PAYLAŞIMLI ULAŞIM MODELLERİ: SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KENT YAŞAMINA GEÇİŞTE YENİ TRENDLER

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 2, 1 - 12, 29.06.2025

Rıdvan Karacan

Öz

Günümüz kentleri, artan trafik yoğunluğu, hava kirliliği ve sürdürülebilir ulaşım ihtiyacı gibi önemli zorluklarla karşı karşıyadır. Bu bağlamda paylaşımlı ulaşım modelleri, bireysel araç sahipliğini azaltarak kent içi hareketliliği optimize eden ve çevresel sürdürülebilirliği destekleyen bir alternatif olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Çalışmada, paylaşımlı ulaşım sistemlerinin çevresel, ekonomik ve sosyal etkileri değerlendirilmiş, bu sistemlerin kent yaşamına katkıları incelenmiştir. Çevresel açıdan paylaşımlı ulaşım, bireysel araç kullanımını azaltarak karbon emisyonlarını düşürmekte ve trafik sıkışıklığını hafifletmektedir. Elektrikli araç paylaşım sistemleri ve mikro-mobilite seçenekleri (bisiklet ve scooter paylaşımı) fosil yakıt tüketimini azaltarak hava kalitesini iyileştirmektedir. Ekonomik boyutta araç sahipliği yerine ihtiyaç duyulduğunda ulaşım hizmetlerine erişim sağlanması, bireylerin ulaşım maliyetlerini düşürmekte, şehirlerin ekonomik verimliliğini artırmakta ve yeni iş fırsatları yaratmaktadır. Sosyal açıdan paylaşımlı ulaşım çözümleri, düşük gelirli bireyler için hareketliliği artırarak ulaşımda fırsat eşitliği sağlamakta ve kent içinde toplumsal entegrasyonu teşvik etmektedir. Ancak bu sistemlerin yaygınlaşmasının önünde düzenleyici çerçevenin eksikliği, kullanıcı alışkanlıkları ve altyapı yetersizlikleri gibi önemli engeller bulunmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda şehir planlamasında paylaşımlı ulaşım politikalarının desteklenmesi, düzenleyici çerçevenin geliştirilmesi ve altyapı yatırımlarının artırılması önerilmektedir. Çalışma, paylaşımlı ulaşımın sürdürülebilir kent yaşamına entegrasyonu için politika yapıcılar ve şehir planlamacıları açısından rehber niteliğindedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Paylaşımlı Ulaşım , Sürdürülebilir Kentleşme , Çevre Dostu Ulaşım

Etik Beyan

Araştırma sürecinde, bilimsel etik kurallarına ve ilgili mevzuatlara tam uyum sağlanmıştır.

SHARED TRANSPORTATION MODELS: NEW TRENDS IN TRANSITIONING TO SUSTAINABLE URBAN LIFE

Öz

Today's cities face significant challenges such as increasing traffic congestion, air pollution, and the need for sustainable transportation. In this context, shared transportation models emerge as an alternative that reduces individual vehicle ownership, optimizes urban mobility, and supports environmental sustainability. This study evaluates the environmental, economic, and social impacts of shared transportation systems and examines their contributions to urban life. From an environmental perspective, shared transportation reduces carbon emissions by decreasing individual vehicle use and alleviating traffic congestion. Electric vehicle sharing systems and micro-mobility options (bike and scooter sharing) improve air quality by reducing fossil fuel consumption. Economically, accessing transportation services when needed, rather than owning a vehicle, lowers transportation costs for individuals, increases cities' economic efficiency, and creates new job opportunities. Socially, shared transportation solutions enhance mobility for low-income individuals, promote transportation equity, and encourage social integration within cities. However, the widespread adoption of these systems face significant barriers, including a lack of regulatory frameworks, user habits, and infrastructure deficiencies. In this regard, the study recommends supporting shared transportation policies in urban planning, developing regulatory frameworks, and increasing infrastructure investments. This study serves as a guide for policymakers and urban planners in integrating shared transportation into sustainable urban life.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Shared Transportation , Sustainable Urbanization , Eco-Friendly Transportation

