Two Sides of the Coin in The State Administration: Asabiyya and Nepotism In Ibn Khaldun's Muqaddimah

Öz

The purpose of this study is to comparatively examine the presence of nepotism and universal values in the expressions associated with the concept of Asabiyyah, a concept frequently emphasized by Ibn Khaldun in the Muqaddimah, within the context of state administration. The primary source analyzed in this study is Muqaddimah: An Introduction to Universal History and Social Sciences by Ibn Khaldun, translated into Turkish by Cemal Aydın. Document analysis was employed as the data collection method, while content analysis was used to analyze the data. The findings revealed themes reflecting universal values, including mutual assistance, protection, defence, the pursuit of justice and rights, solidarity among friends and allies, and the prevention of injustice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ibn Khaldun
• Muqaddimah
• Asabiyyah
• Nepotism
• State Administration.

Devlet Yönetiminde Madalyonun İki Yüzü: Ibn Haldun’un Mukaddime’sinde Asabiyet ve Kayırmacılık

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, İbn Haldun'un Mukaddime adlı eserinde sıklıkla övdüğü Asabiyye olgusunda geçen ifadelerde kayırmacılık ve evrensel değerlerin varlığını devlet yönetimi bağlamında karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektir. Çalışmada incelenen kaynak, Cemal Aydın tarafından Türkçeye çevrilmiş olan "İbn Haldun'un 'Mukaddime: Evrensel Tarih ve Sosyal Bilimlere Giriş'" adlı eserdir. Veri toplama yöntemi olarak belge analizi, veri analizi için ise içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. İncelenen temalar arasında, karşılıklı yardımlaşma, koruma, savunma, hak arama, dostları bir araya getirme ve adaletsizliği önleme gibi evrensel değerleri somutlaştıran ifadeler yer almaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İbn Haldun
• Mukaddime
• Asabiyet
• Kayırmacılık
• Devlet Yönetimi.

Kaynakça

1. Abdalla, H., Maghrabi, A. and Raggad, B. (1998) Assessing the Perceptions of Human Resource Managers toward Nepotism: A Cross-Cultural Study. International Journal of Manpower, 19, 554-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437729810242235
2. Ahmed, F. B. J. (2018). Corruption According to the Main Sources of Islam. Intellectual Discourse, 26(1), 91-110. Aktan, C.C. and Acar, O.K. (Ed). (2021). Kamu Yönetiminde Kayırmacılık. İzmir: SOBİAD Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Yayınları.
3. Altheide, D. (1996). Process of Document Analysis. (Ed.: D. Altheide). In Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pub.
4. Ammour, L. and Baruh, L. T. (1999). Çalışan Kadından Bir Kesit (1911-1934) : Osmanlı Bankası Kadın Personeli. Tarih ve Toplum, 183.
5. Apak, A. (2011). Kabile Asabiyetinin Mahiyeti Üzerinde Değerlendirmeler. İslam Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 76-91.
6. Atmaca, E. (2021). Abdulmuttalib’s Children in Terms of Their Reaction to Prophet Muhammad’s Dawah an Evaluation in the Context of Asabiyyah. Journal of Academic Sirah, 4, 32- 57.
7. Aydın, Ö. (2024). The Relationship Between the State’s Migration Planning and The Rights of Migrants On the Basis of Ibn-i Haldun’s Theory of Asabiyyah. AKDHFD, 14(2), 757-779.
8. Azimli, E. (2021). İbn Khaldun’s Asabiyyah Theory and Its Present-day Provisions. Din Araştırmaları Jurnali, 1(6), 7-21.

