Investigation of the Relationship Between Elementary School Mathematics Teacher Candidates' Attitudes Towards STEM Education and Their Proficiency Perceptions of 21st Century Skills

Öz

This study aimed to determine the relationship between elementary mathematics teacher candidates' attitudes towards STEM education and proficiency perceptions of 21st-century skills. The relational screening model, which is used to determine the relationship between two or more variables, was used from quantitative research methods. The sample of the study consists of 71 elementary mathematics teachers. The data were collected with two measurement tools, “STEM (Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics) Education Attitude Scale” and “21st Century Skills and Competences Scale Directed at Teaching Candidates”. In the study, it was investigated whether there is a significant difference in the attitudes of elementary school mathematics teacher candidates towards STEM education according to grade level and gender, whether there is a significant difference in 21st-century skills proficiency perceptions according to grade level and gender, and whether there is a significant relationship between their attitudes towards STEM education and 21st-century skills. As a result of the analyses conducted, it has been determined that there is a significant difference in 21st-century skills proficiency perceptions according to grade levels. It was concluded that there is no significant relationship between their attitudes towards STEM education and their perceptions of 21st-century skills competence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Attitude scale
• Competence perception scale
• Mathematics education
• STEM education
• 21st-century skills

İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının STEM Eğitimine Yönelik Tutumları ile 21. Yüzyıl Becerileri Yeterlilik Algıları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmada ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının STEM (FeTeMM) eğitimine yönelik tutumları ile 21. Yüzyıl becerileri yeterlilik algıları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel tarama modelinin kullanıldığı çalışmanın örneklemi, 71 ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri, “STEM (Fen-Teknoloji-Mühendislik–Matematik) Eğitimi Tutum Ölçeği” ve “Öğretmen Adaylarına Yönelik 21. Yüzyıl Becerileri Yeterlilik Algıları Ölçeği” olmak üzere iki ölçme aracı ile elde edilmiştir. Çalışmada ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının STEM eğitimine yönelik tutumları ve 21. Yüzyıl becerileri yeterlilik algıları arasında sınıf düzeyi cinsiyete ve genel not ortalamalarına göre anlamlı farklılığın olup olmadığı ve STEM eğitimine yönelik tutumları ile 21. Yüzyıl becerileri yeterlilik algıları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olup olmadığı incelenmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının sınıf düzeylerine göre STEM eğitimine yönelik tutumlarında anlamlı bir farklılığın olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. 21. Yüzyıl becerileri yeterlilik algılarında ise sınıf düzeylerine göre anlamlı farklılığın olduğu belirlenmiştir. Cinsiyete göre hem STEM eğitimine yönelik tutumlarda hem de 21. Yüzyıl becerileri yeterlilik algılarında anlamlı farklılığın olmadığı ortaya konulmuştur. Öğretmen adaylarının genel not ortalamalarına göre hem STEM eğitimine yönelik tutumlarında hem de 21. Yüzyıl becerilerine yönelik yeterlilik algılarında bir farklılığın olmadığı görülmüştür. STEM eğitimine yönelik tutumları ile 21. Yüzyıl becerileri yeterlilik algıları arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tutum ölçeği
• Yeterlilik algısı ölçeği
• Matematik eğitimi
• STEM (FeTeMM) eğitimi
• 21. Yüzyıl becerileri

Kaynakça

1. Acar, D., Tertemiz, N., & Taşdemir, A. (2019). The relationship between mathematics and science problem solving skills and achievements of students who were being educated with STEM. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 12-23.
2. Akaygun, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2016). STEM images revealing STEM conceptions of pre-service chemistry and mathematics teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 56-71.
3. Akbıyık, C., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2006) Eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri ve akademik başarı [Critical thinking dispositions and academic achievement]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(32), 90-99.
4. Akgündüz, D. (2018). STEM eğitiminin kuramsal çerçevesi ve tarihsel gelişimi [Theoretical framework and historical development of STEM education]. In D. Akgündüz (eds.), Okul öncesinden üniversiteye kuram ve uygulamada STEM eğitimi (pp. 19-49). Anı Yayıncılık.
5. Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M. S., Öner, T., & Özdemir, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu [STEM education Turkey report]. Scala Basım.
6. Anagün, Ş. S., Atalay, N., Kılıç, Z., & Yaşar, S. (2016). the development of a 21st-century skills and competences scale directed at teaching candidates: validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 40(40), 160-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.9779/PUJE768
7. Aydın, G., Saka, M., & Guzey, S. (2017). Science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) attitude levels in grades 4th- 8th. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2). 787-802. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.290319
8. Azgın, A. O., & Şenler, B. (2019). STEM in primary school: Students’ career ınterest and attitudes. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(13), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.538352

9. Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: How teachers and schools can meet the challenge. Routledge.
10. Baran, E., Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S., & Mesutoğlu, C. (2015). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) public service announcement (PSA) development activity. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 5(2), 60-69.
11. Batdi, V., Talan, T., & Semerci, C. (2019). Meta-analytic and meta-thematic analysis of STEM education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 7(4), 382-399.
12. Baz, F. Ç. (2019). STEM education cycle in the framework of Bloom taxonomy. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 142-150.
13. Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7–12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9164-0
14. Bingöl, G., & Demir, A. (2011). Communication skills of students of Amasya medical vocational school. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, 26(4), 152-159.
15. Bircan, M. A. (2019). The effect of stem education activities on attitudes towards STEM, 21st century skills and mathematics achievements of fourth grade students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ondokuz Mayıs University.
16. Bircan, M. A., & Köksal, Ç. (2020). Investigation of STEM attitudes and STEM career ınterests of gifted students. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 16-32.
17. Bozkurt, Ş. B., & Çakır, H. (2016). 21st century learner skills: an investigation of middle school students based on grade level and gender. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 39(39), 69-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.9779/PUJE757
18. Britton, B., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405- 410.
19. Bulut, T. (2020). Examination of STEM attitudes of secondary school students in terms of different variables. Asian Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.713778
20. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 30-35.
21. Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS] (3rd ed.). Pegem Akademi.
22. Çepni, S (2018). Kuramdan uygulamaya STEM eğitimi [STEM education from theory to practice]. (2nd ed.). Pegem Akademi.
23. Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş [Introduction to research and project studies]. (3rd ed.). Celepler Matbaacılık.
24. Ceylan, Ö., Ermiş, G., & Yıldız, G. (2018). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin bilim, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik (STEM) eğitimine yönelik tutumları [Attitudes of gifted students towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education]. In G. Akkaya & P. Ertekin (Eds.), International congress on gifted and talented education congress (pp. 64-75).
25. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275649
26. Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898-909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6
27. Çiftçi, B., & Bakar, M. H. D. (2020). Investigation of social studies teacher candidates' 21st century skills competence perceptions. Kapadokya Eğitim Dergisi, 1(2), 44-60.
28. Çolak, M. (2019). The examination of prospective science teachers' perceptions of 21st century skills in terms of various variables [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Niğde Ömer Halis Demir University.
29. Cooper, R., & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem solving and creativity and design: What influence do they have on girls' interest in STEM subject areas? American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 27-38.
30. Çorlu, M. S. (2014). Call for manuscripts on STEM education. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.181071
31. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
32. Derin, G., Aydın, E., & Kırkıç, K. A. (2017). A scale on the attitudes towards STEM education. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(3), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.336550
33. Durmaz, M., Hüseyinli, T., & Güçlü, C. (2016). The relation between time management and academic success. Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Research, 5(7), 2291-2303.
34. ElSayary, A. (2021). Transdisciplinary STEAM curriculum design and authentic assessment in online learning: a model of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 18(3), 493-511. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.86
35. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw Hill Higher Education.
36. Fajrina, S., Lufri, L., & Ahda, Y. (2020). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) as a learning approach to improve 21st century skills: A review. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 16(7), 94-104.
37. Gökbulut, B. (2020). The relationship between teacher candidates' beliefs in education and 21st century skills. Turkish Studies- Education, 15 (1), 127-141. https://dx.doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.40164
38. Gömleksiz, M. N., Sinan, A. T., & Doğan, F. D. (2019). Perceptions of prospective teachers of Turkish, Turkish language and literature and contemporary Turkish dialects of the 21st century skills and competences. International Journal of Euroasian Research, 7(19), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.33692/avrasyad.628236
39. Greiff, S., & Kyllonen, P. (2016). Contemporary assessment challenges: The measurement of 21st century skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 243–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209209
40. Gürültü, E., Aslan, M., & Alcı, B. (2020). Secondary school teachers’ competencies in the use of 21st century skills. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35(4), 780-798. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2019051590
41. Hanushek, E. A., (2008). Schooling, gender equity, and economic outcomes. In Tembon, M., & Fort, L., (Ed.) Girls’ education in the 21st century: gender equality, empowerment, and economic growth (pp. 23-39). World Bank.
42. Haviz, M., Maris, I. M., Adripen, Lufri, David, & Fudholi, A. (2020). Assessing preservice teachers’ perception on 21st century skills in Indonesia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.32
43. Heaverlo, C. (2011). STEM development: A study of 6th-12th grade girls' interest and confidence in mathematics and science [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Iowa State University.
44. Hiğde, E., Keleş, F., & Aktamış, H. (2020). Model study on attitudes towards STEM fields and teaching. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 1145-1160. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2020..-648229
