Sosyal Medya, Dijital Diplomasi ve Diplomatik Kriz: Yisrael Katz’ın X Paylaşımları Örneği

Öz

Sosyal medya üzerinden dijital diplomasinin hız kazandığı günümüzde, 2024 yılında dönemin İsrail Dışişleri Bakanı Yisrael Katz’ın Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Devleti Cumhurbaşkanı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’ı hedef alan sosyal medya (X) paylaşımları dikkat çekmiştir. İlgili paylaşımlar “dijital” ve diplomatik bir krizi aracılarken, Türkiye’de iç siyasette de çeşitli düzeylerde tepkiler almıştır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada, Katz’ın X üzerinden yaptığı Erdoğan konulu görsel destekli tweet’ler, birer “anlatı” olarak ele alınmış ve Roland Barthes’ın belirttiği “anlatının 5 kodu” temel alınarak göstergebilimsel analize tabi tutulmuştur. Böylelikle Yisrael Katz’ın göstergeler aracılığı ile vermek istediği mesajların ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada ayrıca içerik analizinden faydalanarak, Katz’ın Erdoğan konulu paylaşımlarının sıklığı, paylaşımlarda öne çıkan temalar ve aktörler de araştırılmıştır. Yürütülen analizler sonucunda Katz’ın Erdoğan’ı eleştirmek için görsel destekli paylaşımlarının çoğunda hermeneutik kod, proairetik kod, semantik kod, sembolik kod ve kültürel koddan yararlandığı, paylaşımlarında siyasi aktörlere yer verdiği, hedef kitle olarak Türk halkına ve muhalefete seslendiği ve genellikle “diktatörlük”, “antisemitizm”, “ifade özgürlüğü”, “gelecek”, “modern Cumhuriyet”, “Osmanlı İmparatorluğu” gibi temalara dikkat çektiği görülmüştür. Dahası, Ayasofya Camii ve Türk bayrağı birer sembol olarak, sık kullanılan gösterenler olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Diplomasi
• Sosyal Medya
• Diplomatik Kriz
• İsrail
• Türkiye

Social Media, Digital Diplomacy and Diplomatic Crisis: The Case of Yisrael Katz’s X Shares

Öz

In today’s world, where digital diplomacy is gaining momentum via social media, the social media (X) posts of Yisrael Katz -the Israeli Foreign Minister of the time- targeting the President of the Republic of Türkiye, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, attracted attention in 2024. While the relevant posts mediated a “digital” and diplomatic crisis, they also received reactions at various levels in domestic politics in Türkiye. Therefore, in this study, Katz’s visually supported tweets on Erdoğan via X were considered as “narratives” and subjected to semiotic analysis based on the “5 codes of narrative” stated by Roland Barthes. Thus, it was aimed to reveal the messages Yisrael Katz wanted to convey through signs. In addition, the study investigated the frequency of Katz’s posts on Erdoğan, and the prominent themes and actors in the posts by using content analysis. As a result of the study conducted, it was seen that Katz used the hermeneutic code, proairetic code, semantic code, symbolic code, and cultural code in most of his visually supported posts to criticize Erdoğan, included political actors in his posts, addressed the Turkish people and the opposition as the target audience and generally drew attention to themes such as “dictatorship”, “anti-Semitism”, “freedom of expression”, “future”, “modern Republic”, “Ottoman Empire”. Moreover, Istanbul, the Hagia Sophia Mosque, and the Turkish flag were frequently used signifiers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social Media
• Digital Diplomacy
• Diplomatic Crisis
• Israel
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Adiller, D. & Güreller, M. (2021). Twitter ve kamusal alan kavramı üzerine bir içerik analizi: Spinal Musküler Atrofi (SMA) hastası çocukların kampanyalarıyla ilgili örnek olay çalışması [A content analysis on Twitter and the concept of public sphere: A case study on campaigns of children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)]. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (38), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.932145
2. Al Jazeera. (2024). Who is Israel Katz, Israel’s new defence minister?. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/11/6/who-is-israel-katz-israels-new-defence-minister
3. Anadolu Agency (AA). (2024). Türkiye’den, İsrailli bakanın sosyal medya paylaşımına tepki [Turkey reacts strongly to Israeli minister's social media post]. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/turkiyeden-israilli-bakanin-sosyal-medya-paylasimina-tepki/3296796
4. Barthes, R. (1968). Elements of semiology (A. Lavers & C. Smith, Trans.). Hill & Wang.
5. Barthes. R. (1974). S/Z. Hill & Wang.
6. Bayraktar, B. (2019). The Palestinian question in Turkish foreign policy from 1990s to 2010s. Gazi Akademik Bakış, 12(24), 19–44.
