Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Mediating Role of Attitude in the Effect of Sustainable Consumption Knowledge on Sustainable Consumption Behavior

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 634 - 650, 06.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1669801

Öz

The understanding of sustainable consumption, which is one of the sustainable development goals adopted by the United Nations and sought by conscious consumers in products, has led businesses to adopt this understanding. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of sustainable consumption knowledge on sustainable consumption behavior with the mediating role of attitude. In the study, which was designed based on a causal research design, data (n=317) were collected through an online survey. The data analysis was performed using SPSS (27.0) and JASP (0.19.1.0) software. In the study, the effect of sustainable consumption knowledge on sustainable consumption behavior was tested using Simple Linear Regression. The research model was tested using the SPSS PROCESS macro (Model 4). The findings, in line with the literature, indicate that sustainable consumption knowledge, attitudes toward sustainable consumption, and behaviors are positively and moderately correlated with each other. It was found that sustainable consumption knowledge is a significant predictor of both attitude and behavior. Similarly, attitudes toward sustainable consumption were also a significant predictor of behavior. The results suggest that knowledge and attitudes are determining factors in the adoption of sustainable consumption habits.

Kaynakça

  • Ahmad, S. N. B., Juhdi, N., & Awadz, A. S. (2010). Examination of environmental knowledge and perceived pro-environmental behavior among students of University Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought, 1(1), 328-342.
  • Akenji, L. (2014). Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 13-23.
  • Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A Literature and Practice Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (23. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  • Ceschin, F. (2008). Sustainable Consumption and Production. Framework for Action.
  • Chetioui Y, Benlafqih H, Lebdaoui H (2020) How fashion influencers contribute to consumers' purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 24(3), 361-380.
  • Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2012). The potential role of carbon labeling in a green economy. Energy Economics, 34, S53-S63.
  • Dimitrova, T., Ilieva, I., & Angelova, M. (2022). Exploring factors affecting sustainable consumption behaviour. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 155.
  • George, D. & Mallery, M. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step a simple guide and reference (14th edition). New York: Routledge.
  • Green, L. W. (1991). Health promotion planning. Mountain View, 24.
  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspec¬tive. 7th ed. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Hayes, AF. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York. Guildford Publications.
  • Heo J, Muralidharan, S. 2019. What triggers young Millennials to purchase eco-friendly products?: the interrelationships among knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness, and environmental concern. J Mark Commun. 25 (4), 421–437.
  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2021). Sixth Assessment Report - Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  • Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Sustainable Development Research Network, 29(1), 30-40.
  • Jambeck, J.R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., et al. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771.
  • Kim, Y., Yun, S., Lee, J., & Ko, E. (2018). How consumer knowledge shapes green consumption: An empirical study on voluntary carbon offsetting. In Social and environmental issues in advertising (pp. 33-51). Routledge.
  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guildford Pres
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of struc-tural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Liao, X., Nguyen, T. P. L., & Sasaki, N. (2022). Use of the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) model to examine sustainable agriculture in Thailand. Regional Sustainability, 3(1), 41-52.
  • Matharu, M., Jain, R., & Kamboj, S. (2020). Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behavior: a sharing economy perspective. Management of environmental quality. An international Journal, 32(1), 20-40.
  • Moitra, P., Verma, P., & Madan, J. (2021). Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) to healthy eating and activity patterns in school children (HEAPS). Nutrition and health, 27(2), 199-209.
  • Nielsen. (2020). The Evolution of the Sustainability Mindset. Nielsen Global Sustainability Report. Özmen. M., Uzkurt, C., Özdemir, Ş., Altunışık, R. ve Torlak, Ö. (2013). Pazarlama İlkeleri. Eskişehir:Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını.
  • Öztürk, A. (2022). The effect of halal product knowledge, halal awareness, perceived psychological risk and halal product attitude on purchasing intention. Business and Economics Research Journal, 13(1), 127-141.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98.
  • Quoquab, Farzana, and Jihad Mohammad. 2017. Managing sustainable consumption: Is it a problem or panacea? In Sustainable Economic Development: Green Economy and Green Growth, World Sustainability Series. Edited by Walter Leal Filho, Diana-Mihaela Pociovalisteanu and Abul Quasem Al-Amin. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 115–25.
  • Rousta, A., & Allaf Jafari, E. (2024). Impact of environmental knowledge, responsibility and concern on sustainable consumption behavior: does customer attitude matter?. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(8), 1721–1743.
  • Salehi, S., Telešienė, A., & Pazokinejad, Z. (2021). Socio-cultural determinants and the moderating effect of gender in adopting sustainable consumption behavior among university students in Iran and Japan. Sustainability, 13(16), 8955.
  • Schiffman, L.G and Kanuk, L.L (2010). Consumer behavior. Prentice Hall.
  • Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386.
  • Schor, J. (2010). Plenitude: The New Economics of True Wealth. Penguin Press.
  • Schultz, P. W., Khazian, A. M., & Zaleski, A. C. (2008). Using Normative Social Influence to Promote Environmental Conservation: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 324-337.
  • Shin, Y. H., Im, J., Jung, S. E., & Severt, K. (2018). The theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model approach to consumer behavior regarding organic menus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 69, 21-29.
  • Solomon, M. R. (2017). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.
  • Sun, J., Safdar, H., Jaffri, Z. U. A., Ibn-ul-Hassan, S., & Ozturk, I. (2022). Substantiating Nexus Between Consumption Values and Sustainable Consumption Behavior: A Way Toward Sustainable Business. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 908391.
  • Temizkan, V. (2022). Investigating the effect of consumers' environmental values on green buying behavior. Business and Economics Research Journal, 13(3), 505-521.
  • Thidell, A. (2011). Sustainable Consumptıon And Green Lifestyles–Defınıtıons and Concepts. In Background Material for the Workshop on Sustainable Consumption and Green Lifestyles of The Nordic Council of Ministers.
  • Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumer behavior. Consumer Psychology Review, 2(1), 85-96.
  • Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542-553.
  • Wang, Y. (2017). Promoting sustainable consumption behaviors: The impacts of environmental attitudes and governance in a cross-national context. Environment and Behavior, 49(10), 1128-1155.
  • Yıldırım, E. (2014). An Investigation On He Addiationational Cost Of Green Products: The Willingness To Pay of Universtiy Students. Journal Of Sustainable Development Studies, 7(1), 132-146.
  • Zeng, Z., Zhong, W., & Naz, S. (2023). Can environmental knowledge and risk perception make a difference? The role of environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior in fostering sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability, 15(6), 4791.

Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Bilgisinin Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Tutumun Aracı Rolü

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 634 - 650, 06.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1669801

Öz

Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından da benimsenerek sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerinden olan ve bilinçlenen tüketicilerin ürünlerde aradığı sürdürülebilir tüketim anlayışı işletmeleri bu anlayışı benimsemeye yönlendirmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilir tüketim bilgisinin sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışı üzerindeki etkisini tutumun aracı rolü ile incelemektir. Nedensel araştırma tasarımına göre hazırlanan çalışmada veriler (n=317) çevrim içi anket yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Verilerinin analizi SPSS (27.0) ve JASP (0.19.1.0) programları ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, sürdürülebilir tüketim bilgisinin sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışı üzerindeki etkisi Basit Doğrusal Regresyon ile test edilmiştir. Araştırma modelini test etmek için SPSS PROCESS makrosu (Model 4) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, literatürle uyumlu olarak, sürdürülebilir tüketim bilgisi, sürdürülebilir tüketime yönelik tutum ve davranışların birbirleri ile pozitif yönde orta düzeyde ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Sürdürülebilir tüketim bilgisinin, tutum ve davranışın anlamlı yordayıcısı olduğu görülmüştür. Benzer şekilde sürdürülebilir tüketime yönelik tutum da davranışın anlamlı yordayıcısıdır. Sonuçlar, sürdürülebilir tüketim alışkanlıklarının benimsenmesinde bilgi ve tutumların belirleyici faktörler olduğunu göstermektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Ahmad, S. N. B., Juhdi, N., & Awadz, A. S. (2010). Examination of environmental knowledge and perceived pro-environmental behavior among students of University Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought, 1(1), 328-342.
  • Akenji, L. (2014). Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 13-23.
  • Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A Literature and Practice Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (23. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  • Ceschin, F. (2008). Sustainable Consumption and Production. Framework for Action.
  • Chetioui Y, Benlafqih H, Lebdaoui H (2020) How fashion influencers contribute to consumers' purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 24(3), 361-380.
  • Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2012). The potential role of carbon labeling in a green economy. Energy Economics, 34, S53-S63.
  • Dimitrova, T., Ilieva, I., & Angelova, M. (2022). Exploring factors affecting sustainable consumption behaviour. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 155.
  • George, D. & Mallery, M. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step a simple guide and reference (14th edition). New York: Routledge.
  • Green, L. W. (1991). Health promotion planning. Mountain View, 24.
  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspec¬tive. 7th ed. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Hayes, AF. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York. Guildford Publications.
  • Heo J, Muralidharan, S. 2019. What triggers young Millennials to purchase eco-friendly products?: the interrelationships among knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness, and environmental concern. J Mark Commun. 25 (4), 421–437.
  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2021). Sixth Assessment Report - Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  • Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Sustainable Development Research Network, 29(1), 30-40.
  • Jambeck, J.R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., et al. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771.
  • Kim, Y., Yun, S., Lee, J., & Ko, E. (2018). How consumer knowledge shapes green consumption: An empirical study on voluntary carbon offsetting. In Social and environmental issues in advertising (pp. 33-51). Routledge.
  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guildford Pres
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of struc-tural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Liao, X., Nguyen, T. P. L., & Sasaki, N. (2022). Use of the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) model to examine sustainable agriculture in Thailand. Regional Sustainability, 3(1), 41-52.
