/2025 and numbered 2025/6). Written permission was obtained from Gümüşhane Province Kelkit State Hospital (numbered E.31127779- 774.01.06) for the data collection process of the study. Before data collection, participants were given detailed information about the study and their verbal consent was obtained. The confidentiality of the participants was ensured, no personal identification information was collected, and all data were anonymized and used only for research purposes. The information and records collected were used only for this study and for no other purpose.

Teşekkür

Çalışmaya katılan katılımcılara, hastane yönetim ekibine, iç hastalıkları doktoruna ve çalışma iznini veren yetkililere teşekkür etmek istiyorum.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Kumar L, Mittal R, Bhalla A, Kumar A, Madan H, Pandhi K, et al. Knowledge and awareness about diabetes mellitus among urban and rural population attending a tertiary care hospital in Haryana. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e38359. https://doi. org/10.7759/cureus.38359
2. 2. Kelvin-Agwu MC, Mustapha AY, Mbata AO, Tomoh BO, For kuo AY. Development of smart insulin delivery systems for improving diabetes management in public health. Develop ment. 2025;9(3):19–32. https://www.researchgate.net/publica tion/390312338
3. 3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 10th ed. Brussels: IDF; 2021. Available from: https://diabetesatlas. org/ accessed 22 October 2025.
4. 4. Coşansu Gülhan. Diabetes Management in Primary Care. Turkiye Klinikleri Internal Medicine Nursing-Special Top ics .2015; 1(3):1-6. https://www.turkiyeklinikleri.com/article/ en-birinci-basamakta-diyabet-yonetimi-74087.html
5. 5. Şireci E, Karabulutlu EYTo determine the level of acceptance of the disease and self-efficacy in self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci.2017;20(1):48 55.
6. 6. İlaslan E, Dalkıran Ş, Canlı Özer Z, Balcı MK. The level of ac ceptance of the disease among individuals with type 2 diabe tes and the burden of care on caregivers. J Contin Med Educ. 2021;30(2):84–95. https://doi.org/10.17942/sted.803667
7. 7. Besen DB, Esen A. The adaptation of the Acceptance of Ill ness Scale to diabetic patients in Turkish society. J Clin Anal Med. 2011;10(2):155–164. http://www.scopemed.org/?i id=2011-10-2.000&&jid=1.
8. 8. Graham CD, Gouick J, Krahé C, Gillanders D. A systematic review of the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in chronic disease and long-term conditions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;46:46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.009