7. BBC News Turkish. (2023a). Sosyal medya ‘influencer’ları İsrail-Hamas savaşına dair sahte görüntülerle para kazanıyor [Social media influencers are profiting from fake footage related to the Israel-Hamas war]. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/cv2z91ny572o.amp
8. BBC News Turkish. (2023b). İsrail-Filistin: Sosyal medyada etiketler nasıl savaşıyor?[ Israel-Palestine: How hashtags are fighting on social media]. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/cgrdrjrnepko.amp

9. Belder, F. & Muminov, N. (2023). Analysing the role of Turkey in Israel’s post-2011 regional vision through the lens of identity-security: Challenger or bystander? Anadolu Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(2), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1220864
10. Berger, A. A. (2014). Semiotics and society. Society, 51(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-013-9731-4
11. Bjola, C. (2018). Digital diplomacy 2.0: Trends and counter-trends. Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior, 113, 1–14.
12. Casas, A. (2024). The geopolitics of deplatforming: A study of suspensions of politically-interested Iranian accounts on Twitter. Political Communication, 41(3), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2306503
13. Djukic, A., Vukmirovic, M., Jokovic, J. & Dinkic, N. (2017). Tweeting in open public space case study Belgrade. In A. Zammit, & T. Kenna (Eds.), Enhancing places through technology (pp. 191–203). Edições Universitárias Lusófonas.
14. Eliodori, S. (2021). Trump’s populism and the Twitter diplomacy. Rivista di Digital Politics, I(2), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.53227/101945
15. Erdoğan, R. T. [@RTErdogan]. (2025, March 15). Today we opened a new hospital in Gaziantep that will serve thousands of citizens across the region [Post]. X. https://x.com/RTErdogan/status/1234567890123456789
16. Erdoğan, R. T. [@RTErdogan]. (n.d.). Home [X profile]. X. https://x.com/RTErdogan
17. Erdoğan Şafak, A. (2024). Turkey and Israel: Evolution of state identity and shifting relations. Israel Affairs, 30(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2024.2295616
18. Farahdina, D., Loebis, M. N., & Zahrah, W. (2020). The influence of social media on use in public space (Case study of Lapangan Merdeka Medan). IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 452(1), 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012061
19. Fei, W. & Yao, J. (2022). The development and game of US digital diplomacy under geopolitics. International Relations and Diplomacy, 10(5), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2134/2022.05.001
20. Frey, C. (2024). Digital diplomacy: The impact of technology on modern diplomacy and foreign policy. Current realities and future prospects. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 24(1), 107–126. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4864962
21. Gearhart, S., Zhang, B. & Adegbola, O. (2024). Tweeting, talking, or doing politics? Testing the influence of communication on democratic engagement. Telematics and Intormatics Keports, 16(2024), 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100167
22. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Goyanes, M., & Mateos, A. (2024). Twitter communication among democracy actors: How interacting with journalists and elected officials influence people’s government performance assessment and trust. Social Media + Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241232907
23. Goren, N. (2020). Assessing Israel Katz’s first year as foreign minister. Mitvim. https://mitvim.org.il/en/publication/assessing-israel-katzs-first-year-as-foreign-minister/
24. Guerrero-Solé, F. (2018). Interactive behavior in political discussions on Twitter: Politicians, media, and citizens’ patterns of interaction in the 2015 and 2016 electoral campaigns in Spain. Social Media + Society, 2018, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808776
25. Güz, N., Yegen, C., & Aydın, B. O. (2019). Dijital propaganda ve politik başarı: 24 Haziran 2018 cumhurbaşkanlığı seçiminin twitter analizi [Digital propaganda and political success: Twitter analysis of June 24, 2018 presidential election]. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 6(2), 1461–1482. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.522546
26. Hürriyet. (2024a). Son dakika... İsrail dışişleri bakanı Katz’a peş peşe tepkiler [Breaking: Israeli Foreign Minister Katz draws backlash]. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/son-dakika-israil-disisleri-bakani-katza-pes-pese-tepkiler-42506200
27. Hürriyet. (2024b). Haniye’nin Türk bankalarında birikimi olduğu iddialarına yalanlama [Claims about Haniyeh’s savings in Turkish banks refuted]. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/haniyenin-turk-bankalarinda-birikimi-oldugu-iddialarina-yalanlama-42506217
28. Imamoğlu, E. [@ekrem_imamoglu]. (n.d.). Home [X profile]. X. https://x.com/ekrem_imamoglu
29. Imamoğlu, E. [@ekrem_imamoglu]. (2024, Agust 02). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Devleti’nin bayrağına ve Cumhurbaşkanı’na hakaret eden bu açıklamanızı size iade ediyorum. Demokrasiyi ve hukuku, elinde onbinlerce çocuğun kanı [I reject your statement, which insults the flag and the President of the Republic of Turkey. Speaking of democracy and law, while bearing the blood of tens of thousands of children, is sheer hypocrisy.]. [Image attached] [Post]. X. https://x.com/ekrem_imamoglu/18193143462034930078
30. Kampf, R., Manor, I. & Segev, E. (2015). Digital diplomacy 2.0? A cross-national comparison of public engagement in Facebook and Twitter. Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 10(4), 1–27.
