The Impact of Financial Development and Technological Innovations on Carbon Emissions in Türkiye: Evidence from the RALS-EG Test Approach

Abstract

This study examines the impact of economic growth, financial development, and technological innovation on carbon emissions in Turkey from 1984 to 2021. The analysis employs the RALS-ADF and ADF unit root tests, the RALS-EG and Bayer-Hanck cointegration tests, the FMOLS estimation method, and the Fourier-based Granger causality test. The empirical findings reveal that economic growth is the strongest driver of carbon emissions, while financial development has a mitigating effect on carbon emissions. Technological innovation, however, leads to a limited increase in emissions. Moreover, the causality analysis reveals bidirectional relationships between economic growth and emissions, as well as between financial development and emissions. In contrast, an asymmetric causality is found between emissions and technology. Overall, the results suggest that Turkey should design low-carbon growth strategies, strengthen its financial system to support green investments, and reorient technology policies toward renewable energy and environmentally friendly practices.

Keywords

• Carbon Emissions
• Technological Innovations
• RALS-EG

Türkiye'de Finansal Gelişme ve Teknolojik Yeniliklerin Karbon Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: RALS Yaklaşımından Elde Edilen Kanıtlar

Öz

Bu çalışma, 1984–2021 dönemi için Türkiye’de ekonomik büyüme, finansal gelişme ve teknolojik yeniliklerin karbon emisyonları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Analizde RALS-ADF ve ADF birim kök testleri, RALS-EG ve Bayer-Hanck eşbütünleşme testleri, FMOLS tahmin yöntemi ve Fourier tabanlı Granger nedensellik testi uygulanmıştır. Ampirik bulgular, ekonomik büyümenin karbon emisyonlarını en güçlü biçimde artırdığını, finansal gelişmenin emisyonları azaltıcı yönde etkili olduğunu, teknolojik yeniliklerin ise sınırlı düzeyde emisyon artışına yol açtığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, nedensellik analizleri ekonomik büyüme ile emisyonlar ve finansal gelişme ile emisyonlar arasında çift yönlü ilişkiler olduğunu, emisyonlar ile teknoloji arasında ise asimetrik bir nedensellik bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçlar, Türkiye’nin düşük karbonlu büyüme stratejileri geliştirmesi, finansal sistemin yeşil yatırımları desteklemesi ve teknoloji politikalarının yenilenebilir enerji ve çevre dostu uygulamalara yönlendirilmesi gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Karbon Emisyonu
• Teknolojik Yenilikler
• RALS-EG

Kaynakça

1. Adebayo, T. S., Ullah, S., Kartal, M. T., Ali, K., Pata, U. K., & Ağa, M. (2023). Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: The role of technological innovation and renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. The Science of the Total Environment, 859, 160181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160181
2. Boutabba, M. A. (2014). The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: Evidence from the Indian economy. Economic Modelling, 40, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.005
3. British Petroleum. (2025). British Petroleum. Erişim adresi: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics.html
4. Cai, A., Zheng, S., Cai, L. H., Yang, H., & Comite, U. (2021). How does green technology innovation affect carbon emissions? A spatial econometric analysis of China’s provincial panel data. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 813811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.813811
5. Chen, J., Gao, M., Mangla, S. K., Song, M., & Wen, J. (2020). Effects of technological changes on China’s carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119938
6. Chen, Y., & Lee, C. C. (2020). Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121550
7. Cheng, C., Ren, X., Dong, K., Dong, X., & Wang, Z. (2020). How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111818
8. Destek, M. A., & Manga, M. (2021). Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: Evidence from BEM economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 21991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2

9. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072.
10. Doğan, B. Ö. (2023). Ekolojik sürdürülebilirlikte finansal gelişme ve teknolojik inovasyon etkisi: Türkiye’den kanıtlar. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 10(23), 200–217.https://doi.org/10.58884/AKADEMIKHASSASIYETLER.1331 306
11. Enders, W., & Jones, P. (2016). Grain prices, oil prices, and multiple smooth breaks in a VAR. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 20(4), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1515/SNDE-2014-0101
12. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
13. Erdoğan, S. (2021). Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and buildings sector’s carbon emission in BRICS countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780
14. Erdoğan, S., Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, D. Ç., & Gedikli, A. (2020). The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 267, 110637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637
15. Fernández Fernández, Y., Fernández López, M. A., & Olmedillas Blanco, B. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3459–3467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001
16. Ganda, F. (2019). The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.235
17. Gonenc, H., & Poleska, A. (2023). Multinationals, research and development, and carbon emissions: International evidence. Climate Policy, 23(8), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2135484
18. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
19. Gültekin, H. (2023). Finansal gelişme, inovasyon ve CO2 emisyonları: ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı. Econder Uluslararası Akademik Dergi, 7(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.35342/ECONDER.1269394
20. Im, K. S., & Schmidt, P. (2008). More efficient estimation under non-normality when higher moments do not depend on the regressors, using residual augmented least squares. Journal of Econometrics, 144(1), 219–233.
21. Jiang, C., & Ma, X. (2019). The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: A global perspective. Sustainability, 11(19), 5241. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195241
22. Khalid, T., Wen, J., Khalid, M., Khalid, S., Zakaria, M., & Mahmood, H. (2023). Does technological innovation reduce environmental degradation? Evidence from China. Engineering Economics, 34(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.34.3.32818
23. Khan, I., Hou, F., & Le, H. P. (2021). The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. Science of the Total Environment, 754, 142222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv .2020.142222
24. Koçak, E. (2024). Çevresel teknolojik inovasyonun küresel ısınma üzerindeki etkisine ilişkin bir inceleme: Türkiye’den kanıtlar. Fiscaoeconomia, 8(2), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1405227
25. Lau, C. K., Patel, G., Mahalik, M. K., Sahoo, B. K., & Gozgor, G. (2024). Effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policies in promoting environmental quality: Evidence from five large emerging economies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 60(1), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2023.2210716
26. Lee, H., Lee, J., & Im, K. (2015). More powerful cointegration tests with non-normal errors. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 19(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1515/SNDE-2013-0060
27. Liu, Y., Tang, L., & Liu, G. (2022). Carbon dioxide emissions reduction through technological innovation: Empirical evidence from Chinese provinces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159543
28. Osobajo, O. A., Otitoju, A., Otitoju, M. A., & Oke, A. (2020). The impact of energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions. Sustainability, 12(19), 7965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197965
29. Our World in Data. (2024). Per capita CO₂ emissions. Erişim adresi: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita?tab=chart&time=1960..latest&country=~TUR
30. Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236
31. Petrović, P., & Lobanov, M. M. (2020). The impact of R&D expenditures on CO2 emissions: Evidence from sixteen OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119187
32. Qayyum, M., Ali, M., Nizamani, M. M., Li, S., Yu, Y., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Nexus between financial development, renewable energy consumption, technological innovations and CO2 emissions: The case of India. Energies, 14(15), 4505. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154505
33. Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022). The nexus between economic growth, renewable energy use, agricultural land expansion, and carbon emissions: New insights from Peru. Energy Nexus, 6, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100067
34. Sagar, A. D., & van der Zwaan, B. (2006). Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment, and learning-by-doing. Energy Policy, 34(17), 2601–2608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.012
35. Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. The Science of the Total Environment, 646, 862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365
36. Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A., Hammoudeh, S., & Shahzad, S. J. H. (2017). Bounds testing approach to analyzing the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis with structural breaks: The role of biomass energy consumption in the United States. Energy Economics, 68, 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.004
37. Sheraz, M., Deyi, X., Ahmed, J., Ullah, S., & Ullah, A. (2021). Moderating the effect of globalization on financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 35126–35144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13116-0
38. Shoaib, H., Rafique, M. Z., Nadeem, A. M., & Huang, S. (2020). Impact of financial development on CO2 emissions: A comparative analysis of developing countries (D8) and developed countries (G8). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 12461–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z
39. Sikder, M., Wang, C., Yao, X., Huai, X., Wu, L., Yeboah, F. K., Wood, J., Zhao, Y., & Dou, X. (2022). The integrated impact of GDP growth, industrialization, energy use, and urbanization on CO2 emissions in developing countries: Evidence from the panel ARDL approach. Science of The Total Environment, 837, 155795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155795
40. Song, W., Mao, H., & Han, X. (2021). The two-sided effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions performance in China. The Science of the Total Environment, 791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148331
41. Su, L., Ji, T., Ahmad, F., Chandio, A. A., Ahmad, M., Jabeen, G., & Rehman, A. (2023). Technology innovations impact on carbon emission in Chinese cities: Exploring the mediating role of economic growth and industrial structure transformation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 46321–46335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25493-9
42. Şeyranlioğlu, O. (2024). Türkiye’de finansal gelişmenin karbon (CO2) emisyonlarına etkisi: Çevresel Kuznets eğrisi hipotezi çerçevesinde sektörel bir bakış. Sosyoekonomi, 32(61), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.03.20
43. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
44. Tsimisaraka, R. S. M., Xiang, L., Andrianarivo, A. R. N. A., Josoa, E. Z., Khan, N., Hanif, M. S., Khurshid, A., & Limongi, R. (2023). Impact of financial inclusion, globalization, renewable energy, ICT, and economic growth on CO2 emission in OBOR countries. Sustainability, 15(8), 6534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086534
45. Tufail, M., Song, L., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Khan, S. (2021). Do fiscal decentralization and natural resources rent curb carbon emissions? Evidence from developed countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 49179–49190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13865-y
46. UNFCCC. (2015). UNFCCC. Erişim adresi: https://unfccc.int/ sites/default/files/NDC/202206/The_INDC_of_TURKEY_v.15.19.30.pdf
47. Wahab, S. (2021). Does technological innovation limit trade-adjusted carbon emissions? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(28), 38043–38053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13345-3
48. Wang, F., Fan, W., Liu, J., Wang, G., & Chai, W. (2020). The effect of urbanization and spatial agglomeration on carbon emissions in urban agglomeration. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(19), 24329–24341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08597-4
49. Wang, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Foreign direct investment and carbon emission efficiency: The role of direct and indirect channels. Sustainability, 14(20), 13484. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013484
50. Wang, W. Z., Liu, L. C., Liao, H., & Wei, Y. M. (2021). Impacts of urbanization on carbon emissions: An empirical analysis from OECD countries. Energy Policy, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112171
51. Wang, Z., Gao, L., Wei, Z., Majeed, A., & Alam, I. (2022). How FDI and technology innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in high-tech industries: Evidence from province-level data of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 4641–4653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15946-4
52. World Bank. (2025). World Bank Data. Erişim adresi: https://data.worldbank.org/
53. Yağiş, O. (2024). Türkiye’de teknolojik yenilikler ve ekonomik büyümenin çevre kalitesi üzerindeki etkileri: ARDL sınır testi. Journal of Abant Social Sciences, 24(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1391389
54. Zhang, M., Li, B., & Yin, S. (2020). Is technological innovation effective for energy saving and carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. IEEE Access, 8, 83524–83537. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990678
55. Zhao, J., Shahbaz, M., Dong, X., & Dong, K. (2021). How does financial risk affect global CO2 emissions? The role of technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.techfore.2021.120751