Araştırma Makalesi

DISCURSIVE PRACTICES USED FOR MANAGING CONFLICT IN TRAVEL MEMOIRS

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

DISCURSIVE PRACTICES USED FOR MANAGING CONFLICT IN TRAVEL MEMOIRS

Abstract

Travel writing about intercultural interactions sheds light on the conflict faced by the author in a foreign environment. The conflict caused by differences of cultures and unfamiliar ways of living is a recurring issue which the authors who produced works on travel writing deal with, experience and reflect on. In narratives, the use of specific discursive practices appear to function for especially managing such kinds of conflict. This paper focuses on using subversive humour and pathos in the travel memoir extracts of four Turkish women authors published in the memoir collection titled Three Centuries of Travel Writing by Muslim Women (Lambert-Hurley et al, 2022). An evaluation of the intercultural encounters reflected by the four Turkish authors reveals that humour and pathos are often used together not only as literary devices but also as discursive practices for managing conflict. These practices of managing conflict are both used in challenging communication incidents with members of a foreign culture and as a criticism device in reflections on certain social occasions. The paper presents examples of the use of humour and pathos for managing conflict under the themes of reflections on female identity, facing disappointment and appreciation of experiencing a new culture.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Bloor, M. & Bloor, T. (2007). The Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Hodder Education. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  2. Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
  3. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Longman.
  4. Fisher-Yoshida, B. (2005). Reframing Conflict: Intercultural Conflict as Potential Transformation. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 8, 1-15.
  5. Higgins, C., & Walker, R. (2012). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Accounting Forum, 36, 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.02.003
  6. Ho, V. (2016). Discourse of persuasion: a preliminary study of the use of metadiscourse in policy documents. Text & Talk, 36 (1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0001
  7. Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace. Discourse Studies, 2 (2), 159-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002
  8. Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2002). Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (12), 1683-1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 2166(02)00032-2

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Karşılaştırmalı Dil Çalışmaları

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

29 Haziran 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

14 Mayıs 2024

Kabul Tarihi

28 Haziran 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Erdem Mete, D. (2024). DISCURSIVE PRACTICES USED FOR MANAGING CONFLICT IN TRAVEL MEMOIRS. Uluslararası Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 355-363. https://doi.org/10.37999/udekad.1484146

* Hakemlerimizin uzmanlık alanlarını detaylı olarak girmesi süreçte hakem ataması açısından önem arz etmektedir.