9. 9. Marciano L, Camerini AL, Schulz PJ. The role of health lit eracy in diabetes knowledge, self-care, and glycemic control: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(6):1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606- 019-04832-y
10. 10. Chen P, Callisaya M, Wills K, Greenaway T, Winzenberg T. Cognition, educational attainment and diabetes distress pre dict poor health literacy in diabetes: a cross-sectional analy sis of the SHELLED study. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267265
11. 11. Li C, Zhao X, Kim M, Quan J, Li C, Li C. Effect of disease-re lated health literacy on blood glucose control among diabetic patients in the community. Chin J Nurs. 2012;47:69–71.
12. 12. Chima CC, Abdelaziz A, Asuzu C, Beech BM. Impact of health literacy on medication engagement among adults with diabe tes in the United States: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(4):335–349.
13. 13. Mogessie HM, Gebeyehu MA, Kenbaw MG, Tadesse TA. Di abetic health literacy and associated factors among diabetes mellitus patients. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0270161. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270161
14. 14. Gonzalez JS, Tanenbaum ML, Commissariat PV. Psychosocial factors in medication adherence and diabetes self-manage ment. Am Psychol. 2016;71(7):539–551.
15. 15. Gölbaşı C, Poyraz Çökmüş F, Mustoo Başer L, Gölbaşı H, Ünal Aydın P, Aydın O. Awareness, metacognition, and HbA1c levels among pregnant patients with diabetes. Psihologija. 2025;58(2):193–209.
16. 16. Liu X, Zhang Q, Huang L, Zhuang Y. Associations between disease acceptance and dietary adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025;112196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112196
17. 17. Roshan-Nejad M, Hosseini M, Vasli P, Nasiri M, Hejazi S. Effect of health literacy-based teach-back training on quality of life and treatment adherence in type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84399-9
18. 18. Ziady HH, El-Zeiny NAEM, Fetohy EM, Hewi SAH, Hagras EMA. Assessment of diabetes health literacy and its predictors among diabetic older adults. Alexandria J Med. 2025;61(1):1 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/20905068.2025.2464362
19. 19. Cohen J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic; 1988
20. 20. Ergün U, Ürk A, Eroğlu M. Investigation of primary care and diabetes attitudes of type 2 diabetic patients. Rize Med J. 2024;1(2):1–7.
21. 21. Karataş G, Özdemir Ç. Evaluation of happiness levels in pa tients with type 2 diabetes mellitus according to disease aware ness and acceptance. Turk J Diabetes Obes. 2024;8(2):180–190. https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.1411309
22. 22. Atik D, İnel Manav A, Keşer E. A scale development study: diabetes awareness and acceptance scale. Diabetes Stoffw Herz. 2022;31(2):152–158.
23. 23. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9
24. 24. Uskun E, Doğan E, Önal Ö, Kişioğlu AN. E-health literacy scale: Turkish validity and reliability study. Turk J Hyg Exp Biol. 2022;79(4):674–689. https://doi.org/10.5505/TurkHi jyen.2022.75608
25. 25. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2013.
26. 26. Ranjan S, Thakur R. Gender differential in awareness and risk factors of diabetes. J Public Health. 2024;32(9):1751–1760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01933-1
27. 27. Karasakal B, Ekici E. Examination of diabetes awareness levels in patients with type II diabetes. Koşuyolu Heart J. 2025;28(1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.51645/khj.2025.480
28. 28. Yavuz B. The effect of diabetes awareness and acceptance on metabolic control status. Master’s Thesis. Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University; 2022.
29. 29. Altunsoy A, İnkaya B. The relationship between health literacy and diabetes self-management. J Lifespan Nurs. 2025;6(2):1 19. https://doi.org/10.29228/llnursing.78699
30. 30. Chen Y, Wang Z, Jiang F, Shi J, Jiang K. Analysis of influencing factors related to health literacy of diabetic patients. J Diabetes Res. 2024;2024:5110867. https://doi.org/10.1155/jdr/5110867
31. 31. Parlak AG, Şahin ZA. Evaluation of health literacy in diabetic patients. World J Health Nat Sci. 2021;4(2):113–125. https:// dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2111350
32. 32. Demiröz HE, Turten Kaymaz T. The relationship between ill ness acceptance and health literacy with type 2 diabetes. UHS J Nurs. 2024;6(3):237–242. https://doi.org/10.48071/sbuhem sirelik.1454790
33. 33. Dilekçi NN, Aşiret GD. The relationship between health liter acy and self-care management in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Nurs Res Dev. 2024;27(2):142–156. https://doi.org/10.69487/ hemarge.1582908
34. 34. AlShehri WS, Khojah YY. Impact of e-health literacy on diabe tes self-care activities. Cureus. 2025;17(7):e87968. https://doi. org/10.7759/cureus.87968
35. 35. Arı N, Özdelikara A. The effect of family support on disease acceptance and treatment adherence. Turk J Diabetes Obes. 2022;6(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.1018441
36. 36. Özonuk E, Yılmaz M. The Relationship Between Health Lit eracy and Treatment Adherence in Patients Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Education & Research in Nursing. 2019;16(2):96-103. https://doi.org:10.5222/ HEAD.2019.096
37. 37. Akyol Güner T, Kuzu A, Bayraktaroğlu T. Relationship be tween health literacy and rational drug use in diabetes. Turk J Diabetes Obes. 2020;4(3):214–223. https://doi.org/10.25048/ tudod.775075
38. 38. Deniz S. Evaluation of health literacy levels in Akçadağ district. Doctoral Thesis. Fırat University; 2018.
39. 39. Neşe A, Bakır E, Bağlama SS, Karasu F. Effect of health literacy on diabetes self-care. Turk Klin J Health Sci. 2021;6(1):112 119. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2020-74281
40. 40. İlgar Y, Bilgili N. E-health literacy level and use of digital health services among older adults. Eurasian J Soc Sci Hu manit. 2023;10:126–135. https://doi.org/10.47141/geriatr ik.1537080
41. 41. Deniz E, Duman İ. The relationship between e-health literacy and polypharmacy in older adults. J Geriatr Sci. 2024;7(3):195 205. https://doi.org/10.47141/geriatrik.1537080
42. 42. Kılınç İşleyen E, Özdemir İN. The relationship between e-health literacy and health promotion self-care behav iors. Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci. 2025;17(1). https://doi. org/10.5336/nurses.2024-104274
43. 43. Çöme O, Gökdemir Ö, Sezer BB, Kasapoğlu SS, Kjær NK, Güldal D. Interaction between cognitive function and digital health literacy in older adults. Int J Med Inform. 2025;201:105934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105934