A Review on Smile Perception

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 439 - 451, 27.12.2024

Demet Er , Işıl Sarıkaya

https://doi.org/10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1576199

Öz

The concept of beauty is an essential physical behavior for individuals because it affects the perceived attractiveness of individuals and plays an influential role in social communication. It is known that people focus on the teeth in the lower facial triad first and for a more extended period on a smiling person’s face. Knowing the elements required to ensure harmony and balance between the dentolabial components is
necessary for smile esthetics. In addition, in the perception of esthetics, it is essential to understand the behaviors of observers and the elements that create the esthetic appearance. In this way, it is possible to create esthetically pleasing restorations for patients and to use them with pleasure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Esthetics, Smiling, Beauty

Gülümseme Algısı Üzerine Bir Derleme

Öz

Güzel kavramı estetiğin alt dalı olarak kabul görmektedir. Gülümseme, bireylerin algılanan çekiciliğine etki ettiğinden dolayı ve sosyal iletişimde etkili rol oynadığından kişiler açısından önemli bir fiziksel davranıştır. İnsanların gülümseyen bir kişinin yüzünde ilk olarak ve daha uzun süreyle alt yüz üçlüsünde dişlere odaklandığı bilinmektedir. Gülümseme estetiğinde, dentolabial bileşenlerin arasındaki uyumun ve dengenin sağlanması için gereken unsurların bilinmesi gerekmektedir. Ayrıca estetiğin algılanmasında, gözlemcilerin davranışları ve estetik görünümü oluşturan bileşenlerin bilinmesi önem arz eder. Bu sayede hastalar için
estetik görünen restorasyonların yaratılması ve beğeniyle kullanılması imkanı sağlanabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Estetik, Gülümseme, Güzellik