  • Matharu, M., Jain, R., & Kamboj, S. (2020). Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behavior: a sharing economy perspective. Management of environmental quality. An international Journal, 32(1), 20-40.
  • Moitra, P., Verma, P., & Madan, J. (2021). Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) to healthy eating and activity patterns in school children (HEAPS). Nutrition and health, 27(2), 199-209.
  • Nielsen. (2020). The Evolution of the Sustainability Mindset. Nielsen Global Sustainability Report. Özmen. M., Uzkurt, C., Özdemir, Ş., Altunışık, R. ve Torlak, Ö. (2013). Pazarlama İlkeleri. Eskişehir:Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını.
  • Öztürk, A. (2022). The effect of halal product knowledge, halal awareness, perceived psychological risk and halal product attitude on purchasing intention. Business and Economics Research Journal, 13(1), 127-141.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98.
  • Quoquab, Farzana, and Jihad Mohammad. 2017. Managing sustainable consumption: Is it a problem or panacea? In Sustainable Economic Development: Green Economy and Green Growth, World Sustainability Series. Edited by Walter Leal Filho, Diana-Mihaela Pociovalisteanu and Abul Quasem Al-Amin. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 115–25.
  • Rousta, A., & Allaf Jafari, E. (2024). Impact of environmental knowledge, responsibility and concern on sustainable consumption behavior: does customer attitude matter?. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(8), 1721–1743.
  • Salehi, S., Telešienė, A., & Pazokinejad, Z. (2021). Socio-cultural determinants and the moderating effect of gender in adopting sustainable consumption behavior among university students in Iran and Japan. Sustainability, 13(16), 8955.
  • Schiffman, L.G and Kanuk, L.L (2010). Consumer behavior. Prentice Hall.
  • Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386.
  • Schor, J. (2010). Plenitude: The New Economics of True Wealth. Penguin Press.
  • Schultz, P. W., Khazian, A. M., & Zaleski, A. C. (2008). Using Normative Social Influence to Promote Environmental Conservation: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 324-337.
  • Shin, Y. H., Im, J., Jung, S. E., & Severt, K. (2018). The theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model approach to consumer behavior regarding organic menus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 69, 21-29.
  • Solomon, M. R. (2017). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.
  • Sun, J., Safdar, H., Jaffri, Z. U. A., Ibn-ul-Hassan, S., & Ozturk, I. (2022). Substantiating Nexus Between Consumption Values and Sustainable Consumption Behavior: A Way Toward Sustainable Business. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 908391.
  • Temizkan, V. (2022). Investigating the effect of consumers' environmental values on green buying behavior. Business and Economics Research Journal, 13(3), 505-521.
  • Thidell, A. (2011). Sustainable Consumptıon And Green Lifestyles–Defınıtıons and Concepts. In Background Material for the Workshop on Sustainable Consumption and Green Lifestyles of The Nordic Council of Ministers.
  • Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumer behavior. Consumer Psychology Review, 2(1), 85-96.
  • Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542-553.
  • Wang, Y. (2017). Promoting sustainable consumption behaviors: The impacts of environmental attitudes and governance in a cross-national context. Environment and Behavior, 49(10), 1128-1155.
  • Yıldırım, E. (2014). An Investigation On He Addiationational Cost Of Green Products: The Willingness To Pay of Universtiy Students. Journal Of Sustainable Development Studies, 7(1), 132-146.
  • Zeng, Z., Zhong, W., & Naz, S. (2023). Can environmental knowledge and risk perception make a difference? The role of environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior in fostering sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability, 15(6), 4791.
Toplam 46 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İşletme
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALELERİ
Yazarlar

Ebru Maraş Çakır 0000-0002-1640-0303

Abdülkadir Öztürk 0000-0002-1855-8892

Yayımlanma Tarihi 6 Ekim 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 3 Nisan 2025
Kabul Tarihi 12 Eylül 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Maraş Çakır, E., & Öztürk, A. (2025). Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Bilgisinin Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Tutumun Aracı Rolü. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 9(2), 634-650. https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1669801

Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
İktisat Bölümü
RİZE / TÜRKİYE