Toplumsal Cinsiyet İletişimi ve Liderlik: Yönetim Düzeyinde Nitel Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2021, , 477 - 496, 31.12.2021

Müge Öztunç , Gonca Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.930886

Öz

Kadınlar tarihsel süreç içinde yönetim pozisyonlarında her zamankinden daha fazla görev alsa da hala
dünyanın birçok ülkesinde kadının yönetim süreçlerinde yeterli düzeyde söz sahibi olmadığı görülmektedir.
Toplumsal cinsiyet iletişiminde ortaya çıkabilecek sorunlar veya toplumsal cinsiyet konusundaki
stereotipler kadınların kariyer gelişimlerindeki engellerden biri olarak tanımlanabilir. Bu bağlamda,
bu çalışmanın amacı, cinsiyete dayalı iletişim rollerini, davranış kalıplarını, erkek ve kadın liderlerin
birbirlerine yönelik algılarına dayalı olarak üst düzey yöneticiler arasındaki iletişim yetkinliklerini ve
engellerini keşfetmektedir. Çalışmada, kadın ve erkek yöneticilerin birbirlerini iletişim ve liderlik rolleri
anlamında nasıl değerlendirdiklerini yorumlamak amacıyla yarı yapılandırılmış sorulara dayalı nitel analiz
yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Yalnızca önemli kavramların kodlanması yerine, daha derin bir anlayış elde etmek
için tam görüşmeleri içeren gömülü kodlama sürecini takiben, kodların benzerliklerini araştıran kümeleme
analizi uygulanmış ve Türkiye’deki büyük ölçekli kurumsal şirketlerde cinsiyet iletişimi ve farklılıkları
derinlemesine irdelenmiştir. Bulgular, Türkye’deki kurumsal şirketlerde toplumsal cinsiyete dayalı rollerin
ve toplumsal cinsiyete dayalı kalıp yargıların literatürle uyumlu olduğunu göstermekle birlikte yeni
örüntüleri de ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bağlamda kadınların iletişim becerilerine ilişkin farkındalıkları
artmış olsa da kabul ettikleri bazı toplumsal cinsiyet kalıplarının varlığını koruduğu ve kabul gördüğü
gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Toplumsal Cinsiyet İletişimi, Cinsiyet stereotipleri, Cinsiyet Eşitsizliği, Liderlik Tarzları, Lider İletişimi

Gender Communication and Leadership: A Qualitative Research in Managerial Level

Öz

As a result of women’s struggles over the years, more women than ever are entering the labor force and
taking senior management positions but the representation of women in managerial processes is still
limited in almost all countries. Gender stereotypes or the problems that may arise in gender communication
can be defined as one of the obstacles in women’s career process. In this context, the aim of this study
was to discover the communication competencies and barriers among senior managers based on gender
communication language, behavioral patterns, and perceptions of male and female leaders toward each
other. The study employed qualitative analysis based on semi-structured questions to interpret how female
and male executives evaluate each other. Instead of coding only important concepts, a grounded coding
process that involved full interviews was permitted to acquire a deeper understanding was applied. After
finalizing the coding process, cluster analysis that explores the similarities of the codes was applied, and
this enabled a deep understanding of gender differences within large-scale corporate companies in Turkey.
Findings show that gender-based roles and gender stereotypes in corporate companies in Turkish society
are compatible with the literature, but also reveal new patterns. Although women’s awareness of their
communication skills has increased, it is seen that there are still some gender stereotypes that they accept.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gender Communication, Gender Stereotyping, Gender Inequality, Leadership Styles, Leadership Communication