45. İçel, K. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between the disciplined mind attributes and STEM attitudes of elementary school 4th grade students (Afyonkarahisar sampling) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Afyon Kocatepe University.
46. Kan, A. Ü. & Murat, A. (2018). Investigation of prospective science teachers’ 21st century skill competence perceptions and attitudes toward STEM. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(4), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2018.04.014
47. Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi [Scientific Research Method]. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
48. Kavak, T. (2019). The effect of STEM applications on attitudes towards science and technology, skills of scientific process and problem solving of 4th grade students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Fırat University.
49. Kayri, M. (2009). The multiple comparison (post-hoc) techniques to determine the difference between groups in research. Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 19(1), 51-64.
50. Kennedy, J., Quinn, F., & Taylor, N. (2016). The school science attitude survey: A new instrument for measuring attitudes towards school science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1160046
51. Kırıktaş, H., & Şahin, M. (2019). An investigation of career attitudes and attitudes of high school students towards stem areas in terms of demographic variables. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 55-77.
52. Koştur, H. İ. (2017). The history of science practices in STEM education: Al-Jazari example. Başkent University Journal of Education, 4(1), 61-73.
53. Kozikoğlu İ., & Altunova N., (2018). The predictive power of prospective teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions of 21st century skills for their lifelong learning tendencies. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 8(3), 522-531. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2018.293
54. Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
55. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: https://timssandpirls. bc. edu/timss2019/international-results.
56. Nacaroğlu, O., & Kızkapan, O. (2021). STEM attitudes and levels of 21st century skills in gifted students. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 25(2), 425-442.
57. Nadelson, L. D., Seifert A., Moll, A. J., & Coat, B. (2012). I-STEM summer institute: An integrated approach to teacher professional development in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 13(2), 69-83.
58. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). PISA 2022 mathematics framework (Draft). OECD Publishing.
59. Orhan-Goksun, D. (2016). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ 21st century learner skills and 21st century teacher skills [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Anatolian University.
60. Ormanci, Ü. (2020). Thematic content analysis of doctoral theses in stem education: Turkey context. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.17
61. Osgood, C. E., Succi, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press Özcan, H., & Koca, E. (2019). Turkish adaptation of the attitude towards STEM scale: A validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(2), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018045061
62. Özdemir-Özden, D., Karakuş-Tayşi, E., Kılıç-Şahin, H., Demir-Kaya, S., & Bayram, F. Ö. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ perceived efficacy beliefs towards the 21st century skills: the case of Kütahya. Turkish Studies, 13(27), 1163-1184.
63. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS program (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
64. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21). (2008). 21 st. century skills, education, and competitiveness. Tucson, AZ: Author.
65. Radu, M. (2014, March). Developing hands-on experiments to improve student learning via activities outside the classroom in engineering technology programs. In 2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
66. Şahin, A., Ayar, C. M., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 297-322.
67. Sivrikaya, S. Ö. (2019). Research of high school students’ attitudes of STEM. OPUS -International Journal of Society Research, 11(18), 914-934. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.547459
68. Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM education, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1
69. Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Tutum ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Attitude measurement and data analysis with SPSS]. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
70. Tektaş, M., & Tektaş, N. (2010). The relationship between vocational school student’s academic success and time management. Selçuk University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 23, 221-229.
71. Verbalis, JG, Barsony, J., Sugimura, Y., Tian, Y., Adams, DJ, Carter, EA & Resnick, HE (2010). Hyponatremia induced osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 25, 554-563.
72. Walker, W., Moore, T., Guzey, S., & Sorge, B. (2018). Frameworks to develop integrated STEM curricula. K-12 STEM Education, 4(2), 331-339.
73. Wells, B. H., Sanchez, H. A., & Attridge, J. M. (2007). Modeling student interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. In 2007 IEEE Meeting the Growing Demand for Engineers and Their Educators 2010-2020 International Summit (Vol. 50, pp. 1-17). IEEE
74. Wicklein, R. C., & Schell, J. W. (1995). Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science, & technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 59-76.
75. Yamak, H., Bulut, N., & Dündar, S. (2014). The impact of STEM activities on 5th grade students’ scientific process skills and their attitudes towards science. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 34(2), 249-265.
76. Yerdelen, S., Kahraman, N., & Yasemin, T. A. Ş. (2016). Low socioeconomic status students' STEM career interest in relation to gender, grade level, and STEM attitude. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(special), 59-74.
77. Yıldırım, B. (2021). Preschool STEM activities: preschool teachers’ preparation and views. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01056-2
78. Yıldırım, B., & Altun, Y. (2015). Investigating the effect of STEM education and engineering applications on science laboratory lectures. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 28-40.
79. Yıldırım, H., & Gelmez-Burakgazi, S. (2020). Research on STEM education studies in Turkey: A qualitative metasynthesis study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, (50), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.590319