31. Katz, I. [@Israel_katz]. (n.d.). Home [X profile]. X. https://x.com/Israel_katz
32. Katz, I. [@Israel_katz]. (2024, Agust 09). @RTErdogan'ın yeni arkadaşı, Hamas'ın lideri, toplu katliamcı Yahya Sinwar. Türk milleti sizden utanıyor! [President @RTErdogan’s new friend is Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader and mass murderer. The Turkish nation is ashamed of you!] [Image attached] [Post]. X. https://x.com/Israel_katz/status/1821929316705358189?lang=tr
33. Katz, I. [@Israel_katz]. (2024a, Agust 09). @RTErdogan'ın yeni arkadaşı, Hamas'ın lideri, toplu katliamcı Yahya Sinwar [President @RTErdogan’s new friend is Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader and mass murderer]. [Image attached] [Post]. X. https://x.com/Israel_katz/status/1821929316705358189
34. Katz, I. [@Israel_katz]. (2024b, Agust 06). Dün, antisemit diktatör @rterdogan_ar @RTErdogan, ABD ve Batılı Devletlere sözel olarak saldırarak "İsrail'deki Siyonistler tarafından esir alındıklarını" söyledi [Yesterday, the anti-Semitic dictator @rterdogan_ar @RTErdogan verbally attacked the US and Western countries, claiming that they are “hostages of Zionists in Israel”].[Image attached] [Post]. X. https://x.com/Israel_katz/status/1820745356759499019
35. Katz, I. [@Israel_katz]. (2024c, Agust 02). @RTErdogan, tüm özgür dünyanın duruşuna karşı, sadece Hamas'ın katillerine ve tecavüzcülerine verdiği destek uğruna Türkiye'yi bir diktatörlüğe dönüştürüyor [@RTErdogan is turning Turkey into a dictatorship, solely for the sake of supporting Hamas's killers and rapists, against the stance of the entire free world]. [Image attached] [Post]. X. https://x.com/Israel_katz/status/1819414362034930078
36. Katz, I. [@Israel_katz]. (2024d, July 21). @RTErdogan, İsraillilerin öldürülmesi için, Hamas'ın terör hücrelerine silah ve para yardımında bulunuyor. İsrail İç Güvenlik Servisi Shin Bet, Zeit Üniversitesi [@RTErdogan is providing weapons and financial aid to Hamas’s terror cells to kill Israelis. Israeli Internal Security Service Shin Bet, Zeit University]. [Image attached] [Post]. X. https://x.com/Israel_katz/status/1815018533132120163
37. Katz, I. [@Israel_katz]. (2024e, April 26). Erdoğan Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nu yeniden kurmayı hayal ediyor ve bugün Parlamentolar Arası Kudüs Platformu Konferansı'nda İsrail'e yönelik saldırılarını ve karalamalarını sürdürdü [Erdoğan dreams of reestablishing the Ottoman Empire and continued his attacks and defamations against Israel today at the Inter-Parliamentary Jerusalem Platform Conference]. [Image attached] [Post]. X. https://x.com/israel_katz/status/1783876488942502293
38. Katz, I. [@Israel_katz]. (2024f, March 01). Turkiye'de ve bölgede Kürtlere sürekli katliam uygulayan Erdoğan İsrail'i Gazze'de kasıtlı olarak soykırım yapmakla itham ediyor [Erdoğan, who constantly commits massacres against Kurds in Turkey and the region, accuses Israel of deliberately committing genocide in Gaza]. [Image attached] [Post]. X. https://x.com/Israel_katz/status/1763589728631230680
39. Kreps, S. (2020). Social media and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
40. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis an introduction to its methodology. Sage.
