Araştırma Makalesi

İŞİTME ENGELLİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN TOPLAMA VE ÇIKARMADAKİ İŞLEM HATALARI

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 30 Nisan 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

ANALYSIS OF ERRORS MADE BY CHILDREN WITH AND WITHOUT HEARING IMPAIRMENT

Abstract

The aim of this study; to compare errors of hearing impaired 3th grade students in written operations with students showing normal development. Working group of the study consists of 30 Hİ (hearing impaired) and 30 ND (normal development) 3th grade students in Ankara. Groups are created by selecting students from 3th grade students during 2014-2015 academic year in Etimesgut county of Ankara. Students taking place in hearing impaired group consist of students who were diagnosed by counselling and research centre before and are still attending to primary school. Students taking place in ND group are chosen from students without any inability, indicated by teacher as the one who has average success level and who is attending to school which is located within the same neighbourhood with hearing impaired primary school. There are 11 girls and 19 boys in the hearing impaired group. There are 12 girls and 18 boys in normal development group. At the end of the study, analysing every operation made by students. Error types of groups involved in study about written operation calculations are compared with using t-Test. When analysis results are considered, it has been observed that Hİ students make more errors than showing ND peers in all types of errors. In eight of the nine types of errors, which are subject in the study, significant differences were found between groups. In any case, error of subtracting big number from small number which is done by half of the students and error related with zero which is done by more than half of the students has been found striking. 

Keywords

Addition,subtraction,hearing ımpairment,error analysis

Kaynakça

  1. Altındağ Kumaş, Ö. (2014). Öğrenme güçlüğü olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin toplama ve çıkarma işlemlerindeki performansları. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  2. Artut P. D. & Tarım K. (2006). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin basamak değer kavramını anlama düzeyleri. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi, 2(1), 26-36.
  3. Ashlock, R. B. (1994). Error patterns in computation. Columbus. California: Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers.
  4. Bisanz, J., Sherman, J., Rasmussen, C., & Ho, E. (2005). Development of arithmetic skills and knowledge in preschool children. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 143-162). New York: Psychology Press.
  5. Bull, R. (2008). Deafness, numerical cognition, and mathematics. In M. Marschark, P Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes (pp. 170–200). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  6. Burns, M., & Silbey, R. (2000). So you have to teach math? Sound advice for K-6 teachers. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
  7. Clements, M. A., & Ellerton, N. F. (1992). Errors on written mathematical tasks made by Grade 5 children in two schools in Penang, Malaysia. Seminar presented at Regional Centre for Education in Science and Mathematics, Penang, Malaysia.
  8. Conrad, R. (1979). The Deaf Schoolchild. London: Harper & Row.
  9. Davis R. B. (1984). Learning mathematics: The cognitive science approach to mathematics education. London: Croom Helm Publisher.
  10. Davis, S. M., & Kelly, R. R. (2003). Comparing deaf and hearing college students' mental arithmetic calculations under two interference conditions. American Annals of the Deaf, 148(3), 213-221.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Altındağ Kumaş, Ö., & Sümer, H. M. (2017). İŞİTME ENGELLİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN TOPLAMA VE ÇIKARMADAKİ İŞLEM HATALARI. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3(1), 1-12. https://izlik.org/JA75AZ67RD