Kaynakça

• AAA (2021). Your Driving Costs: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? American Automobile Association.
• Akan, Y., & Tepeler, M. İ. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik ve güven ekseninde paylaşım ekonomisi. Sosyoekonomi, 30(53), 447-464.
• AlKheder, S. (2021). Promoting public transport as a strategy to reduce GHG emissions from private vehicles in Kuwait. Environmental Challenges, 3, 100075.
• Banister, D. (2011). Cities, mobility and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1538-1546.
• Bata.net. (n.d.). Economic impact of public transportation. Retrieved from https:// www.bata.net/how-to-ride/economic-impact-of-public-transportation.html
• Cohen, B., & Kietzmann, J. (2014). Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & environment, 27(3), 279-296.
• Dill, J., & McNeil, N. (2021). Are shared vehicles shared by all? A review of equity and vehicle sharing. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(1), 5-30.
• Fielbaum, A., & Tirachini, A. (2021). The sharing economy and the job market: the case of ride-hailing drivers in Chile. Transportation, 48(5), 2235-2261.
• Fishman, E. (2016). Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 92-113.Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., & Watson, A. (2015). Factors influencing bike share membership: An analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 71, 17-30.
• Gao, K., Yang, Y., Li, A., Li, J., & Yu, B. (2021). Quantifying economic benefits from freefloating bike-sharing systems: a trip-level inference approach and city-scale analysis. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 144, 89-103.
• Goodman, A., & Cheshire, J. (2014). Inequalities in the London bicycle sharing system revisited: impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 272-279.
• ITF (2017). Shared Mobility: Innovation for Liveable Cities. International Transport Forum.
• Jung, J., & Koo, Y. (2018). Analyzing the effects of car sharing services on the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Sustainability, 10(2), 539.
• Katzev, R. (2003). Car sharing: A new approach to urban transportation problems. Analyses of social issues and public policy, 3(1), 65-86.
• Machado, C. A. S., de Salles Hue, N. P. M., Berssaneti, F. T., & Quintanilha, J. A. (2018). An overview of shared mobility. Sustainability, 10(12), 4342.
• Marsden, G. (n.d.). Social benefits of shared mobility: Metrics and methodologies (26th ACEA SAG Report). European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA). Retrieved from https://www.acea.auto/files/Social_benefits_of_shared_mobility- 26th_ACEA_SAG-report.pdf
• Martin, E., & Shaheen, S. (2011). Greenhouse gas emission impacts of carsharing in North America. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(4), 1074-1086.
• Martin, E., Shaheen, S., & Lidicker, J. (2010). Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings. Transportation Research Record, 2143(1), 150-158.
• Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2015). The end of automobile dependence: How cities are moving beyond car-based planning. Island Press.
• Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., & Shaheen, S. (2016). Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy, 45, 168-178.
• Schaller, B. (2018). The new automobility: Lyft, Uber and the future of American cities. Schaller Consulting Report.
• Shaheen, S., & Chan, N. (2016). Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Facilitate the First-and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections. University of California Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center.
• Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2019). Shared mobility: The potential of ride-hailing and pooling. The International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 8(1), 13-24.
• Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Bansal, A., & Cohen, A. (2015). Shared mobility: A sustainability & technologies workshop: definitions, industry developments, and early understanding.
• Shaheen, S., Sperling, D., & Wagner, C. (2012). Carsharing and personal vehicle services: Worldwide market developments and emerging trends. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 5-34.
• Sperling, D. (2018). Three revolutions: Steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better future. Island Press.
• Sun, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, H., Jiao, J., & Overstreet, R. E. (2021). Travel behaviours, user characteristics, and social-economic impacts of shared transportation: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 24(1), 51-78.
• Motion Digest Network. (2021, July 21). The different challenges of shared mobility. Motion Digest Network: Leading Urban Transformation. https://motiondigest. com/2021/07/21/the-different-challenges-of-shared-mobility/
• Federal Highway Administration. (2016). Shared mobility: Current practices and guiding principles (Publication No. FHWA-HOP-16-022). U.S. Department of Transportation. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop16022/ch5.htm
• Paddeu, D., Parkhurst, G., & Shergold, I. (2020). Passenger comfort and trust on firsttime use of a shared autonomous shuttle vehicle. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 115, 102604.
• Bachmann, F., Hanimann, A., Artho, J., & Jonas, K. (2018). What drives people to carpool? Explaining carpooling intention from the perspectives of carpooling passengers and drivers. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 59, 260-268.
• Sun, L., Wang, S., Liu, S., Yao, L., Luo, W., & Shukla, A. (2018). A completive research on the feasibility and adaptation of shared transportation in mega-cities–A case study in Beijing. Applied Energy, 230, 1014-1033.