Rekabet İstihbaratının Firma Performansına Etkisinde Entelektüel Sermayenin Aracılık Rolü

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 379 - 396

Mustafa Altıntaş , Yusuf Akkoca , Fatih Ferhat Çetinkaya

https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1640887

Öz

Günümüzde baş döndüren bir hızla gelişen iş dünyasında örgütlerin varlıklarını devam ettirebilmeleri ve rekabet avantajı yakalayabilmelerinin birçok yolu olduğu gibi diğer örgütlerin stratejilerinden haberdar olmaları önemli bir avantaj kaynağıdır. Örgütlerin rakipleri karşısında fark yaratabilmelerinin bir yolu olan rekabet istihbaratı stratejik yönetimin bir parçası olup örgüte fayda sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı rekabet istihbaratının firma performansına etkisinde entelektüel sermayenin aracılık rolünün belirlenmesidir. Bu amaçla Kırşehir’de faaliyet gösteren KOBİ’lerde çalışanlardan 409 kişiye kolayda örnekleme yoluyla ulaşılmış ve anket tekniği kullanılarak veri toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (PLS-SEM) kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre rekabet istihbaratının firma performansına etkisinde entelektüel sermayenin kısmi aracılık rolünün olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra rekabet istihbaratının entelektüel sermaye üzerinde ve entelektüel sermayenin firma performansı üzerinde anlamlı etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçların hem alan yazın hem de örgütler için katkı niteliğinde olduğu ve bunun yanı sıra araştırmanın bazı kısıtlamalar nedeniyle genellenebilir bir yapıda olmadığı söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Firma Performansı, Entelektüel Sermaye, Rekabet İstihbaratı

The Mediating Role of Intellectual Capital in the Effect of Competitive Intelligence on Firm Performance

Öz

In today's rapidly evolving business world, organizations have multiple ways to sustain their existence and gain a competitive advantage. One significant source of advantage is being aware of the strategies employed by other organizations. Competitive intelligence, which serves as a means for organizations to differentiate themselves from their competitors, is an integral part of strategic management and provides substantial benefits to organizations. This study aims to determine the mediating role of intellectual capital in the effect of competitive intelligence on firm performance. To achieve this objective, data were collected through a survey from 409 employees working in SMEs operating in Kırşehir using a convenience sampling method. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed for data analysis. The findings of the study indicate that intellectual capital plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between competitive intelligence and firm performance. Furthermore, competitive intelligence has a significant effect on intellectual capital, and intellectual capital has a significant effect on firm performance. The results obtained from the study contribute to both the literature and organizations. However, it should be noted that the study's findings are not generalizable due to certain limitations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Firm Performance, Intellectual Capital, Competitive Intelligence

