The Effects of Spillover of Negative Emotion In Family-Job Roles And Examination of The Moderator Role of The Importance of Job: A Research on Academicians

Abstract

The sample of the study, which aims to examine the relationships between family negative emotions, work attention, and the importance of work, consists of 388 academic staff. Regression analyzes were applied to test the hypotheses developed within the conceptual framework of the research. It has been found that negative emotions from the family have a negative effect on attention to work and the importance of work has a moderating role in this relationship. This finding shows that negative spillover, which is assumed in the depletion approach and spillover theory, will not always be valid, and that this negative spillover may change depending on the importance given to roles.

Keywords

• work family roles
• negative emotions
• importance of work

Aile - İş Rollerinde Negatif Duygu Yayılmasının Etkileri Ve İşin Öneminin Düzenleyici Rolünün İncelenmesi: Akademisyenler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Çalışanların aileden gelen negatif duyguları, iş dikkati ve işin önemi arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi amaçlayan bu çalışmanın örneklemi, 388 akademik personelden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın kavramsal çerçevesi kapsamında geliştirilen hipotezlerin test edilmesi için uygulanan analiz sonuçlarına göre aileden gelen negatif duyguların işe dikkat üzerinde negatif yönlü bir etkiye sahip olduğu ve bu ilişkide işin öneminin düzenleyici (moderator) rolü olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Bu bulgu tükenme yaklaşımında ve yayılma teorisinde varsayılan negatif yayılmanın her zaman geçerli olmayacağını ve rollere verilen önem düzeyine göre bu negatif yayılmanın değişebileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• iş aile rolleri
• negatif duygular
• işin önemi

Kaynakça

1. AİKEN, L. S. ve WEST, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2. ALBAYRAK, A. S. (2005) “Çoklu Doğrusal Bağlantı Halinde Enküçük Kareler Tekniğinin Alternatifi Yanlı Tahmin Teknikleri ve Bir Uygulama”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1 (1), 105-126.
3. ALMAGOR, M., ve BEN-PORATH, Y. S. (1989). The Two-Factor Model Of Self-Reported Mood: A Cross-Cultural Replication. Journal Of Personality Assessment, 53(1), 10-21.
4. BARON, R. M., KENNY, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173 – 1182.
5. BAŞ, T. (2008). Anket: Anket Nasıl Hazırlanır, Uygulanır, Değerlendirilir?, 5. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi. BEEK, I., V., HU, Q., Schaufeli, W., B., Taris, Schreurs B. H. J. (2012). For Fun, Love, or Money: What Drives Workaholic, Engaged, and Burned-Out Employees at Work?. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61 (1), 30–55.
6. BRİEF, A. P., ve WEİSS, H. M. (2002). Organizational Behavior: Affect İn The Workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 279-307.
7. BOWLİNG, N., A., ESCHLEMAN, K. J., WANG Q., KIRKENDALL, C. ve Alarcon G. (2010). A Meta-Analysis Of The Predictors And Consequences Of Organization-Based Self-Esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 601–626.
8. BYRNE, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modelling With Amos; Basic Concepts, Applications And Programming, New York: Taylor And Francis.

9. CARLSON, D. S., KACMAR, K. M., WAYNE, J. H., ve GRZYWACZ, J. G. (2006). Measuring The Positive Side Of The Work–Family İnterface: Development And Validation Of A Work–Family Enrichment Scale. Journal Of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131-164.
10. DE JONGE, J. ve DORMANN, C. (2003). The DISC Model: Demand-İnduced Strain Compensation Mechanisms İn Job Stress. Occupational Stress in the Service Professions, 91, 43-74.
11. EDWARDS, J. R., ve ROTHBARD, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms Linking Work And Family: Clarifying The Relationship Between Work And Family Constructs. Academy Of Management Review, 25(1), 178-199.
12. FRONE, M. R. (2003). Work-Family Balance. Handbook of Occupatonal Health Psychology, Washington, American Psychological Association, 143-162.
13. GREENHAUS, J. H. ve POWELL, G. N. (2006). When Work And Family Are Allies: A Theory Of Work–Family Enrichment. The Academy of Management Review, 31 (1), 72–92.
14. GRZYWACZ, J. G. ve MARKS, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing The Work–Family İnterface: An Ecological Perspective On The Correlates Of Positive And Negative Spillover Between Work And Family. Journal Of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111-126.
15. HİRSCHFELD, R. R., ve FEİLD, H. S. (2000). Work Centrality And Work Alienation: Distinct Aspects Of A General Commitment To Work. Journal Of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal Of Industrial, Occupational And Organizational Psychology And Behavior, 21(7), 789-800.
16. KAHN, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions Of Personal Engagement And Disengagement At Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
17. KINGSTON, P. W., NOCK, S. L., (1992). Couple’s Joint Work Status And Community and Social Attachment. Social Science Quarterly,73(4).
18. KORMAN A. K., (1976) Hypothesis of Work Behavior Revisited and an Extension. Academy of Management Review, January, 50-63.
19. LAPİERRE, L. M., Lİ, Y., KWAN, H. K., GREENHAUS, J. H., DİRENZO, M. S. ve SHAO, P. (2017). A Meta-Analysis Of The Antecedents Of Work-Family Enrichment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 385–401.
20. LODAHL, T. M., ve KEJNAR, M. (1965). The Definition And Measurement Of Job İnvolvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 24-33.
21. MASON, W. A. (2001). Self-Esteem And Delinquency Revisited (Again): A Test Of Kaplan's Self-Derogation Theory Of Delinquency Using Latent Growth Curve Modeling. Journal of Youth And Adolescence, 30(1), 83-102.
22. MAY, D. R., GİLSON, R. L., ve HARTER, L. M. (2004). The Psychological Conditions Of Meaningfulness, Safety And Availability And The Engagement Of The Human Spirit At Work. Journal Of Occupational And Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37.
23. ÖZKALP, E. ve YILDIZ, H. (2018). Olumlu ve Olumsuz Sanal Kaytarma Davranışlarının İşteki Stres Üzerindeki Etkisi. İş, Güç: Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 20(1), 57-74.
24. POLAMA, M. M. (1993). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları, 1. Basım, Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
25. REITZES, D. C. ve MUTRAN, E. J. (2002). Self-Concept As The Organization Of Roles: Importance, Centrality, And Balance. The Sociological Quarterly, 43(4), 647-667.
26. RİTZER, G. (1992). Sociological Theory, (Çeviren:Ümit Tatlıcan) Third Edition, McGraw-Hill.
27. ROSENBERG, M. (1979). Conceiving The Self , New York: Basic Books.
28. ROTHBARD, N. P. (2001). Enriching Or Depleting? The Dynamics Of Engagement In Work And Family Roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655-684.
29. ŞENCAN, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde, Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik, Ankara: Seçkin.
30. TENBRUNSEL, A. E., BRETT, J. M., MAOZ, E., STROH, L. K. ve REİLLY, A. H. (1995). Dynamic And Static Work-Family Relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 233-246.
31. WATSON, D., ve TELLEGEN, A. (1985). Toward A Consensual Structure Of Mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219-235.
32. WATSON, D., CLARK, L. A., ve TELLEGEN, A. (1988). Development And Validation Of Brief Measures Of Positive And Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.
33. YOUNG, L., ve KLEİNER, B. H. (1992). Work And Family: Issues For The 1990s. Women İn Management Review, 7(5), 24-28.