Tuz Gölü Özel Çevre Koruma Bölgesi Göllerinde Alg Çeşitliliği ve Potansiyel Siyanobakteri Toksisitesi

Yıl 2022, , 94 - 109, 31.12.2022

Tahir Atıcı

https://doi.org/10.53803/turvehab.1171691

Öz

Jeolojik bakımdan tektonik bir yapıya sahip olan Tuz Gölü Özel Çevre Koruma Bölgesi, Ramsar ölçütlerine göre biyolojik çeşitliliğin korunması açısından büyük önem taşıyan “A Sınıfı” bir sulak alandır ve uluslararası ölçütlere göre korunmaktadır. Büyük bir sahayı kaplamasına karşın Türkiye’nin en sığ göllerine sahip olan Tuz Gölü Özel Çevre Koruma Bölgesi, yıllık ortalama 324 mm/m2 yağış miktarı ile ülkenin en kurak coğrafyasında yer almaktadır. Çalışmada bu göllerde yaşayan Cyanophyta, Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta ve Euglenophyta gruplarına ait türler teşhis edilmiştir. Porphyrosiphon versicolor 1,08 mg/L ile siyanotoksin üreten türler arasında en yoğun tür olarak belirlenmiştir. Tuz Gölü Özel Çevre Koruma Bölgesi’nde çeşitli kuş türlerinin besinini teşkil eden Artemia salina ve mikroskobik alglerden özellikle Dunaliella salina ile bazı diyatome ve siyanobakteri türleri bol miktarda bulunur. Fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri bakımından aylara göre farklılık gösteren aşırı tuzlu bu ortamda halofilik türler bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Beslenme İlişkileri, Algler, Tuz Gölü Özel Çevre Koruma Bölgesi, Cyanotoksin, Nutritional relationships, algae, Tuz Lake Special Environmental Protection Area, cyanotoxin

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

218B144

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma 218B144 numaralı proje tarafından desteklenmiştir. Maddi katkısı nedeniyle TÜBİTAK’a teşekkür ederim

Algal Diversity and Potential Cyanobacteria Toxicity in Tuz Lake Special Environmental Protection Area Lakes

Öz

Tuz Lake Special Environmental Protection Area, which has a tectonic structure in terms of geology, is a "Class A" wetland, which is of great importance for the protection of biological according to Ramsar criteria, and is protected according to international criteria. Although Tuz Lake Special Environmental Protection Area covers a large area, which has the shallowest lakes in Türkiye, is located in the driest geography of the country with an average annual precipitation of 324 mm/m2. In the study, species belonging to the Cyanophyta, Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, and Euglenophyta groups living in these lakes have been identified. Porphyrosiphon versicolor was determined as the most concentrated species among the cyanotoxin producing species with 1.08 mg/L. In Tuz Lake Special Environmental Protection Area, Artemia salina, which is the food of various bird species, and especially Dunaliella salina, which is one of the microscopic algae, and some diatom and cyanobacteria species are abundantly distributed. There are halophilic species in this extremely salty area, which differs according to the months in terms of physical and chemical properties.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nutritional relationships, algae, Tuz Lake Special Environmental Protection Area, cyanotoxin