Kaynakça

• 1. Beiser FC. Diotima’s children: German aesthetic rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. 1st ed. Oxford University Press, 2012.
• 2. Tunalı İ. Estetik. 1st ed. İstanbul: Remzi kitapevi,1998.
• 3. Rosenstiel SF, Ward D, Robert G, Rashid R. Dentists’ preferences of anterior tooth proportion: A web-based study. J Prosthodont. 2000;9(3):123-136.
• 4. Borisavljevi’c M. The golden number. 1st ed. London: Alec Tiranti, 1958.
• 5. Ghyka M. Geometrical composition and desing. 1st ed. London: Alec Tiranti, 1964.
• 6. Huntley HE. The divine proportion: A study in mathematical beauty. 1st ed. New York: Dover publications, 1970.
• 7. Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:358-382.
• 8. Neves J. Implantodontia Oral: Otimizaçao da estetica, uma abordagem dos tecidos mole e dura. Belo Horizante: Ed. Rona, 2001.
• 9. Goleman D, Goleman T. Beauty’s hidden equation. Am Healty, 1987.
• 10. Patzer GL. The physical attractiveness phenomena. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed: Springer, 2012.
• 11. Gürel G. Porselen laminat venerler. 1st ed. İstanbul: Quintessence, 2004.
• 12. Pithon MM, Nascimento CC, Barbosa G, Coqueiro R. Do dental esthetics have any influence on finding a job? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;146(4):423-429.
• 13. LaFrance M, Hecht M, Paluck E. The contingent smile: a meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(2):305-334.
• 14. Proffit W, Fields H, Sarver D. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Canada: Elsevier, 2013.
• 15. Ekman P, Davidson R, Friesen W. The duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;58(2):342-353.
• 16. Ekman P. The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion. Handbook of Social Psychophysiology. London: H. Wagner & A. Manstead, 1989.
• 17. Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: The smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120:98-111.
• 18. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 1970;57(2):132-144.
• 19. Rigsbee OH, Sperry T, BeGole E. The influence of facial animation in smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1988;3:233-239.
• 20. Hess U, Kappas A, Mchugo G, Robert Kleck R. An analysis of the encoding and decoding of spontaneous and posed smiles: The use of facial electromyography. J Nonverbal Behav. 1989;13(2):121-137.
• 21. Rubin LR. The anatomy of a smile: its importance in the treatment of facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;53(4):384-387.
• 22. Philips E. The classification of smile patterns. J Can Dent Assoc. 1999;65:252-254.
• 23. Ackerman MB, Ackerman J. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:221-236.
• 24. Machado AW. 10 commandments of smile. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014;19(4):136-157.
• 25. Ackerman MB, Brensinger C, Landis J. An evaluation of dynamic lip-tooth characteristics during speech and smile in adolescents. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(1):43-50.
• 26. Cosendey VL, Drummond S, Júnior J. Capture, analysis and measurement of images of speech and smile dynamics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17(5):151-156.
• 27. Zhang,YL, Le D, Hu WJ, Zhang H, Liang LZ, Chung KH, Cao ZQ. Assessment of dynamic smile and gingival contour in young Chinese people. Int Dent J. 2015;65(4):182-187.
• 28. Kokich VO, Kıyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311-324.
• 29. Moore T, Southard K, Casko J, Qian F, Southard T. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(2):208-213.
• 30. Kokich VO, Kokich V, Kiyak H. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130(2):141-151.
• 31. Parekh SM, Fields H, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(4):557-563.
• 32. Janson G, Branco N, Fernandes T, Sathler R, Garib D, Lauris J. Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:153-161.
• 33. Türkkahraman H, Gökalp, H. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(5):640-647.
• 34. Sharma N, Rosenstiel S, Fields H, Beck F. Layperson’s esthetics and smile characterization between caucasian and Indian populations. J Dent Res. 2010;89:3626.
• 35. Dindaroğlu F, Karabıyıkoğlu Özmutlu M, Işıksal E. The effect of educational status on the perception of social and spontaneous smiles. Turk J Orthod. 2016;29(1):10-15.
• 36. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga M, Lagravere M, Major P. Lay person’s perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. Journal of Orthodontics. 2004;31:204-209.
• 37. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza M. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(6):748-753.
• 38. McNamara L, McNamara J, Ackerman M, Baccetti T. Hard and soft tissue contributions to the esthetics of the posed smile in growing patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(4):491-499.
• 39. Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields H, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson’s perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(10):1318-1327.
• 40. Yang S, Guo Y, Yang X, Zhang F, Wang J, Qiu J, Li J. Effect of mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary central incisors on esthetic perceptions of the smile in the frontal view. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(3):396-404.
• 41. Springer NC, Chang C, Fields H, Beck F, Firestone A, Rosenstiel S, Christensen J. Smile esthetics from the layperson’s perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(1):91-101.
• 42. Garber DA, Salama M. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol 2000. 1996;11:18-28.
• 43. Gill DS, Naini F, Tredwin C. Smile aesthetics. Dent Update. 2007;34(3):152-154.
• 44. Morley J, Eubank J. Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(1):39-45.
• 45. McLaren EA, Garber D, Figueira J. The photoshop smile design technique (part 1): digital dental photography. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(10):772-776.
• 46. Fradeani M. Esthetic rehabilitation in fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Publishing Company, 2008.
• 47. Rufenacht C. Fundamentals of esthetics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1990.
• 48. Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the aesthetic face. New York: Thime-Stratton, 1984.
• 49. Moskowitz M, Nayyar A. Determinants of dental esthetics: A rationale for smile analysis and treatment. Compent Contin Educ Dent. 1995;16:1164-1186.
• 50. Golup J. Entire smile pivotal to teeth design. Clin Dent. 1988;33(1):15-18.
• 51. Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry from basic to videoimaging. Chicago: Quintessence, 1995.
• 52. Proffit W. Diagnosis and treatment planning. In: W. Proffit, contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby, 1986.
• 53. Burstone C. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod. 1958;44:1-25.
• 54. Brunton P, McCord J. An analysis of nasolabial angles and their relevance to tooth position in the edentulous patient. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1993;2:53-56.
• 55. Viazis AA. Cephalometric analysis based on natural head position. J Clin Orthod. 1991;25:172-181.
• 56. Paul S. Smile analysis and face-bow transfer: Enhancing aesthetic restorative treatment. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001;13:217-222.
• 57. Levine J, Finkel S. Esthetic Diagnosis: A three-step analysis. In: J. Levine, smile design integrating esthetics and function: Essentials in esthetic dentistry. New York: Brian J. Miller, 2016.
• 58. Vig R, Brundo G. The kinetics of anterior tooth display. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:502-504.
