The Mediating Role of Artificial Intelligence Attitude in the Effect of Digital Leadership on Business Performance

Abstract

This study examines the effect of digital leadership on job performance and investigates the mediating role of employees' attitudes towards artificial intelligence in this effect. Based on the assumption that human factors are as determinative as technological infrastructures in digital transformation processes, the conceptual model is constructed within the framework of three basic variables: digital leadership, attitude towards artificial intelligence and job performance. The research was conducted with data collected from 415 individuals working in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in Trabzon province; a structured questionnaire form was used as a data collection tool. The data obtained were analyzed by Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) method through Smart PLS 4.1.1 software. The findings show that digital leadership has a direct and significant effect on job performance. In addition, positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence were found to increase job performance and partially mediate the effect of digital leadership on job performance. These results suggest that the success of digital leadership strategies is shaped not only by technological but also by psychological and behavioral dimensions.

Keywords

• Digital Leadership
• Business Performance
• Artificial Intelligence Attitude
• Digital Transformation

Dijital Liderliğin İş Performansına Etkisinde Yapay Zekâ Tutumunun Aracı Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışma, dijital liderliğin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisini incelemekte ve bu etkide çalışanların yapay zekâya yönelik tutumlarının aracı rolünü araştırmaktadır. Dijital dönüşüm süreçlerinde teknolojik altyapılar kadar insan faktörünün de belirleyici olduğu varsayımından hareketle yapılandırılan çalışmada, kavramsal model üç temel değişken çerçevesinde oluşturulmuştur: dijital liderlik, yapay zekâ tutumu ve iş performansı. Araştırma, Trabzon ilinde faaliyet gösteren küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmelerde (KOBİ) çalışan 415 bireyden toplanan verilerle gerçekleştirilmiş; veri toplama aracı olarak yapılandırılmış anket formu kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, Smart PLS 4.1.1 programı aracılığıyla Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (PLS-SEM) yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, dijital liderliğin iş performansı üzerinde doğrudan ve anlamlı bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, yapay zekâya yönelik olumlu tutumların iş performansını artırdığı ve dijital liderliğin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinde kısmi aracılık rolü gösterdiği saptanmıştır. Bu sonuçlar, dijital liderlik stratejilerinin başarısının yalnızca teknolojik değil, aynı zamanda psikolojik ve davranışsal boyutlarla da şekillendiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Liderlik
• İş Performansı
• Yapay Zekâ Tutumu
• Dijital Dönüşüm

Kaynakça

1. Ali, M., Khan, T. I., Khattak, M. N., ve Şener, İ. (2024). Synergizing AI and Business: Maximizing Innovation, Creativity, Decision Precision, and Operational Efficiency in High-Tech Enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 1-9.
2. Arabiun, A., Tajpour, M., ve Zahedi, M. R. (2024). The Effect of Digital Leadership on the Performance of Businesses: The Mediating Role of Organizational Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 9(1), 17-28.
3. Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., ve Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of Digital Leadership Capability on Innovation Performance: The Role of Platform Digitization Capability. Information & Management, 59(2), 1-17.
4. Bentler, P. M. ve Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in The Analysis Of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
5. Bezrukova, K., Griffith, T. L., Spell, C., Rice, V., ve Yang, H. E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Groups: Effects of Attitudes and Discretion on Collaboration. Group & Organization Management, 48(2), 629-670.
6. Bughin, J., Deakin, J., ve O’beirne, B. (2019). Digital Transformation: Improving the Odds of Success. McKinsey Quarterly, 22, 1-5.
7. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., ve Giovando, G. (2023). Digital Workplace and Organization Performance: Moderating Role of Digital Leadership Capability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 1-10.
8. Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.

