The Effects of Reading Activities on Pre-service Teachers' Critical Reading Self-Efficacy, Reading Habits and Attitudes toward Teaching Profession

Öz

This study aimed to reveal the effects of reading activities on pre-service teachers' critical reading self-efficacy, attitudes towards the teaching profession, and reading habits. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, and participants were selected through purposive sampling. The study was conducted with 59 volunteer pre-service teachers from six different academic departments. The experimental intervention, consisting of reading activities, was implemented over a six-week period. Quantitative data were collected using scales measuring critical reading self-efficacy, attitudes toward the teaching profession, and reading habits. Qualitative data were obtained through participants’ opinions and suggestions following the intervention. The data were analyzed using paired-samples t-tests and content analysis. The findings revealed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Critical reading
• Book reading
• Critical reading self-efficacy
• Attitudes towards reading habit
• Attitudes towards teaching profession

Proje Numarası

TÜBİTAK 2209

Okuma Etkinliklerinin Öğretmen Adaylarının Eleştirel Okuma Öz-Yeterlikleri, Okuma Alışkanlığı ve Öğretmenlik Mesleğine İlişkin Tutumlarına Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, okuma etkinliklerinin öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel okuma öz-yeterlik algıları, öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumları ve okuma alışkanlıkları üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Eş zamanlı karma yöntem desenli yapılan çalışmada amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmış ve çalışma, altı farklı bölümden gönüllü olarak katılan 59 öğretmen adayı ile yürütülmüştür. Nicel bölümde gerçekleştirilen deneysel süreçte uygulanan okuma etkinlikleri altı hafta sürmüştür. Bu süreçte, algı ve tutumları ölçmek amacıyla ön-test ve son-test uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın nitel bölümünde okuma etkinlikleri ile ilgili öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri ve önerileri alınmıştır. Nicel verilerin analizi için bağımlı gruplar t-test, nitel verilerin analizi için de içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, eleştirel kitap okuma etkinliklerinin öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel okuma öz-yeterlik algıları, öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumları ve kitap okuma alışkanlıkları üzerinde anlamlı ve olumlu etkileri olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, eleştirel kitap okuma etkinliklerinin öğretmen adayları için hem mesleki hem de kişisel anlamda daha etkili olabileceği ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eleştirel okuma
• Kitap okuma
• Eleştirel okuma özyeterliği
• Okuma alışkanlığına yönelik tutumlar
• Öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumlar

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

TÜBİTAK 2209

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, Fırat Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören öğretmen adayları ile yürütülmüş ve Etik Kurul onayı alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir (Karar No: 20, Oturum No: 2023/23, Tarih: 14.12.2023).

Teşekkür

Yazarlar, TÜBİTAK'a ve çalışmaya katılan tüm öğrencilere teşekkür eder.

Kaynakça

1. Adalı, O. (2010). Interactive and critical reading techniques. Toroslu Publishing.
2. Akaydın, B., & Çeçen, M. A. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel okuma alışkanlıklarının incelenmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 215–234.
3. Akçamete, G. (1989). Evaluation of university students' reading. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 22(2), 735-753. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001416
4. Akın, E., & Çeçen, M.A. (2014). Secondary school students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies level (Muş-Bulanık Sample). Turkish Studies, 9(8), 91-110.
5. Akkaya, N. (2009). An investigation of prospective teachers’ attitudes regarding teaching various in terms of variables. Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 25, 35-42.
6. Akkuzu, N. (2012). Determination of professional competence levels of chemistry preservice teachers (Unpublisher master thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
7. Aksoy, M.E. (2010). Prospective teachers' attitudes towards teaching profession (Gaziosmanpaşa University Sample). The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2, 197-212.
8. Almagro, M., & Trianto, T. (2017). The effect of critical reading instruction on prospective teachers’ reading comprehension and attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 145–160.

