Türkiye’de Aile Yapısının Dönüşümü ve Bölgesel Gelişmişlik: Hanehalkı Büyüklüğü ve Elektrik Tüketimi Üzerine İBBS-3 Düzeyinde Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2011-2023 dönemine ilişkin il düzeyindeki panel veri setinden yararlanarak Türkiye’nin 81 ilinde ortalama hanehalkı büyüklüğünün belirleyicilerini incelemekte ve söz konusu değişkenlerin bölgesel sosyoekonomik gelişmişlik bağlamındaki ilişkisini değerlendirmektedir. Ampirik analiz kapsamında eğitim düzeyi, toplam doğurganlık hızı, kentleşme oranı ve ekonomik gelişmişliğin dolaylı bir göstergesi olarak kişi başı hanehalkı elektrik tüketimi değişkenleri modele dâhil edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, uzun dönemde eğitim seviyesindeki artış, kentleşme oranındaki yükseliş ve kişi başı elektrik tüketimindeki gelişmenin daha küçük hane yapılarıyla ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koyarken, doğurganlık hızının hanehalkı büyüklüğünü pozitif yönlü ve güçlü biçimde açıklamaya devam ettiğini göstermektedir. Kısa dönem katsayıları ise bölgeler arasında farklılaşmakta olup, dönüşüm süreçlerinin iller düzeyinde heterojen nitelik taşıdığına işaret etmektedir. İl bazlı kapsamlı analiz, hanehalkı dinamiklerindeki mekânsal eşitsizlikleri görünür kılmakta ve Türkiye’de sürmekte olan demografik dönüşümün sosyoekonomik izdüşümlerine ilişkin güncel kanıtlar sunmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, hanehalkı yapısı ile bölgesel gelişme arasındaki ilişkinin akademik literatürdeki yerini güçlendirmekte ve aile oluşum biçimlerindeki değişen eğilimlerin, bölgesel politika tasarımında dikkate alınmasının önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hanehalkı büyüklüğü
• Kişi başı hanehalkı elektrik tüketimi
• Panel ARDL

Transformation of Family Structure and Regional Development in Türkiye: A NUTS-3 Level Analysis on Household Size and Electricity Consumption

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of average household size across Türkiye’s 81 provinces over the 2011-2023 period, emphasizing its connection to regional socio-economic development. Within the scope of the empirical analysis, the variables of education level, total fertility rate, urbanization rate, and household electricity consumption per capita as an indirect indicator of economic development were included in the model. The results show that increased educational attainment, urbanization, and electricity consumption are associated with smaller households in the long run, while fertility remains a positive and robust driver of household size. Short-run dynamics vary, highlighting transitional effects across regions. The study’s province-level focus reveals spatial disparities in household dynamics and offers insight into the demographic transformation unfolding in Turkey. These findings contribute to a growing literature on the intersection of household structure and development, and suggest that regional policy design should account for the evolving patterns of family formation and living arrangements.

Keywords

• Household size
• Household electricity consumption
• Panel ARDL

Kaynakça

1. Aref, A., Fallentine, A., and Zahran, S. (2024). The state of urbanization, demographic changes, and family dynamics in Africa. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 54(3), 283-297.
2. Arı, E., Aydın, N., Karacan, S., and Saraclı, S. (2016). Analysis of households’ electricity consumption with ordered logit models: Example of Turkey. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(6), 73-84.
3. Balogun, S., and Aruoture, E. (2025). Healing the nation from the inside out: The role of home and family in national development. Caritas Journal of Psychology and Behaviourial Sciences, 3(1).
4. Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
5. Becca, F., Esteve, A., and Castro Torres, A. F. (2025). Changes in Latin American and Caribbean household structure amidst fertility decline, 1960-2020. Studies in Family Planning, 56(1), 135-160.
6. Belmin, C., Hoffmann, R., Pichler, P. P., and Weisz, H. (2022). Fertility transition powered by women’s access to electricity and modern cooking fuels. Nature Sustainability, 5(3), 245-253.
7. Bensch, G., Kluve, J., and Peters, J. (2011). Impacts of rural electrification in Rwanda. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 3(4), 567-588.
8. Blackburne III, E. F., and Frank, M. W. (2007). Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. The Stata Journal, 7(2), 197-208.