• 59. Arnett G, Bergman R. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;103:299-312.
• 60. Choi T, Jin T, Dong J. A study on the exposure of maxillary and mandibular central incisor in smiling and physiologic rest position. J Wonkwang Dent Res Instit. 1995;5:371-379.
• 61. Basting RT, Trindade R, Flório F. Comparative study of smile analysis by subjective and computerized methods. Oper Dent. 2006;31(6):652-659.
• 62. Sharma PK, Sharma P. Dental Smile Esthetics: The assessment and creation of the ideal smile. Semin Orthod. 2012;18(3):193–201.
• 63. Tjan AH, Miller G, The J. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(1):24-28.
• 64. Roy S. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39(3):155-167.
• 65. Desai S, Upadhyay M, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis: changes with age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136(3):310-320.
• 66. Stallard H. Survival of the periodontium during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:584-592.
• 67. Pound E. Personalized denture procedures dentists’ manual. Anaheim: Denar Corporation, 1973.
• 68. Chiche G, Pinault A. Artistic and scientific principles applied to esthetic dentistry. Chiche G, In: Pinault A, esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1994.
• 69. Dong JK, Jin T, Cho H, Oh S. The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(1):9-19.
• 70. Mackley RJ. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1993;63(3):183-189.
• 71. Allen EP. Use of mucogingival surgical procedures to enhance esthetics. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;32:307-330.
• 72. Peck S, Peck L. Selected aspect of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:105-126.
• 73. Rigsbee OH, Sperry T, BeGole E. The influence of facial animation in smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1988;3:233-239.
• 74. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Some vertical lineaments of lip position. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101(6):519- 524.
• 75. Coslet J, Vanarsdall R, Weisgold A. Diagnosis and classification of delayed passive eruption of the dentogingival junction in the adult. Alpha Omegan. 1977;70:24-28.
• 76. Schabel BJ, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J. Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(4):490-496.
• 77. Johnson DK, Smith R. Smile estheties after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:162-167.
• 78. Goldstein RE. Esthetics in dentistry. Hamilton: Decker, 1998.
• 79. Frush J, Fisher R. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent. 1958;8(4): 558-581.
• 80. Renner R. An introduction to dental anatomy and esthetics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985.
• 81. Lee R. Esthetics and relationship to function. In: C. Rufenacht, fundamentals of esthetics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1990.
• 82. Zange SE, Ramos A, Cuogh O, Mendonça M, Suguino R. Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(1):86-90.
• 83. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;127(3):343-350.
• 84. Martin AJ, Buschang P, Boley J, Taylor R, McKinney T. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(5):530-537.
• 85. Schabel BJ, McNamara J, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135(4):61- 71.
• 86. Dunn WJ, Murchison D, Broome J. Esthetics: Patients’ perceptions of dental attractiveness. J Prosthodont. 1996;5(3):166-71.
• 87. Sarver DM, Ackerman M. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;124(1):4-12.
• 88. Ritter DE, Gandini L, Pinto A, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(2):198-203.
• 89. Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts A. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(4):628- 633.
• 90. Fradeani M. Evaluation of dentolabial parameters as part of a comprehensive esthetic analysis. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2006;1:62-69.
• 91. Latta G. The midline and its relation to anatomic landmarks in the edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59;681- 683.
• 92. Heartwell CJ. Syllabus of complete dentures. Philadelphia: Lea Febiger, 1968.
• 93. Miller E, Bodden W, Jamison H. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41;657-660.
• 94. Owens E, Goodacre C, Loh P. A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: A comparison of extraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:273-282.
• 95. Singla S, Lehl G. Smile analysis in orthodontics. Indian J Oral Sci. 2014;5(2):49-54.
• 96. Prosthodontics AO. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. 7th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1999.
• 97. Pound E. Applying harmony in selecting and arranging teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 1962;3:241-258.
• 98. Castellani D. Elements of Occlusion. Bologna: Edizioni Martina, 2000.
• 99. Aschheim K. Esthetic dentistry: A clinical approach to techniques and materials. 3rd ed. Elsevier: Mosby, 2014.
• 100. Graber L, Vanarsdall R, Vig K, Huang G. Orthodontics current principles and techniques. 6th ed. St Louis: Elsevier, 2017.
• 101. Jacobsen T. Beauty and the brain: culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation. J Anat. 2010;216(2):184-191.
• 102. Edler R, Agarwal P, Wertheim D, Greenhill D. The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28(3):274-281.
• 103. Richardson S. Age and sex differences in values toward physical handicaps. J Health Soc Behav. 1970;11(3):207-214.
• 104. Tobiasen J. Social judgments of facial deformity. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:323-327.
• 105. Cross J, Cross J. Age, sex, race, and the perception of facial beauty. Dev Psychol. 1971;5(3):433-439.
• 106. Howells D, Shaw W. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod. 1985;88(5):402- 408.
• 107. Şifaoğlu AH. Dudak ve dişeti analizinin gülümseme estetiğine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. [Diş Hekimliğinde Uzmanlık Tezi]. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi; 2022 [30.10.2024]
• 108. Johnston C, Hunt O, Burden D, Stevenson M, Hepper P. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(2):129-133.
• 109. Kiekens R, Maltha J, Hof M, Kuijpers-Jagtman A. A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: reproducibility and validity. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(6):579-584.
• 110. Okkerse J, Beemer F, Haan MD, Boer JD, Mellenbergh G, Wolters W. Facial attractiveness and facial impairment ratings in children with craniofacial malformations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(4):386-392.
• 111. Chang C, Fields H, Beck F, Springer N, Firestone A, Rosenstiel S, et al. Smile esthetics from patients’ perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;140(4):171-180.
• 112. Cochrane S, Cunningham S, Hunt N. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31(3):164-168.
• 113. Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod. 1984;86(1):67-73.
• 114. Howels D, Shaw W. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod. 1885;88(5):402- 408.
• 115. O’Neill K, Harkness M, Knight R. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;118(4):371- 376.
• 116. Patzer GL. Measurement of physical attractiveness: truth-of-consensus. J Esthet Dent. 1994;6(4):185- 188.
• 117. Er D. Estetik gülümseme algısına diş ve çevre dokuların etkisi. [Diş Hekimliğinde Uzmanlık Tezi]. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi; 2022 [30.10.2024].
• 118. Krishnan V, Daniel S, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(4):515-523.