41. Kupreishvili, T. & Kobaidze, N. (2024). Israel-Turkish relations: Challenges and ensuring peace in Gaza strip. Security Science Journal, 5(3), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.37458/ssj.5.3.5
42. Kuzniar, E. & Filimoniuk, N. (2017). E-diplomacy on Twitter. International comparison of strategies and effectivity. Social Communication, 2(2017), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/sc-2017-0010
43. Malkoç, İ. B. (2018). Makro bir siber kamusal alan olarak Twitter: Türkiye’nin “trending topic”leri analizi [Twitter as a macro cyber public sphere: An analysis of “trending topics” of Turkey]. Sosyoloji Notları, 2(1), 100–126.
44. Mengüaslan, H. (2024). 7 Ekim sonrası Türkiye’nin Gazze diplomasisi: Filistin’de barış inşasına yönelik imkân ve sınırlar [Türkiye’s Gaza diplomacy after October 7: opportunities and challenges to peacebuilding in Palestine]. Ombudsman Akademik, 2(2), 250281.
45. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Türkiye. (2024). No: 120, 26 Haziran 2024, İsrail dışişleri bakanının bir sosyal medya platformunda yaptığı paylaşım hk. [Regarding the social media post made by the Israeli Foreign Minister on June 26, 2024]. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-120_-israil-disisleri-bakaninin-bir-sosyal-medya-platformunda-yaptigi-paylasim-hk.tr.mfa
46. NTV. (2024a). İsrail’den sosyal medyada savaş propagandası | Sahte hesaplara 2 milyon dolarlık fon [War propaganda on social media from Israel | $2 million funding for fake accounts]. https://www.ntv.com.tr/amp/dunya/israilden-sosyal-medyada-savas-propagandasi-sahte-hesaplara-2-milyon-dolarlik-fon,3nHjBqKsUkSKCcR8M2LjZA
47. NTV. (2024b). Hamas lideri Haniye Tahran’da öldürüldü (İsmail Haniye kimdir?) [Hamas leader Haniyeh killed in Tehran (Who is Ismail Haniyeh?)]. https://www.ntv.com.tr/galeri/dunya/hamas-lideri-haniye-tahranda-olduruldu-ismail-haniye-kimdir,-YSC79a8W02xpEVpV6Cj-Q#
48. Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy, (80), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580
49. Rochberg-Halton, E. & McMurtrey, K. (1983). The foundations of modern semiotic: Charles Peirce and Charles Morris. American Journal of Semiotics, 2(1–2), 129–156.
50. Radpey, L. (2024). Israel’s advocacy for Kurdistan must go beyond tweets. Middle East Forum. https://www.meforum.org/mef-observer/israels-advocacy-for-kurdistan-must-go-beyond-tweets
51. Saldaña, M., McGregor, S. C. & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2015). Social media as a public space for politics: Cross-national comparison of news consumption and participatory behaviors in the United States and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Communication, 9(2015), 3304–3326.
52. Sarıaslan, F. (2023). Turkish-Israeli economic relations in the new normalisation environment. Israel Affairs, 30(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2024.2295634
53. Stratton SJ. (2024). Purposeful sampling: Advantages and pitfalls. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 39(2), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000281
54. Šimunjak, M., & Caliandro, A. (2019). Twiplomacy in the age of Donald Trump: Is the diplomatic code changing? Information Society, 35(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1542646
55. Verrekia, B. (2017). Digital diplomacy and its effect on international relations. School for International Training (SIT) Study Abroad. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2596
56. Yegen, C., & Berger, A. A. (2022). A metaphorical approach to developing behavior within the context of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (40), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.1051964
57. Yegen, C., Ayhan, B., & Demir, Y. (2022). Twitter’s role in digital democracy, post-truth, and political polarization. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 24(2), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2022.2.343
58. Zhang, X. & Tang, Y. (2024). Digital diplomacy and domestic audience: How official discourse shapes nationalist sentiments in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 182. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02669-3