9. Altunsöz, B. (2016). Eleştirel düşünme eğitiminin öğretmen adaylarının mesleki tutumlarına etkisi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
10. Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
11. Aybek, B., & Aslan, S. (2015). Eleştirel düşünme eğitimi ve akademik başarı ilişkisi: Öğretmen adayları üzerine bir çalışma. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(181), 23–36.
12. Bağcı, H. (2009). Assessment of attitude of secondary education students towards reading. In Proceedings of the II. International Turkish as a World Language Symposium. International Cyprus University, December 9–11, Nicosia.
13. Baki, Y. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel okuma becerilerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik bir uygulama [Yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
14. Balcı, A., Uyar, Y., & Büyükikiz, K. K. (2012). The examination of reading habits, frequency to use library and attitudes towards reading of 6th grade primary school students. Turkish Studies, 7(4), 965-985. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.3795.
15. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). Academic Press.
16. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
17. Basma, B., & Savage, R. (2023). Teacher professional development and student reading in middle and high school: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(3), 214-228.
18. Başaran, M., & Ateş, S. (2009). Investigation of fifth-grade primary school students' attitudes towards reading. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 29(1), 73-92.
19. Baykara-Pehlivan, K. (2010). A study on prospective teachers’ learning styles and their attitudes toward the teaching profession. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 749-763.
20. Bayrak, M. (2021). A phenomenological study on the professional development of vocatıonal teachers, (Unpublished master thesis). Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.
21. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2000). Experimental patterns. Pegem.
22. Byers, P.Y., & Wilcox, J.R. (1988, November). Focus groups: An alternative method of gathering qualitative data in communication research. 74th Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
24. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.
25. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
26. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
27. Cullinan, B. (1987). Children's literature in the reading program. International Reading Association.
28. Çakmak, T., & Yılmaz, B. (2009). A research about the reading habit readiness situations of preschool children: Hacettepe University Beytepe Preschool sample. Turkish Librarianship, 23(3), 489-509. https://doi.org/10.16923/turkishstudies.3372
29. Çetin, Ş. (2003). The comparison of attitudes of students in education faculties, who qraduated from Anatolian teaching high schools and general high schools (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
30. Darch, C., & Kameenui, E.J. (1987). Teaching LD students critical reading skills: A systematic replication. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(2), 82-91.
31. Demirel, Ö. (1999). Teaching Turkish. Pegem.
32. Doğan, T., & Çoban, A. E. (2009). The investigation of the relations between students’ attitude toward teaching profession and anxiety level in faculty of education. Education and Science, 34(153), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2009.1713
33. Durualp, E., Çiçekoğlu, P., & Durualp, E. (2013). The examination of eighth grade students' attitudes towards reading books in terms of their internet and book reading habits. International Journal of Turkish Literature, Culture and Education, 2(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.16993/teke.155638
34. Edmunds, H. (2000). The focus group research handbook. McGraw-Hill.
35. Epçaçan, C. (2012). Relationship between critical reading skills of secondary school students and their attitudes toward reading. Electronic Turkish Studies, 7(4), 1711-1726.
36. Fisher, R. M. (2017). Radical love--Is it radical enough?. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 8(1).
37. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
38. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
39. Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1998). Literacy: Reading the word and the world (S. Ayhan, Trans.). İmge Yayınları. (Original work published in 1987).
40. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Pearson Education.
41. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
42. Goss, J. D., & Leinbach, T. R. (1996). Focus groups as alternative research practice. Area, 28(2), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1996.tb00056.x
43. Göğüş, B. (1978). Orta dereceli okullarımızda Türkçe ve yazın eğitimi [Turkish and literary education in secondary schools]. Kadıoğlu Publishing.
44. Gökçe, O. (2006). Content analysis: Theoretical and practical information. Siyasal Kitabevi.
45. Gökkuş, A., & Delican, B. (2016). Eleştirel okuma eğitiminin öğretmen adaylarının akademik başarısına etkisi. International Journal of Language Academy, 4(2), 35–47.
46. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Güloğlu-Demir, C. (2016). Investigation of primary school fourth grade students' attitudes toward reading in terms of different variables. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Gazi University, Ankara. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.30334
48. Gür-Erdoğan, D., & Demir, Y. E. (2016). Examination of fourth-grade primary school students' attitudes towards reading in terms of different variables. Sakarya University Journal of Education Faculty, 32, 85-96.