Kaynakça

• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
• Alserhan, H. F. (2017). The role of intellectual capital in achieving a competitive advantage: A field study on Jordanian private universities in the northern region. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 6(2), 33-42.
• Astuti, P. D., Chariri, A. ve Rohman, A. (2019). Association between intellectual capital and competitive advantage: A case study on the hotel industry in Bali province, Indonesia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 440-449.
• Avcı, U., Madanoğlu, M. ve Okumuş, F. (2011). Strategic orientation and performance of tourism firms: Evidence from a developing country. Tourism Management, 32, 147-157.
• Bali, S., ve Akkaya B. (2018). Entelektüel sermaye ve ölçümüne yönelik bazı yaklaşımlar. Journal of International Social Research, 11(55), 1145-1161.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
• Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-56.
• Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advance (2. bs.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
• Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C. ve Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100.
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3. bs.). Routledge.
• Chen, J., Zhu, Z., & Xie, H. Y. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: A new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 195-212.
• Chen, Y. S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 271-286.
• Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2. bs.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501.
• Coşkun, A. (2006). Bankaların stratejik performans yönetiminde performans karnesi kullanımı. Bankacılar Dergisi, 56(17), 28-39.
• Coşkun, R., Altunışık, R. ve Yıldırım, E. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
• Çelik, M., & Karamustafa, K. (2014). Entelektüel Sermaye ve Örgüt Performansı İlişkisi: Akdeniz Bölgesindeki Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), 1-25.
• Daft, R. (1983). Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 135-142.
• Dess, G. G. ve Robinson, R. B. Jr. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265-273.
• Do Rosã, M. ve Vaz, J. L. (2006). Intellectual capital and value creation: Evidence from the Portuguese banking industry. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 11-20.
• Edvinsson, L. ve Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Business.
• Edvinsson, L. ve Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 14(4), 356-364.
• Elitok, U. (2019). Entellektüel sermayenin kurumsal itibar üzerine etkisi ve bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Malatya.
• Fleisher, C. S., & Bensoussan, B. E. (2007). Business and Competitive Analysis: Effective Application of New and Classic Methods. FT Press.
• Ghosh, D. ve Wu, A. (2007). Intellectual capital and capital markets: Additional evidence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(2), 216-235.
• Gilad, B. (2011). Business war games: How large, small, and new companies can vastly improve their strategies and outmaneuver the competition. Career Press.
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
• Grant, R. M. (2002). Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications. Blackwell Publishers.
• Guthrie, J. (2001). The management, measurement and the reporting of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(1), 27-41.
• Gündüz, M. A. (2017). Rekabet istihbaratının uluslararası pazar seçimindeki rolü (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (1. bs.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123.
• Hall, C. & Bensoussan, B. (2007). Staying ahead of the competition: How firms really manage their CI and knowledge, evidence from a decade of rapid change. World Scientific Publishing.
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
• Hoque, Z. (2005). Linking environmental uncertainty to non-financial performance measures and performance: A research note. The British Accounting Review, 37(4), 471-481.
• Hughes, S., & White, R. (2005). Improving strategic planning and implementation in universities through competitive intelligence tools: A means to gaining relevance. Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 339-344.
• Jaworski, B. J., & Wee, C. A. (1993). Competitive intelligence and bottom line: An executive's guide. Dow Jones-Irwin.
• Kahaner, L. (1996). Competitive Intelligence: How to Gather, Analyze, and Use Information to Move Your Business to the Top. Simon & Schuster.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
• Köseoğlu, M. A. & Akdeve, E. (2013). Rekabet istihbaratı (Competitive intelligence). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• López-Nicolás, C., & Meroño-Cerdán, A. L. (2011). Strategic knowledge management, innovation, and performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 502-509.
• Macinati, M. S. (2008). The relationship between quality management systems and organizational performance in the Italian National Health Service. Health Policy, 85(2), 228-241.
• Marr, B. (2007). Measuring and managing intangible value drivers. Business Strategy Series, 8(3), 172-178.
• Miller, D. (1987). Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 7-32.
• Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2002). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1228–1263.
• Ngugi, J. K., Gakure, R. W. & Mugo, H. (2012). Competitive intelligence practices and their effect on profitability of firms in the Kenyan banking industry. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2(3), 11-18.
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
• Özdemir, B. & Taşcı, D. (2019). Entelektüel sermaye ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin testi: Türkiye’nin ilk 1000 sanayi kuruluşu’nda ampirik bir araştırma. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 8(61), 363-372.
• Öztek, M. Y. (2005). Performans ölçümünde esas alınan ölçütler. Öneri Dergisi, 6(23), 19-22.
• Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
• Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731.
• Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
• Prescott, J. E., & Gibbons, P. T. (1993). Global competitive intelligence: An overview. Competitiveness Review, 3(4), 1-13.
• Rauch, D. & Santi, P. (2001). Competitive intelligence adds value: Five intelligence attitudes. European Management Journal, 19(5), 552-559.
• Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804.
• Roos, G. & Roos, J. (1997). Measuring your company's intellectual performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 413-426.
• Roos, J., Edvinsson, L. & Dragonetti, N. C. (1997). Intellectual capital: Navigating the new business landscape. Springer.
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Henseler, J. & Hair, J. F. (2014). On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon (2012). Long Range Planning, 47(3), 154–160.
• Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 45-62.
• Stewart, T. A. & Kirsch, S. L. (1991). Brainpower: Intellectual capital is becoming corporate America's most valuable asset and can be its sharpest competitive weapon, the challenge is to find what you have and use it. FORTUNE Magazine. Access address: https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1991/06/03/75096/
• Stewart, T. A. (1997). Entelektüel sermaye: Örgütlerin yeni zenginliği (N. Elhüseyni, Çev.). Mess Yayıncılık.
• Subramaniam, M. & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
• Sullivan, P. H. (1998). Profiting from intellectual capital: Extracting value from innovation. John Wiley & Sons.
• Sumedrea, S. (2013). Intellectual capital and firm performance: A dynamic relationship in crisis time. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 137-144.
• Sveiby, K. E. (2001). A knowledge‐based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 344-358.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814.
• Weiss, A. (2002). A brief guide to competitive intelligence: How to gather and use information competitors. Business Information Review, 19(2), 39-47.
• Wright, S., Bisson, C., & Duffy, A. (2012). Competitive intelligence and information technology adoption of SMEs in Turkey: Diagnosing current performance and identifying barriers. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 2(1), 5-29.
• Wright, S., Eid, E. R. & Fleisher, C. S. (2009). Empirical study of competitive intelligence practice: Evidence from UK retail banking. Academy of Marketing Conference, Competitive Intelligence, Analysis & Strategy Track, Leeds, UK.
• Wright, S., Pickton, D. W., & Callow, J. (2009). Competitive intelligence in UK firms: A typology. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(6), 718-735.
• Yıldız, E. (2021). SmartPLS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: Reflektif ve formatif yapılar (2. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yıldız, T. (2021). Denizcilik işletmelerine yönelik entelektüel sermaye değerlemesi üzerine bir model önerisi (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Yılmaz, C., & Özgener, Ş. (2021). Competitive intelligence and competitiveness in accommodation businesses: the role of employee training effectiveness. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(18), 2905-2921.
• Youndt, M. A., Subramaniam, M., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 335-361.
• Yörük, N. & Erdem, N. S. (2008). Entelektüel sermaye ve unsurlarının, İMKB’de işlem gören otomotiv sektörü firmalarının finansal performansı üzerine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 397-413.
• Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.