9. Bongaarts, J. (2010). The causes of educational differences in fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 8, 31-50.
10. Bradbury, M., Peterson, M. N., and Liu, J. (2014). Long-term dynamics of household size and their environmental implications. Population and Environment, 36(1), 73-84.
11. Channon, M. D., and Harper, S. (2019). Educational differentials in the realisation of fertility intentions: Is sub-Saharan Africa different?. PloS One, 14(7), e0219736.
12. Chen, D., and Ma, Q. (2025). Household energy transition, health and fertility in China. Economic Modelling, 107231.
13. Esteve, A., Pohl, M., Becca, F., Fang, H., Galeano, J., García-Román, J., and Turu, A. (2024). A global perspective on household size and composition, 1970–2020. Genus, 80, 2.
14. Grimm, M., Sparrow, R., and Tasciotti, L. (2015). Does electrification spur the fertility transition? Evidence from Indonesia. Demography, 52(5), 1773-1796.
15. Haq, S. N. (2024). The Effects of urbanization on traditional family structures. Journal of Social Signs Review, 2(3), 70-79.
16. Hossain, S. I. (1990). Interrelations between child education, health, and family size: Evidence from a developing country. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 38(4), 763-781.
17. Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press.
18. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
19. Jiang, L., and O'Neill, B. C. (2007). Impacts of demographic trends on US household size and structure. Population and Development Review, 33(3), 567-591.
20. Kebede, E., Striessnig, E., and Goujon, A. (2022). The relative importance of women’s education on fertility desires in sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis. Population Studies, 76(1), 137-156.
21. Lewis, J. (2018). Infant health, women's fertility, and rural electrification in the United States, 1930–1960. The Journal of Economic History, 78(1), 118-154.
22. Libois, F., and Somville, V. (2018). Fertility, household size and poverty in Nepal. World Development, 103, 311-322.
23. Maralani, V. (2008). The changing relationship between family size and educational attainment over the course of socioeconomic development: Evidence from Indonesia. Demography, 45(3), 693-717.
24. Mather, M., and Jarosz, B. (2025, April 30). Because we need good data to predict the future. Why social science? https://www.whysocialscience.com/blog/2025/4/30/because-we-need-good-data-to-predict-the-future
25. Patrinos, H. A., and Psacharopoulos, G. (1997). Family size, schooling and child labor in Peru: An empirical analysis. Journal of Population Economics, 10(4), 387-405.
26. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
27. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
28. Peters, J., and Vance, C. (2011). Rural electrification and fertility–evidence from Côte d'Ivoire. The Journal of Development Studies, 47(5), 753-766.
29. Pohl, M., Esteve, A., ve Galeano, J. (2025). African households: National and subnational trends from censuses and surveys. Population Studies, 1-21.
30. Sangiácomo, M. (2018). XTCIPS: Stata module to compute Pesaran panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence.
31. Tripathi, S. (2020). Does economic development reduce household size? Evidence from India. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(5), 982-999.
32. TURKSTAT (2025). Central Dissemination System. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?locale=en
33. Vanorman, A., ve Jacobsen, L. A. (2020). US household composition shifts as the population grows older; more young adults live with parents. https://www.prb.org/resources/u-s-household-composition-shifts-as-the-population-grows-older-more-young-adults-live-with-parents/
34. Verma, N., and Reddy, A. (2025). The demographic consequences of urbanization: A study of changes in family structure and household composition. Progression Journal of Human Demography and Anthropology, 1-7.
35. Wu, W., Kanamori, Y., Zhang, R., Zhou, Q., Takahashi, K., and Masui, T. (2021). Implications of declining household economies of scale on electricity consumption and sustainability in China. Ecological Economics, 184, 106981.