49. Harris, A.J., & Sipay, E.R. (1990). How to increase reading ability. Longman.
50. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
51. İşeri, K. (1998). Educational function of reading act. Language Journal, (70), 5-18.
52. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1999). The new human and humans. Evrim Publishing.
53. Karabay, A. (2013). The development of critical reading self-efficacy perception scale. Turkish Studies, 8(13), 1107-1122.
54. Karabay, A. & Kuşdemir-Kayıran, B. (2010). Measurement understanding of reading skills in 5 th classes of primary schools. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 3(38), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.3372
55. Karadeniz, A. (2014). Critical reading self-efficacy perception scale validity and reliability study. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 3(1), 113-140.
56. Karasakaloğlu, N., Saracaloğlu, A., & Özelçi, S. Y. (2012). Primary school teachers' critical reading self-efficacy perceptions. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(19), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.17984/mkusbed.3372.
57. Khoshsima, H., & Hashemi Toroujeni, S. M. (2023). Enhancing teacher candidates’ critical thinking through explicit instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101245.
58. Kırmızı, F.S. (2012). An attitude scale towards teacher candidates’ reading habit: Reliability and validity analysis. Turkish Studies (Elektronic), 7(3), 2353-2366.
59. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
60. Küçükoğlu, H. (2008). Pre-service English teachers' self-efficacy perceptions toward critical reading (Unpublished master's thesis). Dicle University, Diyarbakır.
61. Krashen, S.D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Libraries Unlimited.
62. Macintosh, J. (1981). Focus groups in distance nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18121981.x.
63. Miles, M. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
64. Miller, J.P. (2005). Holistic learning and spirituality in education: Breaking new ground. Suny Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book4903.
65. McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., ... & Gray, A. L. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500106.
66. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
67. Öz, F. (2001). Applied Turkish teaching. Anı Publishing.
68. Özdemir, E. (1993). Reading art. İnkılâp Publishing.
69. Özyürek, A., & Erbay, F. (2015). The relationship between preschool teachers' teaching attitudes and life satisfaction. Journal of Social Sciences Institute of Çankırı Karatekin University, 6(2), 31-48.
70. Özyürek, C., & Erbay, H. N. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri ile okuma tutumları arasındaki ilişki. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 34–53.
71. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools (5th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
72. Pirozzi, R. (2003). Critical reading, critical thinking. Addison-Wesley.
73. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. The Guilford Press.
74. Rozan, N. (1982). The role of teachers in developing reading habits. Education and Science, 7(39), 19-23.
75. Sarı, M. (2010). The effect of master of education programme on opinions about teaching profession and the programme itself. Education and Science, 35(155), 3-15.
76. Shokouhi, H., & Askari, M. (2015). The effect of reading strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(4), 216–222.
77. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
78. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879498-9.
79. Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450-452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597.
80. Susar Kırmızı, F. (2012). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının eleştirel okuma becerileri ile okuduğunu anlama becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 371–377.
81. Şahin, A. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel okuma becerilerinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
82. Şahin, F.S., Zade, B.M. & Direk, H. (2009, 1-3 October). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutum ve yaşam doyum düzeyleri, XVIII. Paper Presented at the National Educational Sciences Congress, Ege University, Izmir.
83. Terzi, A.R., & Tezci, E. (2007). The attitudes of the students towards teaching profession at Necatibey education faculty. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 52(52), 593-614.
84. Tinker, M.A. & McCullough, C.M. (1968). Teaching elementary reading. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
85. Türk Dil Kurumu. (1998). Turkish Dictionary. Turkish Language Association Publications.
86. Uğurlu, C.T., & Polat, S. (2011). Eleştirel düşünme eğitimi alan öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(159), 230–242.
87. Uğurlu, C.T., & Polat, S. (2011). The attitudes of elementary education students towards teaching profession. Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Letters Journal of Social Sciences, 35(1), 68-74.
88. Uysal, H., Özkaya, A., & Coşkun, M. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel okuma becerilerinin geliştirilmesi. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 45–58.
89. Ülper, H., & Bağcı, H. (2012). Eleştirel okuma ve yazma becerilerinin gelişimi için bir model önerisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(3), 1927–1949.
90. Ünal, F.T. & Sever, A. (2013). Sense-efficacy perceptions of Turkish teacher candidates' for critical reading. Journal of Language and Literature Education, 2(6), 33-42.
91. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
92. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
93. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.10.