9. Balcı, İ. (2013). Hak ve Adaletle Taçlandırılan Bir İdari Portre: Hz. Ömer. Din ve Hayat Dergisi, 18, 84-90.
10. Baş, B. (2022). Characteristics of Societies According to Ibn Khaldun. İdrak Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 376-402.
11. Batur, B. (2021). The Asabiyya of Ibn Khaldun: Sociological Projections of a Concept. Selçuk Ün. Sos. Bil. Ens. Der, 46, 152-161.
12. Bayram, M. (2023). A Comparative Evaluation Between Ibn Khaldun Thought and Liberal Views. Temaşa Journal of Philosophy, (20), 70-84.
13. Buhari, M. (1422/2001). Sahîhu’l-Buhari, thk. Muhammed Zehir b. Nâsir, Dimeşk, 1422/2001.
14. Çağrıcı, M. (1991). Asabiyet, TDV İslam Ansiklopedisi, C. 3, İstanbul, (s. 453-455).
15. Diken, A. and Erdirençelebi, M. (2013). 1. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Aile İşletmelerinde Nepotizm ve Çalışanların İşletmeye Bağlılıklarındaki Etkisi, Sakarya Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi, Sakarya, 59-71.
16. Dilek, S. and Fidan, M. (2022). Evaluation of Muqaddimah in the Context of Economic Schools. Journal of Economics Business Politics and International Relations, 8(2), 379-397.
17. Dursun, T. and Hassan, Ü. (2012). İbn-i Haldun’da Uygarlıkların Yükselişi ve Çöküş, (2. Basım). İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları.
18. Eken, Y. (2015). The Impact of Nepotizm and Cronyism On the Employee Performance, Beykent University, Institute of Social Sciences Master’s Thesis, İstanbul.
19. Ensârî, E. F. C. M. (2003). Lisânü’l-Arab. Dâru’s-Sadr.
20. Erol, S. (2023). Sociological Views of Emille Durkheim and Ibn-i Haldun On the Conceptions of Collective Consciousness and Asabetity in Providing Unity and Solidarity in Society, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master’s Thesis, Nevşehir.
21. Farooq, M. O. (2019). Khaldūn’s Defense of Mu‘āwiya: The Dynamics of ‘Asabīyya, Mulk and the Counter-Revolution According to the Muqaddima. Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies, 4(1), 87-106.
22. Forte, F. (2025). Ibn Khaldūn in Contemporary Moroccan Thought, Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section one, The Near and Middle East, Leiden: Brill, doi:10.1163/9789004519534_011
23. Gedik, A. (2024). Ibn Khaldun’s Theory of Umran and Historical Consciousness. Turkish Journal of Religious Education Studies, 18, 263-280.
24. Haldun, İ. (2016). Miftahu’l-İber İnsanlık ve Peygamberlik Tarihine Giriş, Çev. Abdullatif Suphi Paşa, İstanbul: Rağbet Yayınları.
25. Haliloğlu, N. (2021). The Failed Asabiyya and Cultural Suicide in Michel Houellebecq’s Submission. The Journal of Humanity and Society, 11(1), 97-131.
26. İbn Haldun, A. (2025). Mukaddime: Evrensel Tarihe ve Toplum Bilimlerine Giriş. Çev. Cemal Aydın. Timaş Yayınları. İbn Manzur, C. (1414/1994), Lisanu’l Arab, Beyrut, Daru’l-Sadir.
27. Jamal, M. (2012). Ibn Khaldun’s Asabiyah: Past and Present. Pakistan Perspectives, 7(2), 77-89.
28. Kılıçarslan, U. (2018). The Impact of Nepotism On Job Satisfaction and Intent to Quit in Accommodation Enterprises: Example of Antalya, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Master’s Thesis, Muğla.
29. Kıral, B. (2020). Document Analysis as A Qualitative Data Analysis Method. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 15, 170-189.
30. Kur’an-ı Kerîm ve Türkçe Meali. (3023). Çev. Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır. sad. Süleyman Feyzullahoğlu. İstanbul: Nuh Yayıncılık.
31. Kyngäs, H., Elo, S., Pölkki, T., Kääriäinen, M. and Kanste, O. (2011). Sisällönanalyysi Suomalaisessa Hoitotieteellisessä Tutkimuksessa [The Use of Content Analysis in Finnish Nursing Science Research]. Hoitotiede, 23: 2, 138-148.
32. Mensouri, S. (2002). Ibn Khaldûn: Historien du Passé Et Du Présent, De L'ici Et De L'ailleurs. Revue des Deux Mondes, 122-127. http://www.jstor.com/s/44189625.
33. Muila, M. (2019). Teori’ Asabiyyah Ibn Khaldun Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 3(2), 400-417.
34. Okene, A. A. and Shukri, B. A. (2011). Ibn Khaldun, Cyclical Theory and the Rise and Fall of Sokoto Caliphate, Nigeria WestAfrica. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), 80-91.
35. Özel, M. (2021). Clientelism as A Social and Political Relationship Type and Some New Conceptualizations. Journal of Sociological Research, 24(3), 64-97.
36. Özkanan, A. and Erdem, R. (2015). A Qualitative Study on Favoritism Applications in Management. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 2 (4), 7-28.
37. Platon, (2005). Devlet, (Çev., Cenk Saraçoğlu; Veysel Atayman). İstanbul: Bordo Siyah.
38. Schilpzand, P., Lagios, C. and Simon, L. D. R. (2025). Famiyl First: An Integrative Conceptual Review of Nepotism in Organisations. Human Resources Management, 64, 157-180.
39. Severinsson, E. (2003). Moral Stress and Burnout: Qualitative Content Analysis. Nursing and Health Sciences, 5, 59- 66.
40. Sherman, P. W. (1980). The Meaning of Nepotism. American Naturalist, 116 (4), 604–606.
41. Sidani, Y. M. and Thornberry, J. (2013). Nepotism in the Arap World: An Instutional Thery Perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 69-96.
42. Şimşek, H. (2009). Methodical Problem in The Researches of Educational History. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 42(1), 33-51.
43. Tekâsür. (t.y.). Kur’an Yolu (20 September 2024). https://kuran.diyanet.gov.tr/.
44. TLA. (2025). https://sozluk.gov.tr/. https://sozluk.gov.tr/?kelime=liyakat.
45. UCLA. (2025). University of California Los Angeles, https://www.college.ucla.edu/2019/03/28/new-endowed-chair-in history-goes-to-nile-green-scholar-of-global-history-and-islam/
46. Uludağ, S. (1999). Ibn Haldun, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 19/538-543. Ankara: TDV Yayınları.
47. Uludağ, S. (2016). İbn Haldun Mukaddime, İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları.
48. Uludağ, S. (2017). Ibn Haldun ve Mukaddime (Mukaddime tercümesi giriş). İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları.
49. Ümütlü, A. Y. (2023). The Criticisms of Ibn Khaldûn, The Maliki Qadi, On The Institution of Jurisdiction and The Justice Ethics in The 14th Century. Journal of Justice, 1(70), 463-480.
50. Yılmaz, I. (2024). Analysis of Economic Principles of Ibn Khaldun in the Context of the Concepts of Asabiyyah and Umran. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 17(101), 103-114.
51. YÖK (2025).https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.