Kaynakça

• Adamo, S. A. (2013). Attrition of women in the biological sciences: Workload, motherhood, and other explanations revisited. BioScience, 63(1), 43–48.
• Aldoory, L. & Toth, E. (2004). Leadership and gender in public relations: Perceived effectiveness of transformational and transactional leadership styles. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(2), 157- 183.
• Barrett, D. J. (2006). Strong communication skills a must for today’s leaders. Handbook of Business Strategy, 7(1), 385-390.
• Baxter, J. (2008). Is it all tough talking at the top? A post-structuralist analysis of the construction of gendered speaking identities of British business leaders within interview narratives. Gender and Language, 2(2), 197–222.
• Berkery, E., Morley, M. & Tiernan, S. (2013). Beyond gender role stereotypes and requisite managerial characteristics: Gender in management. An International Journal, 28(5), 278–298.
• Bianet (2020). Women in politics 2020 map: Turkey ranks 122nd. Retrived March, 31, 2021 from https://bianet. org/english/world/222224-women-in-politics-2020-map-turkey-ranks-122nd.
• Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L. & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84 –103.
• Cacace, M., Balahur, D., Bleijenbergh, I., Falcinelli, D., Friedrich, M. & Schmidt, E. K. (2015). Structural transformation to achieve gender equality in science guidelines. Eige.europa.eu. Retrieved February, 26, 2021 from http://www.stages.unimi.it/upload/documents/Guidelines_STAGES_new.pdf.
• Chapman, J. B. (1975). Comparison of male and female leadership styles. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 645-650.
• Correll, S. J., Benard S., & In, P. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? The American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297-1339.
• Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S. & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80, 655– 681.
• Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62- 71.
• Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2003). Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 851– 859.
• Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
• Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125-145.
• Elsaid, A. M. & Elsaid, E. (2012). Sex stereotyping managerial positions: A cross-cultural comparison between Egypt and the USA. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 27(2), 81–99.
• European Institute For Gender Equality (n.d.). Largest listed companies: CEO’s executive and non-Executive. Retrieved September, 21, 2021 from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/dgs/indicator/wmidm_bus_ bus__wmid_comp_compex.
• Evans, K. J. & Maley, J. F (2020). Barriers to women in senior leadership: How unconscious bias is holding back Australia’s economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59, 204-226.
• Ezzedeen, S. & Ritchey, K. (2009). Career advancement and family balance strategies of executive women. Gender in Management, 24(6), 388–411.
• Fisher, G. (2007). You need tits to get on round here: Gender and sexuality in the entrepreneurial university of the 21st century. Ethnography, 8(4), 503–517.
• Foldy, E. G. (2006). Dueling schemata: Dialectical sensemaking about gender. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(3), 350–372.
• Frost, F. A. (2003). The use of strategic tools by small and medium‐sized enterprises: An Australasian study. Strategic Change, 12(1), 49-62.
• Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars women are from Venus. New York: HarperCollins.
• Grisoni, L. & Beeby, M. (2007). Leadership, gender and sense-making. Gender Work and Organisation, 14(3), 191-209.
• Heilman, M. E. & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(4), 393–398.
• Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D. & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427.
• Hengel, E. (2018). Publishing while female: Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics, 1753. Faculty of Economics: University of Cambridge.
• Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E. & Peus, C. (2013). Have perceptions of women and men changed? Gender stereotypes and self-ratings of men and women. Paper presented at Society of Personality and Social Psychology Annual Conference, New Orleans, 17-19 January 2013.
• Heywood, L. L. (2006). The women’s movement today: An encyclopedia of third-wave feminism. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
• Hilton, J. L. & Von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 237–271.
• Howe-Walsh, L. & Turnbull, S. (2016). Barriers to women leaders in academia: Tales from science and technology. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 415–428.
• International Labour Organization (2020). Gender wage gap is 15.6% in Turkey, according to the joint study by ILO Turkey Office and TURKSTAT. Retrieved November 26, 2021 from https://www.ilo.org/ankara/ news/WCMS_757055.
• Kolehmainen, C., Brennan, M., Filut, A., Isaac, C. & Carnes, M. (2014). Afraid of being witchy with a ‘B’: A qualitative study of how gender influences residents’ experiences leading cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1276–1281.
• Lindsey, A. E. & Zakahi, W. R. (2006). Perceptions of men and women departing from conversational sex-role stereotypes. In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (Eds.) Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 281-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Livingstone, D.W., Pollock, K. & Raykov, M. (2014). Family binds and glass ceilings: Women managers’ promotion limits in a ‘knowledge economy’. Critical Sociology, 42(1), 145-166.
• Lorber, J. (2010). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Ginzberg, L. D. (2002). Re-viewing the first wave. Feminist Studies, 28, 419-434.
• Grant Thorton (2020). Women in business report 2020: Putting the blueprint into action. Retrieved February, 21, 2021 from https://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/women-in-business-2020/ women-in-business-2020-report/.
• Maak, T., Pless, N. M. & Wohlgezogen, F. (2021) The fault lines of leadership: Lessons from the global Covid-19 crisis. Journal of Change Management, 21(1), 66-86.
• Mason, M. A. (2008). Do babies matter in science?. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved October, 2, 2021 from https://www.chronicle.com/article/do-babies-matter-in-science/.
• Merchant, K. (2012). How men and women differ: gender differences in communication styles, ınfluence tactics, and leadership styles. Unpublished Senior Dissertation. California: Claremont McKenna College Bachelor of Arts, Psychology Department.
• Mulac, A., James, J. B. & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 121–152.
• Mullany, L., & Yoong, M. (2017). Gender and the workplace. In B. Vine (Ed.) The Routledge handbook of language in the workplace (pp. 310-322). New York: Routledge.
• Naldini, M., Pavolini, E. & Solera, C. (2016). Female employment and elderly care: The role of care policies and culture in 21 European countries. Organization Theory,30(4), 607-630.
• Onay, M. (2013). Antik çağdan bugüne tarihin başarılı kadın liderleri. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 213-225.
• Onay, M. & Heptazeler, O. (2014). Kadın ve erkek yöneticilerin liderlik davranışları arasındaki farklılıklar. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 73-85.
• Orser, B. (1994). Sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics: An international perspective. Women in Management Review, 9(4), 11–19.
• Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A. & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed. Journal of Management, 28, 177-193.
• Sarsons, H. (2017). Recognition for group work: Gender differences in academia. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 107(5), 141-145.
• Schnurr, S. (2008). Surviving in a man’s world with a sense of humour: An analysis of women leaders’ use of humour at work. Leadership, 4(3), 299-319.
• Shields, S. A. (2002). Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Staub, S. (2017). İş dünyasında kadının liderliği ve onların liderlik dili. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 12(2), 209-221.
• Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. NY: William Morrow.
• Thompson, M. D. (2000). Gender, leadership orientation, and effectiveness: Testing the theoretical model of Bolman & Deal and Quinn. Sex Roles, 42(11/12), 969-992.
• Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 3, 68–70.
• Timmers, T. M., Willemsen, T. M. & Tijdens, K. G. (2010). Gender diversity policies in universities: A multiperspective framework of policy measures. Higher Education, 59(6), 719–735.
• Wilkins, B. M. & Andersen, P. A. (1991). Gender differences and similarities in management communication: A meta-analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 5(1), 6-35.
• Vinkenburg, C. J., van Engen, M. L., Eagly, A. H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 10-21.
• Zhao, Y. & Lord, B. R. (2016). Chinese women in the accounting profession article information. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 226–245.