9. de Araujo, L. M., Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., ve Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital Leadership in Business Organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 2(1), 45-56.
10. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., ve Eirug, A. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Emerging Challenges, Opportunities, And Agenda for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 1-47.
11. El Sawy, O. A., Kræmmergaard, P., Amsinck, H., ve Vinther, A. L. (2020). How LEGO Built the Foundations and Enterprise Capabilities for Digital Leadership. İçinde Strategic Information Management (ss. 174-201). Londra: Routledge.
12. Ertiö, T., Eriksson, T., Rowan, W., ve McCarthy, S. (2024). The Role of Digital Leaders’ Emotional Intelligence in Mitigating Employee Technostress. Business Horizons, 67(4), 399-409.
13. Glikson, E., ve Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660.
14. Grassini, S. (2023). Development and Validation of the AI Attitude Scale (AIAS-4): A Brief Measure of General Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-12.
15. Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., ve Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated Guidelines on Which Method to Use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
16. Hair Jr., J. F., M. Hult, G. T., M. Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Castillo Apraiz, J., Cepeda Carrión, G. A., ve Roldán, J. L. (2019). Manual de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Terrassa: OmniaScience.
17. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., ve Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209.
18. Hensellek, S. (2020). Digital Leadership: A Framework for Successful Leadership in the Digital Age. Journal of Media Management and Entrepreneurship (JMME), 2(1), 1-15.
19. Hu, L., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
20. Huang, M. H., ve Rust, R. T. (2021). A Strategic Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 30-50.
21. Janssen, O., ve Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ Goal Orientations, The Quality of Leader-Member Exchange, And the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368-384.
22. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., ve Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 14, 1-25.
23. Kanter, R. M., ve Brinkerhoff, D. (1981). Organizational Performance: Recent Developments in Measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 321-349.
24. Korkmaz, M., ve Altıntaş, M. (2024). Yöneticinin Algılanan Aydınlık Kişilik Özelliklerinin Yöneticiye Duyulan Güven Düzeyine Etkisinde Birey-Örgüt Uyumunun Aracılık Rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 11(1), 93-107.
25. Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., ve Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research. Sage Open, 11(3), 1-15.
26. Kumar, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., ve Anand, A. (2023). Responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Value Formation and Market Performance in Healthcare: The Mediating Role of Patient’s Cognitive Engagement. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(6), 2197-2220.
27. Kurtovic, A., ve Samardzija, J. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Employee Mental Health, Productivity, And Overall Economic Growth. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 390-399.
28. Latané, B. (1981). The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
29. Lee, O. F., Tan, J. A., ve Javalgi, R. (2010). Goal Orientation and Organizational Commitment: Individual Difference Predictors of Job Performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 18(1), 129-150.
30. Munir, S., Mahmood, G., Abdullah, F., ve Noreen, A. (2023). Exploring The Impact of Digital Leadership on Sustainable Performance with Mediating Role of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 213-226.
31. Oktaysoy, O., Topcuoglu, E., ve Kaygin, E. (2022). A Study on Digital Leadership Scale Adaptation. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 11(4), 407-425.
32. Pajo, A. (2025a). Sanal Evren Turizmi Turizm İşletmeleri ve Destinasyonları için Bir Tehdit mi, Fırsat mı?. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences, 8(1), 276-293.
33. Pajo, A. (2025b). Turizm işletmelerinde Metaverse Kullanımı ve Gelecekteki Kullanımına Yönelik Beklentiler. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(2), 793-812.
34. Pomerol, J. C. (1997). Artificial Intelligence and Human Decision Making. European Journal of Operational Research, 99(1), 3-25.
35. Quaquebeke, N. V., ve Gerpott, F. H. (2023). The Now, New, and Next of Digital Leadership: How Artificial Intelligence (AI) Will Take Over and Change Leadership as We Know It. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(3), 265-275.
36. Sainger, G. (2018). Leadership in Digital Age: A Study on The Role of Leader in This Era of Digital Transformation. International Journal on Leadership, 6(1), 1-6.
37. Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., ve Von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66-83.
38. Sigler, T. H., ve Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating An Empowering Culture: Examining the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Perceptions of Empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 27-52.
39. Topcuoglu, E., Kobanoglu, M. S., Kaygin, E., Karafakioglu, E., Erdogan, S. U., Torun, B. T., ve Oktaysoy, O. (2023a). The Improving Role of Digital Leadership in The Impact of Social Loafing on Job Performance. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 12(1), 22-40.
40. Topcuoglu, E., Oktaysoy, O., Erdogan, S. U., Kaygin, E., ve Karafakioglu, E. (2023b). The Mediating Role of Job Security in The Impact of Digital Leadership on Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 122-132
41. Turan-Torun, B., Oktaysoy, O., Kobanoglu, M. S., Topcuoglu, E., Yenikaya, M. A., Topcuoglu, V., ve Uygungil-Erdogan, S. (2025). Identification Of Heavy Work Investment Antecedents: A Research on Digital Leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1-17.
42. Turyadi, I., Zulkifli, Z., Tawil, M. R., Ali, H., ve Sadikin, A. (2023). The Role of Digital Leadership in Organizations to Improve Employee Performance and Business Success. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(02), 1671-1677.
43. Uygungil-Erdogan, S., Şahin, Y., Sökmen-Alaca, A. İ., Oktaysoy, O., Altıntaş, M., ve Topçuoğlu, V. (2025). Assessing the Effect of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety on Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Quiet Quitting in Turkish Small and Medium Enterprises. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 1-21.
44. Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., ve Trichina, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Advanced Technologies and Human Resource Management: A Systematic Review. Artificial Intelligence and International HRM, 172-201.
45. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., ve Zhu, W. (2008). How Transformational Leadership Weaves Its Influence on Individual Job Performance: The Role of Identification and Efficacy Beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 793-825.
46. Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Wamba, S. F., Kamdjoug, J. R. K., ve Wanko, C. E. T. (2020). Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Firm Performance: The Business Value of AI-Based Transformation Projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893-1924.
47. Wang, T., Lin, X., ve Sheng, F. (2022). Digital Leadership and Exploratory Innovation: From the Dual Perspectives of Strategic Orientation and Organizational Culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-20.
48. Zeike, S., Bradbury, K., Lindert, L., ve Pfaff, H. (2019). Digital Leadership Skills and Associations with Psychological Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 1-12.
49. Zhang, T. (2024). The Competency Baseline of the Digital Age: Digital Literacy and Digital Leadership. İçinde Emerging Developments and Technologies in Digital Government (ss. 85-99). IGI Global.
50. Zhu, J., Zhang, B., Xie, M., ve Cao, Q. (2022). Digital Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Role of Employee Job Crafting and Person-Organization Fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-12.