Proje Numarası

218B144

Kaynakça

• Amarouayache, M. & Kara, M.H. (2017). Aspects of life history of Artemia salina (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) from Algeria reared in different conditions of salinity. Vie et Milieu 67(1): 15–20.
• Anagnostidis, K. & Komárek, J. (1988). Modern approach to the classification system of Cyanophytes Oscillatoriales. Algological Studies (Suppl. Vol.) 50-53: 327–472.
• Atıcı, T. (2020). Production and collection of microalgae isolated from freshwater reserves in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Türler ve Habitatlar 1(1): 3744.
• Atıcı, T., Obalı, O., Akköz, C. & Elmacı, A. (2001). Isolation and Identification of Halophytic Algae from Salty Soil around Salt Lake of Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 4(3): 298–300.
• Bourelly, P. (1966). Les Algues d’eau douce. Tome I: Les Algues vertes. Editions N. Boubee & Cie., Paris.
• Bourelly, P. (1968). Les Algues d’eau douce. Tome II: Les Algues janues et brunes. Editions N. Boubee & Cie, Paris.
• Çakmakçı, M.L. & Karahan, A.G. (1995). Mikrobiyolojiye Giriş. Bizim Büro Basımevi, Ankara.
• Cessford, G. & Muhar, A. (2003). Monitoring Options for Visitor Numbers in National Parks and Natural Areas. Journal for Nature Conservation 11(4): 240–250. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1078/1617-1381-00055.
• Cleve-Euler, A. (1953). Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland. Teil II-III. Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri AB, Stockholm.
• Cleve-Euler, A. (1955). Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland. Teil IV-V. Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri AB, Stockholm.
• Cox, E.J. (2015). Coscinodiscophyceae, Mediophyceae, Fragilariophyceae, Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms)] In: Frey, W. (Ed.). Syllabus of Plant Families. Adolf Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Photoautotrophic eukaryotic algae Glaucocystophyta, Cryptophyta, Dinophyta / Dinozoa, Heterokontophyta / Ochrophyta, Chlorarachniophyta / Cercozoa, Euglenophyta / Euglenozoa, Chlorophyta, Streptophyta. 13th Ed., Borntraeger Science Publishers, Berlin, pp. 64103.
• Des Marais, D.J. (1995). The Biogeochemistry of Hypersaline Microbial Mats] In: Jones, J.G. (Ed.) Advances in Microbial Ecology. Vol. 14. Springer, Boston.
• Eagles, P., McCool, S. & Haynes, C. (2002). Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas: Guidelines for Planning and Management. IUCN, Gland.
• Farrell, T.A. & Marion, J.L. (2002). The Protected Area Visitor Impact Management (PAVIM) Framework: A Simplified Process for Making Management Decisions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 10(1): 31–51.
• Gerrath, J.F. & Denny, P. (1980). Freshwater algae of Siera Leone III. Cyanophyta, Chrysophyta, Xantophyta, Chloromonadophyta, Cryptophyta, Dinophyta. Nova Hedwigia 33: 445–463.
• Giongo, F., Bosco–Nizeye, J. & Wallace, N. (1993). A Study of Visitor Management in the World’s National Parks and Protected Areas. Colorado State University: Ecotourism Society, Colorado.
• Guiry, M.D. & Guiry, G.M. (2022). AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication. National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www.algaebase.org 29.09.2022].
• Hall, C.M. & McArthur, S. (1996). Visitor Management: Principles and Practice] In: Hall, C.M. & McArthur, S. (Eds.). Heritage Management in Australia and New Zealand. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp. 37–54.
• Huber-Pestalozzi, G. (1982). Das Phytoplankton des Süsswasers, 8. Teil, 1. Halfte, Conjugatophyceae, Zygnematales and Desmidiales. E.Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
• Javor, B. (1989). Hypersaline Environments. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
• Karaman, S. & Gökalp, Z. (2010). Küresel Isınma ve İklim Değişikliğinin Su Kaynakları Üzerine Etkileri. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 3(1): 5966.
• Katırcıoğlu, H., Akın, B. & Atıcı, T. (2004). Microalgal Toxin(s): Characteristics and Importance. African Journal of Biotechnology 3(12): 667–674.
• Kociolek, J.P., Blanco, S., Coste, M., Ector, L., Liu, Y., Karthick, B., Kulikovskiy, M., Lundholm, N., Ludwig, T., Potapova, M., Rimet, F., Sabbe, K., Sala, S., Sar, E., Taylor, J., Van de Vijver, B., Wetzel, C.E., Williams, D.M.,
• Witkowski, A. & Witkowski, J. (2022). DiatomBase. https://www.diatombase.org 29.09.2022].
• Korshikov, O.A. (1987). The Freshwater Algae of the Ukrainian S.S.R. Vol. V. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh & Koeltz Scientific Books, Dehra Dun & Köenigstein.
• Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (2000). Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bacillariophyceae, 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag GmbH Heidelberg, Berlin.
• Mason, P. (2005). Visitor management in protected areas of the periphery: Polar perspectives. Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development 2(3): 171–190.
• Newsome, D. (2002). Aspects of Tourism 4: Natural Area Tourism: Ecology, Impacts and Management. Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 340 p.
• Patrick, R. & Reimer, C.W. (1975). The Diatoms of the United States. Vol. II. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
• Prescott, G.W. (1975). Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area. Michigan State University, Michigan.
• Resmi Gazete (2015). Resmi Gazete. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/04/20150415-18.htm 26.09.2022].
• Round, F.E. (1984). The Ecology of Algae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Round, F.E. (1993). A Review and Methods for the Use of Epilithic Diatoms for Detecting and Monitoring Changes in River Water Quality (Methods for the Examination of Waters and Associated Materials). The Stationery Office Books, London.
• Sağlam, N.E., Düzgüneş, E. & Balık, İ. (2008). Küresel Isınma ve İklim Değişikliği. E.U. Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences 25(1): 89–94.
• Shelknanloymilan, L., Atıcı, T. & Obalı, O. (2012). Removal of nitrogen and phosphate by using Chloralla vulgaris on synthetic and organic materials waste water. Biological Diversity and Conservation 5(2): 8994.
• Stanier, R.Y., Adelberg, E.A. & Ingraham, J. (1976). The Microbial World. The Blue Green Bacteria. 13th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
• Thomas, L. & Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas, World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), best Practice Protected Area Guidelines. Series No: 10. IUCN, Gland.
• WoRMS Editorial Board (2022). World Register of Marine Species. https://www.marinespecies.org 29.09.2022].